The regulatory status of herbal medicines in Brazil: A comparison between the legislation and the pharmaceutical market (1995–2015)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Danilo Ribeiro de
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Oliveira, Ana Claudia Dias de, Marques, Luis Carlos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
Texto Completo: https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/806
Resumo: Until the mid-1990s there was no specific regulations for herbal medicines in Brazil, leading to the disorderly growth of the pharmaceutical industry that occupied the drug production within a category considered hitherto low risk. However, this scenario has changed drastically in the last 20 years, due to the publication of 5 regulatory frameworks that regulated the herbal registration in safety aspects, efficacy and quality, and significantly improved the product profile on the market. Over the years, the rules expanded the number of species for simplified registration improving the ability to obtain the marketing authorization based on the tradition of use. But in a contradictory way, these rules maintained, and even increased, accuracy in quality control, which has become a complicating factor, along with the rules of good manufacturing practices for herbal medicines registration in general, including those originating from native species and herbal compounds. Therefore, the development of regulatory standards resulted in a maturing of the Brazilian herbal medicine market, but some negative aspects are worth mentioning, like the small number of native species registered as herbal medicines. In this sense, it is expected a better alignment of government and the productive sector, considering the government programs geared to medicinal plants and herbal medicines and the new Biodiversity Law, so Brazil can advance the availability of herbal medicines with quality, efficacy and safety.
id FIOCRUZ-9_83f80c45812498bfd93745b28c0dc58b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/806
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-9
network_name_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository_id_str
spelling The regulatory status of herbal medicines in Brazil: A comparison between the legislation and the pharmaceutical market (1995–2015)O estado regulatório dos fitoterápicos no Brasil: Um paralelo entre a legislação e o mercado farmacêutico (1995–2015)Legislação de MedicamentosRegulamentação GovernamentalFitoterápicosPlantas MedicinaisMercado FarmacêuticoDrug LawsGovernment RegulationHerbal MedicineMedicinal PlantsPharmaceutical MarketUntil the mid-1990s there was no specific regulations for herbal medicines in Brazil, leading to the disorderly growth of the pharmaceutical industry that occupied the drug production within a category considered hitherto low risk. However, this scenario has changed drastically in the last 20 years, due to the publication of 5 regulatory frameworks that regulated the herbal registration in safety aspects, efficacy and quality, and significantly improved the product profile on the market. Over the years, the rules expanded the number of species for simplified registration improving the ability to obtain the marketing authorization based on the tradition of use. But in a contradictory way, these rules maintained, and even increased, accuracy in quality control, which has become a complicating factor, along with the rules of good manufacturing practices for herbal medicines registration in general, including those originating from native species and herbal compounds. Therefore, the development of regulatory standards resulted in a maturing of the Brazilian herbal medicine market, but some negative aspects are worth mentioning, like the small number of native species registered as herbal medicines. In this sense, it is expected a better alignment of government and the productive sector, considering the government programs geared to medicinal plants and herbal medicines and the new Biodiversity Law, so Brazil can advance the availability of herbal medicines with quality, efficacy and safety.Até 1995, inexistia regulamentação específica para fitoterápicos no Brasil, propiciando o crescimento desordenado de parte do setor farmacêutico que se ocupava da produção de medicamentos dentro de uma categoria considerada, até então, de baixo risco. Contudo, esse cenário mudou drasticamente em 20 anos com a publicação de cinco marcos regulatórios que regularam o registro fitoterápico nos aspectos segurança, eficácia e qualidade, e melhoraram sensivelmente o perfil de produtos disponíveis no mercado. Ao longo dos anos, as normas ampliaram o número de espécies para registro simplificado, melhorando a possibilidade de registro com base na tradição de uso. Mas, de modo contraditório, mantiveram, e até mesmo ampliaram, o rigor no controle de qualidade, o que se tornou um fator complicador, juntamente com as regras de boas práticas de fabricação, para registro de fitoterápicos em geral, inclusive aos oriundos de espécies nativas e fitoterápicos compostos. Portanto, a evolução das normas regulatórias resultou em um amadurecimento do mercado fitoterápico brasileiro, mas alguns aspectos desfavoráveis merecem destaque, como o pequeno número de espécies nativas registradas como fitoterápicos. Nesse sentido, espera-se um maior alinhamento do setor governamental e produtivo, considerando os programas governamentais voltados às plantas medicinais e fitoterápicos e a nova Lei da Biodiversidade, para que o Brasil possa avançar na disponibilidade de fitoterápicos com qualidade, eficácia e segurança.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2016-11-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/80610.22239/2317-269X.00806Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 4 No. 4 (2016): November - Diversidades Culturais e Riscos Sanitários; 139-148Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 4 Núm. 4 (2016): Noviembre - Diversidades Culturais e Riscos Sanitários; 139-148Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 4 n. 4 (2016): Novembro - Diversidades Culturais e Riscos Sanitários; 139-1482317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/806/351Copyright (c) 2016 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Danilo Ribeiro deOliveira, Ana Claudia Dias deMarques, Luis Carlos2023-06-27T15:18:27Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/806Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:18:27Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The regulatory status of herbal medicines in Brazil: A comparison between the legislation and the pharmaceutical market (1995–2015)
O estado regulatório dos fitoterápicos no Brasil: Um paralelo entre a legislação e o mercado farmacêutico (1995–2015)
title The regulatory status of herbal medicines in Brazil: A comparison between the legislation and the pharmaceutical market (1995–2015)
spellingShingle The regulatory status of herbal medicines in Brazil: A comparison between the legislation and the pharmaceutical market (1995–2015)
Oliveira, Danilo Ribeiro de
Legislação de Medicamentos
Regulamentação Governamental
Fitoterápicos
Plantas Medicinais
Mercado Farmacêutico
Drug Laws
Government Regulation
Herbal Medicine
Medicinal Plants
Pharmaceutical Market
title_short The regulatory status of herbal medicines in Brazil: A comparison between the legislation and the pharmaceutical market (1995–2015)
title_full The regulatory status of herbal medicines in Brazil: A comparison between the legislation and the pharmaceutical market (1995–2015)
title_fullStr The regulatory status of herbal medicines in Brazil: A comparison between the legislation and the pharmaceutical market (1995–2015)
title_full_unstemmed The regulatory status of herbal medicines in Brazil: A comparison between the legislation and the pharmaceutical market (1995–2015)
title_sort The regulatory status of herbal medicines in Brazil: A comparison between the legislation and the pharmaceutical market (1995–2015)
author Oliveira, Danilo Ribeiro de
author_facet Oliveira, Danilo Ribeiro de
Oliveira, Ana Claudia Dias de
Marques, Luis Carlos
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, Ana Claudia Dias de
Marques, Luis Carlos
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Danilo Ribeiro de
Oliveira, Ana Claudia Dias de
Marques, Luis Carlos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Legislação de Medicamentos
Regulamentação Governamental
Fitoterápicos
Plantas Medicinais
Mercado Farmacêutico
Drug Laws
Government Regulation
Herbal Medicine
Medicinal Plants
Pharmaceutical Market
topic Legislação de Medicamentos
Regulamentação Governamental
Fitoterápicos
Plantas Medicinais
Mercado Farmacêutico
Drug Laws
Government Regulation
Herbal Medicine
Medicinal Plants
Pharmaceutical Market
description Until the mid-1990s there was no specific regulations for herbal medicines in Brazil, leading to the disorderly growth of the pharmaceutical industry that occupied the drug production within a category considered hitherto low risk. However, this scenario has changed drastically in the last 20 years, due to the publication of 5 regulatory frameworks that regulated the herbal registration in safety aspects, efficacy and quality, and significantly improved the product profile on the market. Over the years, the rules expanded the number of species for simplified registration improving the ability to obtain the marketing authorization based on the tradition of use. But in a contradictory way, these rules maintained, and even increased, accuracy in quality control, which has become a complicating factor, along with the rules of good manufacturing practices for herbal medicines registration in general, including those originating from native species and herbal compounds. Therefore, the development of regulatory standards resulted in a maturing of the Brazilian herbal medicine market, but some negative aspects are worth mentioning, like the small number of native species registered as herbal medicines. In this sense, it is expected a better alignment of government and the productive sector, considering the government programs geared to medicinal plants and herbal medicines and the new Biodiversity Law, so Brazil can advance the availability of herbal medicines with quality, efficacy and safety.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-11-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Peer-reviewed article"
"Artículo revisado por pares"
"Artigo avaliado pelos pares"
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/806
10.22239/2317-269X.00806
url https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/806
identifier_str_mv 10.22239/2317-269X.00806
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/806/351
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 4 No. 4 (2016): November - Diversidades Culturais e Riscos Sanitários; 139-148
Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 4 Núm. 4 (2016): Noviembre - Diversidades Culturais e Riscos Sanitários; 139-148
Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 4 n. 4 (2016): Novembro - Diversidades Culturais e Riscos Sanitários; 139-148
2317-269X
reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
collection Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository.name.fl_str_mv Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br
_version_ 1797042044731916288