Content validation and reliability of the instrument to assessment hygienic-sanitary in food services

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mello, Aline Gomes
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Carmo, Cleber Nascimento do, Leite, Selma Gomes Ferreira, Miguel, Marco Antônio Lemos, Colares, Luciléia Granhen Tavares
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
Texto Completo: https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/222
Resumo: It was development and content validity of the script on evaluation of the sanitary conditions in food service (SESC-FS) and also verify interrater reliability. The development of the SESC-FS was based on the current legislation of public health. The instrument was value by experts to content validity by Delphi technique. Experts were selected by experience in food safety and knowledge on development in good practice instruments. The content was validated when there was agreement among experts ≥ 70% in the classification of essential or necessary or recommended items. After content had been validated the SESC-FS was applied by 4 dietitians in a restaurant. The food service sanitary conditions were evaluated and classified as adequate, or partially adequate, or inadequate. The Kruskal-Wallis test was conducted to compare the variance between responses. The interrater reliability was analyzed by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) were used and significance level of 5% was adopted. The SESC-FS made of 12 blocks and 159 items. From those items 58.5% were classified as essential. The food service was reported with partially adequate sanitary conditions. No statistically significant difference was observed (p-value =  0,457). The 75% of the blocks showed ICC above 0.75, this indicating excellent interrater reliability. The content of SESC-FS was validated and could be a reliable instrument to assessing the hygienic and sanitary conditions in food service.
id FIOCRUZ-9_2101dbeb95ce76f68c68978982b4e709
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/222
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-9
network_name_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository_id_str
spelling Content validation and reliability of the instrument to assessment hygienic-sanitary in food servicesElaboração, validação de conteúdo e da confiabilidade do instrumento para avaliação higiênico-sanitária de serviços de alimentaçãoEstudos de ValidaçãoCondições SanitáriasServiços de AlimentaçãoConfiabilidade e ValidadeValidity StudiesSanitary ConditionsFood ServicesReliabilityIt was development and content validity of the script on evaluation of the sanitary conditions in food service (SESC-FS) and also verify interrater reliability. The development of the SESC-FS was based on the current legislation of public health. The instrument was value by experts to content validity by Delphi technique. Experts were selected by experience in food safety and knowledge on development in good practice instruments. The content was validated when there was agreement among experts ≥ 70% in the classification of essential or necessary or recommended items. After content had been validated the SESC-FS was applied by 4 dietitians in a restaurant. The food service sanitary conditions were evaluated and classified as adequate, or partially adequate, or inadequate. The Kruskal-Wallis test was conducted to compare the variance between responses. The interrater reliability was analyzed by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) were used and significance level of 5% was adopted. The SESC-FS made of 12 blocks and 159 items. From those items 58.5% were classified as essential. The food service was reported with partially adequate sanitary conditions. No statistically significant difference was observed (p-value =  0,457). The 75% of the blocks showed ICC above 0.75, this indicating excellent interrater reliability. The content of SESC-FS was validated and could be a reliable instrument to assessing the hygienic and sanitary conditions in food service.Buscou-se elaborar, validar o conteúdo de um roteiro de avaliação das condições higiênico-sanitárias em Serviço de Alimentação (RACHS-SA) e verificar a confiabilidade interavaliadores. O instrumento baseou-se na legislação sanitária vigente, sendo submetido aos especialistas para validação do conteúdo pela Técnica Delphi. Os especialistas tinham experiência e/ou de-senvolviam pesquisas em segurança dos alimentos e vigilância sanitária e conhecimento sobre a construção de instrumentos de boas práticas. O conteúdo foi considerado validado quando houve concordância maior ou igual a 70% para classificação do item em: imprescindível, necessário e recomendável. Após a validação, o instrumento foi aplicado por 4 nutricionistas em um SA para avaliar as condições higiênico-sanitárias e verificar a confiabilidade interavaliadores utilizando o coeficiente de correlação intraclasse (CCI) a um nível de significância de 5%. A comparação da variância entre as respostas foi realizada pelo teste Kruskal-Wallis. O RACHS-SA contém 12 blocos e 159 itens. Dos itens, 58,5% foram classificados como imprescindíveis. O SA foi avaliado com condições higiênico-sanitárias parcialmente adequadas, não tendo ocorrido diferença estatisticamente significativa (valor p = 0,457) entre os avaliadores. Foi obtido CCI acima de 0,75 para 75% dos blocos, indicando excelente concordância entre os avaliadores. O RACHS-SA com o conteúdo validado atende à legislação vigente e permite a execução de uma avaliação das condições higiênico-sanitárias em serviços de alimentação.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2014-08-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/22210.3395/vd.v2n3.222Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 2 No. 3 (2014): August; 86-93Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 2 Núm. 3 (2014): Agosto; 86-93Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 2 n. 3 (2014): Agosto; 86-932317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/222/140https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/222/616Copyright (c) 2014 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMello, Aline GomesCarmo, Cleber Nascimento doLeite, Selma Gomes FerreiraMiguel, Marco Antônio LemosColares, Luciléia Granhen Tavares2023-06-27T14:57:33Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/222Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T14:57:33Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Content validation and reliability of the instrument to assessment hygienic-sanitary in food services
Elaboração, validação de conteúdo e da confiabilidade do instrumento para avaliação higiênico-sanitária de serviços de alimentação
title Content validation and reliability of the instrument to assessment hygienic-sanitary in food services
spellingShingle Content validation and reliability of the instrument to assessment hygienic-sanitary in food services
Mello, Aline Gomes
Estudos de Validação
Condições Sanitárias
Serviços de Alimentação
Confiabilidade e Validade
Validity Studies
Sanitary Conditions
Food Services
Reliability
title_short Content validation and reliability of the instrument to assessment hygienic-sanitary in food services
title_full Content validation and reliability of the instrument to assessment hygienic-sanitary in food services
title_fullStr Content validation and reliability of the instrument to assessment hygienic-sanitary in food services
title_full_unstemmed Content validation and reliability of the instrument to assessment hygienic-sanitary in food services
title_sort Content validation and reliability of the instrument to assessment hygienic-sanitary in food services
author Mello, Aline Gomes
author_facet Mello, Aline Gomes
Carmo, Cleber Nascimento do
Leite, Selma Gomes Ferreira
Miguel, Marco Antônio Lemos
Colares, Luciléia Granhen Tavares
author_role author
author2 Carmo, Cleber Nascimento do
Leite, Selma Gomes Ferreira
Miguel, Marco Antônio Lemos
Colares, Luciléia Granhen Tavares
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mello, Aline Gomes
Carmo, Cleber Nascimento do
Leite, Selma Gomes Ferreira
Miguel, Marco Antônio Lemos
Colares, Luciléia Granhen Tavares
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Estudos de Validação
Condições Sanitárias
Serviços de Alimentação
Confiabilidade e Validade
Validity Studies
Sanitary Conditions
Food Services
Reliability
topic Estudos de Validação
Condições Sanitárias
Serviços de Alimentação
Confiabilidade e Validade
Validity Studies
Sanitary Conditions
Food Services
Reliability
description It was development and content validity of the script on evaluation of the sanitary conditions in food service (SESC-FS) and also verify interrater reliability. The development of the SESC-FS was based on the current legislation of public health. The instrument was value by experts to content validity by Delphi technique. Experts were selected by experience in food safety and knowledge on development in good practice instruments. The content was validated when there was agreement among experts ≥ 70% in the classification of essential or necessary or recommended items. After content had been validated the SESC-FS was applied by 4 dietitians in a restaurant. The food service sanitary conditions were evaluated and classified as adequate, or partially adequate, or inadequate. The Kruskal-Wallis test was conducted to compare the variance between responses. The interrater reliability was analyzed by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) were used and significance level of 5% was adopted. The SESC-FS made of 12 blocks and 159 items. From those items 58.5% were classified as essential. The food service was reported with partially adequate sanitary conditions. No statistically significant difference was observed (p-value =  0,457). The 75% of the blocks showed ICC above 0.75, this indicating excellent interrater reliability. The content of SESC-FS was validated and could be a reliable instrument to assessing the hygienic and sanitary conditions in food service.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-08-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Peer-reviewed article"
"Artículo revisado por pares"
"Artigo avaliado pelos pares"
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/222
10.3395/vd.v2n3.222
url https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/222
identifier_str_mv 10.3395/vd.v2n3.222
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/222/140
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/222/616
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 2 No. 3 (2014): August; 86-93
Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 2 Núm. 3 (2014): Agosto; 86-93
Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 2 n. 3 (2014): Agosto; 86-93
2317-269X
reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
collection Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository.name.fl_str_mv Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br
_version_ 1797042043479916544