R&D ADMINISTRATION IN THE HIGH TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY: HOW TO MANAGE A PARADOX
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng por |
Título da fonte: | Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/article/view/60 |
Resumo: | The competitive environment of the knowledge age is getting more complex, dynamic, and fast-moving each day. The high tech industry is intensively tied to its effects and demands for innovation, so the field of Research and Development must act strategically, generating innovations and granting success and sustainability to the business. However, there is a paradox in R&D which may lay traps and obstacles disguised by the busy day-to-day activity of the organization. The purpose of this paper is to point out directions that managers may take to cope with these contradictions in R&D administration. The R&D paradox is rooted in the conflict between exploitation, achieved by continual improvement through incremental innovation, and by exploration, which seeks new opportunities in the creation of new technologies through disruptive innovations. These two sides of the paradox demand different, and sometimes even divergent, organizations. Top management leadership is crucial for the acceptance and balancing of the contradictions created by this paradox, and can align exploitation/exploration through distributive and integrative decisions and transform companies into truly ambidextrous organizations. Key-words: Research & Development. Innovation. Paradox. Ambidextrous organizations. Strategy. |
id |
FIA-1_87de70a66e72b86fb92007d5cbd072f9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.future.emnuvens.com.br:article/60 |
network_acronym_str |
FIA-1 |
network_name_str |
Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
R&D ADMINISTRATION IN THE HIGH TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY: HOW TO MANAGE A PARADOXADMINISTRAÇÃO DE P&D NA INDÚSTRIA DE ALTA TECNOLOGIA: COMO GERENCIAR UM PARADOXO? DOI:10.7444/fsrj.v2i2.60The competitive environment of the knowledge age is getting more complex, dynamic, and fast-moving each day. The high tech industry is intensively tied to its effects and demands for innovation, so the field of Research and Development must act strategically, generating innovations and granting success and sustainability to the business. However, there is a paradox in R&D which may lay traps and obstacles disguised by the busy day-to-day activity of the organization. The purpose of this paper is to point out directions that managers may take to cope with these contradictions in R&D administration. The R&D paradox is rooted in the conflict between exploitation, achieved by continual improvement through incremental innovation, and by exploration, which seeks new opportunities in the creation of new technologies through disruptive innovations. These two sides of the paradox demand different, and sometimes even divergent, organizations. Top management leadership is crucial for the acceptance and balancing of the contradictions created by this paradox, and can align exploitation/exploration through distributive and integrative decisions and transform companies into truly ambidextrous organizations. Key-words: Research & Development. Innovation. Paradox. Ambidextrous organizations. Strategy. O ambiente competitivo da Era do Conhecimento é cada vez mais complexo, dinâmico e veloz. A indústria de alta tecnologia vive intensamente esses efeitos e as exigências por inovações. Assim, a área de P&D atua estrategicamente, gerando inovações e garantindo o sucesso e a sustentabilidade do negócio. Entretanto, existe um paradoxo na área de P&D que pode criar armadilhas e obstáculos mascarados pela correria das atividades diárias. Este é um estudo é realizado por meio de uma revisão bibliográfica e argumentação teórica. O objetivo deste trabalho é indicar caminhos para os gerentes conduzirem as atividades de P&D sob uma perspectiva do paradoxo exploit / explore. O paradoxo da P&D é causado pelo conflito entre eficiência, obtida por melhorias contínuas por intermédio de inovações incrementais, e pela exploração, que busca novas oportunidades na criação de novas tecnologias pelas inovações de ruptura. Essas duas faces do paradoxo exigem organizações diferentes e, frequentemente, divergentes. A liderança da alta administração é crítica no reconhecimento e no balanceamento das contradições criadas pelo paradoxo e, por decisões distributivas e integradoras, conseguem aliar exploit / explore e transformar as empresas em verdadeiras organizações ambidestras. Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies2010-12-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/article/view/6010.24023/FutureJournal/2175-5825/2010.v2i2.60Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies; Vol. 2 No. 2 (2010): Future Studies Research Journal; 108-131Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies [FSRJ]; v. 2 n. 2 (2010): Future Studies Research Journal; 108-1312175-5825reponame:Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategiesinstname:Fundação Instituto de Administração (FIA)instacron:FIAengporhttps://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/article/view/60/106https://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/article/view/60/96Copyright (c) 2011 Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategiesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessIto, Nobuiuki CostaMirica, Mihail de Pieri2018-07-19T15:46:01Zoai:ojs.future.emnuvens.com.br:article/60Revistahttps://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/oai2175-58252175-5825opendoar:2018-07-19T15:46:01Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies - Fundação Instituto de Administração (FIA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
R&D ADMINISTRATION IN THE HIGH TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY: HOW TO MANAGE A PARADOX ADMINISTRAÇÃO DE P&D NA INDÚSTRIA DE ALTA TECNOLOGIA: COMO GERENCIAR UM PARADOXO? DOI:10.7444/fsrj.v2i2.60 |
title |
R&D ADMINISTRATION IN THE HIGH TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY: HOW TO MANAGE A PARADOX |
spellingShingle |
R&D ADMINISTRATION IN THE HIGH TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY: HOW TO MANAGE A PARADOX Ito, Nobuiuki Costa |
title_short |
R&D ADMINISTRATION IN THE HIGH TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY: HOW TO MANAGE A PARADOX |
title_full |
R&D ADMINISTRATION IN THE HIGH TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY: HOW TO MANAGE A PARADOX |
title_fullStr |
R&D ADMINISTRATION IN THE HIGH TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY: HOW TO MANAGE A PARADOX |
title_full_unstemmed |
R&D ADMINISTRATION IN THE HIGH TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY: HOW TO MANAGE A PARADOX |
title_sort |
R&D ADMINISTRATION IN THE HIGH TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY: HOW TO MANAGE A PARADOX |
author |
Ito, Nobuiuki Costa |
author_facet |
Ito, Nobuiuki Costa Mirica, Mihail de Pieri |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mirica, Mihail de Pieri |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ito, Nobuiuki Costa Mirica, Mihail de Pieri |
description |
The competitive environment of the knowledge age is getting more complex, dynamic, and fast-moving each day. The high tech industry is intensively tied to its effects and demands for innovation, so the field of Research and Development must act strategically, generating innovations and granting success and sustainability to the business. However, there is a paradox in R&D which may lay traps and obstacles disguised by the busy day-to-day activity of the organization. The purpose of this paper is to point out directions that managers may take to cope with these contradictions in R&D administration. The R&D paradox is rooted in the conflict between exploitation, achieved by continual improvement through incremental innovation, and by exploration, which seeks new opportunities in the creation of new technologies through disruptive innovations. These two sides of the paradox demand different, and sometimes even divergent, organizations. Top management leadership is crucial for the acceptance and balancing of the contradictions created by this paradox, and can align exploitation/exploration through distributive and integrative decisions and transform companies into truly ambidextrous organizations. Key-words: Research & Development. Innovation. Paradox. Ambidextrous organizations. Strategy. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-12-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/article/view/60 10.24023/FutureJournal/2175-5825/2010.v2i2.60 |
url |
https://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/article/view/60 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.24023/FutureJournal/2175-5825/2010.v2i2.60 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
language |
eng por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/article/view/60/106 https://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/article/view/60/96 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2011 Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2011 Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies; Vol. 2 No. 2 (2010): Future Studies Research Journal; 108-131 Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies [FSRJ]; v. 2 n. 2 (2010): Future Studies Research Journal; 108-131 2175-5825 reponame:Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies instname:Fundação Instituto de Administração (FIA) instacron:FIA |
instname_str |
Fundação Instituto de Administração (FIA) |
instacron_str |
FIA |
institution |
FIA |
reponame_str |
Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies |
collection |
Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies - Fundação Instituto de Administração (FIA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808843615784402944 |