Sostenibilidad en intervenciones para la prevención de dengue y diarrea en escuelas rurales de dos municipios de Colombia: evaluación de dos años post-proyecto

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Juan Felipe Jaramillo
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Sandra Vargas, Diana Sarmiento-Senior, Paola Giraldo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Cadernos de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6792
Resumo: This study evaluated the sustainability of a set of interventions to prevent dengue and diarrhea in 33 rural schools in the municipalities (counties) of Anapoima and La Mesa, Colombia, two years post-project. The study measured sustainability in two categories: maintenance of the benefits and the interventions, and institutionalization and community capacity-building. The sustainability of the interventions was compared across four arms: interventions to prevent diarrhea, to prevent dengue, combined interventions to prevent diarrhea and dengue, and control. The final score for each arm was classified in five levels of sustainability: regressive, not sustainable, moderately sustainable, sustainable, and highly sustainable. The arms were compared with ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test, with significance set at 0.05. At two years post-project, the overall sustainability for the prevention of diarrhea was moderate in the four arms, while dengue prevention was not sustainable in three of the four arms, without statistically significant differences. Sustainability levels also varied in terms of benefits, interventions, capacity-building, and institutionalization. Maintenance of benefits and interventions in both diseases was more sustainable than institutionalization and capacity-building. The analysis of these variables is important for identifying the different factors that influence projects’ sustainability, related to their design and execution, organizational framework, and social context.
id FIOCRUZ-5_d8f0c7ad439b70dd0df8c526ee79a3e6
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/6792
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-5
network_name_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Sostenibilidad en intervenciones para la prevención de dengue y diarrea en escuelas rurales de dos municipios de Colombia: evaluación de dos años post-proyectoEvaluación de Programas y Proyectos de SaludInstitucionalizaciónDengueDiarreaThis study evaluated the sustainability of a set of interventions to prevent dengue and diarrhea in 33 rural schools in the municipalities (counties) of Anapoima and La Mesa, Colombia, two years post-project. The study measured sustainability in two categories: maintenance of the benefits and the interventions, and institutionalization and community capacity-building. The sustainability of the interventions was compared across four arms: interventions to prevent diarrhea, to prevent dengue, combined interventions to prevent diarrhea and dengue, and control. The final score for each arm was classified in five levels of sustainability: regressive, not sustainable, moderately sustainable, sustainable, and highly sustainable. The arms were compared with ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test, with significance set at 0.05. At two years post-project, the overall sustainability for the prevention of diarrhea was moderate in the four arms, while dengue prevention was not sustainable in three of the four arms, without statistically significant differences. Sustainability levels also varied in terms of benefits, interventions, capacity-building, and institutionalization. Maintenance of benefits and interventions in both diseases was more sustainable than institutionalization and capacity-building. The analysis of these variables is important for identifying the different factors that influence projects’ sustainability, related to their design and execution, organizational framework, and social context.Este estudio evaluó la sostenibilidad de un conjunto de intervenciones para la prevención del dengue y la diarrea, en 33 escuelas rurales en los municipios de Anapoima y La Mesa, Colombia, dos años post-proyecto. Se midió la sostenibilidad en dos categorías: mantenimiento de los beneficios e intervenciones, e institucionalización y desarrollo de capacidades de la comunidad. Se comparó la sostenibilidad de las intervenciones que fueron distribuidas en cuatro brazos: intervenciones para prevenir la diarrea, para prevenir el dengue, combinadas para prevenir la diarrea y el dengue, y control. El puntaje final de cada brazo se clasificó en uno de cinco niveles de sostenibilidad: regresivo, no sostenible, moderadamente sostenible, sostenible y altamente sostenible. Se compararon los brazos mediante las pruebas ANOVA y Kruskal-Wallis, con un nivel de significancia de 0,05. A los dos años post-proyecto, se observa que el nivel total de sostenibilidad para la prevención de diarrea fue moderadamente sostenible en los cuatro brazos y para dengue no sostenible en tres de los cuatro brazos, sin encontrar diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre estos. También se observa que los niveles de sostenibilidad varían, en cuanto a los beneficios, intervenciones, desarrollo de capacidades e institucionalización. El mantenimiento de los beneficios y de las intervenciones en ambas enfermedades fue más sostenible que la institucionalización y desarrollo de capacidades. Es importante el análisis de estas variables para identificar los diferentes factores que influyen en la sostenibilidad de los proyectos, relacionados con el diseño y ejecución de estos, con el marco organizacional, y con el contexto social.Este estudo avaliou a sustentabilidade de um conjunto de intervenções para a prevenção de dengue e diarreia, em 33 escolas rurais nos municípios de Anapoima e La Mesa, Colômbia, dois anos pós-projeto. A sustentabilidade foi medida em duas categorias: manutenção dos benefícios e intervenções, e institucionalização e desenvolvimento de capacidades da comunidade. Foi comparada a sustentabilidade das intervenções que foram distribuídas em quatro áreas: intervenções para prevenir a diarreia, e também o dengue, combinadas para prevenir a diarreia e o dengue, e o controle. A pontuação final de cada área foi classificada em um entre cinco níveis de sustentabilidade: regressivo, não sustentável, moderadamente sustentável, sustentável e altamente sustentável. As diferentes áreas foram comparadas através das provas ANOVA e Kruskal-Wallis, com um nível de significância de 0,05. Em dois anos pós-projeto, foi observado que o nível total de sustentabilidade para a prevenção de diarreia foi moderadamente sustentável nas quatro áreas e para dengue não sustentável em três das quatro áreas, sem encontrar diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre elas. Também foi observado que os níveis de sustentabilidade variam, em quanto aos benefícios, intervenções, desenvolvimento de capacidades e institucionalização. A manutenção dos benefícios e das intervenções em ambas as doenças foi mais sustentável do que a institucionalização e desenvolvimento de capacidades. É importante o análise destas variáveis para identificar os diferentes fatores que influem na sustentabilidade dos projetos, em relação com o desenho e execução destes, com o marco organizativo, e com o contexto social.Reports in Public HealthCadernos de Saúde Pública2018-10-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlapplication/pdfhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6792Reports in Public Health; Vol. 34 No. 10 (2018): OctoberCadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 34 n. 10 (2018): Outubro1678-44640102-311Xreponame:Cadernos de Saúde Públicainstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZspahttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6792/14674https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6792/14675Juan Felipe JaramilloSandra VargasDiana Sarmiento-SeniorPaola Giraldoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-03-06T15:29:31Zoai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/6792Revistahttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csphttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/oaicadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br1678-44640102-311Xopendoar:2024-03-06T13:07:46.282628Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sostenibilidad en intervenciones para la prevención de dengue y diarrea en escuelas rurales de dos municipios de Colombia: evaluación de dos años post-proyecto
title Sostenibilidad en intervenciones para la prevención de dengue y diarrea en escuelas rurales de dos municipios de Colombia: evaluación de dos años post-proyecto
spellingShingle Sostenibilidad en intervenciones para la prevención de dengue y diarrea en escuelas rurales de dos municipios de Colombia: evaluación de dos años post-proyecto
Juan Felipe Jaramillo
Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud
Institucionalización
Dengue
Diarrea
title_short Sostenibilidad en intervenciones para la prevención de dengue y diarrea en escuelas rurales de dos municipios de Colombia: evaluación de dos años post-proyecto
title_full Sostenibilidad en intervenciones para la prevención de dengue y diarrea en escuelas rurales de dos municipios de Colombia: evaluación de dos años post-proyecto
title_fullStr Sostenibilidad en intervenciones para la prevención de dengue y diarrea en escuelas rurales de dos municipios de Colombia: evaluación de dos años post-proyecto
title_full_unstemmed Sostenibilidad en intervenciones para la prevención de dengue y diarrea en escuelas rurales de dos municipios de Colombia: evaluación de dos años post-proyecto
title_sort Sostenibilidad en intervenciones para la prevención de dengue y diarrea en escuelas rurales de dos municipios de Colombia: evaluación de dos años post-proyecto
author Juan Felipe Jaramillo
author_facet Juan Felipe Jaramillo
Sandra Vargas
Diana Sarmiento-Senior
Paola Giraldo
author_role author
author2 Sandra Vargas
Diana Sarmiento-Senior
Paola Giraldo
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Juan Felipe Jaramillo
Sandra Vargas
Diana Sarmiento-Senior
Paola Giraldo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud
Institucionalización
Dengue
Diarrea
topic Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud
Institucionalización
Dengue
Diarrea
description This study evaluated the sustainability of a set of interventions to prevent dengue and diarrhea in 33 rural schools in the municipalities (counties) of Anapoima and La Mesa, Colombia, two years post-project. The study measured sustainability in two categories: maintenance of the benefits and the interventions, and institutionalization and community capacity-building. The sustainability of the interventions was compared across four arms: interventions to prevent diarrhea, to prevent dengue, combined interventions to prevent diarrhea and dengue, and control. The final score for each arm was classified in five levels of sustainability: regressive, not sustainable, moderately sustainable, sustainable, and highly sustainable. The arms were compared with ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test, with significance set at 0.05. At two years post-project, the overall sustainability for the prevention of diarrhea was moderate in the four arms, while dengue prevention was not sustainable in three of the four arms, without statistically significant differences. Sustainability levels also varied in terms of benefits, interventions, capacity-building, and institutionalization. Maintenance of benefits and interventions in both diseases was more sustainable than institutionalization and capacity-building. The analysis of these variables is important for identifying the different factors that influence projects’ sustainability, related to their design and execution, organizational framework, and social context.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-10-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6792
url https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6792
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6792/14674
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6792/14675
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health; Vol. 34 No. 10 (2018): October
Cadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 34 n. 10 (2018): Outubro
1678-4464
0102-311X
reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Pública
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
collection Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br
_version_ 1798943386791575552