A decade of improvement of health legislation for medical devices and its impacts on the health regulation cycle

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Teixeira, Leidy Anne Alves
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Macêdo Filho, Hélio Bomfim de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
Texto Completo: https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2104
Resumo: Introduction: The sanitary regulation of medical devices was improved with a focus on sanitary risk, through the  simplification of regulatory steps and the reduction of the administrative burden. Objective: To evaluate the impacts of the improvement of health legislation during the decade 2012-2021 by three indicators representing government, company, and product. Method: The indicators developed to evaluate the health regulation cycle are 1) Anvisa’s regulatory performance (by median evaluation time of medical devices); 2) companies’ performance in complying with health legislation (by proportion of medical devices not authorized for sale); and 3) evidence of medical device health risk (due to adverse events, technical complaints, health alerts and preventive/cautionary measures). Influence analyses were carried out with variables associated with regulatory process, company size and medical device characteristics as predictors of the indicators. Results: The first indicator shows that the Agency’s timing has improved across all risk classes of medical devices. In 2012, the indicator was measured in 73 days (interquartile range 56–111), while in 2021 in 9 days (interquartile range 6–15). The second indicator showed improvement only for medical devices in the low/medium risk classes. The third indicator did not show an increase in health risk for medical devices with the regulatory simplifications adopted in the last decade. The influence analysis indicates that the need for a certificate of good manufacturing practices, company size and need for additional information are the most relevant predictor variables. Conclusions: The regulatory results from the legislation on medical devices in the last decade were positive.
id FIOCRUZ-9_0b7a86f514ec0b5ba2ef059683160514
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/2104
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-9
network_name_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository_id_str
spelling A decade of improvement of health legislation for medical devices and its impacts on the health regulation cycleUna Década de Mejora de la Legislación Sanitaria de Dispositivos Médicos y sus Impactos en el Ciclo de Regulación SanitariaUma década de aperfeiçoamento da legislação sanitária de dispositivos médicos e os impactos no ciclo da regulação sanitáriaDispositivos MédicosRegulação SanitáriaAnvisaMedical DeviceSanitary RegulationAnvisaregulación sanitariadispositivos médicosAnvisaIntroduction: The sanitary regulation of medical devices was improved with a focus on sanitary risk, through the  simplification of regulatory steps and the reduction of the administrative burden. Objective: To evaluate the impacts of the improvement of health legislation during the decade 2012-2021 by three indicators representing government, company, and product. Method: The indicators developed to evaluate the health regulation cycle are 1) Anvisa’s regulatory performance (by median evaluation time of medical devices); 2) companies’ performance in complying with health legislation (by proportion of medical devices not authorized for sale); and 3) evidence of medical device health risk (due to adverse events, technical complaints, health alerts and preventive/cautionary measures). Influence analyses were carried out with variables associated with regulatory process, company size and medical device characteristics as predictors of the indicators. Results: The first indicator shows that the Agency’s timing has improved across all risk classes of medical devices. In 2012, the indicator was measured in 73 days (interquartile range 56–111), while in 2021 in 9 days (interquartile range 6–15). The second indicator showed improvement only for medical devices in the low/medium risk classes. The third indicator did not show an increase in health risk for medical devices with the regulatory simplifications adopted in the last decade. The influence analysis indicates that the need for a certificate of good manufacturing practices, company size and need for additional information are the most relevant predictor variables. Conclusions: The regulatory results from the legislation on medical devices in the last decade were positive.IntroducciónSe mejoró la regulación sanitaria de dispositivos médicos con enfoque de riesgo sanitario, a través de la simplificación de trámites regulatorios y la reducción de la carga administrativa.objetivoEvaluar los impactos de la mejora de la legislación sanitaria durante la década 2012-2021 mediante tres indicadores que representen al gobierno, la empresa y el producto.MétodoLos indicadores desarrollados para evaluar el ciclo de regulación sanitaria son 1) el desempeño regulatorio de la Anvisa (por tiempo medio de evaluación de dispositivos médicos); 2) desempeño de las empresas en el cumplimiento de la legislación sanitaria (por proporción de dispositivos médicos no autorizados para la venta); y 3) evidencia de riesgo para la salud del dispositivo médico (debido a eventos adversos, quejas técnicas, alertas de salud y medidas preventivas/cautelares). Se realizaron análisis de influencia con variables asociadas al proceso regulatorio, el tamaño de la empresa y las características del dispositivo médico como predictores de los indicadores.ResultadosEl primer indicador muestra que el tiempo de la Agencia ha mejorado en todas las clases de riesgo de dispositivos médicos. En 2012, el indicador se midió en 73 días (rango intercuartílico 56-111), mientras que en 2021 fue de 9 días (rango intercuartílico 6-15). El segundo indicador mostró una mejora solo para dispositivos médicos en las clases de riesgo bajo/medio. El tercer indicador no mostró un aumento en el riesgo para la salud de los dispositivos médicos con las simplificaciones regulatorias adoptadas en la última década. El análisis de influencia indica que la necesidad de un certificado de buenas prácticas de manufactura, el tamaño de la empresa y la necesidad de información adicional son las variables predictoras más relevantes.Introdução: O regramento sanitário de dispositivos médicos foi aperfeiçoado com foco no risco sanitário, por meio da simplificação de etapas regulatórias e da redução da carga administrativa. Objetivo: Avaliar os impactos do aperfeiçoamento da legislação sanitária durante a década 2012-2021 por três indicadores que representam governo, empresa e produto. Método: Os indicadores desenvolvidos para avaliar o ciclo de regulação sanitária são: 1) desempenho regulatório da Anvisa (por mediana de tempo de avaliação dos dispositivos médicos); 2) desempenho das empresas no cumprimento da legislação sanitária (por porcentagem de dispositivos médicos não autorizados para comercialização); e 3) evidências de risco sanitário do  dispositivo médico (por eventos adversos, queixas técnicas, alertas sanitários e medidas preventivas/cautelares). Foram realizadas análises de influência com variáveis associadas ao processo regulatório, porte da empresa e características do dispositivo médico como preditoras dos indicadores. Resultados: O primeiro indicador evidencia que os tempos da Agência foram aperfeiçoados em todas as classes de risco de dispositivos médicos. Em 2012, o indicador foi mensurado em 73 dias (intervalo interquartil 56–111), ao passo que, em 2021, foi de 9 dias (intervalo interquartil 6–15). O segundo indicador apresentou melhora apenas para os dispositivos médicos das classes de risco  baixo/médio. O terceiro indicador não demonstrou incremento de risco sanitário para os dispositivos médicos com as simplificações regulatórias adotadas na última década. A análise de influência indica que a necessidade de certificado de boas práticas de fabricação, porte da empresa e a necessidade de informações complementares são as variáveis preditoras mais relevantes. Conclusões: Os resultados regulatórios oriundos da legislação sobre dispositivos médicos na última década foram positivos.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2022-11-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Guest Article""Artigo de convidado""Artigo de convidado"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/210410.22239/2317-269x.02104Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 10 No. 4 (2022): November - Commemorative Edition: 10 Years of Visa in Debate; 32-43Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 10 Núm. 4 (2022): Noviembre - Edición Conmemorativa: 10 Años de Visa en Debate; 32-43Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 10 n. 4 (2022): Novembro - Edição comemorativa: 10 anos da Visa em Debate; 32-432317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2104/1462https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2104/1500Copyright (c) 2022 Leidy Anne Alves Teixeira, Hélio Bomfim de Macêdo Filho (Autor)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTeixeira, Leidy Anne Alves Macêdo Filho, Hélio Bomfim de2023-12-14T14:28:38Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/2104Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-12-14T14:28:38Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A decade of improvement of health legislation for medical devices and its impacts on the health regulation cycle
Una Década de Mejora de la Legislación Sanitaria de Dispositivos Médicos y sus Impactos en el Ciclo de Regulación Sanitaria
Uma década de aperfeiçoamento da legislação sanitária de dispositivos médicos e os impactos no ciclo da regulação sanitária
title A decade of improvement of health legislation for medical devices and its impacts on the health regulation cycle
spellingShingle A decade of improvement of health legislation for medical devices and its impacts on the health regulation cycle
Teixeira, Leidy Anne Alves
Dispositivos Médicos
Regulação Sanitária
Anvisa
Medical Device
Sanitary Regulation
Anvisa
regulación sanitaria
dispositivos médicos
Anvisa
title_short A decade of improvement of health legislation for medical devices and its impacts on the health regulation cycle
title_full A decade of improvement of health legislation for medical devices and its impacts on the health regulation cycle
title_fullStr A decade of improvement of health legislation for medical devices and its impacts on the health regulation cycle
title_full_unstemmed A decade of improvement of health legislation for medical devices and its impacts on the health regulation cycle
title_sort A decade of improvement of health legislation for medical devices and its impacts on the health regulation cycle
author Teixeira, Leidy Anne Alves
author_facet Teixeira, Leidy Anne Alves
Macêdo Filho, Hélio Bomfim de
author_role author
author2 Macêdo Filho, Hélio Bomfim de
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Teixeira, Leidy Anne Alves
Macêdo Filho, Hélio Bomfim de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dispositivos Médicos
Regulação Sanitária
Anvisa
Medical Device
Sanitary Regulation
Anvisa
regulación sanitaria
dispositivos médicos
Anvisa
topic Dispositivos Médicos
Regulação Sanitária
Anvisa
Medical Device
Sanitary Regulation
Anvisa
regulación sanitaria
dispositivos médicos
Anvisa
description Introduction: The sanitary regulation of medical devices was improved with a focus on sanitary risk, through the  simplification of regulatory steps and the reduction of the administrative burden. Objective: To evaluate the impacts of the improvement of health legislation during the decade 2012-2021 by three indicators representing government, company, and product. Method: The indicators developed to evaluate the health regulation cycle are 1) Anvisa’s regulatory performance (by median evaluation time of medical devices); 2) companies’ performance in complying with health legislation (by proportion of medical devices not authorized for sale); and 3) evidence of medical device health risk (due to adverse events, technical complaints, health alerts and preventive/cautionary measures). Influence analyses were carried out with variables associated with regulatory process, company size and medical device characteristics as predictors of the indicators. Results: The first indicator shows that the Agency’s timing has improved across all risk classes of medical devices. In 2012, the indicator was measured in 73 days (interquartile range 56–111), while in 2021 in 9 days (interquartile range 6–15). The second indicator showed improvement only for medical devices in the low/medium risk classes. The third indicator did not show an increase in health risk for medical devices with the regulatory simplifications adopted in the last decade. The influence analysis indicates that the need for a certificate of good manufacturing practices, company size and need for additional information are the most relevant predictor variables. Conclusions: The regulatory results from the legislation on medical devices in the last decade were positive.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-11-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Guest Article"
"Artigo de convidado"
"Artigo de convidado"
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2104
10.22239/2317-269x.02104
url https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2104
identifier_str_mv 10.22239/2317-269x.02104
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2104/1462
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/2104/1500
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Leidy Anne Alves Teixeira, Hélio Bomfim de Macêdo Filho (Autor)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Leidy Anne Alves Teixeira, Hélio Bomfim de Macêdo Filho (Autor)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 10 No. 4 (2022): November - Commemorative Edition: 10 Years of Visa in Debate; 32-43
Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 10 Núm. 4 (2022): Noviembre - Edición Conmemorativa: 10 Años de Visa en Debate; 32-43
Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 10 n. 4 (2022): Novembro - Edição comemorativa: 10 anos da Visa em Debate; 32-43
2317-269X
reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
collection Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository.name.fl_str_mv Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br
_version_ 1797042046721064960