R&D ADMINISTRATION IN THE HIGH TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY: HOW TO MANAGE A PARADOX

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ito, Nobuiuki Costa
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Mirica, Mihail de Pieri
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies
Texto Completo: https://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/article/view/60
Resumo: The competitive environment of the knowledge age is getting more complex, dynamic, and fast-moving each day. The high tech industry is intensively tied to its effects and demands for innovation, so the field of Research and Development must act strategically, generating innovations and granting success and sustainability to the business. However, there is a paradox in R&D which may lay traps and obstacles disguised by the busy day-to-day activity of the organization. The purpose of this paper is to point out directions that managers may take to cope with these contradictions in R&D administration. The R&D paradox is rooted in the conflict between exploitation, achieved by continual improvement through incremental innovation, and by exploration, which seeks new opportunities in the creation of new technologies through disruptive innovations. These two sides of the paradox demand different, and sometimes even divergent, organizations. Top management leadership is crucial for the acceptance and balancing of the contradictions created by this paradox, and can align exploitation/exploration through distributive and integrative decisions and transform companies into truly ambidextrous organizations.    Key-words:  Research & Development. Innovation. Paradox. Ambidextrous organizations. Strategy. 
id FIA-1_87de70a66e72b86fb92007d5cbd072f9
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.future.emnuvens.com.br:article/60
network_acronym_str FIA-1
network_name_str Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies
repository_id_str
spelling R&D ADMINISTRATION IN THE HIGH TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY: HOW TO MANAGE A PARADOXADMINISTRAÇÃO DE P&D NA INDÚSTRIA DE ALTA TECNOLOGIA: COMO GERENCIAR UM PARADOXO? DOI:10.7444/fsrj.v2i2.60The competitive environment of the knowledge age is getting more complex, dynamic, and fast-moving each day. The high tech industry is intensively tied to its effects and demands for innovation, so the field of Research and Development must act strategically, generating innovations and granting success and sustainability to the business. However, there is a paradox in R&D which may lay traps and obstacles disguised by the busy day-to-day activity of the organization. The purpose of this paper is to point out directions that managers may take to cope with these contradictions in R&D administration. The R&D paradox is rooted in the conflict between exploitation, achieved by continual improvement through incremental innovation, and by exploration, which seeks new opportunities in the creation of new technologies through disruptive innovations. These two sides of the paradox demand different, and sometimes even divergent, organizations. Top management leadership is crucial for the acceptance and balancing of the contradictions created by this paradox, and can align exploitation/exploration through distributive and integrative decisions and transform companies into truly ambidextrous organizations.    Key-words:  Research & Development. Innovation. Paradox. Ambidextrous organizations. Strategy. O ambiente competitivo da Era do Conhecimento é cada vez mais complexo, dinâmico e veloz. A indústria de alta tecnologia vive intensamente esses efeitos e as exigências por inovações. Assim, a área de P&D atua estrategicamente, gerando inovações e garantindo o sucesso e a sustentabilidade do negócio. Entretanto, existe um paradoxo na área de P&D que pode criar armadilhas e obstáculos mascarados pela correria das atividades diárias. Este é um estudo é realizado por meio de uma revisão bibliográfica e argumentação teórica. O objetivo deste trabalho é indicar caminhos para os gerentes conduzirem as atividades de P&D sob uma perspectiva do paradoxo exploit / explore. O paradoxo da P&D é causado pelo conflito entre eficiência, obtida por melhorias contínuas por intermédio de inovações incrementais, e pela exploração, que busca novas oportunidades na criação de novas tecnologias pelas inovações de ruptura. Essas duas faces do paradoxo exigem organizações diferentes e, frequentemente, divergentes. A liderança da alta administração é crítica no reconhecimento e no balanceamento das contradições criadas pelo paradoxo e, por decisões distributivas e integradoras, conseguem aliar exploit / explore e transformar as empresas em verdadeiras organizações ambidestras. Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies2010-12-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/article/view/6010.24023/FutureJournal/2175-5825/2010.v2i2.60Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies; Vol. 2 No. 2 (2010): Future Studies Research Journal; 108-131Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies [FSRJ]; v. 2 n. 2 (2010): Future Studies Research Journal; 108-1312175-5825reponame:Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategiesinstname:Fundação Instituto de Administração (FIA)instacron:FIAengporhttps://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/article/view/60/106https://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/article/view/60/96Copyright (c) 2011 Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategiesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessIto, Nobuiuki CostaMirica, Mihail de Pieri2018-07-19T15:46:01Zoai:ojs.future.emnuvens.com.br:article/60Revistahttps://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/oai2175-58252175-5825opendoar:2018-07-19T15:46:01Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies - Fundação Instituto de Administração (FIA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv R&D ADMINISTRATION IN THE HIGH TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY: HOW TO MANAGE A PARADOX
ADMINISTRAÇÃO DE P&D NA INDÚSTRIA DE ALTA TECNOLOGIA: COMO GERENCIAR UM PARADOXO? DOI:10.7444/fsrj.v2i2.60
title R&D ADMINISTRATION IN THE HIGH TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY: HOW TO MANAGE A PARADOX
spellingShingle R&D ADMINISTRATION IN THE HIGH TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY: HOW TO MANAGE A PARADOX
Ito, Nobuiuki Costa
title_short R&D ADMINISTRATION IN THE HIGH TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY: HOW TO MANAGE A PARADOX
title_full R&D ADMINISTRATION IN THE HIGH TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY: HOW TO MANAGE A PARADOX
title_fullStr R&D ADMINISTRATION IN THE HIGH TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY: HOW TO MANAGE A PARADOX
title_full_unstemmed R&D ADMINISTRATION IN THE HIGH TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY: HOW TO MANAGE A PARADOX
title_sort R&D ADMINISTRATION IN THE HIGH TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY: HOW TO MANAGE A PARADOX
author Ito, Nobuiuki Costa
author_facet Ito, Nobuiuki Costa
Mirica, Mihail de Pieri
author_role author
author2 Mirica, Mihail de Pieri
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ito, Nobuiuki Costa
Mirica, Mihail de Pieri
description The competitive environment of the knowledge age is getting more complex, dynamic, and fast-moving each day. The high tech industry is intensively tied to its effects and demands for innovation, so the field of Research and Development must act strategically, generating innovations and granting success and sustainability to the business. However, there is a paradox in R&D which may lay traps and obstacles disguised by the busy day-to-day activity of the organization. The purpose of this paper is to point out directions that managers may take to cope with these contradictions in R&D administration. The R&D paradox is rooted in the conflict between exploitation, achieved by continual improvement through incremental innovation, and by exploration, which seeks new opportunities in the creation of new technologies through disruptive innovations. These two sides of the paradox demand different, and sometimes even divergent, organizations. Top management leadership is crucial for the acceptance and balancing of the contradictions created by this paradox, and can align exploitation/exploration through distributive and integrative decisions and transform companies into truly ambidextrous organizations.    Key-words:  Research & Development. Innovation. Paradox. Ambidextrous organizations. Strategy. 
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-12-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/article/view/60
10.24023/FutureJournal/2175-5825/2010.v2i2.60
url https://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/article/view/60
identifier_str_mv 10.24023/FutureJournal/2175-5825/2010.v2i2.60
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/article/view/60/106
https://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/article/view/60/96
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2011 Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2011 Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies; Vol. 2 No. 2 (2010): Future Studies Research Journal; 108-131
Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies [FSRJ]; v. 2 n. 2 (2010): Future Studies Research Journal; 108-131
2175-5825
reponame:Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies
instname:Fundação Instituto de Administração (FIA)
instacron:FIA
instname_str Fundação Instituto de Administração (FIA)
instacron_str FIA
institution FIA
reponame_str Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies
collection Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies
repository.name.fl_str_mv Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies - Fundação Instituto de Administração (FIA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808843615784402944