The regulatory status of herbal medicines in Brazil: A comparison between the legislation and the pharmaceutical market (1995–2015)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
Texto Completo: | https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/806 |
Resumo: | Until the mid-1990s there was no specific regulations for herbal medicines in Brazil, leading to the disorderly growth of the pharmaceutical industry that occupied the drug production within a category considered hitherto low risk. However, this scenario has changed drastically in the last 20 years, due to the publication of 5 regulatory frameworks that regulated the herbal registration in safety aspects, efficacy and quality, and significantly improved the product profile on the market. Over the years, the rules expanded the number of species for simplified registration improving the ability to obtain the marketing authorization based on the tradition of use. But in a contradictory way, these rules maintained, and even increased, accuracy in quality control, which has become a complicating factor, along with the rules of good manufacturing practices for herbal medicines registration in general, including those originating from native species and herbal compounds. Therefore, the development of regulatory standards resulted in a maturing of the Brazilian herbal medicine market, but some negative aspects are worth mentioning, like the small number of native species registered as herbal medicines. In this sense, it is expected a better alignment of government and the productive sector, considering the government programs geared to medicinal plants and herbal medicines and the new Biodiversity Law, so Brazil can advance the availability of herbal medicines with quality, efficacy and safety. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-9_83f80c45812498bfd93745b28c0dc58b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/806 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-9 |
network_name_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The regulatory status of herbal medicines in Brazil: A comparison between the legislation and the pharmaceutical market (1995–2015)O estado regulatório dos fitoterápicos no Brasil: Um paralelo entre a legislação e o mercado farmacêutico (1995–2015)Legislação de MedicamentosRegulamentação GovernamentalFitoterápicosPlantas MedicinaisMercado FarmacêuticoDrug LawsGovernment RegulationHerbal MedicineMedicinal PlantsPharmaceutical MarketUntil the mid-1990s there was no specific regulations for herbal medicines in Brazil, leading to the disorderly growth of the pharmaceutical industry that occupied the drug production within a category considered hitherto low risk. However, this scenario has changed drastically in the last 20 years, due to the publication of 5 regulatory frameworks that regulated the herbal registration in safety aspects, efficacy and quality, and significantly improved the product profile on the market. Over the years, the rules expanded the number of species for simplified registration improving the ability to obtain the marketing authorization based on the tradition of use. But in a contradictory way, these rules maintained, and even increased, accuracy in quality control, which has become a complicating factor, along with the rules of good manufacturing practices for herbal medicines registration in general, including those originating from native species and herbal compounds. Therefore, the development of regulatory standards resulted in a maturing of the Brazilian herbal medicine market, but some negative aspects are worth mentioning, like the small number of native species registered as herbal medicines. In this sense, it is expected a better alignment of government and the productive sector, considering the government programs geared to medicinal plants and herbal medicines and the new Biodiversity Law, so Brazil can advance the availability of herbal medicines with quality, efficacy and safety.Até 1995, inexistia regulamentação específica para fitoterápicos no Brasil, propiciando o crescimento desordenado de parte do setor farmacêutico que se ocupava da produção de medicamentos dentro de uma categoria considerada, até então, de baixo risco. Contudo, esse cenário mudou drasticamente em 20 anos com a publicação de cinco marcos regulatórios que regularam o registro fitoterápico nos aspectos segurança, eficácia e qualidade, e melhoraram sensivelmente o perfil de produtos disponíveis no mercado. Ao longo dos anos, as normas ampliaram o número de espécies para registro simplificado, melhorando a possibilidade de registro com base na tradição de uso. Mas, de modo contraditório, mantiveram, e até mesmo ampliaram, o rigor no controle de qualidade, o que se tornou um fator complicador, juntamente com as regras de boas práticas de fabricação, para registro de fitoterápicos em geral, inclusive aos oriundos de espécies nativas e fitoterápicos compostos. Portanto, a evolução das normas regulatórias resultou em um amadurecimento do mercado fitoterápico brasileiro, mas alguns aspectos desfavoráveis merecem destaque, como o pequeno número de espécies nativas registradas como fitoterápicos. Nesse sentido, espera-se um maior alinhamento do setor governamental e produtivo, considerando os programas governamentais voltados às plantas medicinais e fitoterápicos e a nova Lei da Biodiversidade, para que o Brasil possa avançar na disponibilidade de fitoterápicos com qualidade, eficácia e segurança.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2016-11-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/80610.22239/2317-269X.00806Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 4 No. 4 (2016): November - Diversidades Culturais e Riscos Sanitários; 139-148Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 4 Núm. 4 (2016): Noviembre - Diversidades Culturais e Riscos Sanitários; 139-148Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 4 n. 4 (2016): Novembro - Diversidades Culturais e Riscos Sanitários; 139-1482317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/806/351Copyright (c) 2016 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Danilo Ribeiro deOliveira, Ana Claudia Dias deMarques, Luis Carlos2023-06-27T15:18:27Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/806Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:18:27Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The regulatory status of herbal medicines in Brazil: A comparison between the legislation and the pharmaceutical market (1995–2015) O estado regulatório dos fitoterápicos no Brasil: Um paralelo entre a legislação e o mercado farmacêutico (1995–2015) |
title |
The regulatory status of herbal medicines in Brazil: A comparison between the legislation and the pharmaceutical market (1995–2015) |
spellingShingle |
The regulatory status of herbal medicines in Brazil: A comparison between the legislation and the pharmaceutical market (1995–2015) Oliveira, Danilo Ribeiro de Legislação de Medicamentos Regulamentação Governamental Fitoterápicos Plantas Medicinais Mercado Farmacêutico Drug Laws Government Regulation Herbal Medicine Medicinal Plants Pharmaceutical Market |
title_short |
The regulatory status of herbal medicines in Brazil: A comparison between the legislation and the pharmaceutical market (1995–2015) |
title_full |
The regulatory status of herbal medicines in Brazil: A comparison between the legislation and the pharmaceutical market (1995–2015) |
title_fullStr |
The regulatory status of herbal medicines in Brazil: A comparison between the legislation and the pharmaceutical market (1995–2015) |
title_full_unstemmed |
The regulatory status of herbal medicines in Brazil: A comparison between the legislation and the pharmaceutical market (1995–2015) |
title_sort |
The regulatory status of herbal medicines in Brazil: A comparison between the legislation and the pharmaceutical market (1995–2015) |
author |
Oliveira, Danilo Ribeiro de |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Danilo Ribeiro de Oliveira, Ana Claudia Dias de Marques, Luis Carlos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Oliveira, Ana Claudia Dias de Marques, Luis Carlos |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Danilo Ribeiro de Oliveira, Ana Claudia Dias de Marques, Luis Carlos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Legislação de Medicamentos Regulamentação Governamental Fitoterápicos Plantas Medicinais Mercado Farmacêutico Drug Laws Government Regulation Herbal Medicine Medicinal Plants Pharmaceutical Market |
topic |
Legislação de Medicamentos Regulamentação Governamental Fitoterápicos Plantas Medicinais Mercado Farmacêutico Drug Laws Government Regulation Herbal Medicine Medicinal Plants Pharmaceutical Market |
description |
Until the mid-1990s there was no specific regulations for herbal medicines in Brazil, leading to the disorderly growth of the pharmaceutical industry that occupied the drug production within a category considered hitherto low risk. However, this scenario has changed drastically in the last 20 years, due to the publication of 5 regulatory frameworks that regulated the herbal registration in safety aspects, efficacy and quality, and significantly improved the product profile on the market. Over the years, the rules expanded the number of species for simplified registration improving the ability to obtain the marketing authorization based on the tradition of use. But in a contradictory way, these rules maintained, and even increased, accuracy in quality control, which has become a complicating factor, along with the rules of good manufacturing practices for herbal medicines registration in general, including those originating from native species and herbal compounds. Therefore, the development of regulatory standards resulted in a maturing of the Brazilian herbal medicine market, but some negative aspects are worth mentioning, like the small number of native species registered as herbal medicines. In this sense, it is expected a better alignment of government and the productive sector, considering the government programs geared to medicinal plants and herbal medicines and the new Biodiversity Law, so Brazil can advance the availability of herbal medicines with quality, efficacy and safety. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-11-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Peer-reviewed article" "Artículo revisado por pares" "Artigo avaliado pelos pares" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/806 10.22239/2317-269X.00806 |
url |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/806 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22239/2317-269X.00806 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/806/351 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 4 No. 4 (2016): November - Diversidades Culturais e Riscos Sanitários; 139-148 Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 4 Núm. 4 (2016): Noviembre - Diversidades Culturais e Riscos Sanitários; 139-148 Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 4 n. 4 (2016): Novembro - Diversidades Culturais e Riscos Sanitários; 139-148 2317-269X reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
collection |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1797042044731916288 |