World Health Organization and the search for accountability: a critical analysis of the new framework of engagement with non-state actors

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Danielle Hanna Rached
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Deisy de Freitas Lima Ventura
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Cadernos de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6552
Resumo: The article probes the origins and content of the Framework of Engagement with Non-State Actors (FENSA) of the World Health Organization (WHO), approved on May 28, 2016, at the 69th World Health Assembly, which established different rules of collaboration to four categories of actors: nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), private sector entities, philanthropic foundations, and academic institutions. Applying the findings of International Legal Theory and based on extensive documentary research, we sought to determine whether FENSA is an appropriate accountability mechanism according to four functions of accountability: constitutional, democratic, epistemic, and populist. The article concludes that there is a risk of the prevalence of the populist function at the expense of the accountability potential that could result from the better use of the other three accountability functions.
id FIOCRUZ-5_8a57b329ef504887f376620e21250436
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/6552
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-5
network_name_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling World Health Organization and the search for accountability: a critical analysis of the new framework of engagement with non-state actorsGlobal HealthLegal LiabilityInternational LawThe article probes the origins and content of the Framework of Engagement with Non-State Actors (FENSA) of the World Health Organization (WHO), approved on May 28, 2016, at the 69th World Health Assembly, which established different rules of collaboration to four categories of actors: nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), private sector entities, philanthropic foundations, and academic institutions. Applying the findings of International Legal Theory and based on extensive documentary research, we sought to determine whether FENSA is an appropriate accountability mechanism according to four functions of accountability: constitutional, democratic, epistemic, and populist. The article concludes that there is a risk of the prevalence of the populist function at the expense of the accountability potential that could result from the better use of the other three accountability functions.El artículo examina los orígenes y el contenido del Marco de Colaboración con Actores no Estatales (FENSA, en inglés) de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS), aprobado el 28 de mayo de 2016 en la 69ª Asamblea Mundial de la Salud, que estableció diferentes reglas de colaboración para cuatro categorías de actores: organizaciones no gubernamentales (ONG), entidades del sector privado, fundaciones filantrópicas e instituciones académicas. Aplicando los hallazgos de la Teoría Legal Internacional y basándonos en una extensa investigación documental, buscamos determinar si FENSA es un mecanismo apropiado de rendición de cuentas según cuatro funciones de rendición de cuentas: constitucional, democrática, epistémica y populista. El artículo concluye que existe el riesgo de que la función populista se mantenga a expensas del potencial de rendición de cuentas que podría derivarse del mejor uso de las otras tres funciones de rendición de cuentas.O artigo investiga as origens e o conteúdo da Estrutura de Colaboração com Intervenientes Não Estatais (FENSA, em inglês) da Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS), aprovada em 28 de maio de 2016 pela 69ª Assembleia Mundial da Saúde, e que define regras distintas para quatro categorias de atores: organizações não governamentais (ONGs), entidades do setor privado, fundações filantrópicas e instituições acadêmicas. O estudo aplicou os achados da Teoria do Direito Internacional e recorreu a uma extensa pesquisa documental para determinar se a FENSA é um mecanismo apropriado de accountability de acordo com quatro funções de responsabilização: constitucional, democrática, epistêmica e populista. O artigo conclui que há um risco de prevalência da função populista com detrimento do potencial de accountability pelo uso melhor das outras três funções de accountability.Reports in Public HealthCadernos de Saúde Pública2017-07-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlapplication/pdfhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6552Reports in Public Health; Vol. 33 No. 6 (2017): JuneCadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 33 n. 6 (2017): Junho1678-44640102-311Xreponame:Cadernos de Saúde Públicainstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZenghttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6552/14044https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6552/14045Danielle Hanna RachedDeisy de Freitas Lima Venturainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-03-06T15:29:23Zoai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/6552Revistahttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csphttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/oaicadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br1678-44640102-311Xopendoar:2024-03-06T13:07:30.771468Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv World Health Organization and the search for accountability: a critical analysis of the new framework of engagement with non-state actors
title World Health Organization and the search for accountability: a critical analysis of the new framework of engagement with non-state actors
spellingShingle World Health Organization and the search for accountability: a critical analysis of the new framework of engagement with non-state actors
Danielle Hanna Rached
Global Health
Legal Liability
International Law
title_short World Health Organization and the search for accountability: a critical analysis of the new framework of engagement with non-state actors
title_full World Health Organization and the search for accountability: a critical analysis of the new framework of engagement with non-state actors
title_fullStr World Health Organization and the search for accountability: a critical analysis of the new framework of engagement with non-state actors
title_full_unstemmed World Health Organization and the search for accountability: a critical analysis of the new framework of engagement with non-state actors
title_sort World Health Organization and the search for accountability: a critical analysis of the new framework of engagement with non-state actors
author Danielle Hanna Rached
author_facet Danielle Hanna Rached
Deisy de Freitas Lima Ventura
author_role author
author2 Deisy de Freitas Lima Ventura
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Danielle Hanna Rached
Deisy de Freitas Lima Ventura
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Global Health
Legal Liability
International Law
topic Global Health
Legal Liability
International Law
description The article probes the origins and content of the Framework of Engagement with Non-State Actors (FENSA) of the World Health Organization (WHO), approved on May 28, 2016, at the 69th World Health Assembly, which established different rules of collaboration to four categories of actors: nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), private sector entities, philanthropic foundations, and academic institutions. Applying the findings of International Legal Theory and based on extensive documentary research, we sought to determine whether FENSA is an appropriate accountability mechanism according to four functions of accountability: constitutional, democratic, epistemic, and populist. The article concludes that there is a risk of the prevalence of the populist function at the expense of the accountability potential that could result from the better use of the other three accountability functions.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-07-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6552
url https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6552
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6552/14044
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6552/14045
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health; Vol. 33 No. 6 (2017): June
Cadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 33 n. 6 (2017): Junho
1678-4464
0102-311X
reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Pública
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
collection Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br
_version_ 1798943384946081792