JUDICIAL REVIEW AND CRIMINAL TRIALS: CONSIDERATIONS IN COMPARATIVE LAW
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/8407 |
Resumo: | The present article has, as its main objective, to analyze the trials of the GSS Torture Case by Israel’s Supreme Court and the Habeas Corpus 126.292, by the Brazilian Supreme Court under the point of view of Minister Luís Roberto Barroso’s vote, aiming to reflect on the Judicial Review institute through the analysis of such cases. For such task, the article has employed the individual analysis of each one of the chosen cases and, in sequence, analyzed bibliographic works on the matter. The results attained by the research showed, therefore, that both cases involve situations in which the Judicial Review has been employed to grant legitimacy to determined positionings to the detriment of the legal order. Ultimately, it was possible to observe that the Judicial Review is an institute whose inadequate application can cause the most diverse range of damages, although it can also be considered as an important tool in the task of maintenance of the constitutional order. Keywords: Judicial Review, Habeas Corpus 126.292, Israeli Torture Trials |
id |
FUMEC-1_692867f6d1e0316c6583e3969303f1ef |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.fumec.br:article/8407 |
network_acronym_str |
FUMEC-1 |
network_name_str |
Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
JUDICIAL REVIEW AND CRIMINAL TRIALS: CONSIDERATIONS IN COMPARATIVE LAWCONTROLE DE CONSTITUCIONALIDADE E JULGAMENTOS PENAIS: CONSIDERAÇÕES EM DIREITO COMPARADOThe present article has, as its main objective, to analyze the trials of the GSS Torture Case by Israel’s Supreme Court and the Habeas Corpus 126.292, by the Brazilian Supreme Court under the point of view of Minister Luís Roberto Barroso’s vote, aiming to reflect on the Judicial Review institute through the analysis of such cases. For such task, the article has employed the individual analysis of each one of the chosen cases and, in sequence, analyzed bibliographic works on the matter. The results attained by the research showed, therefore, that both cases involve situations in which the Judicial Review has been employed to grant legitimacy to determined positionings to the detriment of the legal order. Ultimately, it was possible to observe that the Judicial Review is an institute whose inadequate application can cause the most diverse range of damages, although it can also be considered as an important tool in the task of maintenance of the constitutional order. Keywords: Judicial Review, Habeas Corpus 126.292, Israeli Torture TrialsO presente artigo tem como objetivo principal analisar os julgamentos do caso de tortura praticado pela GSS pela Suprema Corte de Israel e do Habeas Corpus 126.292 pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal, sob a ótica do voto do Ministro Luís Roberto Barroso, visando a promover uma reflexão a respeito do instituto do Controle de Constitucionalidade através do estudo destes casos. Para tanto, o artigo empregou a análise individual de cada um dos casos escolhidos e, em sequência, da análise de obras bibliográficas a respeito do assunto. Os resultados obtidos pela pesquisa demonstraram que ambos os casos envolvem situações nas quais o Controle de Constitucionalidade foi empregado de forma a legitimar determinados posicionamentos em detrimento da ordem jurídica. Por derradeiro, foi possível observar que o Controle de Constitucionalidade é um instituto cuja aplicação inadequada pode acarretar a mais variada gama de prejuízos, em que pese possa, também, ser considerado como uma importante ferramenta de manutenção da ordem jurídica constitucional. Palavras-Chave: Controle de Constitucionalidade, Habeas Corpus 126.292, Julgamentos de Tortura em IsraelUniversidade FUMEC2022-03-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/840710.46560/meritum.v16i3.8407Meritum, Law Journal of FUMEC University; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021Meritum, Revista de Derecho de la Universidad FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021Meritum, Journal de droit de l'Université FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021Meritum, Revista de Direito da Universidade FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 20212238-69391980-207210.46560/meritum.v16i3reponame:Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online)instname:Universidade FUMECinstacron:FUMECporhttp://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/8407/438010.21714/pretexto.v20i4.6712.s2135Massaro, João Paulo GomesIfanger, Fernanda Carolina de AraújoLaurentiis, Lucas Catib deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-03-16T13:27:44Zoai:ojs.fumec.br:article/8407Revistahttp://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritumPUBhttps://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/oairevistameritum@fumec.br2238-69391980-2072opendoar:2022-03-16T13:27:44Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) - Universidade FUMECfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
JUDICIAL REVIEW AND CRIMINAL TRIALS: CONSIDERATIONS IN COMPARATIVE LAW CONTROLE DE CONSTITUCIONALIDADE E JULGAMENTOS PENAIS: CONSIDERAÇÕES EM DIREITO COMPARADO |
title |
JUDICIAL REVIEW AND CRIMINAL TRIALS: CONSIDERATIONS IN COMPARATIVE LAW |
spellingShingle |
JUDICIAL REVIEW AND CRIMINAL TRIALS: CONSIDERATIONS IN COMPARATIVE LAW Massaro, João Paulo Gomes |
title_short |
JUDICIAL REVIEW AND CRIMINAL TRIALS: CONSIDERATIONS IN COMPARATIVE LAW |
title_full |
JUDICIAL REVIEW AND CRIMINAL TRIALS: CONSIDERATIONS IN COMPARATIVE LAW |
title_fullStr |
JUDICIAL REVIEW AND CRIMINAL TRIALS: CONSIDERATIONS IN COMPARATIVE LAW |
title_full_unstemmed |
JUDICIAL REVIEW AND CRIMINAL TRIALS: CONSIDERATIONS IN COMPARATIVE LAW |
title_sort |
JUDICIAL REVIEW AND CRIMINAL TRIALS: CONSIDERATIONS IN COMPARATIVE LAW |
author |
Massaro, João Paulo Gomes |
author_facet |
Massaro, João Paulo Gomes Ifanger, Fernanda Carolina de Araújo Laurentiis, Lucas Catib de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ifanger, Fernanda Carolina de Araújo Laurentiis, Lucas Catib de |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Massaro, João Paulo Gomes Ifanger, Fernanda Carolina de Araújo Laurentiis, Lucas Catib de |
description |
The present article has, as its main objective, to analyze the trials of the GSS Torture Case by Israel’s Supreme Court and the Habeas Corpus 126.292, by the Brazilian Supreme Court under the point of view of Minister Luís Roberto Barroso’s vote, aiming to reflect on the Judicial Review institute through the analysis of such cases. For such task, the article has employed the individual analysis of each one of the chosen cases and, in sequence, analyzed bibliographic works on the matter. The results attained by the research showed, therefore, that both cases involve situations in which the Judicial Review has been employed to grant legitimacy to determined positionings to the detriment of the legal order. Ultimately, it was possible to observe that the Judicial Review is an institute whose inadequate application can cause the most diverse range of damages, although it can also be considered as an important tool in the task of maintenance of the constitutional order. Keywords: Judicial Review, Habeas Corpus 126.292, Israeli Torture Trials |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-03-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/8407 10.46560/meritum.v16i3.8407 |
url |
http://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/8407 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.46560/meritum.v16i3.8407 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/8407/4380 10.21714/pretexto.v20i4.6712.s2135 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade FUMEC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade FUMEC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Meritum, Law Journal of FUMEC University; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021 Meritum, Revista de Derecho de la Universidad FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021 Meritum, Journal de droit de l'Université FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021 Meritum, Revista de Direito da Universidade FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021 2238-6939 1980-2072 10.46560/meritum.v16i3 reponame:Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) instname:Universidade FUMEC instacron:FUMEC |
instname_str |
Universidade FUMEC |
instacron_str |
FUMEC |
institution |
FUMEC |
reponame_str |
Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) |
collection |
Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) - Universidade FUMEC |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistameritum@fumec.br |
_version_ |
1798945263603154944 |