JUDICIAL REVIEW AND CRIMINAL TRIALS: CONSIDERATIONS IN COMPARATIVE LAW

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Massaro, João Paulo Gomes
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Ifanger, Fernanda Carolina de Araújo, Laurentiis, Lucas Catib de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online)
Texto Completo: http://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/8407
Resumo: The present article has, as its main objective, to analyze the trials of the GSS Torture Case by Israel’s Supreme Court and the Habeas Corpus 126.292, by the Brazilian Supreme Court under the point of view of Minister Luís Roberto Barroso’s vote, aiming to reflect on the Judicial Review institute through the analysis of such cases. For such task, the article has employed the individual analysis of each one of the chosen cases and, in sequence, analyzed  bibliographic works on the matter. The results attained by the research showed, therefore, that both cases involve situations in which the Judicial Review has been employed to grant legitimacy to determined positionings to the detriment of the legal order. Ultimately, it was possible to observe that the Judicial Review is an institute whose inadequate application can cause the most diverse range of damages, although it can also be considered as an important tool in the task of maintenance of the constitutional order.   Keywords: Judicial Review, Habeas Corpus 126.292, Israeli Torture Trials
id FUMEC-1_692867f6d1e0316c6583e3969303f1ef
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.fumec.br:article/8407
network_acronym_str FUMEC-1
network_name_str Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling JUDICIAL REVIEW AND CRIMINAL TRIALS: CONSIDERATIONS IN COMPARATIVE LAWCONTROLE DE CONSTITUCIONALIDADE E JULGAMENTOS PENAIS: CONSIDERAÇÕES EM DIREITO COMPARADOThe present article has, as its main objective, to analyze the trials of the GSS Torture Case by Israel’s Supreme Court and the Habeas Corpus 126.292, by the Brazilian Supreme Court under the point of view of Minister Luís Roberto Barroso’s vote, aiming to reflect on the Judicial Review institute through the analysis of such cases. For such task, the article has employed the individual analysis of each one of the chosen cases and, in sequence, analyzed  bibliographic works on the matter. The results attained by the research showed, therefore, that both cases involve situations in which the Judicial Review has been employed to grant legitimacy to determined positionings to the detriment of the legal order. Ultimately, it was possible to observe that the Judicial Review is an institute whose inadequate application can cause the most diverse range of damages, although it can also be considered as an important tool in the task of maintenance of the constitutional order.   Keywords: Judicial Review, Habeas Corpus 126.292, Israeli Torture TrialsO presente artigo tem como objetivo principal analisar os julgamentos do caso de tortura praticado pela GSS pela Suprema Corte de Israel e do Habeas Corpus 126.292 pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal, sob a ótica do voto do Ministro Luís Roberto Barroso, visando a promover uma reflexão a respeito do instituto do Controle de Constitucionalidade através do estudo  destes casos. Para tanto, o artigo empregou a análise individual de cada um dos casos escolhidos e, em sequência, da análise de obras bibliográficas a respeito do assunto. Os resultados obtidos pela pesquisa demonstraram que ambos os casos envolvem situações nas quais o Controle de Constitucionalidade foi empregado de forma a legitimar determinados posicionamentos em detrimento da ordem jurídica. Por derradeiro, foi possível observar que o Controle de Constitucionalidade é um instituto cuja aplicação inadequada pode acarretar a mais variada gama de prejuízos, em que pese possa, também, ser considerado como uma importante ferramenta de manutenção da ordem jurídica constitucional.   Palavras-Chave: Controle de Constitucionalidade, Habeas Corpus 126.292, Julgamentos de Tortura em IsraelUniversidade FUMEC2022-03-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/840710.46560/meritum.v16i3.8407Meritum, Law Journal of FUMEC University; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021Meritum, Revista de Derecho de la Universidad FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021Meritum, Journal de droit de l'Université FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021Meritum, Revista de Direito da Universidade FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 20212238-69391980-207210.46560/meritum.v16i3reponame:Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online)instname:Universidade FUMECinstacron:FUMECporhttp://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/8407/438010.21714/pretexto.v20i4.6712.s2135Massaro, João Paulo GomesIfanger, Fernanda Carolina de AraújoLaurentiis, Lucas Catib deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-03-16T13:27:44Zoai:ojs.fumec.br:article/8407Revistahttp://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritumPUBhttps://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/oairevistameritum@fumec.br2238-69391980-2072opendoar:2022-03-16T13:27:44Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) - Universidade FUMECfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv JUDICIAL REVIEW AND CRIMINAL TRIALS: CONSIDERATIONS IN COMPARATIVE LAW
CONTROLE DE CONSTITUCIONALIDADE E JULGAMENTOS PENAIS: CONSIDERAÇÕES EM DIREITO COMPARADO
title JUDICIAL REVIEW AND CRIMINAL TRIALS: CONSIDERATIONS IN COMPARATIVE LAW
spellingShingle JUDICIAL REVIEW AND CRIMINAL TRIALS: CONSIDERATIONS IN COMPARATIVE LAW
Massaro, João Paulo Gomes
title_short JUDICIAL REVIEW AND CRIMINAL TRIALS: CONSIDERATIONS IN COMPARATIVE LAW
title_full JUDICIAL REVIEW AND CRIMINAL TRIALS: CONSIDERATIONS IN COMPARATIVE LAW
title_fullStr JUDICIAL REVIEW AND CRIMINAL TRIALS: CONSIDERATIONS IN COMPARATIVE LAW
title_full_unstemmed JUDICIAL REVIEW AND CRIMINAL TRIALS: CONSIDERATIONS IN COMPARATIVE LAW
title_sort JUDICIAL REVIEW AND CRIMINAL TRIALS: CONSIDERATIONS IN COMPARATIVE LAW
author Massaro, João Paulo Gomes
author_facet Massaro, João Paulo Gomes
Ifanger, Fernanda Carolina de Araújo
Laurentiis, Lucas Catib de
author_role author
author2 Ifanger, Fernanda Carolina de Araújo
Laurentiis, Lucas Catib de
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Massaro, João Paulo Gomes
Ifanger, Fernanda Carolina de Araújo
Laurentiis, Lucas Catib de
description The present article has, as its main objective, to analyze the trials of the GSS Torture Case by Israel’s Supreme Court and the Habeas Corpus 126.292, by the Brazilian Supreme Court under the point of view of Minister Luís Roberto Barroso’s vote, aiming to reflect on the Judicial Review institute through the analysis of such cases. For such task, the article has employed the individual analysis of each one of the chosen cases and, in sequence, analyzed  bibliographic works on the matter. The results attained by the research showed, therefore, that both cases involve situations in which the Judicial Review has been employed to grant legitimacy to determined positionings to the detriment of the legal order. Ultimately, it was possible to observe that the Judicial Review is an institute whose inadequate application can cause the most diverse range of damages, although it can also be considered as an important tool in the task of maintenance of the constitutional order.   Keywords: Judicial Review, Habeas Corpus 126.292, Israeli Torture Trials
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-03-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/8407
10.46560/meritum.v16i3.8407
url http://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/8407
identifier_str_mv 10.46560/meritum.v16i3.8407
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/8407/4380
10.21714/pretexto.v20i4.6712.s2135
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade FUMEC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade FUMEC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Meritum, Law Journal of FUMEC University; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021
Meritum, Revista de Derecho de la Universidad FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021
Meritum, Journal de droit de l'Université FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021
Meritum, Revista de Direito da Universidade FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021
2238-6939
1980-2072
10.46560/meritum.v16i3
reponame:Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online)
instname:Universidade FUMEC
instacron:FUMEC
instname_str Universidade FUMEC
instacron_str FUMEC
institution FUMEC
reponame_str Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online)
collection Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) - Universidade FUMEC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistameritum@fumec.br
_version_ 1798945263603154944

Registros relacionados