Mandatory use of a face mask to contain COVID-19 in Brazil: legitimate limitation to the fundamental right of self-determination

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Abud, Carol Oliveira
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Souza, Luciano Pereira de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
Texto Completo: https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1651
Resumo: Introduction: The autonomy of the individual’s will aiming at the exercise of individual freedom by refusing the use of a face mask as a means of protection can have serious collective consequences in relation to the prevention and spread of the contagious infectious disease caused by SARS-CoV-2. Objective: To analyze whether the individual’s freedom of self-determination against collective interest in cases of compulsory use of a face mask will prevail. Method: The study was developed through documentary and bibliographic collection, with descriptive bias. Results: The official data and guidelines of the World Health Organization in joint analysis with the existing Brazilian legislation and the constitutional commandments of fundamental rights, allowed us to reach the result of the proposed objective. Conclusions: The published normative acts are based on validity in a federal standard with the status of a law in a formal sense, with the provision for the adoption of prophylaxis measures, including the mandatory use of the mask, to combat the pandemic. The prevalence of the collective interest in favor of public health and the fundamental right to life and health of others is legitimate given the individual’s freedom of self-determination.
id FIOCRUZ-9_e1d820989d1269de1afa21cc0b32a29b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1651
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-9
network_name_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository_id_str
spelling Mandatory use of a face mask to contain COVID-19 in Brazil: legitimate limitation to the fundamental right of self-determinationUso obrigatório de máscara facial para conter a COVID-19 no Brasil: limitação legítima ao direito fundamental de autodeterminaçãoDireito à SaúdeInfecções por CoronavírusTransmissão de Doença InfeciosaSaúde PúblicaPrevenção e ControleRight to HealthCoronavirus InfectionsDisease Transmissions InfectiousPublic HealthPrevention and ControlIntroduction: The autonomy of the individual’s will aiming at the exercise of individual freedom by refusing the use of a face mask as a means of protection can have serious collective consequences in relation to the prevention and spread of the contagious infectious disease caused by SARS-CoV-2. Objective: To analyze whether the individual’s freedom of self-determination against collective interest in cases of compulsory use of a face mask will prevail. Method: The study was developed through documentary and bibliographic collection, with descriptive bias. Results: The official data and guidelines of the World Health Organization in joint analysis with the existing Brazilian legislation and the constitutional commandments of fundamental rights, allowed us to reach the result of the proposed objective. Conclusions: The published normative acts are based on validity in a federal standard with the status of a law in a formal sense, with the provision for the adoption of prophylaxis measures, including the mandatory use of the mask, to combat the pandemic. The prevalence of the collective interest in favor of public health and the fundamental right to life and health of others is legitimate given the individual’s freedom of self-determination.Introdução: A autonomia da vontade do indivíduo visando o exercício de liberdade individual ao recusar a utilização de máscara facial como meio de proteção pode trazer sérias consequências coletivas em relação à prevenção e à propagação de doença infectocontagiosa causada pelo SARS-CoV-2. Objetivo: Analisar se a liberdade de autodeterminação do indivíduo em confronto com o interesse coletivo nos casos de utilização compulsória de máscara facial irá prevalecer. Método: O estudo foi elaborado por meio de coleta documental e bibliográfica, com viés descritivo. Resultados: Os dados oficiais e as orientações da Organização Mundial de Saúde em análise conjunta com a legislação brasileira existente e os mandamentos constitucionais dos direitos fundamentais nos permitiram chegar ao objetivo proposto. Conclusões: Os atos normativos editados têm fundamento de validade em norma federal com status de lei em sentido formal, havendo neles a previsão de adoção de medidas de profilaxia, dentre elas o uso obrigatório da máscara, no combate à pandemia. A prevalência do interesse coletivo em prol da saúde pública e do direito fundamental à vida e à saúde de outrem são legítimas frente à liberdade de autodeterminação do indivíduo.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2020-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/165110.22239/2317-269X.01651Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 8 No. 3 (2020): August; 34-43Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 8 Núm. 3 (2020): Agosto; 34-43Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 8 n. 3 (2020): Agosto; 34-432317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1651/1193https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1651/1252Copyright (c) 2020 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.pt_BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAbud, Carol OliveiraSouza, Luciano Pereira de2023-06-27T15:12:36Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1651Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:12:36Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Mandatory use of a face mask to contain COVID-19 in Brazil: legitimate limitation to the fundamental right of self-determination
Uso obrigatório de máscara facial para conter a COVID-19 no Brasil: limitação legítima ao direito fundamental de autodeterminação
title Mandatory use of a face mask to contain COVID-19 in Brazil: legitimate limitation to the fundamental right of self-determination
spellingShingle Mandatory use of a face mask to contain COVID-19 in Brazil: legitimate limitation to the fundamental right of self-determination
Abud, Carol Oliveira
Direito à Saúde
Infecções por Coronavírus
Transmissão de Doença Infeciosa
Saúde Pública
Prevenção e Controle
Right to Health
Coronavirus Infections
Disease Transmissions Infectious
Public Health
Prevention and Control
title_short Mandatory use of a face mask to contain COVID-19 in Brazil: legitimate limitation to the fundamental right of self-determination
title_full Mandatory use of a face mask to contain COVID-19 in Brazil: legitimate limitation to the fundamental right of self-determination
title_fullStr Mandatory use of a face mask to contain COVID-19 in Brazil: legitimate limitation to the fundamental right of self-determination
title_full_unstemmed Mandatory use of a face mask to contain COVID-19 in Brazil: legitimate limitation to the fundamental right of self-determination
title_sort Mandatory use of a face mask to contain COVID-19 in Brazil: legitimate limitation to the fundamental right of self-determination
author Abud, Carol Oliveira
author_facet Abud, Carol Oliveira
Souza, Luciano Pereira de
author_role author
author2 Souza, Luciano Pereira de
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Abud, Carol Oliveira
Souza, Luciano Pereira de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Direito à Saúde
Infecções por Coronavírus
Transmissão de Doença Infeciosa
Saúde Pública
Prevenção e Controle
Right to Health
Coronavirus Infections
Disease Transmissions Infectious
Public Health
Prevention and Control
topic Direito à Saúde
Infecções por Coronavírus
Transmissão de Doença Infeciosa
Saúde Pública
Prevenção e Controle
Right to Health
Coronavirus Infections
Disease Transmissions Infectious
Public Health
Prevention and Control
description Introduction: The autonomy of the individual’s will aiming at the exercise of individual freedom by refusing the use of a face mask as a means of protection can have serious collective consequences in relation to the prevention and spread of the contagious infectious disease caused by SARS-CoV-2. Objective: To analyze whether the individual’s freedom of self-determination against collective interest in cases of compulsory use of a face mask will prevail. Method: The study was developed through documentary and bibliographic collection, with descriptive bias. Results: The official data and guidelines of the World Health Organization in joint analysis with the existing Brazilian legislation and the constitutional commandments of fundamental rights, allowed us to reach the result of the proposed objective. Conclusions: The published normative acts are based on validity in a federal standard with the status of a law in a formal sense, with the provision for the adoption of prophylaxis measures, including the mandatory use of the mask, to combat the pandemic. The prevalence of the collective interest in favor of public health and the fundamental right to life and health of others is legitimate given the individual’s freedom of self-determination.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-07-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1651
10.22239/2317-269X.01651
url https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1651
identifier_str_mv 10.22239/2317-269X.01651
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1651/1193
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1651/1252
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.pt_BR
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.pt_BR
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 8 No. 3 (2020): August; 34-43
Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 8 Núm. 3 (2020): Agosto; 34-43
Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 8 n. 3 (2020): Agosto; 34-43
2317-269X
reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
collection Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository.name.fl_str_mv Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br
_version_ 1797042046012227584

Registros relacionados