Autonomia administrativa financeira e orçamentária das defensorias públicas estaduais: análise e descrição dos seus modelos

• Autor(a) principal: Stancati, Victor Henrique
• Data de Publicação: 2015
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital)
• Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10438/15195
• topic: Public defender; Administrative autonomy; Financial autonomy; Budget autonomy; Defensoria pública; Autonomia administrativa; Autonomia financeira; Autonomia orçamentária; Administração pública; Autonomia administrativa; Administração financeira; Defensorias públicas; Defensores públicos; Assistência judiciária

After more than ten years of recognition of the administrative, financial and budget to the State Public Defender, which was given by Constitutional Amendment No. 45/2004, it is still possible to find institutions of this species that suffer from daily interference in various aspects of his administration, in total disregard to what determines our Basic Law. However, interestingly this problem has not been shown to cool even on the national scene, with states where the Public Defender enjoy more autonomy and prestige, while in others they suffer to be recognized equal rights. In this sense, starting from a basic theoretical framework on autonomy of the Public Defender, the present study aimed to explore the elements that compose the concept, seeking to further verify and describe the existing asymmetries between the models of autonomy found in the Public Defender's state around the country. To this end, data were collected through direct observation, archival research and interviews, which were further processed and interpreted through the methodology of content analysis. The results obtained through the consolidations done under the five categories of analysis proposals led to the conclusion that the asymmetry between the existing models is a fact and is mostly noticeable in the areas of Financial Management and Budget as well as the choice of the institution's Board. Were also identified two key barriers to the implementation of the autonomy model recommended by the system, namely, the low autonomy in the estimated expenditure in the budget process and the absence of staff of its own limit for the Public Defender in the Fiscal Responsibility Law.