Abortion, criminal evidence and medical secrecy: a transdisciplinary analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/591 |
Resumo: | Objective: to debate, based on a literature review and normative provisions, ethical conflicts and legal paradoxes that permeate the typification adopted by criminal tutelage for framing criminal abortion, its means of proof produced by legal medicine and the provisions of the code of medical ethics about professional secrecy. Methodology: it was used a qualitative approach with a descriptive and exploratory nature. A bibliographic review of articles, rules and jurisprudence was carried out using pre-defined descriptors. Results: expert evidence in the investigation of criminal abortion is an act that affront the device of the code of medical ethics regarding professional secrecy, in addition to hurting the autonomy prerogative of women bodies and the precept of non- self-discrimination. Conclusions: the protection of deontological norms related to medical confidentiality was not able to verify proper treatment to the pregnant in cases of investigation of criminal abortion, especially if considered as fundamental bases of reproductive rights: body integrity, personal autonomy, equality and diversity. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-3_7e81e0b8d9e1f0def2a5b14c81bfd71e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br:article/591 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-3 |
network_name_str |
Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Abortion, criminal evidence and medical secrecy: a transdisciplinary analysisAborto criminal, evidencia criminal y confidencialidad médica: un análisis transdisciplinarioAbortamento criminoso, prova penal e sigilo médico: uma análise transdisciplinarAborto criminoso. Prova pericial. Confidencialidade. Bioética. Direitos Humanos.Aborto criminal. Testimonio de experto. Confidencialidad. Bioética. Derechos Humanos.Abortion criminal. Expert testimony. Confidentiality. Bioethics. Human Rights.Objective: to debate, based on a literature review and normative provisions, ethical conflicts and legal paradoxes that permeate the typification adopted by criminal tutelage for framing criminal abortion, its means of proof produced by legal medicine and the provisions of the code of medical ethics about professional secrecy. Methodology: it was used a qualitative approach with a descriptive and exploratory nature. A bibliographic review of articles, rules and jurisprudence was carried out using pre-defined descriptors. Results: expert evidence in the investigation of criminal abortion is an act that affront the device of the code of medical ethics regarding professional secrecy, in addition to hurting the autonomy prerogative of women bodies and the precept of non- self-discrimination. Conclusions: the protection of deontological norms related to medical confidentiality was not able to verify proper treatment to the pregnant in cases of investigation of criminal abortion, especially if considered as fundamental bases of reproductive rights: body integrity, personal autonomy, equality and diversity.Objetivo: debate, basado en la revisión de literatura y disposiciones normativas, conflictos éticos y paradojas legales que impregnan la tipificación adoptada por la tutela criminal para enmarcar el aborto criminal, su evidencia producida por la medicina legal y las disposiciones del código de ética médica sobre el secreto professional. Metodología: se utilizó un enfoque cualitativo de carácter descriptivo y exploratorio. Se realizó una revisión bibliográfica de artículos, normas y jurisprudencia utilizando descriptores predefinidos. Resultados: la evidencia experta en la investigación del aborto criminal es un acto que ofende la provisión del código de ética médica con respecto al secreto profesional, además de dañar la prerrogativa de autonomía de los cuerpos de las mujeres y el precepto de no discriminación. Conclusiones: la protección de las normas deontológicas con respecto a la confidencialidad médica no ha sido capaz de dar a las mujeres embarazadas un tratamiento adecuado en casos de investigación de aborto criminal, especialmente considerando las bases fundamentales de los derechos reproductivos: integridad corporal, autonomía personal, igualdad y diversidad.Objetivo: debater, a partir de revisão de literatura e de dispositivos normativos, conflitos éticos e paradoxos jurídicos que permeiam a tipificação adotada pela tutela penal para enquadramento do aborto criminoso, seus meios de prova produzidos pela medicina legal e o disposto no código de ética médica acerca do sigilo profissional. Metodologia: utilizou-se uma abordagem qualitativa com natureza descritiva e exploratória. Foi realizada revisão bibliográfica de artigos, normas e jurisprudência a partir de descritores pré-definidos. Resultados: a prova pericial na investigação de aborto criminoso constitui-se em ato que afronta o dispositivo do código de ética médica referente ao sigilo profissional, além de ferir a prerrogativa de autonomia dos corpos das mulheres e o preceito da não autoincriminação. Conclusões: a proteção das normas deontológicas referentes ao sigilo médico não tem sido capaz de conferir tratamento adequado a gestante nos casos de investigação de abortamento criminoso, sobretudo se considerados as bases fundamentais dos direitos reprodutivos: integridade corporal, autonomia pessoal, igualdade e diversidade. Fundação Oswaldo Cruz Brasília2020-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/59110.17566/ciads.v9i2.591Iberoamerican Journal of Health Law; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2020): (APR./JUN. 2020); 182-207Cuadernos Iberoamericanos de Derecho Sanitario; Vol. 9 Núm. 2 (2020): (ABR./JUN. 2020); 182-207Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário; v. 9 n. 2 (2020): (ABR./JUN. 2020); 182-2072358-18242317-839610.17566/ciads.v9i2reponame:Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online)instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporhttps://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/591/746Copyright (c) 2020 CADERNOS IBERO-AMERICANOS DE DIREITO SANITÁRIOhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Aragão, Suéllyn Mattosde Aragão, Suéllyn Mattosde Aragão, Suéllyn Mattos2020-10-07T14:11:12Zoai:ojs.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br:article/591Revistahttp://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.brPUBhttp://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/oaicadernos.direitosanitario@fiocruz.br2358-18242317-8396opendoar:2020-10-07T14:11:12Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online) - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Abortion, criminal evidence and medical secrecy: a transdisciplinary analysis Aborto criminal, evidencia criminal y confidencialidad médica: un análisis transdisciplinario Abortamento criminoso, prova penal e sigilo médico: uma análise transdisciplinar |
title |
Abortion, criminal evidence and medical secrecy: a transdisciplinary analysis |
spellingShingle |
Abortion, criminal evidence and medical secrecy: a transdisciplinary analysis de Aragão, Suéllyn Mattos Aborto criminoso. Prova pericial. Confidencialidade. Bioética. Direitos Humanos. Aborto criminal. Testimonio de experto. Confidencialidad. Bioética. Derechos Humanos. Abortion criminal. Expert testimony. Confidentiality. Bioethics. Human Rights. |
title_short |
Abortion, criminal evidence and medical secrecy: a transdisciplinary analysis |
title_full |
Abortion, criminal evidence and medical secrecy: a transdisciplinary analysis |
title_fullStr |
Abortion, criminal evidence and medical secrecy: a transdisciplinary analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Abortion, criminal evidence and medical secrecy: a transdisciplinary analysis |
title_sort |
Abortion, criminal evidence and medical secrecy: a transdisciplinary analysis |
author |
de Aragão, Suéllyn Mattos |
author_facet |
de Aragão, Suéllyn Mattos |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
de Aragão, Suéllyn Mattos de Aragão, Suéllyn Mattos de Aragão, Suéllyn Mattos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Aborto criminoso. Prova pericial. Confidencialidade. Bioética. Direitos Humanos. Aborto criminal. Testimonio de experto. Confidencialidad. Bioética. Derechos Humanos. Abortion criminal. Expert testimony. Confidentiality. Bioethics. Human Rights. |
topic |
Aborto criminoso. Prova pericial. Confidencialidade. Bioética. Direitos Humanos. Aborto criminal. Testimonio de experto. Confidencialidad. Bioética. Derechos Humanos. Abortion criminal. Expert testimony. Confidentiality. Bioethics. Human Rights. |
description |
Objective: to debate, based on a literature review and normative provisions, ethical conflicts and legal paradoxes that permeate the typification adopted by criminal tutelage for framing criminal abortion, its means of proof produced by legal medicine and the provisions of the code of medical ethics about professional secrecy. Methodology: it was used a qualitative approach with a descriptive and exploratory nature. A bibliographic review of articles, rules and jurisprudence was carried out using pre-defined descriptors. Results: expert evidence in the investigation of criminal abortion is an act that affront the device of the code of medical ethics regarding professional secrecy, in addition to hurting the autonomy prerogative of women bodies and the precept of non- self-discrimination. Conclusions: the protection of deontological norms related to medical confidentiality was not able to verify proper treatment to the pregnant in cases of investigation of criminal abortion, especially if considered as fundamental bases of reproductive rights: body integrity, personal autonomy, equality and diversity. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-06-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/591 10.17566/ciads.v9i2.591 |
url |
https://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/591 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.17566/ciads.v9i2.591 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/591/746 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 CADERNOS IBERO-AMERICANOS DE DIREITO SANITÁRIO https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 CADERNOS IBERO-AMERICANOS DE DIREITO SANITÁRIO https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz Brasília |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz Brasília |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Iberoamerican Journal of Health Law; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2020): (APR./JUN. 2020); 182-207 Cuadernos Iberoamericanos de Derecho Sanitario; Vol. 9 Núm. 2 (2020): (ABR./JUN. 2020); 182-207 Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário; v. 9 n. 2 (2020): (ABR./JUN. 2020); 182-207 2358-1824 2317-8396 10.17566/ciads.v9i2 reponame:Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online) instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online) |
collection |
Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online) - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cadernos.direitosanitario@fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1798942494961958912 |