Health surveillance actions in community pharmacies: Analysis of a national consultation
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
Texto Completo: | https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1972 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Law No. 13.021, August 8, 2014, renewed the concept of pharmacy, driving actions of the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa) to update RDC No. 44, August 17, 2009, such as conducting a consultation directed to the National Health Surveillance System on the resolution. Objective: To identify health surveillance actions related to health services in community pharmacies. Methods: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study carried out with secondary data from the consultation addressed to municipal Health Surveys (Visa) promoted in 2019 by Anvisa. The responses of the 349 respondents were organized in the blocks ‘General Considerations’, ‘Structure’, ‘Process and Monitoring’ and categorized according to the question format (open or closed) and content, using health assessment parameters. Results: The sharing of the dispensing location with other healthcare activities reflected a health risk regarding structure. Waste management was the most cited process, surpassing those related to pharmaceutical assistance. As for monitoring, the document named Statement on Pharmaceutical Care proved to be a good instrument for recording the activities performed, while notifcations of adverse events and technical complaints did not appear as a routine. The decentralization in Visa actions is well established, but has evolved unevenly for regulated products and health activities, so that the RDC No. 44 of 2009 proved to be useful, but outdated in the impacting aspects to health services. Conclusions: The delimitation of health activities in pharmacies is a challenge for health surveillance, either by the adjustment of sanitary regulation, either by the technologies of products and services that are updated faster than the analysis of the risks involved in the its exposure to the population. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-9_48ff519eaafea38cfaa2797cb089e1c9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1972 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-9 |
network_name_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Health surveillance actions in community pharmacies: Analysis of a national consultationAcciones de vigilancia sanitaria en las farmacias comunitarias: análisis de una consulta nacionalAções da vigilância sanitária em farmácias comunitárias: análise de uma consulta nacional Health Surveillance; Community Pharmacy; Health Services; RDC No. 44/2009Vigilância Sanitária; Farmácia Comunitária; Serviços de Saúde; RDC nº 44/2009Vigilância sanitária em farmácias comunitárias brasileirasIntroduction: Law No. 13.021, August 8, 2014, renewed the concept of pharmacy, driving actions of the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa) to update RDC No. 44, August 17, 2009, such as conducting a consultation directed to the National Health Surveillance System on the resolution. Objective: To identify health surveillance actions related to health services in community pharmacies. Methods: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study carried out with secondary data from the consultation addressed to municipal Health Surveys (Visa) promoted in 2019 by Anvisa. The responses of the 349 respondents were organized in the blocks ‘General Considerations’, ‘Structure’, ‘Process and Monitoring’ and categorized according to the question format (open or closed) and content, using health assessment parameters. Results: The sharing of the dispensing location with other healthcare activities reflected a health risk regarding structure. Waste management was the most cited process, surpassing those related to pharmaceutical assistance. As for monitoring, the document named Statement on Pharmaceutical Care proved to be a good instrument for recording the activities performed, while notifcations of adverse events and technical complaints did not appear as a routine. The decentralization in Visa actions is well established, but has evolved unevenly for regulated products and health activities, so that the RDC No. 44 of 2009 proved to be useful, but outdated in the impacting aspects to health services. Conclusions: The delimitation of health activities in pharmacies is a challenge for health surveillance, either by the adjustment of sanitary regulation, either by the technologies of products and services that are updated faster than the analysis of the risks involved in the its exposure to the population. Introdução: A Lei nº 13.021, de 8 de agosto de 2014, renovou o conceito de farmácia, impulsionando ações da Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (Anvisa) para a atualização da RDC n° 44, de 17 de agosto de 2009, como a realização de uma consulta dirigida ao Sistema Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária sobre a resolução. Objetivo: Identifcar ações de vigilância sanitária relacionadas aos serviços de saúde em farmácias comunitárias. Método: Trata-se de um estudo transversal descritivo realizado com dados secundários da consulta dirigida às Vigilâncias Sanitárias (Visa) municipais promovida em 2019 pela Anvisa. As respostas das 349 respondentes foram organizadas nos blocos “Considerações Gerais”, “Estrutura”, “Processo e Monitoramento” e categorizados conforme o formato de pergunta (aberta ou fechada) e o conteúdo, utilizando-se parâmetros de avaliação em saúde. Resultados: O compartilhamento do local da dispensação com outras atividades de saúde refletiu um risco sanitário quanto a estrutura. O gerenciamento dos resíduos foi o processo mais citado, superando aqueles relacionados à assistência farmacêutica. Quanto ao monitoramento, a Declaração de Serviços Farmacêuticos mostrou-se um bom instrumento para o registro das atividades realizadas, enquanto notifcações de eventos adversos e queixas técnicas não apareceram como rotineiros. A descentralização nas ações de Visa está bem estabelecida, mas evoluiu de forma desigual para produtos regulados e atividades de saúde, de forma que a RDC n° 44 de 2009 mostrou-se útil, mas desatualizada nos aspectos impactantes aos serviços de saúde. Conclusões: A delimitação de atividades de saúde em farmácias é um desafo para a vigilância sanitária, seja pelo ajuste do regulamento sanitário, seja pelas tecnologias de produtos e serviços que são atualizadas mais rapidamente do que a análise dos riscos envolvidos na sua exposição à população.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2022-02-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/197210.22239/2317-269X.01972Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2022): February; 25-33Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 10 Núm. 1 (2022): Febrero ; 25-33Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 10 n. 1 (2022): Fevereiro; 25-332317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1972/1386https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1972/1627Copyright (c) 2022 Vigilancia Sanitaria em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Almeida Jubé, TatianaMaia Barreto, Jorge Otávio2024-03-13T13:50:45Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1972Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2024-03-13T13:50:45Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Health surveillance actions in community pharmacies: Analysis of a national consultation Acciones de vigilancia sanitaria en las farmacias comunitarias: análisis de una consulta nacional Ações da vigilância sanitária em farmácias comunitárias: análise de uma consulta nacional |
title |
Health surveillance actions in community pharmacies: Analysis of a national consultation |
spellingShingle |
Health surveillance actions in community pharmacies: Analysis of a national consultation de Almeida Jubé, Tatiana Health Surveillance; Community Pharmacy; Health Services; RDC No. 44/2009 Vigilância Sanitária; Farmácia Comunitária; Serviços de Saúde; RDC nº 44/2009 Vigilância sanitária em farmácias comunitárias brasileiras |
title_short |
Health surveillance actions in community pharmacies: Analysis of a national consultation |
title_full |
Health surveillance actions in community pharmacies: Analysis of a national consultation |
title_fullStr |
Health surveillance actions in community pharmacies: Analysis of a national consultation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Health surveillance actions in community pharmacies: Analysis of a national consultation |
title_sort |
Health surveillance actions in community pharmacies: Analysis of a national consultation |
author |
de Almeida Jubé, Tatiana |
author_facet |
de Almeida Jubé, Tatiana Maia Barreto, Jorge Otávio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Maia Barreto, Jorge Otávio |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
de Almeida Jubé, Tatiana Maia Barreto, Jorge Otávio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Health Surveillance; Community Pharmacy; Health Services; RDC No. 44/2009 Vigilância Sanitária; Farmácia Comunitária; Serviços de Saúde; RDC nº 44/2009 Vigilância sanitária em farmácias comunitárias brasileiras |
topic |
Health Surveillance; Community Pharmacy; Health Services; RDC No. 44/2009 Vigilância Sanitária; Farmácia Comunitária; Serviços de Saúde; RDC nº 44/2009 Vigilância sanitária em farmácias comunitárias brasileiras |
description |
Introduction: Law No. 13.021, August 8, 2014, renewed the concept of pharmacy, driving actions of the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa) to update RDC No. 44, August 17, 2009, such as conducting a consultation directed to the National Health Surveillance System on the resolution. Objective: To identify health surveillance actions related to health services in community pharmacies. Methods: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study carried out with secondary data from the consultation addressed to municipal Health Surveys (Visa) promoted in 2019 by Anvisa. The responses of the 349 respondents were organized in the blocks ‘General Considerations’, ‘Structure’, ‘Process and Monitoring’ and categorized according to the question format (open or closed) and content, using health assessment parameters. Results: The sharing of the dispensing location with other healthcare activities reflected a health risk regarding structure. Waste management was the most cited process, surpassing those related to pharmaceutical assistance. As for monitoring, the document named Statement on Pharmaceutical Care proved to be a good instrument for recording the activities performed, while notifcations of adverse events and technical complaints did not appear as a routine. The decentralization in Visa actions is well established, but has evolved unevenly for regulated products and health activities, so that the RDC No. 44 of 2009 proved to be useful, but outdated in the impacting aspects to health services. Conclusions: The delimitation of health activities in pharmacies is a challenge for health surveillance, either by the adjustment of sanitary regulation, either by the technologies of products and services that are updated faster than the analysis of the risks involved in the its exposure to the population. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-02-28 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Peer-reviewed article" "Artículo revisado por pares" "Artigo avaliado pelos pares" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1972 10.22239/2317-269X.01972 |
url |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1972 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22239/2317-269X.01972 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1972/1386 https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1972/1627 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Vigilancia Sanitaria em Debate https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Vigilancia Sanitaria em Debate https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2022): February; 25-33 Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 10 Núm. 1 (2022): Febrero ; 25-33 Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 10 n. 1 (2022): Fevereiro; 25-33 2317-269X reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
collection |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1797042046588944384 |