Comparison between the Brazilian Technical Regulation on Good Practices for Food Services and complementary laws in the Southern Region
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
Texto Completo: | https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/454 |
Resumo: | This study attempted to compare the sanitary regulations for food services in the Southern Region of the country, with Federal Technical Regulations. The study used a descriptive and exploratory approach with data collected between March and July 2010 and updated in August 2015. Interviews with those responsible for the food sector in the Health Surveillance Agency were recorded, transcribed, and approved for use. The interviews aided analysis and comparison of the different health regulations. The most similar regulation came from Rio Grande do Sul Secretary of Health, which established a specific regulation for the responsibilities and training of food handlers. Another similar regulation was the Ordinance design, which used a structured checklist and compliance percentage. In contrast, Santa Catarina State’s resolution, despite its checklist design, presents fewer similarities. The Health Surveillance Agency of the state of Paraná had no complementary laws, published a specific Technical Note for street food. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-9_9a591575873b54106cbe3c8ce46d82a9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/454 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-9 |
network_name_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison between the Brazilian Technical Regulation on Good Practices for Food Services and complementary laws in the Southern RegionComparativo entre o Regulamento Técnico Brasileiro de Boas Práticas para Serviços de Alimentação e as legislações complementares da Região SulSanitary InspectionGood Manufacturing PracticeRegulationsHealth LegislationHealth CodeFiscalização SanitáriaBoas Práticas de FabricaçãoRegulamentosLegislação SanitáriaCódigo SanitárioThis study attempted to compare the sanitary regulations for food services in the Southern Region of the country, with Federal Technical Regulations. The study used a descriptive and exploratory approach with data collected between March and July 2010 and updated in August 2015. Interviews with those responsible for the food sector in the Health Surveillance Agency were recorded, transcribed, and approved for use. The interviews aided analysis and comparison of the different health regulations. The most similar regulation came from Rio Grande do Sul Secretary of Health, which established a specific regulation for the responsibilities and training of food handlers. Another similar regulation was the Ordinance design, which used a structured checklist and compliance percentage. In contrast, Santa Catarina State’s resolution, despite its checklist design, presents fewer similarities. The Health Surveillance Agency of the state of Paraná had no complementary laws, published a specific Technical Note for street food.O objetivo foi traçar um comparativo das legislações sanitárias vigentes para serviços de alimentação da Região Sul do país, com o Regulamento Técnico Federal. Este estudo possui característica descritiva e exploratória, foi desenvolvido no período de março a julho de 2010, sendo atualizado em agosto de 2015. Foi realizada uma entrevista gravada com os responsáveis pelo setor de alimentos da vigilância sanitária envolvidas, e após realizou-se a transcrição e aprovação. Esta entrevista forneceu subsídio para a análise e comparação das legislações sanitárias em estudo. Pode-se constatar que a maior contribuição foi da Secretaria de Saúde do Rio Grande do Sul com uma regulamentação especifica para a formação do responsável pela manipulação de alimentos e sobre as suas responsabilidades. Também o formato da Portaria, que está estruturada como uma Lista de Verificação, podendo-se verificar o percentual de adequação. Em contrapartida, a Resolução de Santa Catarina, apesar de também estar na forma de Lista de Verificação, apresenta menos complementações. A Vigilância sanitária do estado do Paraná não apresenta legislação complementar, publicou uma Nota Técnica específica para ambulantes de alimentos.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2015-11-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfimage/jpeghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/45410.3395/2317-269x.00454Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 3 No. 4 (2015): November; 74-83Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 3 Núm. 4 (2015): Noviembre; 74-83Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 3 n. 4 (2015): Novembro; 74-832317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/454/257https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/454/683Copyright (c) 2015 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSaccol, Ana Lúcia de FreitasSilva, Maritiele Naissinger daOliveira, Ana Beatriz Almeida deHecktheuer, Luisa Helena RycheckiSilva Jr, Eneo Alves da2023-06-27T15:18:07Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/454Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:18:07Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison between the Brazilian Technical Regulation on Good Practices for Food Services and complementary laws in the Southern Region Comparativo entre o Regulamento Técnico Brasileiro de Boas Práticas para Serviços de Alimentação e as legislações complementares da Região Sul |
title |
Comparison between the Brazilian Technical Regulation on Good Practices for Food Services and complementary laws in the Southern Region |
spellingShingle |
Comparison between the Brazilian Technical Regulation on Good Practices for Food Services and complementary laws in the Southern Region Saccol, Ana Lúcia de Freitas Sanitary Inspection Good Manufacturing Practice Regulations Health Legislation Health Code Fiscalização Sanitária Boas Práticas de Fabricação Regulamentos Legislação Sanitária Código Sanitário |
title_short |
Comparison between the Brazilian Technical Regulation on Good Practices for Food Services and complementary laws in the Southern Region |
title_full |
Comparison between the Brazilian Technical Regulation on Good Practices for Food Services and complementary laws in the Southern Region |
title_fullStr |
Comparison between the Brazilian Technical Regulation on Good Practices for Food Services and complementary laws in the Southern Region |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison between the Brazilian Technical Regulation on Good Practices for Food Services and complementary laws in the Southern Region |
title_sort |
Comparison between the Brazilian Technical Regulation on Good Practices for Food Services and complementary laws in the Southern Region |
author |
Saccol, Ana Lúcia de Freitas |
author_facet |
Saccol, Ana Lúcia de Freitas Silva, Maritiele Naissinger da Oliveira, Ana Beatriz Almeida de Hecktheuer, Luisa Helena Rychecki Silva Jr, Eneo Alves da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Maritiele Naissinger da Oliveira, Ana Beatriz Almeida de Hecktheuer, Luisa Helena Rychecki Silva Jr, Eneo Alves da |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Saccol, Ana Lúcia de Freitas Silva, Maritiele Naissinger da Oliveira, Ana Beatriz Almeida de Hecktheuer, Luisa Helena Rychecki Silva Jr, Eneo Alves da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Sanitary Inspection Good Manufacturing Practice Regulations Health Legislation Health Code Fiscalização Sanitária Boas Práticas de Fabricação Regulamentos Legislação Sanitária Código Sanitário |
topic |
Sanitary Inspection Good Manufacturing Practice Regulations Health Legislation Health Code Fiscalização Sanitária Boas Práticas de Fabricação Regulamentos Legislação Sanitária Código Sanitário |
description |
This study attempted to compare the sanitary regulations for food services in the Southern Region of the country, with Federal Technical Regulations. The study used a descriptive and exploratory approach with data collected between March and July 2010 and updated in August 2015. Interviews with those responsible for the food sector in the Health Surveillance Agency were recorded, transcribed, and approved for use. The interviews aided analysis and comparison of the different health regulations. The most similar regulation came from Rio Grande do Sul Secretary of Health, which established a specific regulation for the responsibilities and training of food handlers. Another similar regulation was the Ordinance design, which used a structured checklist and compliance percentage. In contrast, Santa Catarina State’s resolution, despite its checklist design, presents fewer similarities. The Health Surveillance Agency of the state of Paraná had no complementary laws, published a specific Technical Note for street food. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-11-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Peer-reviewed article" "Artículo revisado por pares" "Artigo avaliado pelos pares" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/454 10.3395/2317-269x.00454 |
url |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/454 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.3395/2317-269x.00454 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/454/257 https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/454/683 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf image/jpeg |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 3 No. 4 (2015): November; 74-83 Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 3 Núm. 4 (2015): Noviembre; 74-83 Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 3 n. 4 (2015): Novembro; 74-83 2317-269X reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
collection |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1797042044136325120 |