Evaluation of food sodium level monitoring: a comparative analysis of goals for voluntary reduction in sodium intake in Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Martins, Ana Paula Bortoletto
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Andrade, Giovanna Calixto, Bandoni, Daniel Henrique
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
Texto Completo: https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/323
Resumo: Objective: To analyze the monitoring of sodium content in processed foods conducted by the National Agency of Sanitary Surveillance (ANVISA) and to compare the results with the goals of sodium reduction of the voluntary agreements signed between the Brazilian government and representatives of the food industry. Methods: We used data from 4 technical reports (TR) on sodium content in processed foods by ANVISA published between 2010 and 2014. We characterized the TR according to the year of data collection, state, method of analysis, and number of samples collected by food category. We described the sodium content of the categories that were monitored at least twice and compared the results with the voluntary goals. Results and Discussion: Of the monitored categories of food, only 39.6% were assessed at least twice. Among the 34 categories included in voluntary agreements, 53% were monitored at least once. Even before the voluntary agreement, 7 food categories had mean sodium content below the targets. We observed that there was a lack of standardization and that the scope of the monitoring of sodium content in foods, and consequently of the voluntary agreements, was limited. Conclusions: Several weaknesses in the monitoring of sodium content in foods in Brazil were detected, which could compromise the effectiveness of the regulatory strategy on health.
id FIOCRUZ-9_addcdea75033df8d7f41a204019edfb4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/323
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-9
network_name_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of food sodium level monitoring: a comparative analysis of goals for voluntary reduction in sodium intake in BrazilAvaliação do monitoramento do teor de sódio em alimentos: uma análise comparativa com as metas de redução voluntárias no BrasilSódioAlimentos industrializadosMonitoramentoANVISASodiumProcessed FoodsMonitoringANVISAObjective: To analyze the monitoring of sodium content in processed foods conducted by the National Agency of Sanitary Surveillance (ANVISA) and to compare the results with the goals of sodium reduction of the voluntary agreements signed between the Brazilian government and representatives of the food industry. Methods: We used data from 4 technical reports (TR) on sodium content in processed foods by ANVISA published between 2010 and 2014. We characterized the TR according to the year of data collection, state, method of analysis, and number of samples collected by food category. We described the sodium content of the categories that were monitored at least twice and compared the results with the voluntary goals. Results and Discussion: Of the monitored categories of food, only 39.6% were assessed at least twice. Among the 34 categories included in voluntary agreements, 53% were monitored at least once. Even before the voluntary agreement, 7 food categories had mean sodium content below the targets. We observed that there was a lack of standardization and that the scope of the monitoring of sodium content in foods, and consequently of the voluntary agreements, was limited. Conclusions: Several weaknesses in the monitoring of sodium content in foods in Brazil were detected, which could compromise the effectiveness of the regulatory strategy on health.Objetivo: Analisar o monitoramento do teor de sódio em alimentos industrializados coordenado pela Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária e comparar os resultados com as metas de redução de sódio dos acordos voluntários assinados entre o governo brasileiro e representantes das indústrias de alimentos. Método: Utilizaram-se os dados dos quatro informes técnicos sobre o teor de sódio em alimentos processados publicados pela Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, entre 2010 e 2014. Os informes técnicos foram caracterizados segundo ano de coleta dos dados, Estado, método de análise e número de amostras coletadas por categoria de alimento. Foram descritos os teores de sódio das categorias monitoradas pelo menos duas vezes e comparados com as metas voluntárias estabelecidas. Resultados e Discussão: Do total de categorias de alimentos monitoradas, apenas 39,6% foram avaliadas ao menos duas vezes. Entre as 34 categorias incluídas nos acordos voluntários, 53% foram monitoradas pelo menos uma vez. Mesmo antes do prazo, sete categorias de alimentos possuíam valor médio de teor de sódio abaixo das metas. Verificou-se falta de padronização e pequena abrangência do monitoramento do teor de sódio em alimentos e, consequentemente, dos acordos voluntários. Conclusão: Constataram-se fragilidades no monitoramento do teor de sódio em alimentos industrializados no Brasil, que poderão comprometer a efetividade dessa estratégia regulatória na saúde.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2015-05-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/32310.3395/2317-269x.00323Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2015): May; 56-64Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 3 Núm. 2 (2015): Puede; 56-64Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 3 n. 2 (2015): Maio; 56-642317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/323/218Copyright (c) 2015 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMartins, Ana Paula BortolettoAndrade, Giovanna CalixtoBandoni, Daniel Henrique2023-06-27T14:59:48Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/323Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T14:59:48Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of food sodium level monitoring: a comparative analysis of goals for voluntary reduction in sodium intake in Brazil
Avaliação do monitoramento do teor de sódio em alimentos: uma análise comparativa com as metas de redução voluntárias no Brasil
title Evaluation of food sodium level monitoring: a comparative analysis of goals for voluntary reduction in sodium intake in Brazil
spellingShingle Evaluation of food sodium level monitoring: a comparative analysis of goals for voluntary reduction in sodium intake in Brazil
Martins, Ana Paula Bortoletto
Sódio
Alimentos industrializados
Monitoramento
ANVISA
Sodium
Processed Foods
Monitoring
ANVISA
title_short Evaluation of food sodium level monitoring: a comparative analysis of goals for voluntary reduction in sodium intake in Brazil
title_full Evaluation of food sodium level monitoring: a comparative analysis of goals for voluntary reduction in sodium intake in Brazil
title_fullStr Evaluation of food sodium level monitoring: a comparative analysis of goals for voluntary reduction in sodium intake in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of food sodium level monitoring: a comparative analysis of goals for voluntary reduction in sodium intake in Brazil
title_sort Evaluation of food sodium level monitoring: a comparative analysis of goals for voluntary reduction in sodium intake in Brazil
author Martins, Ana Paula Bortoletto
author_facet Martins, Ana Paula Bortoletto
Andrade, Giovanna Calixto
Bandoni, Daniel Henrique
author_role author
author2 Andrade, Giovanna Calixto
Bandoni, Daniel Henrique
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Martins, Ana Paula Bortoletto
Andrade, Giovanna Calixto
Bandoni, Daniel Henrique
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Sódio
Alimentos industrializados
Monitoramento
ANVISA
Sodium
Processed Foods
Monitoring
ANVISA
topic Sódio
Alimentos industrializados
Monitoramento
ANVISA
Sodium
Processed Foods
Monitoring
ANVISA
description Objective: To analyze the monitoring of sodium content in processed foods conducted by the National Agency of Sanitary Surveillance (ANVISA) and to compare the results with the goals of sodium reduction of the voluntary agreements signed between the Brazilian government and representatives of the food industry. Methods: We used data from 4 technical reports (TR) on sodium content in processed foods by ANVISA published between 2010 and 2014. We characterized the TR according to the year of data collection, state, method of analysis, and number of samples collected by food category. We described the sodium content of the categories that were monitored at least twice and compared the results with the voluntary goals. Results and Discussion: Of the monitored categories of food, only 39.6% were assessed at least twice. Among the 34 categories included in voluntary agreements, 53% were monitored at least once. Even before the voluntary agreement, 7 food categories had mean sodium content below the targets. We observed that there was a lack of standardization and that the scope of the monitoring of sodium content in foods, and consequently of the voluntary agreements, was limited. Conclusions: Several weaknesses in the monitoring of sodium content in foods in Brazil were detected, which could compromise the effectiveness of the regulatory strategy on health.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-05-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Peer-reviewed article"
"Artículo revisado por pares"
"Artigo avaliado pelos pares"
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/323
10.3395/2317-269x.00323
url https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/323
identifier_str_mv 10.3395/2317-269x.00323
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/323/218
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2015): May; 56-64
Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 3 Núm. 2 (2015): Puede; 56-64
Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 3 n. 2 (2015): Maio; 56-64
2317-269X
reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
collection Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository.name.fl_str_mv Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br
_version_ 1797042044013641728