JUDICIARY BRANCH’S PUBLIC HEARING AND THE PERSONALITY RIGHTS:: AN ANALYSIS IN LIGHT OF JÜRGEM HABERMAS AND PETER HÄBERLE’S THEORIES
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/8419 |
Resumo: | The personality rights represent rights really important in the human person dignity effectuation, and also in the people and their personalities free and full development warranty. It does the search for instruments that make feasible their effectuation essential. Considering that, the democratic context is also demanding instruments that make feasible a society with active participation on state decisions, especially in the Judiciary Branch. Thus, this paper aims to analyze the public hearing instruments in the Judiciary Branch in light of the theories proposed by Habermas and Häberle, and also to measure if they can hold as a personality rights’ effectuation instrument. In a specific way, it will be analyzed Habermas’ and Häberle’s theories, highlighting their main aspects and if it is possible to find a relation between them and public hearings, and also it will be analyzed the personality right’s importance in the human person tutelage and if the public hearings hold as an instrument of skillful effectuation. The questions presented are: Can public hearing in the Judiciary Branch be considered as na instrumentalization way of Jürgen Habermas’ and Peter Häberle’s theories in the current judiciary context? Can these hearings hold as a personality rights’ effectuation instrument in the jurisdictional ambit? Therefore, it will be used the deductive method and the methodology guided in the literature review technique. |
id |
FUMEC-1_4766f33df57cf98bffeee1a27083f353 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.fumec.br:article/8419 |
network_acronym_str |
FUMEC-1 |
network_name_str |
Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
JUDICIARY BRANCH’S PUBLIC HEARING AND THE PERSONALITY RIGHTS:: AN ANALYSIS IN LIGHT OF JÜRGEM HABERMAS AND PETER HÄBERLE’S THEORIESAUDIÊNCIAS PÚBLICAS NO PODER JUDICIÁRIO E OS DIREITOS DA PERSONALIDADE:: UMA ANÁLISE À LUZ DAS TEORIAS DE JÜRGEN HABERMAS E PETER HÄBERLEThe personality rights represent rights really important in the human person dignity effectuation, and also in the people and their personalities free and full development warranty. It does the search for instruments that make feasible their effectuation essential. Considering that, the democratic context is also demanding instruments that make feasible a society with active participation on state decisions, especially in the Judiciary Branch. Thus, this paper aims to analyze the public hearing instruments in the Judiciary Branch in light of the theories proposed by Habermas and Häberle, and also to measure if they can hold as a personality rights’ effectuation instrument. In a specific way, it will be analyzed Habermas’ and Häberle’s theories, highlighting their main aspects and if it is possible to find a relation between them and public hearings, and also it will be analyzed the personality right’s importance in the human person tutelage and if the public hearings hold as an instrument of skillful effectuation. The questions presented are: Can public hearing in the Judiciary Branch be considered as na instrumentalization way of Jürgen Habermas’ and Peter Häberle’s theories in the current judiciary context? Can these hearings hold as a personality rights’ effectuation instrument in the jurisdictional ambit? Therefore, it will be used the deductive method and the methodology guided in the literature review technique.Os direitos da personalidade representam direitos de suma importância na efetivação da dignidade da pessoa humana e na garantia do livre e pleno desenvolvimento das pessoas e de sua personalidade, de forma que a busca por instrumentos que viabilizem a efetivação dos mesmos faz-se essencial. No mesmo cenário, o contexto democrático também vem exigindo instrumentos que viabilizem uma participação ativa da sociedade nas decisões estatais, e de modo especial no contexto do Poder Judiciário. Desta forma, o presente artigo visa analisar o instrumento das audiências públicas no Poder Judiciário à luz das teorias propostas por Habermas e Häberle, bem como aferir se as mesmas podem vigorar como um instrumento de efetivação dos direitos da personalidade. De modo específico, analisa-se-á a teoria habermesiana e a teoria de Peter Häberle, destacando seus principais aspectos e se é possível encontrar relação entre as mesmas e as audiências públicas, bem como analisará a importância dos direitos da personalidade na tutela da pessoa humana e se as audiências públicas vigoram como um instrumento hábil à efetivação dos mesmos. Como problemáticas, questiona-se: as audiências públicas no Poder Judiciário podem ser vislumbradas como uma forma de instrumentalização das teorias de Jürgen Habermas e Peter Häberle no contexto jurídico vigente? Tais audiências podem vigorar como um instrumento de efetivação dos direitos da personalidade no âmbito jurisdicional? Para tanto, utilizar-se-á do método dedutivo e da metodologia pautada na técnica de revisão bibliográfica.Universidade FUMEC2022-03-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/841910.46560/meritum.v16i3.8419Meritum, Law Journal of FUMEC University; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021Meritum, Revista de Derecho de la Universidad FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021Meritum, Journal de droit de l'Université FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021Meritum, Revista de Direito da Universidade FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 20212238-69391980-207210.46560/meritum.v16i3reponame:Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online)instname:Universidade FUMECinstacron:FUMECporhttp://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/8419/436810.21714/pretexto.v18i3.3169.s1060Siqueira, Dirceu PereiraSouza, Bruna Caroline Lima dinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-03-16T13:27:44Zoai:ojs.fumec.br:article/8419Revistahttp://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritumPUBhttps://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/oairevistameritum@fumec.br2238-69391980-2072opendoar:2022-03-16T13:27:44Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) - Universidade FUMECfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
JUDICIARY BRANCH’S PUBLIC HEARING AND THE PERSONALITY RIGHTS:: AN ANALYSIS IN LIGHT OF JÜRGEM HABERMAS AND PETER HÄBERLE’S THEORIES AUDIÊNCIAS PÚBLICAS NO PODER JUDICIÁRIO E OS DIREITOS DA PERSONALIDADE:: UMA ANÁLISE À LUZ DAS TEORIAS DE JÜRGEN HABERMAS E PETER HÄBERLE |
title |
JUDICIARY BRANCH’S PUBLIC HEARING AND THE PERSONALITY RIGHTS:: AN ANALYSIS IN LIGHT OF JÜRGEM HABERMAS AND PETER HÄBERLE’S THEORIES |
spellingShingle |
JUDICIARY BRANCH’S PUBLIC HEARING AND THE PERSONALITY RIGHTS:: AN ANALYSIS IN LIGHT OF JÜRGEM HABERMAS AND PETER HÄBERLE’S THEORIES Siqueira, Dirceu Pereira |
title_short |
JUDICIARY BRANCH’S PUBLIC HEARING AND THE PERSONALITY RIGHTS:: AN ANALYSIS IN LIGHT OF JÜRGEM HABERMAS AND PETER HÄBERLE’S THEORIES |
title_full |
JUDICIARY BRANCH’S PUBLIC HEARING AND THE PERSONALITY RIGHTS:: AN ANALYSIS IN LIGHT OF JÜRGEM HABERMAS AND PETER HÄBERLE’S THEORIES |
title_fullStr |
JUDICIARY BRANCH’S PUBLIC HEARING AND THE PERSONALITY RIGHTS:: AN ANALYSIS IN LIGHT OF JÜRGEM HABERMAS AND PETER HÄBERLE’S THEORIES |
title_full_unstemmed |
JUDICIARY BRANCH’S PUBLIC HEARING AND THE PERSONALITY RIGHTS:: AN ANALYSIS IN LIGHT OF JÜRGEM HABERMAS AND PETER HÄBERLE’S THEORIES |
title_sort |
JUDICIARY BRANCH’S PUBLIC HEARING AND THE PERSONALITY RIGHTS:: AN ANALYSIS IN LIGHT OF JÜRGEM HABERMAS AND PETER HÄBERLE’S THEORIES |
author |
Siqueira, Dirceu Pereira |
author_facet |
Siqueira, Dirceu Pereira Souza, Bruna Caroline Lima d |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Souza, Bruna Caroline Lima d |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Siqueira, Dirceu Pereira Souza, Bruna Caroline Lima d |
description |
The personality rights represent rights really important in the human person dignity effectuation, and also in the people and their personalities free and full development warranty. It does the search for instruments that make feasible their effectuation essential. Considering that, the democratic context is also demanding instruments that make feasible a society with active participation on state decisions, especially in the Judiciary Branch. Thus, this paper aims to analyze the public hearing instruments in the Judiciary Branch in light of the theories proposed by Habermas and Häberle, and also to measure if they can hold as a personality rights’ effectuation instrument. In a specific way, it will be analyzed Habermas’ and Häberle’s theories, highlighting their main aspects and if it is possible to find a relation between them and public hearings, and also it will be analyzed the personality right’s importance in the human person tutelage and if the public hearings hold as an instrument of skillful effectuation. The questions presented are: Can public hearing in the Judiciary Branch be considered as na instrumentalization way of Jürgen Habermas’ and Peter Häberle’s theories in the current judiciary context? Can these hearings hold as a personality rights’ effectuation instrument in the jurisdictional ambit? Therefore, it will be used the deductive method and the methodology guided in the literature review technique. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-03-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/8419 10.46560/meritum.v16i3.8419 |
url |
http://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/8419 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.46560/meritum.v16i3.8419 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/8419/4368 10.21714/pretexto.v18i3.3169.s1060 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade FUMEC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade FUMEC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Meritum, Law Journal of FUMEC University; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021 Meritum, Revista de Derecho de la Universidad FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021 Meritum, Journal de droit de l'Université FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021 Meritum, Revista de Direito da Universidade FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021 2238-6939 1980-2072 10.46560/meritum.v16i3 reponame:Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) instname:Universidade FUMEC instacron:FUMEC |
instname_str |
Universidade FUMEC |
instacron_str |
FUMEC |
institution |
FUMEC |
reponame_str |
Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) |
collection |
Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) - Universidade FUMEC |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistameritum@fumec.br |
_version_ |
1798945263608397824 |