Content validation and reliability of the instrument to assessment hygienic-sanitary in food services
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
Texto Completo: | https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/222 |
Resumo: | It was development and content validity of the script on evaluation of the sanitary conditions in food service (SESC-FS) and also verify interrater reliability. The development of the SESC-FS was based on the current legislation of public health. The instrument was value by experts to content validity by Delphi technique. Experts were selected by experience in food safety and knowledge on development in good practice instruments. The content was validated when there was agreement among experts ≥ 70% in the classification of essential or necessary or recommended items. After content had been validated the SESC-FS was applied by 4 dietitians in a restaurant. The food service sanitary conditions were evaluated and classified as adequate, or partially adequate, or inadequate. The Kruskal-Wallis test was conducted to compare the variance between responses. The interrater reliability was analyzed by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) were used and significance level of 5% was adopted. The SESC-FS made of 12 blocks and 159 items. From those items 58.5% were classified as essential. The food service was reported with partially adequate sanitary conditions. No statistically significant difference was observed (p-value = 0,457). The 75% of the blocks showed ICC above 0.75, this indicating excellent interrater reliability. The content of SESC-FS was validated and could be a reliable instrument to assessing the hygienic and sanitary conditions in food service. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-9_2101dbeb95ce76f68c68978982b4e709 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/222 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-9 |
network_name_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Content validation and reliability of the instrument to assessment hygienic-sanitary in food servicesElaboração, validação de conteúdo e da confiabilidade do instrumento para avaliação higiênico-sanitária de serviços de alimentaçãoEstudos de ValidaçãoCondições SanitáriasServiços de AlimentaçãoConfiabilidade e ValidadeValidity StudiesSanitary ConditionsFood ServicesReliabilityIt was development and content validity of the script on evaluation of the sanitary conditions in food service (SESC-FS) and also verify interrater reliability. The development of the SESC-FS was based on the current legislation of public health. The instrument was value by experts to content validity by Delphi technique. Experts were selected by experience in food safety and knowledge on development in good practice instruments. The content was validated when there was agreement among experts ≥ 70% in the classification of essential or necessary or recommended items. After content had been validated the SESC-FS was applied by 4 dietitians in a restaurant. The food service sanitary conditions were evaluated and classified as adequate, or partially adequate, or inadequate. The Kruskal-Wallis test was conducted to compare the variance between responses. The interrater reliability was analyzed by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) were used and significance level of 5% was adopted. The SESC-FS made of 12 blocks and 159 items. From those items 58.5% were classified as essential. The food service was reported with partially adequate sanitary conditions. No statistically significant difference was observed (p-value = 0,457). The 75% of the blocks showed ICC above 0.75, this indicating excellent interrater reliability. The content of SESC-FS was validated and could be a reliable instrument to assessing the hygienic and sanitary conditions in food service.Buscou-se elaborar, validar o conteúdo de um roteiro de avaliação das condições higiênico-sanitárias em Serviço de Alimentação (RACHS-SA) e verificar a confiabilidade interavaliadores. O instrumento baseou-se na legislação sanitária vigente, sendo submetido aos especialistas para validação do conteúdo pela Técnica Delphi. Os especialistas tinham experiência e/ou de-senvolviam pesquisas em segurança dos alimentos e vigilância sanitária e conhecimento sobre a construção de instrumentos de boas práticas. O conteúdo foi considerado validado quando houve concordância maior ou igual a 70% para classificação do item em: imprescindível, necessário e recomendável. Após a validação, o instrumento foi aplicado por 4 nutricionistas em um SA para avaliar as condições higiênico-sanitárias e verificar a confiabilidade interavaliadores utilizando o coeficiente de correlação intraclasse (CCI) a um nível de significância de 5%. A comparação da variância entre as respostas foi realizada pelo teste Kruskal-Wallis. O RACHS-SA contém 12 blocos e 159 itens. Dos itens, 58,5% foram classificados como imprescindíveis. O SA foi avaliado com condições higiênico-sanitárias parcialmente adequadas, não tendo ocorrido diferença estatisticamente significativa (valor p = 0,457) entre os avaliadores. Foi obtido CCI acima de 0,75 para 75% dos blocos, indicando excelente concordância entre os avaliadores. O RACHS-SA com o conteúdo validado atende à legislação vigente e permite a execução de uma avaliação das condições higiênico-sanitárias em serviços de alimentação.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2014-08-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/22210.3395/vd.v2n3.222Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 2 No. 3 (2014): August; 86-93Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 2 Núm. 3 (2014): Agosto; 86-93Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 2 n. 3 (2014): Agosto; 86-932317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/222/140https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/222/616Copyright (c) 2014 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMello, Aline GomesCarmo, Cleber Nascimento doLeite, Selma Gomes FerreiraMiguel, Marco Antônio LemosColares, Luciléia Granhen Tavares2023-06-27T14:57:33Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/222Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T14:57:33Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Content validation and reliability of the instrument to assessment hygienic-sanitary in food services Elaboração, validação de conteúdo e da confiabilidade do instrumento para avaliação higiênico-sanitária de serviços de alimentação |
title |
Content validation and reliability of the instrument to assessment hygienic-sanitary in food services |
spellingShingle |
Content validation and reliability of the instrument to assessment hygienic-sanitary in food services Mello, Aline Gomes Estudos de Validação Condições Sanitárias Serviços de Alimentação Confiabilidade e Validade Validity Studies Sanitary Conditions Food Services Reliability |
title_short |
Content validation and reliability of the instrument to assessment hygienic-sanitary in food services |
title_full |
Content validation and reliability of the instrument to assessment hygienic-sanitary in food services |
title_fullStr |
Content validation and reliability of the instrument to assessment hygienic-sanitary in food services |
title_full_unstemmed |
Content validation and reliability of the instrument to assessment hygienic-sanitary in food services |
title_sort |
Content validation and reliability of the instrument to assessment hygienic-sanitary in food services |
author |
Mello, Aline Gomes |
author_facet |
Mello, Aline Gomes Carmo, Cleber Nascimento do Leite, Selma Gomes Ferreira Miguel, Marco Antônio Lemos Colares, Luciléia Granhen Tavares |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Carmo, Cleber Nascimento do Leite, Selma Gomes Ferreira Miguel, Marco Antônio Lemos Colares, Luciléia Granhen Tavares |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mello, Aline Gomes Carmo, Cleber Nascimento do Leite, Selma Gomes Ferreira Miguel, Marco Antônio Lemos Colares, Luciléia Granhen Tavares |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Estudos de Validação Condições Sanitárias Serviços de Alimentação Confiabilidade e Validade Validity Studies Sanitary Conditions Food Services Reliability |
topic |
Estudos de Validação Condições Sanitárias Serviços de Alimentação Confiabilidade e Validade Validity Studies Sanitary Conditions Food Services Reliability |
description |
It was development and content validity of the script on evaluation of the sanitary conditions in food service (SESC-FS) and also verify interrater reliability. The development of the SESC-FS was based on the current legislation of public health. The instrument was value by experts to content validity by Delphi technique. Experts were selected by experience in food safety and knowledge on development in good practice instruments. The content was validated when there was agreement among experts ≥ 70% in the classification of essential or necessary or recommended items. After content had been validated the SESC-FS was applied by 4 dietitians in a restaurant. The food service sanitary conditions were evaluated and classified as adequate, or partially adequate, or inadequate. The Kruskal-Wallis test was conducted to compare the variance between responses. The interrater reliability was analyzed by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) were used and significance level of 5% was adopted. The SESC-FS made of 12 blocks and 159 items. From those items 58.5% were classified as essential. The food service was reported with partially adequate sanitary conditions. No statistically significant difference was observed (p-value = 0,457). The 75% of the blocks showed ICC above 0.75, this indicating excellent interrater reliability. The content of SESC-FS was validated and could be a reliable instrument to assessing the hygienic and sanitary conditions in food service. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-08-04 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Peer-reviewed article" "Artículo revisado por pares" "Artigo avaliado pelos pares" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/222 10.3395/vd.v2n3.222 |
url |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/222 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.3395/vd.v2n3.222 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/222/140 https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/222/616 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 2 No. 3 (2014): August; 86-93 Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 2 Núm. 3 (2014): Agosto; 86-93 Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 2 n. 3 (2014): Agosto; 86-93 2317-269X reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
collection |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1797042043479916544 |