Factorial validity and reliability of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in the Brazilian physician population

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gouveia,Valdiney V.
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Barbosa,Genário Alves, Andrade,Edson de Oliveira, Carneiro,Mauro Brandão
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Cadernos de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2010000700023
Resumo: The 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) is a widely used screening instrument. One- and two-factor structures have been identified in some countries. In Brazil, the best factor structure is still unclear. This study aimed at knowing its factorial validity and reliability, and testing the one-factor and two-factor models. The participants were 7,512 Brazilian physicians. They answered the GHQ-12 and demographic questions. Unrotated (one-factor) and rotated (two-factor) structures of the GHQ-12 were extracted by principal component analysis. Confirmatory factor analyses (ML) were used to compare the one- and two-factor solutions. The two-factor model fitted the data better than the one-factor one. Those two factors were depression and social dysfunction, and they showed themselves to be directly correlated to one another. They also showed adequate reliability coefficients. The two-factor model is remarkably adequate, showing better fit indices, although it is acceptable to admit a common factor, which could be defined as psychological distress.
id FIOCRUZ-5_5baa346d7ba76fbda37674244f44964d
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-311X2010000700023
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-5
network_name_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Factorial validity and reliability of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in the Brazilian physician populationMental HealthPhysiciansQuestionnaireThe 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) is a widely used screening instrument. One- and two-factor structures have been identified in some countries. In Brazil, the best factor structure is still unclear. This study aimed at knowing its factorial validity and reliability, and testing the one-factor and two-factor models. The participants were 7,512 Brazilian physicians. They answered the GHQ-12 and demographic questions. Unrotated (one-factor) and rotated (two-factor) structures of the GHQ-12 were extracted by principal component analysis. Confirmatory factor analyses (ML) were used to compare the one- and two-factor solutions. The two-factor model fitted the data better than the one-factor one. Those two factors were depression and social dysfunction, and they showed themselves to be directly correlated to one another. They also showed adequate reliability coefficients. The two-factor model is remarkably adequate, showing better fit indices, although it is acceptable to admit a common factor, which could be defined as psychological distress.Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz2010-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2010000700023Cadernos de Saúde Pública v.26 n.7 2010reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Públicainstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZ10.1590/S0102-311X2010000700023info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGouveia,Valdiney V.Barbosa,Genário AlvesAndrade,Edson de OliveiraCarneiro,Mauro Brandãoeng2010-08-03T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-311X2010000700023Revistahttp://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/csp/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br1678-44640102-311Xopendoar:2010-08-03T00:00Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Factorial validity and reliability of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in the Brazilian physician population
title Factorial validity and reliability of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in the Brazilian physician population
spellingShingle Factorial validity and reliability of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in the Brazilian physician population
Gouveia,Valdiney V.
Mental Health
Physicians
Questionnaire
title_short Factorial validity and reliability of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in the Brazilian physician population
title_full Factorial validity and reliability of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in the Brazilian physician population
title_fullStr Factorial validity and reliability of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in the Brazilian physician population
title_full_unstemmed Factorial validity and reliability of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in the Brazilian physician population
title_sort Factorial validity and reliability of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in the Brazilian physician population
author Gouveia,Valdiney V.
author_facet Gouveia,Valdiney V.
Barbosa,Genário Alves
Andrade,Edson de Oliveira
Carneiro,Mauro Brandão
author_role author
author2 Barbosa,Genário Alves
Andrade,Edson de Oliveira
Carneiro,Mauro Brandão
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gouveia,Valdiney V.
Barbosa,Genário Alves
Andrade,Edson de Oliveira
Carneiro,Mauro Brandão
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Mental Health
Physicians
Questionnaire
topic Mental Health
Physicians
Questionnaire
description The 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) is a widely used screening instrument. One- and two-factor structures have been identified in some countries. In Brazil, the best factor structure is still unclear. This study aimed at knowing its factorial validity and reliability, and testing the one-factor and two-factor models. The participants were 7,512 Brazilian physicians. They answered the GHQ-12 and demographic questions. Unrotated (one-factor) and rotated (two-factor) structures of the GHQ-12 were extracted by principal component analysis. Confirmatory factor analyses (ML) were used to compare the one- and two-factor solutions. The two-factor model fitted the data better than the one-factor one. Those two factors were depression and social dysfunction, and they showed themselves to be directly correlated to one another. They also showed adequate reliability coefficients. The two-factor model is remarkably adequate, showing better fit indices, although it is acceptable to admit a common factor, which could be defined as psychological distress.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-07-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2010000700023
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2010000700023
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0102-311X2010000700023
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Saúde Pública v.26 n.7 2010
reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Pública
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
collection Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br
_version_ 1754115730395103232