Evaluation of four molecular methods for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in pulmonary and blood samples from immunocompromised patients

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lyra,Juliana Maria Azevedo de
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Maruza,Magda, Verza,Mirela, Carneiro,Maria Madileuza, Albuquerque,Maria de Fátima Militão de, Rossetti,Maria Lúcia, Ximenes,Ricardo, Braga,Maria Cynthia, Lucena-Silva,Norma
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
Texto Completo: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0074-02762014000600805
Resumo: The present study analysed the concordance among four different molecular diagnostic methods for tuberculosis (TB) in pulmonary and blood samples from immunocompromised patients. A total of 165 blood and 194 sputum samples were collected from 181 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with upper respiratory complaints, regardless of suspicious for TB. The samples were submitted for smear microscopy, culture and molecular tests: a laboratory-developed conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) and the Gen-Probe and Detect-TB Ampligenix kits. The samples were handled blindly by all the technicians involved, from sample processing to results analysis. For sputum, the sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 96.7% for qPCR, 81.8% and 94.5% for Gen-Probe and 100% and 66.3% for Detect-TB, respectively. qPCR presented the best concordance with sputum culture [kappa (k) = 0.864)], followed by Gen-Probe (k = 0.682). For blood samples, qPCR showed 100% sensitivity and 92.3% specificity, with a substantial correlation with sputum culture (k = 0.754) and with the qPCR results obtained from sputum of the corresponding patient (k = 0.630). Conventional PCR demonstrated the worst results for sputa and blood, with a sensitivity of 100% vs. 88.9% and a specificity of 46.3% vs. 32%, respectively. Commercial or laboratory-developed molecular assays can overcome the difficulties in the diagnosis of TB in paucibacillary patients using conventional methods available in most laboratories.
id FIOCRUZ-4_bff5ef2de4783b0359695437c3d7a4eb
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0074-02762014000600805
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-4
network_name_str Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
spelling Evaluation of four molecular methods for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in pulmonary and blood samples from immunocompromised patientstuberculosispaucibacillaryGen-ProbeDetec-TBreal-time PCRThe present study analysed the concordance among four different molecular diagnostic methods for tuberculosis (TB) in pulmonary and blood samples from immunocompromised patients. A total of 165 blood and 194 sputum samples were collected from 181 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with upper respiratory complaints, regardless of suspicious for TB. The samples were submitted for smear microscopy, culture and molecular tests: a laboratory-developed conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) and the Gen-Probe and Detect-TB Ampligenix kits. The samples were handled blindly by all the technicians involved, from sample processing to results analysis. For sputum, the sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 96.7% for qPCR, 81.8% and 94.5% for Gen-Probe and 100% and 66.3% for Detect-TB, respectively. qPCR presented the best concordance with sputum culture [kappa (k) = 0.864)], followed by Gen-Probe (k = 0.682). For blood samples, qPCR showed 100% sensitivity and 92.3% specificity, with a substantial correlation with sputum culture (k = 0.754) and with the qPCR results obtained from sputum of the corresponding patient (k = 0.630). Conventional PCR demonstrated the worst results for sputa and blood, with a sensitivity of 100% vs. 88.9% and a specificity of 46.3% vs. 32%, respectively. Commercial or laboratory-developed molecular assays can overcome the difficulties in the diagnosis of TB in paucibacillary patients using conventional methods available in most laboratories.Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Ministério da Saúde2014-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0074-02762014000600805Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz v.109 n.6 2014reponame:Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruzinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruzinstacron:FIOCRUZ10.1590/0074-0276130542info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLyra,Juliana Maria Azevedo deMaruza,MagdaVerza,MirelaCarneiro,Maria MadileuzaAlbuquerque,Maria de Fátima Militão deRossetti,Maria LúciaXimenes,RicardoBraga,Maria CynthiaLucena-Silva,Normaeng2020-04-25T17:51:48Zhttp://www.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php0074-02761678-8060opendoar:null2020-04-26 02:19:49.913Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz - Fundação Oswaldo Cruztrue
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of four molecular methods for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in pulmonary and blood samples from immunocompromised patients
title Evaluation of four molecular methods for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in pulmonary and blood samples from immunocompromised patients
spellingShingle Evaluation of four molecular methods for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in pulmonary and blood samples from immunocompromised patients
Lyra,Juliana Maria Azevedo de
tuberculosis
paucibacillary
Gen-Probe
Detec-TB
real-time PCR
title_short Evaluation of four molecular methods for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in pulmonary and blood samples from immunocompromised patients
title_full Evaluation of four molecular methods for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in pulmonary and blood samples from immunocompromised patients
title_fullStr Evaluation of four molecular methods for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in pulmonary and blood samples from immunocompromised patients
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of four molecular methods for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in pulmonary and blood samples from immunocompromised patients
title_sort Evaluation of four molecular methods for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in pulmonary and blood samples from immunocompromised patients
author Lyra,Juliana Maria Azevedo de
author_facet Lyra,Juliana Maria Azevedo de
Maruza,Magda
Verza,Mirela
Carneiro,Maria Madileuza
Albuquerque,Maria de Fátima Militão de
Rossetti,Maria Lúcia
Ximenes,Ricardo
Braga,Maria Cynthia
Lucena-Silva,Norma
author_role author
author2 Maruza,Magda
Verza,Mirela
Carneiro,Maria Madileuza
Albuquerque,Maria de Fátima Militão de
Rossetti,Maria Lúcia
Ximenes,Ricardo
Braga,Maria Cynthia
Lucena-Silva,Norma
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lyra,Juliana Maria Azevedo de
Maruza,Magda
Verza,Mirela
Carneiro,Maria Madileuza
Albuquerque,Maria de Fátima Militão de
Rossetti,Maria Lúcia
Ximenes,Ricardo
Braga,Maria Cynthia
Lucena-Silva,Norma
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv tuberculosis
paucibacillary
Gen-Probe
Detec-TB
real-time PCR
topic tuberculosis
paucibacillary
Gen-Probe
Detec-TB
real-time PCR
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The present study analysed the concordance among four different molecular diagnostic methods for tuberculosis (TB) in pulmonary and blood samples from immunocompromised patients. A total of 165 blood and 194 sputum samples were collected from 181 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with upper respiratory complaints, regardless of suspicious for TB. The samples were submitted for smear microscopy, culture and molecular tests: a laboratory-developed conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) and the Gen-Probe and Detect-TB Ampligenix kits. The samples were handled blindly by all the technicians involved, from sample processing to results analysis. For sputum, the sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 96.7% for qPCR, 81.8% and 94.5% for Gen-Probe and 100% and 66.3% for Detect-TB, respectively. qPCR presented the best concordance with sputum culture [kappa (k) = 0.864)], followed by Gen-Probe (k = 0.682). For blood samples, qPCR showed 100% sensitivity and 92.3% specificity, with a substantial correlation with sputum culture (k = 0.754) and with the qPCR results obtained from sputum of the corresponding patient (k = 0.630). Conventional PCR demonstrated the worst results for sputa and blood, with a sensitivity of 100% vs. 88.9% and a specificity of 46.3% vs. 32%, respectively. Commercial or laboratory-developed molecular assays can overcome the difficulties in the diagnosis of TB in paucibacillary patients using conventional methods available in most laboratories.
description The present study analysed the concordance among four different molecular diagnostic methods for tuberculosis (TB) in pulmonary and blood samples from immunocompromised patients. A total of 165 blood and 194 sputum samples were collected from 181 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with upper respiratory complaints, regardless of suspicious for TB. The samples were submitted for smear microscopy, culture and molecular tests: a laboratory-developed conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) and the Gen-Probe and Detect-TB Ampligenix kits. The samples were handled blindly by all the technicians involved, from sample processing to results analysis. For sputum, the sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 96.7% for qPCR, 81.8% and 94.5% for Gen-Probe and 100% and 66.3% for Detect-TB, respectively. qPCR presented the best concordance with sputum culture [kappa (k) = 0.864)], followed by Gen-Probe (k = 0.682). For blood samples, qPCR showed 100% sensitivity and 92.3% specificity, with a substantial correlation with sputum culture (k = 0.754) and with the qPCR results obtained from sputum of the corresponding patient (k = 0.630). Conventional PCR demonstrated the worst results for sputa and blood, with a sensitivity of 100% vs. 88.9% and a specificity of 46.3% vs. 32%, respectively. Commercial or laboratory-developed molecular assays can overcome the difficulties in the diagnosis of TB in paucibacillary patients using conventional methods available in most laboratories.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0074-02762014000600805
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0074-02762014000600805
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0074-0276130542
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Ministério da Saúde
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Ministério da Saúde
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz v.109 n.6 2014
reponame:Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz
instacron:FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
collection Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
repository.name.fl_str_mv Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1669937716111867904