Health surveillance actions in community pharmacies: Analysis of a national consultation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: de Almeida Jubé, Tatiana
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Maia Barreto, Jorge Otávio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
Texto Completo: https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1972
Resumo: Introduction: Law No. 13.021, August 8, 2014,  renewed the concept of  pharmacy, driving actions of the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa) to update RDC No. 44, August 17, 2009, such as conducting a consultation directed to the National Health Surveillance System on the resolution. Objective: To identify health surveillance actions related to health services in community  pharmacies. Methods: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study  carried out with secondary data from the consultation addressed to municipal Health Surveys (Visa) promoted in 2019 by Anvisa. The responses of the 349 respondents were organized in the blocks ‘General Considerations’, ‘Structure’, ‘Process and Monitoring’ and categorized according to the question format (open or closed) and content, using health assessment parameters.  Results: The sharing of the dispensing location with other healthcare activities reflected a health risk regarding structure. Waste  management was the most cited process, surpassing those related to pharmaceutical assistance. As for monitoring, the document named Statement on Pharmaceutical Care proved to be a good  instrument for recording the activities performed, while notifcations of adverse events and technical complaints did not appear as a routine. The  decentralization in Visa actions is well established, but has evolved unevenly for regulated products and health activities, so that the RDC No. 44 of 2009 proved to be useful, but outdated in the impacting aspects to health services. Conclusions: The delimitation of health activities in pharmacies is a challenge for health surveillance, either by the adjustment of sanitary regulation, either by the technologies of products and services that are updated faster than the analysis of the risks involved in the its exposure to the population.
id FIOCRUZ-9_48ff519eaafea38cfaa2797cb089e1c9
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1972
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-9
network_name_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository_id_str
spelling Health surveillance actions in community pharmacies: Analysis of a national consultationAcciones de vigilancia sanitaria en las farmacias comunitarias: análisis de una consulta nacionalAções da vigilância sanitária em farmácias comunitárias: análise de uma consulta nacional Health Surveillance; Community Pharmacy; Health Services; RDC No. 44/2009Vigilância Sanitária; Farmácia Comunitária; Serviços de Saúde; RDC nº 44/2009Vigilância sanitária em farmácias comunitárias brasileirasIntroduction: Law No. 13.021, August 8, 2014,  renewed the concept of  pharmacy, driving actions of the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa) to update RDC No. 44, August 17, 2009, such as conducting a consultation directed to the National Health Surveillance System on the resolution. Objective: To identify health surveillance actions related to health services in community  pharmacies. Methods: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study  carried out with secondary data from the consultation addressed to municipal Health Surveys (Visa) promoted in 2019 by Anvisa. The responses of the 349 respondents were organized in the blocks ‘General Considerations’, ‘Structure’, ‘Process and Monitoring’ and categorized according to the question format (open or closed) and content, using health assessment parameters.  Results: The sharing of the dispensing location with other healthcare activities reflected a health risk regarding structure. Waste  management was the most cited process, surpassing those related to pharmaceutical assistance. As for monitoring, the document named Statement on Pharmaceutical Care proved to be a good  instrument for recording the activities performed, while notifcations of adverse events and technical complaints did not appear as a routine. The  decentralization in Visa actions is well established, but has evolved unevenly for regulated products and health activities, so that the RDC No. 44 of 2009 proved to be useful, but outdated in the impacting aspects to health services. Conclusions: The delimitation of health activities in pharmacies is a challenge for health surveillance, either by the adjustment of sanitary regulation, either by the technologies of products and services that are updated faster than the analysis of the risks involved in the its exposure to the population. Introdução: A Lei nº 13.021, de 8 de agosto de 2014, renovou o conceito de farmácia, impulsionando ações da Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (Anvisa) para a atualização da RDC n° 44, de 17 de agosto de 2009, como a realização de uma consulta dirigida ao Sistema Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária sobre a resolução. Objetivo: Identifcar ações de vigilância sanitária relacionadas aos serviços de saúde em farmácias comunitárias. Método: Trata-se de um estudo transversal descritivo realizado com dados secundários da consulta dirigida às Vigilâncias Sanitárias (Visa) municipais promovida em 2019 pela Anvisa. As respostas das 349 respondentes foram organizadas nos blocos “Considerações Gerais”, “Estrutura”, “Processo e Monitoramento” e categorizados conforme o formato de pergunta (aberta ou fechada) e o conteúdo, utilizando-se parâmetros de avaliação em saúde. Resultados: O compartilhamento do local da dispensação com outras atividades de saúde refletiu um risco sanitário quanto a estrutura. O gerenciamento dos resíduos foi o processo mais citado, superando aqueles relacionados à assistência farmacêutica. Quanto ao monitoramento, a Declaração de Serviços Farmacêuticos mostrou-se um bom instrumento para o registro das atividades realizadas, enquanto notifcações de eventos adversos e queixas técnicas não apareceram como rotineiros. A descentralização nas ações de Visa está bem estabelecida, mas evoluiu de forma desigual para produtos regulados e atividades de saúde, de forma que a RDC n° 44 de 2009 mostrou-se útil, mas desatualizada nos aspectos impactantes aos serviços de saúde. Conclusões: A delimitação de atividades de saúde em farmácias é um desafo para a vigilância sanitária, seja pelo ajuste do regulamento sanitário, seja pelas tecnologias de produtos e serviços que são atualizadas mais rapidamente do que a análise dos riscos envolvidos na sua exposição à população.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2022-02-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/197210.22239/2317-269X.01972Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2022): February; 25-33Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 10 Núm. 1 (2022): Febrero ; 25-33Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 10 n. 1 (2022): Fevereiro; 25-332317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1972/1386https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1972/1627Copyright (c) 2022 Vigilancia Sanitaria em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Almeida Jubé, TatianaMaia Barreto, Jorge Otávio2024-03-13T13:50:45Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1972Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2024-03-13T13:50:45Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Health surveillance actions in community pharmacies: Analysis of a national consultation
Acciones de vigilancia sanitaria en las farmacias comunitarias: análisis de una consulta nacional
Ações da vigilância sanitária em farmácias comunitárias: análise de uma consulta nacional
title Health surveillance actions in community pharmacies: Analysis of a national consultation
spellingShingle Health surveillance actions in community pharmacies: Analysis of a national consultation
de Almeida Jubé, Tatiana
Health Surveillance; Community Pharmacy; Health Services; RDC No. 44/2009
Vigilância Sanitária; Farmácia Comunitária; Serviços de Saúde; RDC nº 44/2009
Vigilância sanitária em farmácias comunitárias brasileiras
title_short Health surveillance actions in community pharmacies: Analysis of a national consultation
title_full Health surveillance actions in community pharmacies: Analysis of a national consultation
title_fullStr Health surveillance actions in community pharmacies: Analysis of a national consultation
title_full_unstemmed Health surveillance actions in community pharmacies: Analysis of a national consultation
title_sort Health surveillance actions in community pharmacies: Analysis of a national consultation
author de Almeida Jubé, Tatiana
author_facet de Almeida Jubé, Tatiana
Maia Barreto, Jorge Otávio
author_role author
author2 Maia Barreto, Jorge Otávio
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv de Almeida Jubé, Tatiana
Maia Barreto, Jorge Otávio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Health Surveillance; Community Pharmacy; Health Services; RDC No. 44/2009
Vigilância Sanitária; Farmácia Comunitária; Serviços de Saúde; RDC nº 44/2009
Vigilância sanitária em farmácias comunitárias brasileiras
topic Health Surveillance; Community Pharmacy; Health Services; RDC No. 44/2009
Vigilância Sanitária; Farmácia Comunitária; Serviços de Saúde; RDC nº 44/2009
Vigilância sanitária em farmácias comunitárias brasileiras
description Introduction: Law No. 13.021, August 8, 2014,  renewed the concept of  pharmacy, driving actions of the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa) to update RDC No. 44, August 17, 2009, such as conducting a consultation directed to the National Health Surveillance System on the resolution. Objective: To identify health surveillance actions related to health services in community  pharmacies. Methods: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study  carried out with secondary data from the consultation addressed to municipal Health Surveys (Visa) promoted in 2019 by Anvisa. The responses of the 349 respondents were organized in the blocks ‘General Considerations’, ‘Structure’, ‘Process and Monitoring’ and categorized according to the question format (open or closed) and content, using health assessment parameters.  Results: The sharing of the dispensing location with other healthcare activities reflected a health risk regarding structure. Waste  management was the most cited process, surpassing those related to pharmaceutical assistance. As for monitoring, the document named Statement on Pharmaceutical Care proved to be a good  instrument for recording the activities performed, while notifcations of adverse events and technical complaints did not appear as a routine. The  decentralization in Visa actions is well established, but has evolved unevenly for regulated products and health activities, so that the RDC No. 44 of 2009 proved to be useful, but outdated in the impacting aspects to health services. Conclusions: The delimitation of health activities in pharmacies is a challenge for health surveillance, either by the adjustment of sanitary regulation, either by the technologies of products and services that are updated faster than the analysis of the risks involved in the its exposure to the population.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-02-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Peer-reviewed article"
"Artículo revisado por pares"
"Artigo avaliado pelos pares"
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1972
10.22239/2317-269X.01972
url https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1972
identifier_str_mv 10.22239/2317-269X.01972
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1972/1386
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1972/1627
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Vigilancia Sanitaria em Debate
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Vigilancia Sanitaria em Debate
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2022): February; 25-33
Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 10 Núm. 1 (2022): Febrero ; 25-33
Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 10 n. 1 (2022): Fevereiro; 25-33
2317-269X
reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
collection Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository.name.fl_str_mv Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br
_version_ 1797042046588944384