Excesso de mortes durante a pandemia de COVID-19: subnotificação e desigualdades regionais no Brasil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Jesem Douglas Yamall Orellana
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Geraldo Marcelo da Cunha, Lihsieh Marrero, Ronaldo Ismerio Moreira, Iuri da Costa Leite, Bernardo Lessa Horta
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Cadernos de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7569
Resumo: Brazil is one of the most heavily impacted countries by the COVID-19 pandemic, and the real number of deaths from the disease makes the scenario even more challenging. This study aimed to estimate the excess deaths and their differences in adults 20 years and older in Manaus (Amazonas State), Fortaleza (Ceará State), Rio de Janeiro, and São Paulo, according to place of death, demographic characteristics, and trajectory over time. The data were obtained from the Mortality Information System and the Central Information Office of the National Civil Registry. The estimates of expected deaths were obtained from quasi-Poisson generalized additive models, adjusting for overdispersion. From February 23 to June 13, 2020, 74,410 natural deaths were recorded in the four cities, with 46% excess deaths (95%CI: 44-47). The largest amount of excess deaths was in Manaus, with 112% (95%CI: 103-121), followed by Fortaleza with 72% (95%CI: 67-78), Rio de Janeiro with 42% (95%CI: 40-45), and São Paulo with 34% (95%CI: 32-36). Excess deaths were greater in males and non-significant in Epidemiologic Weeks (EW) 9-12, except in São Paulo, 10% (95%CI: 6-14). The peak in excess deaths generally occurred in EW 17-20. The number of excess deaths not explained directly by COVID-19 and deaths at home or on public byways is high, especially in Manaus. The high percentages of excess deaths, deaths not explained directly by COVID-19, and deaths outside the hospital suggest high underreporting of deaths from COVID-19 and reinforce the extensive spread of SARS-CoV-2, as well as the need for epidemiological surveillance services to review all causes of deaths associated with respiratory symptoms.
id FIOCRUZ-5_a16df6de9fbf19d2014a1892e55b40de
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/7569
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-5
network_name_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Excesso de mortes durante a pandemia de COVID-19: subnotificação e desigualdades regionais no BrasilCOVID-19PobrezaMortalidadeBrazil is one of the most heavily impacted countries by the COVID-19 pandemic, and the real number of deaths from the disease makes the scenario even more challenging. This study aimed to estimate the excess deaths and their differences in adults 20 years and older in Manaus (Amazonas State), Fortaleza (Ceará State), Rio de Janeiro, and São Paulo, according to place of death, demographic characteristics, and trajectory over time. The data were obtained from the Mortality Information System and the Central Information Office of the National Civil Registry. The estimates of expected deaths were obtained from quasi-Poisson generalized additive models, adjusting for overdispersion. From February 23 to June 13, 2020, 74,410 natural deaths were recorded in the four cities, with 46% excess deaths (95%CI: 44-47). The largest amount of excess deaths was in Manaus, with 112% (95%CI: 103-121), followed by Fortaleza with 72% (95%CI: 67-78), Rio de Janeiro with 42% (95%CI: 40-45), and São Paulo with 34% (95%CI: 32-36). Excess deaths were greater in males and non-significant in Epidemiologic Weeks (EW) 9-12, except in São Paulo, 10% (95%CI: 6-14). The peak in excess deaths generally occurred in EW 17-20. The number of excess deaths not explained directly by COVID-19 and deaths at home or on public byways is high, especially in Manaus. The high percentages of excess deaths, deaths not explained directly by COVID-19, and deaths outside the hospital suggest high underreporting of deaths from COVID-19 and reinforce the extensive spread of SARS-CoV-2, as well as the need for epidemiological surveillance services to review all causes of deaths associated with respiratory symptoms.Brasil es uno de los países más afectados por la pandemia de COVID-19 y el número real de muertes por la enfermedad lo convierte en un escenario todavía más desafiante. El objetivo de este estudio fue estimar el exceso de muertes y sus diferencias en adultos con 20 años y más en Manaus (Amazonas), Fortaleza (Ceará), Rio de Janeiro y São Paulo, de acuerdo con el lugar de ocurrencia del fallecimiento, características demográficas y trayectoria a lo largo del tiempo. Los datos se obtuvieron del Sistema de Información sobre Mortalidad y de la Central de Información del Registro Civil Nacional. Las estimaciones de óbitos esperados se obtuvieron mediante modelos aditivos generalizados quasi-Poisson con ajuste de sobredispersión. Entre el 23 de febrero y 13 de junio de 2020, se registraron 74.410 muertes naturales en las cuatro ciudades, con un exceso de muertes de un 46% (IC95%: 44-47). El mayor exceso de muertes se produjo en Manaus, 112% (IC95%: 103-121), seguido por Fortaleza, 72% (IC95%: 67-78), Río de Janeiro, 42% (IC95%: 40-45) y São Paulo, 34% (IC95%: 32-36). El exceso de muertes fue mayor en hombres y no significativo en las Semanas Epidemiológicas (SE) 9-12, excepto en São Paulo, 10% (IC95%: 6-14). En general, el pico de muertes excedentarias se produjo en las SE 17-20. El exceso de muertes no explicado directamente por la COVID-19 y de las muertes en domicilios/vía pública fue alto, especialmente en Manaus. El elevado porcentaje de muertes excedentarias, de muertes no explicadas directamente por la COVID-19, y de muertes fuera del hospital, sugieren una alta subnotificación de muertes por COVID-19 y refuerza la extensa dispersión del SARS-CoV-2, así como también la necesidad de una revisión de todas las causas de muertes asociadas a síntomas respiratorios, por parte de los servicios de vigilancia epidemiológica.O Brasil é um dos países mais afetados pela pandemia de COVID-19 e o real número de mortes pela doença torna o cenário ainda mais desafiador. O objetivo deste estudo foi estimar o excesso de mortes e suas diferenças em adultos com 20 anos e mais em Manaus (Amazonas), Fortaleza (Ceará), Rio de Janeiro e São Paulo, de acordo com o local de ocorrência do óbito, características demográficas e trajetória ao longo do tempo. Os dados foram obtidos no Sistema de Informações sobre Mortalidade e na Central de Informações do Registro Civil Nacional. As estimativas de óbitos esperados foram obtidas por meio de modelos aditivos generalizados quasi-Poisson com ajuste de sobredispersão. Entre 23 de fevereiro e 13 de junho de 2020, foram registradas 74.410 mortes naturais nas quatro cidades, com excesso de mortes de 46% (IC95%: 44-47). O maior excesso de mortes ocorreu em Manaus, 112% (IC95%: 103-121), seguido por Fortaleza, 72% (IC95%: 67-78), Rio de Janeiro, 42% (IC95%: 40-45) e São Paulo, 34% (IC95%: 32-36). O excesso de mortes foi maior nos homens e não significativo nas Semanas Epidemiológicas (SE) 9-12, exceto em São Paulo, 10% (IC95%: 6-14). Em geral, o pico de mortes excedentes ocorreu nas SE 17-20. O excesso de mortes não explicado diretamente pela COVID-19 e de mortes em domicílios/via pública foi alto, especialmente em Manaus. A elevada porcentagem de mortes excedentes, de mortes não explicadas diretamente pela COVID-19 e de mortes fora do hospital sugerem alta subnotificação de mortes por COVID-19 e reforça a extensa dispersão do SARS-CoV-2, como também a necessidade da revisão de todas as causas de mortes associadas a sintomas respiratórios pelos serviços de vigilância epidemiológica.Reports in Public HealthCadernos de Saúde Pública2021-02-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlapplication/pdfhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7569Reports in Public Health; Vol. 37 No. 1 (2021): JanuaryCadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 37 n. 1 (2021): Janeiro1678-44640102-311Xreponame:Cadernos de Saúde Públicainstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7569/16838https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7569/16839Jesem Douglas Yamall OrellanaGeraldo Marcelo da CunhaLihsieh MarreroRonaldo Ismerio MoreiraIuri da Costa LeiteBernardo Lessa Hortainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-03-06T15:30:01Zoai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/7569Revistahttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csphttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/oaicadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br1678-44640102-311Xopendoar:2024-03-06T13:08:42.796992Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Excesso de mortes durante a pandemia de COVID-19: subnotificação e desigualdades regionais no Brasil
title Excesso de mortes durante a pandemia de COVID-19: subnotificação e desigualdades regionais no Brasil
spellingShingle Excesso de mortes durante a pandemia de COVID-19: subnotificação e desigualdades regionais no Brasil
Jesem Douglas Yamall Orellana
COVID-19
Pobreza
Mortalidade
title_short Excesso de mortes durante a pandemia de COVID-19: subnotificação e desigualdades regionais no Brasil
title_full Excesso de mortes durante a pandemia de COVID-19: subnotificação e desigualdades regionais no Brasil
title_fullStr Excesso de mortes durante a pandemia de COVID-19: subnotificação e desigualdades regionais no Brasil
title_full_unstemmed Excesso de mortes durante a pandemia de COVID-19: subnotificação e desigualdades regionais no Brasil
title_sort Excesso de mortes durante a pandemia de COVID-19: subnotificação e desigualdades regionais no Brasil
author Jesem Douglas Yamall Orellana
author_facet Jesem Douglas Yamall Orellana
Geraldo Marcelo da Cunha
Lihsieh Marrero
Ronaldo Ismerio Moreira
Iuri da Costa Leite
Bernardo Lessa Horta
author_role author
author2 Geraldo Marcelo da Cunha
Lihsieh Marrero
Ronaldo Ismerio Moreira
Iuri da Costa Leite
Bernardo Lessa Horta
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Jesem Douglas Yamall Orellana
Geraldo Marcelo da Cunha
Lihsieh Marrero
Ronaldo Ismerio Moreira
Iuri da Costa Leite
Bernardo Lessa Horta
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv COVID-19
Pobreza
Mortalidade
topic COVID-19
Pobreza
Mortalidade
description Brazil is one of the most heavily impacted countries by the COVID-19 pandemic, and the real number of deaths from the disease makes the scenario even more challenging. This study aimed to estimate the excess deaths and their differences in adults 20 years and older in Manaus (Amazonas State), Fortaleza (Ceará State), Rio de Janeiro, and São Paulo, according to place of death, demographic characteristics, and trajectory over time. The data were obtained from the Mortality Information System and the Central Information Office of the National Civil Registry. The estimates of expected deaths were obtained from quasi-Poisson generalized additive models, adjusting for overdispersion. From February 23 to June 13, 2020, 74,410 natural deaths were recorded in the four cities, with 46% excess deaths (95%CI: 44-47). The largest amount of excess deaths was in Manaus, with 112% (95%CI: 103-121), followed by Fortaleza with 72% (95%CI: 67-78), Rio de Janeiro with 42% (95%CI: 40-45), and São Paulo with 34% (95%CI: 32-36). Excess deaths were greater in males and non-significant in Epidemiologic Weeks (EW) 9-12, except in São Paulo, 10% (95%CI: 6-14). The peak in excess deaths generally occurred in EW 17-20. The number of excess deaths not explained directly by COVID-19 and deaths at home or on public byways is high, especially in Manaus. The high percentages of excess deaths, deaths not explained directly by COVID-19, and deaths outside the hospital suggest high underreporting of deaths from COVID-19 and reinforce the extensive spread of SARS-CoV-2, as well as the need for epidemiological surveillance services to review all causes of deaths associated with respiratory symptoms.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-02-05
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7569
url https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7569
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7569/16838
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7569/16839
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health; Vol. 37 No. 1 (2021): January
Cadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 37 n. 1 (2021): Janeiro
1678-4464
0102-311X
reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Pública
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
collection Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br
_version_ 1798943393200472064