JUDICIARY BRANCH’S PUBLIC HEARING AND THE PERSONALITY RIGHTS:: AN ANALYSIS IN LIGHT OF JÜRGEM HABERMAS AND PETER HÄBERLE’S THEORIES

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Siqueira, Dirceu Pereira
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Souza, Bruna Caroline Lima d
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online)
Texto Completo: http://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/8419
Resumo: The personality rights represent rights really important in the human person dignity effectuation, and also in the people and their personalities free and full development warranty. It does the search for instruments that make feasible their effectuation essential. Considering that, the democratic context is also demanding instruments that make feasible a society with active participation on state decisions, especially in the Judiciary Branch. Thus, this paper aims to analyze the public hearing instruments in the Judiciary Branch in light of the theories proposed by Habermas and Häberle, and also to measure if they can hold as a personality rights’ effectuation instrument. In a specific way, it will be analyzed Habermas’ and Häberle’s theories, highlighting their main aspects and if it is possible to find a relation between them and public hearings, and also it will be analyzed the personality right’s importance in the human person tutelage and if the public hearings hold as an instrument of skillful effectuation. The questions presented are: Can public hearing in the Judiciary Branch be considered as na instrumentalization way of Jürgen Habermas’ and Peter Häberle’s theories in the current judiciary context? Can these hearings hold as a personality rights’ effectuation instrument in the jurisdictional ambit? Therefore, it will be used the deductive method and the methodology guided in the literature review technique.
id FUMEC-1_4766f33df57cf98bffeee1a27083f353
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.fumec.br:article/8419
network_acronym_str FUMEC-1
network_name_str Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling JUDICIARY BRANCH’S PUBLIC HEARING AND THE PERSONALITY RIGHTS:: AN ANALYSIS IN LIGHT OF JÜRGEM HABERMAS AND PETER HÄBERLE’S THEORIESAUDIÊNCIAS PÚBLICAS NO PODER JUDICIÁRIO E OS DIREITOS DA PERSONALIDADE:: UMA ANÁLISE À LUZ DAS TEORIAS DE JÜRGEN HABERMAS E PETER HÄBERLEThe personality rights represent rights really important in the human person dignity effectuation, and also in the people and their personalities free and full development warranty. It does the search for instruments that make feasible their effectuation essential. Considering that, the democratic context is also demanding instruments that make feasible a society with active participation on state decisions, especially in the Judiciary Branch. Thus, this paper aims to analyze the public hearing instruments in the Judiciary Branch in light of the theories proposed by Habermas and Häberle, and also to measure if they can hold as a personality rights’ effectuation instrument. In a specific way, it will be analyzed Habermas’ and Häberle’s theories, highlighting their main aspects and if it is possible to find a relation between them and public hearings, and also it will be analyzed the personality right’s importance in the human person tutelage and if the public hearings hold as an instrument of skillful effectuation. The questions presented are: Can public hearing in the Judiciary Branch be considered as na instrumentalization way of Jürgen Habermas’ and Peter Häberle’s theories in the current judiciary context? Can these hearings hold as a personality rights’ effectuation instrument in the jurisdictional ambit? Therefore, it will be used the deductive method and the methodology guided in the literature review technique.Os direitos da personalidade representam direitos de suma importância na efetivação da dignidade da pessoa humana e na garantia do livre e pleno desenvolvimento das pessoas e de sua personalidade, de forma que a busca por instrumentos que viabilizem a efetivação dos mesmos faz-se essencial. No mesmo cenário, o contexto democrático também vem exigindo instrumentos que viabilizem uma participação ativa da sociedade nas decisões estatais, e de modo especial no contexto do Poder Judiciário. Desta forma, o presente artigo visa analisar o instrumento das audiências públicas no Poder Judiciário à luz das teorias propostas por Habermas e Häberle, bem como aferir se as mesmas podem vigorar como um instrumento de efetivação dos direitos da personalidade. De modo específico, analisa-se-á a teoria habermesiana e a teoria de Peter Häberle, destacando seus principais aspectos e se é possível encontrar relação entre as mesmas e as audiências públicas, bem como analisará a importância dos direitos da personalidade na tutela da pessoa humana e se as audiências públicas vigoram como um instrumento hábil à efetivação dos mesmos. Como problemáticas, questiona-se: as audiências públicas no Poder Judiciário podem ser vislumbradas como uma forma de instrumentalização das teorias de Jürgen Habermas e Peter Häberle no contexto jurídico vigente? Tais audiências podem vigorar como um instrumento de efetivação dos direitos da personalidade no âmbito jurisdicional? Para tanto, utilizar-se-á do método dedutivo e da metodologia pautada na técnica de revisão bibliográfica.Universidade FUMEC2022-03-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/841910.46560/meritum.v16i3.8419Meritum, Law Journal of FUMEC University; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021Meritum, Revista de Derecho de la Universidad FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021Meritum, Journal de droit de l'Université FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021Meritum, Revista de Direito da Universidade FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 20212238-69391980-207210.46560/meritum.v16i3reponame:Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online)instname:Universidade FUMECinstacron:FUMECporhttp://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/8419/436810.21714/pretexto.v18i3.3169.s1060Siqueira, Dirceu PereiraSouza, Bruna Caroline Lima dinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-03-16T13:27:44Zoai:ojs.fumec.br:article/8419Revistahttp://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritumPUBhttps://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/oairevistameritum@fumec.br2238-69391980-2072opendoar:2022-03-16T13:27:44Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) - Universidade FUMECfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv JUDICIARY BRANCH’S PUBLIC HEARING AND THE PERSONALITY RIGHTS:: AN ANALYSIS IN LIGHT OF JÜRGEM HABERMAS AND PETER HÄBERLE’S THEORIES
AUDIÊNCIAS PÚBLICAS NO PODER JUDICIÁRIO E OS DIREITOS DA PERSONALIDADE:: UMA ANÁLISE À LUZ DAS TEORIAS DE JÜRGEN HABERMAS E PETER HÄBERLE
title JUDICIARY BRANCH’S PUBLIC HEARING AND THE PERSONALITY RIGHTS:: AN ANALYSIS IN LIGHT OF JÜRGEM HABERMAS AND PETER HÄBERLE’S THEORIES
spellingShingle JUDICIARY BRANCH’S PUBLIC HEARING AND THE PERSONALITY RIGHTS:: AN ANALYSIS IN LIGHT OF JÜRGEM HABERMAS AND PETER HÄBERLE’S THEORIES
Siqueira, Dirceu Pereira
title_short JUDICIARY BRANCH’S PUBLIC HEARING AND THE PERSONALITY RIGHTS:: AN ANALYSIS IN LIGHT OF JÜRGEM HABERMAS AND PETER HÄBERLE’S THEORIES
title_full JUDICIARY BRANCH’S PUBLIC HEARING AND THE PERSONALITY RIGHTS:: AN ANALYSIS IN LIGHT OF JÜRGEM HABERMAS AND PETER HÄBERLE’S THEORIES
title_fullStr JUDICIARY BRANCH’S PUBLIC HEARING AND THE PERSONALITY RIGHTS:: AN ANALYSIS IN LIGHT OF JÜRGEM HABERMAS AND PETER HÄBERLE’S THEORIES
title_full_unstemmed JUDICIARY BRANCH’S PUBLIC HEARING AND THE PERSONALITY RIGHTS:: AN ANALYSIS IN LIGHT OF JÜRGEM HABERMAS AND PETER HÄBERLE’S THEORIES
title_sort JUDICIARY BRANCH’S PUBLIC HEARING AND THE PERSONALITY RIGHTS:: AN ANALYSIS IN LIGHT OF JÜRGEM HABERMAS AND PETER HÄBERLE’S THEORIES
author Siqueira, Dirceu Pereira
author_facet Siqueira, Dirceu Pereira
Souza, Bruna Caroline Lima d
author_role author
author2 Souza, Bruna Caroline Lima d
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Siqueira, Dirceu Pereira
Souza, Bruna Caroline Lima d
description The personality rights represent rights really important in the human person dignity effectuation, and also in the people and their personalities free and full development warranty. It does the search for instruments that make feasible their effectuation essential. Considering that, the democratic context is also demanding instruments that make feasible a society with active participation on state decisions, especially in the Judiciary Branch. Thus, this paper aims to analyze the public hearing instruments in the Judiciary Branch in light of the theories proposed by Habermas and Häberle, and also to measure if they can hold as a personality rights’ effectuation instrument. In a specific way, it will be analyzed Habermas’ and Häberle’s theories, highlighting their main aspects and if it is possible to find a relation between them and public hearings, and also it will be analyzed the personality right’s importance in the human person tutelage and if the public hearings hold as an instrument of skillful effectuation. The questions presented are: Can public hearing in the Judiciary Branch be considered as na instrumentalization way of Jürgen Habermas’ and Peter Häberle’s theories in the current judiciary context? Can these hearings hold as a personality rights’ effectuation instrument in the jurisdictional ambit? Therefore, it will be used the deductive method and the methodology guided in the literature review technique.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-03-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/8419
10.46560/meritum.v16i3.8419
url http://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/8419
identifier_str_mv 10.46560/meritum.v16i3.8419
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/8419/4368
10.21714/pretexto.v18i3.3169.s1060
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade FUMEC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade FUMEC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Meritum, Law Journal of FUMEC University; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021
Meritum, Revista de Derecho de la Universidad FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021
Meritum, Journal de droit de l'Université FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021
Meritum, Revista de Direito da Universidade FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021
2238-6939
1980-2072
10.46560/meritum.v16i3
reponame:Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online)
instname:Universidade FUMEC
instacron:FUMEC
instname_str Universidade FUMEC
instacron_str FUMEC
institution FUMEC
reponame_str Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online)
collection Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) - Universidade FUMEC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistameritum@fumec.br
_version_ 1798945263608397824