Polishing methods of an alumina-reinforced feldspar ceramic

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bottino,Marco Cícero
Data de Publicação: 2006
Outros Autores: Valandro,Luiz Felipe, Kantorski,Karla Zanini, Bressiani,José Carlos, Bottino,Marco Antonio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Dental Journal
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402006000400004
Resumo: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that mechanical polishing methods of ceramic surfaces allow similar superficial roughness to that of glazed surfaces. Twenty-five Vitadur Alpha ceramic discs (5 mm x 2 mm) were prepared according to the manufacturer's specifications. All specimens were glazed and randomly assigned to 5 groups (n=5), according to finishing and polishing protocols: G1: glazed (control); G2: diamond bur finishing; G3: G2 + silicon rubber tip polishing; G4: G3 + felt disc/diamond polishing paste; G5: G3 + felt disc impregnated with fine-particle diamond paste. Next, surface roughness means (Ra - µm) were calculated. Qualitative analysis was made by scanning electron microscopy. Surface roughness data were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey's test at 5% significance level. G1 and G4 were statistically similar (p>0.05). G2 presented the highest roughness means (p<0.05) followed by groups G3, G5, G4 and G1 in a decreasing order. The hypothesis was partially confirmed as only the mechanical polishing (G4) produced similar superficial roughness to that of surface glazing, although finishing and polishing are technically critical procedures.
id FUNORP-1_d7840bd7791593031b58834a3bfa7d3c
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-64402006000400004
network_acronym_str FUNORP-1
network_name_str Brazilian Dental Journal
repository_id_str
spelling Polishing methods of an alumina-reinforced feldspar ceramicalumina-reinforced feldspar ceramicsurface roughnessfinishing and polishingThe purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that mechanical polishing methods of ceramic surfaces allow similar superficial roughness to that of glazed surfaces. Twenty-five Vitadur Alpha ceramic discs (5 mm x 2 mm) were prepared according to the manufacturer's specifications. All specimens were glazed and randomly assigned to 5 groups (n=5), according to finishing and polishing protocols: G1: glazed (control); G2: diamond bur finishing; G3: G2 + silicon rubber tip polishing; G4: G3 + felt disc/diamond polishing paste; G5: G3 + felt disc impregnated with fine-particle diamond paste. Next, surface roughness means (Ra - µm) were calculated. Qualitative analysis was made by scanning electron microscopy. Surface roughness data were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey's test at 5% significance level. G1 and G4 were statistically similar (p>0.05). G2 presented the highest roughness means (p<0.05) followed by groups G3, G5, G4 and G1 in a decreasing order. The hypothesis was partially confirmed as only the mechanical polishing (G4) produced similar superficial roughness to that of surface glazing, although finishing and polishing are technically critical procedures.Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto2006-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402006000400004Brazilian Dental Journal v.17 n.4 2006reponame:Brazilian Dental Journalinstname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)instacron:FUNORP10.1590/S0103-64402006000400004info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBottino,Marco CíceroValandro,Luiz FelipeKantorski,Karla ZaniniBressiani,José CarlosBottino,Marco Antonioeng2007-01-19T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-64402006000400004Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bdj/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br1806-47600103-6440opendoar:2007-01-19T00:00Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Polishing methods of an alumina-reinforced feldspar ceramic
title Polishing methods of an alumina-reinforced feldspar ceramic
spellingShingle Polishing methods of an alumina-reinforced feldspar ceramic
Bottino,Marco Cícero
alumina-reinforced feldspar ceramic
surface roughness
finishing and polishing
title_short Polishing methods of an alumina-reinforced feldspar ceramic
title_full Polishing methods of an alumina-reinforced feldspar ceramic
title_fullStr Polishing methods of an alumina-reinforced feldspar ceramic
title_full_unstemmed Polishing methods of an alumina-reinforced feldspar ceramic
title_sort Polishing methods of an alumina-reinforced feldspar ceramic
author Bottino,Marco Cícero
author_facet Bottino,Marco Cícero
Valandro,Luiz Felipe
Kantorski,Karla Zanini
Bressiani,José Carlos
Bottino,Marco Antonio
author_role author
author2 Valandro,Luiz Felipe
Kantorski,Karla Zanini
Bressiani,José Carlos
Bottino,Marco Antonio
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bottino,Marco Cícero
Valandro,Luiz Felipe
Kantorski,Karla Zanini
Bressiani,José Carlos
Bottino,Marco Antonio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv alumina-reinforced feldspar ceramic
surface roughness
finishing and polishing
topic alumina-reinforced feldspar ceramic
surface roughness
finishing and polishing
description The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that mechanical polishing methods of ceramic surfaces allow similar superficial roughness to that of glazed surfaces. Twenty-five Vitadur Alpha ceramic discs (5 mm x 2 mm) were prepared according to the manufacturer's specifications. All specimens were glazed and randomly assigned to 5 groups (n=5), according to finishing and polishing protocols: G1: glazed (control); G2: diamond bur finishing; G3: G2 + silicon rubber tip polishing; G4: G3 + felt disc/diamond polishing paste; G5: G3 + felt disc impregnated with fine-particle diamond paste. Next, surface roughness means (Ra - µm) were calculated. Qualitative analysis was made by scanning electron microscopy. Surface roughness data were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey's test at 5% significance level. G1 and G4 were statistically similar (p>0.05). G2 presented the highest roughness means (p<0.05) followed by groups G3, G5, G4 and G1 in a decreasing order. The hypothesis was partially confirmed as only the mechanical polishing (G4) produced similar superficial roughness to that of surface glazing, although finishing and polishing are technically critical procedures.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402006000400004
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402006000400004
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0103-64402006000400004
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal v.17 n.4 2006
reponame:Brazilian Dental Journal
instname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
instacron:FUNORP
instname_str Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
instacron_str FUNORP
institution FUNORP
reponame_str Brazilian Dental Journal
collection Brazilian Dental Journal
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br
_version_ 1754204090447953920