Factorial validity and reliability of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in the Brazilian physician population
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/4473 |
Resumo: | The 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) is a widely used screening instrument. One- and two-factor structures have been identified in some countries. In Brazil, the best factor structure is still unclear. This study aimed at knowing its factorial validity and reliability, and testing the one-factor and two-factor models. The participants were 7,512 Brazilian physicians. They answered the GHQ-12 and demographic questions. Unrotated (one-factor) and rotated (two-factor) structures of the GHQ-12 were extracted by principal component analysis. Confirmatory factor analyses (ML) were used to compare the one- and two-factor solutions. The two-factor model fitted the data better than the one-factor one. Those two factors were depression and social dysfunction, and they showed themselves to be directly correlated to one another. They also showed adequate reliability coefficients. The two-factor model is remarkably adequate, showing better fit indices, although it is acceptable to admit a common factor, which could be defined as psychological distress. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-5_cdb911041217b9d44bb1e01393dffcca |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/4473 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-5 |
network_name_str |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Factorial validity and reliability of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in the Brazilian physician populationMental HealthPhysiciansQuestionnaireThe 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) is a widely used screening instrument. One- and two-factor structures have been identified in some countries. In Brazil, the best factor structure is still unclear. This study aimed at knowing its factorial validity and reliability, and testing the one-factor and two-factor models. The participants were 7,512 Brazilian physicians. They answered the GHQ-12 and demographic questions. Unrotated (one-factor) and rotated (two-factor) structures of the GHQ-12 were extracted by principal component analysis. Confirmatory factor analyses (ML) were used to compare the one- and two-factor solutions. The two-factor model fitted the data better than the one-factor one. Those two factors were depression and social dysfunction, and they showed themselves to be directly correlated to one another. They also showed adequate reliability coefficients. The two-factor model is remarkably adequate, showing better fit indices, although it is acceptable to admit a common factor, which could be defined as psychological distress.O Questionário de Saúde Geral de 12 Itens (QSG-12) é um instrumento de triagem amplamente usado. As estruturas com um e dois fatores têm sido observadas em alguns países. No Brasil não é ainda clara a melhor estrutura fatorial. Este estudo objetivou conhecer evidências de sua validade fatorial e consistência interna. Os participantes deste estudo foram 7.512 médicos brasileiros, que responderam o QSG-12 e perguntas demográficas. Foram extraídas estruturas fatoriais rotadas (unifatorial) e não-rotadas (bifatorial) por meio de análise de componentes principais. Realizaram-se análises fatoriais confirmatórias (ML) para comparar as soluções uni e bi-fatorial. O modelo com dois fatores se ajustou melhor aos dados do que o unifatorial. Os dois fatores foram depressão e disfunção social, sendo diretamente correlacionados entre si; ambos apresentaram coeficientes de confiabilidade aceitáveis. O modelo bifatorial foi claramente adequado, apresentando os melhores indicadores de ajuste, embora possa ser aceito um fator comum, concebido como desconforto psicológico.Reports in Public HealthCadernos de Saúde Pública2010-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlapplication/pdfhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/4473Reports in Public Health; Vol. 26 No. 7 (2010): JulyCadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 26 n. 7 (2010): Julho1678-44640102-311Xreponame:Cadernos de Saúde Públicainstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZenghttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/4473/9117https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/4473/9118Gouveia, Valdiney V.Barbosa, Genário AlvesAndrade, Edson de OliveiraCarneiro, Mauro Brandãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-03-06T15:28:11Zoai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/4473Revistahttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csphttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/oaicadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br1678-44640102-311Xopendoar:2024-03-06T13:05:09.781045Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Factorial validity and reliability of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in the Brazilian physician population |
title |
Factorial validity and reliability of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in the Brazilian physician population |
spellingShingle |
Factorial validity and reliability of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in the Brazilian physician population Gouveia, Valdiney V. Mental Health Physicians Questionnaire |
title_short |
Factorial validity and reliability of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in the Brazilian physician population |
title_full |
Factorial validity and reliability of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in the Brazilian physician population |
title_fullStr |
Factorial validity and reliability of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in the Brazilian physician population |
title_full_unstemmed |
Factorial validity and reliability of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in the Brazilian physician population |
title_sort |
Factorial validity and reliability of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in the Brazilian physician population |
author |
Gouveia, Valdiney V. |
author_facet |
Gouveia, Valdiney V. Barbosa, Genário Alves Andrade, Edson de Oliveira Carneiro, Mauro Brandão |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Barbosa, Genário Alves Andrade, Edson de Oliveira Carneiro, Mauro Brandão |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gouveia, Valdiney V. Barbosa, Genário Alves Andrade, Edson de Oliveira Carneiro, Mauro Brandão |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Mental Health Physicians Questionnaire |
topic |
Mental Health Physicians Questionnaire |
description |
The 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) is a widely used screening instrument. One- and two-factor structures have been identified in some countries. In Brazil, the best factor structure is still unclear. This study aimed at knowing its factorial validity and reliability, and testing the one-factor and two-factor models. The participants were 7,512 Brazilian physicians. They answered the GHQ-12 and demographic questions. Unrotated (one-factor) and rotated (two-factor) structures of the GHQ-12 were extracted by principal component analysis. Confirmatory factor analyses (ML) were used to compare the one- and two-factor solutions. The two-factor model fitted the data better than the one-factor one. Those two factors were depression and social dysfunction, and they showed themselves to be directly correlated to one another. They also showed adequate reliability coefficients. The two-factor model is remarkably adequate, showing better fit indices, although it is acceptable to admit a common factor, which could be defined as psychological distress. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-07-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/4473 |
url |
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/4473 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/4473/9117 https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/4473/9118 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Reports in Public Health Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Reports in Public Health Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Reports in Public Health; Vol. 26 No. 7 (2010): July Cadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 26 n. 7 (2010): Julho 1678-4464 0102-311X reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Pública instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
collection |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1821325524398505984 |