Abortion, criminal evidence and medical secrecy: a transdisciplinary analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: de Aragão, Suéllyn Mattos
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/591
Resumo: Objective: to debate, based on a literature review and normative provisions, ethical conflicts and legal paradoxes that permeate the typification adopted by criminal tutelage for framing criminal abortion, its means of proof produced by legal medicine and the provisions of the code of medical ethics about professional secrecy. Methodology: it was used a qualitative approach with a descriptive and exploratory nature. A bibliographic review of articles, rules and jurisprudence was carried out using pre-defined descriptors. Results: expert evidence in the investigation of criminal abortion is an act that affront the device of the code of medical ethics regarding professional secrecy, in addition to hurting the autonomy prerogative of women bodies and the precept of non- self-discrimination. Conclusions: the protection of deontological norms related to medical confidentiality was not able to verify proper treatment to the pregnant in cases of investigation of criminal abortion, especially if considered as fundamental bases of reproductive rights: body integrity, personal autonomy, equality and diversity.
id FIOCRUZ-3_7e81e0b8d9e1f0def2a5b14c81bfd71e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br:article/591
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-3
network_name_str Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Abortion, criminal evidence and medical secrecy: a transdisciplinary analysisAborto criminal, evidencia criminal y confidencialidad médica: un análisis transdisciplinarioAbortamento criminoso, prova penal e sigilo médico: uma análise transdisciplinarAborto criminoso. Prova pericial. Confidencialidade. Bioética. Direitos Humanos.Aborto criminal. Testimonio de experto. Confidencialidad. Bioética. Derechos Humanos.Abortion criminal. Expert testimony. Confidentiality. Bioethics. Human Rights.Objective: to debate, based on a literature review and normative provisions, ethical conflicts and legal paradoxes that permeate the typification adopted by criminal tutelage for framing criminal abortion, its means of proof produced by legal medicine and the provisions of the code of medical ethics about professional secrecy. Methodology: it was used a qualitative approach with a descriptive and exploratory nature. A bibliographic review of articles, rules and jurisprudence was carried out using pre-defined descriptors. Results: expert evidence in the investigation of criminal abortion is an act that affront the device of the code of medical ethics regarding professional secrecy, in addition to hurting the autonomy prerogative of women bodies and the precept of non- self-discrimination. Conclusions: the protection of deontological norms related to medical confidentiality was not able to verify proper treatment to the pregnant in cases of investigation of criminal abortion, especially if considered as fundamental bases of reproductive rights: body integrity, personal autonomy, equality and diversity.Objetivo: debate, basado en la revisión de literatura y disposiciones normativas, conflictos éticos y paradojas legales que impregnan la tipificación adoptada por la tutela criminal para enmarcar el aborto criminal, su evidencia producida por la medicina legal y las disposiciones del código de ética médica sobre el secreto professional. Metodología: se utilizó un enfoque cualitativo de carácter descriptivo y exploratorio. Se realizó una revisión bibliográfica de artículos, normas y jurisprudencia utilizando descriptores predefinidos. Resultados: la evidencia experta en la investigación del aborto criminal es un acto que ofende la provisión del código de ética médica con respecto al secreto profesional, además de dañar la prerrogativa de autonomía de los cuerpos de las mujeres y el precepto de no discriminación. Conclusiones: la protección de las normas deontológicas con respecto a la confidencialidad médica no ha sido capaz de dar a las mujeres embarazadas un tratamiento adecuado en casos de investigación de aborto criminal, especialmente considerando las bases fundamentales de los derechos reproductivos: integridad corporal, autonomía personal, igualdad y diversidad.Objetivo: debater, a partir de revisão de literatura e de dispositivos normativos, conflitos éticos e paradoxos jurídicos que permeiam a tipificação adotada pela tutela penal para enquadramento do aborto criminoso, seus meios de prova produzidos pela medicina legal e o disposto no código de ética médica acerca do sigilo profissional. Metodologia: utilizou-se uma abordagem qualitativa com natureza descritiva e exploratória. Foi realizada revisão bibliográfica de artigos, normas e jurisprudência a partir de descritores pré-definidos. Resultados: a prova pericial na investigação de aborto criminoso constitui-se em ato que afronta o dispositivo do código de ética médica referente ao sigilo profissional, além de ferir a prerrogativa de autonomia dos corpos das mulheres e o preceito da não autoincriminação. Conclusões: a proteção das normas deontológicas referentes ao sigilo médico não tem sido capaz de conferir tratamento adequado a gestante nos casos de investigação de abortamento criminoso, sobretudo se considerados as bases fundamentais dos direitos reprodutivos: integridade corporal, autonomia pessoal, igualdade e diversidade.  Fundação Oswaldo Cruz Brasília2020-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/59110.17566/ciads.v9i2.591Iberoamerican Journal of Health Law; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2020): (APR./JUN. 2020); 182-207Cuadernos Iberoamericanos de Derecho Sanitario; Vol. 9 Núm. 2 (2020): (ABR./JUN. 2020); 182-207Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário; v. 9 n. 2 (2020): (ABR./JUN. 2020); 182-2072358-18242317-839610.17566/ciads.v9i2reponame:Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online)instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporhttps://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/591/746Copyright (c) 2020 CADERNOS IBERO-AMERICANOS DE DIREITO SANITÁRIOhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Aragão, Suéllyn Mattosde Aragão, Suéllyn Mattosde Aragão, Suéllyn Mattos2020-10-07T14:11:12Zoai:ojs.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br:article/591Revistahttp://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.brPUBhttp://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/oaicadernos.direitosanitario@fiocruz.br2358-18242317-8396opendoar:2020-10-07T14:11:12Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online) - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Abortion, criminal evidence and medical secrecy: a transdisciplinary analysis
Aborto criminal, evidencia criminal y confidencialidad médica: un análisis transdisciplinario
Abortamento criminoso, prova penal e sigilo médico: uma análise transdisciplinar
title Abortion, criminal evidence and medical secrecy: a transdisciplinary analysis
spellingShingle Abortion, criminal evidence and medical secrecy: a transdisciplinary analysis
de Aragão, Suéllyn Mattos
Aborto criminoso. Prova pericial. Confidencialidade. Bioética. Direitos Humanos.
Aborto criminal. Testimonio de experto. Confidencialidad. Bioética. Derechos Humanos.
Abortion criminal. Expert testimony. Confidentiality. Bioethics. Human Rights.
title_short Abortion, criminal evidence and medical secrecy: a transdisciplinary analysis
title_full Abortion, criminal evidence and medical secrecy: a transdisciplinary analysis
title_fullStr Abortion, criminal evidence and medical secrecy: a transdisciplinary analysis
title_full_unstemmed Abortion, criminal evidence and medical secrecy: a transdisciplinary analysis
title_sort Abortion, criminal evidence and medical secrecy: a transdisciplinary analysis
author de Aragão, Suéllyn Mattos
author_facet de Aragão, Suéllyn Mattos
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv de Aragão, Suéllyn Mattos
de Aragão, Suéllyn Mattos
de Aragão, Suéllyn Mattos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Aborto criminoso. Prova pericial. Confidencialidade. Bioética. Direitos Humanos.
Aborto criminal. Testimonio de experto. Confidencialidad. Bioética. Derechos Humanos.
Abortion criminal. Expert testimony. Confidentiality. Bioethics. Human Rights.
topic Aborto criminoso. Prova pericial. Confidencialidade. Bioética. Direitos Humanos.
Aborto criminal. Testimonio de experto. Confidencialidad. Bioética. Derechos Humanos.
Abortion criminal. Expert testimony. Confidentiality. Bioethics. Human Rights.
description Objective: to debate, based on a literature review and normative provisions, ethical conflicts and legal paradoxes that permeate the typification adopted by criminal tutelage for framing criminal abortion, its means of proof produced by legal medicine and the provisions of the code of medical ethics about professional secrecy. Methodology: it was used a qualitative approach with a descriptive and exploratory nature. A bibliographic review of articles, rules and jurisprudence was carried out using pre-defined descriptors. Results: expert evidence in the investigation of criminal abortion is an act that affront the device of the code of medical ethics regarding professional secrecy, in addition to hurting the autonomy prerogative of women bodies and the precept of non- self-discrimination. Conclusions: the protection of deontological norms related to medical confidentiality was not able to verify proper treatment to the pregnant in cases of investigation of criminal abortion, especially if considered as fundamental bases of reproductive rights: body integrity, personal autonomy, equality and diversity.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-06-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/591
10.17566/ciads.v9i2.591
url https://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/591
identifier_str_mv 10.17566/ciads.v9i2.591
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/591/746
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 CADERNOS IBERO-AMERICANOS DE DIREITO SANITÁRIO
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 CADERNOS IBERO-AMERICANOS DE DIREITO SANITÁRIO
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Oswaldo Cruz Brasília
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Oswaldo Cruz Brasília
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Iberoamerican Journal of Health Law; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2020): (APR./JUN. 2020); 182-207
Cuadernos Iberoamericanos de Derecho Sanitario; Vol. 9 Núm. 2 (2020): (ABR./JUN. 2020); 182-207
Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário; v. 9 n. 2 (2020): (ABR./JUN. 2020); 182-207
2358-1824
2317-8396
10.17566/ciads.v9i2
reponame:Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online)
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online)
collection Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online) - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernos.direitosanitario@fiocruz.br
_version_ 1798942494961958912

Registros relacionados