Early implementation of the penalty: between the guarantee of the state of innocence, res judicata and the absolute theories of the penalty

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: David, Décio Franco
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Bonato, Gilson
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/180
Resumo: This paper analyses the judgment of habeas corpus number 126.292/SP, in which the Federal Supreme Court decided for the possibility of early execution of the penalty when there is a confirmatory decision of the conviction in Second Degree of Jurisdiction. The work has developed under the deductive method, having as technique the indirect documentation with secondary sources (bibliographic research). The paper aims to demonstrate the mismatch of the decision under the cut of the central arguments presented in the judgment, understanding that there is, initially, a difficulty of understanding as to the legal nature of the guarantee of the state of innocence and, at the end, demonstrating how the decision hurts the concept of res judicata and reinforces the absolute theories of punishment.
id IBRASPP-1_05c0489eed6f01df127af31545c90b20
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/180
network_acronym_str IBRASPP-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Early implementation of the penalty: between the guarantee of the state of innocence, res judicata and the absolute theories of the penaltyExecução antecipada da pena: entre a garantia do estado de inocência, a coisa julgada e as teorias absolutas da penaPresumption of innocenceLegal rules and principlesAbsolute theories of punishment.Presunção de InocênciaNormas regras e normas princípiosTeorias absolutas da pena.This paper analyses the judgment of habeas corpus number 126.292/SP, in which the Federal Supreme Court decided for the possibility of early execution of the penalty when there is a confirmatory decision of the conviction in Second Degree of Jurisdiction. The work has developed under the deductive method, having as technique the indirect documentation with secondary sources (bibliographic research). The paper aims to demonstrate the mismatch of the decision under the cut of the central arguments presented in the judgment, understanding that there is, initially, a difficulty of understanding as to the legal nature of the guarantee of the state of innocence and, at the end, demonstrating how the decision hurts the concept of res judicata and reinforces the absolute theories of punishment.O presente trabalho analisa o julgamento do Habeas Corpus nº 126.292/SP, no qual o Supremo Tribunal Federal decidiu pela possibilidade da execução antecipada da pena quando houver decisão confirmatória da condenação em Segundo Grau de Jurisdição. O trabalho foi desenvolvido sob o método dedutivo, tendo como técnica a documentação indireta com fontes secundárias (pesquisa bibliográfica). O trabalho objetiva responder a duas indagações: 1) a execução antecipada de pena pode mudar os conceitos de coisa julgada e presunção de inocência?; 2) a execução antecipada de pena corresponde ao retorno das teorias absolutas da pena? Em síntese, o artigo almeja demonstrar o desacerto da decisão sob o recorte dos argumentos centrais apresentados no julgado, compreendendo que há inicialmente uma dificuldade de compreensão quanto à natureza jurídica da garantia do estado de inocência, e, ao final, demonstrando como a decisão fere o conceito de coisa julgada e reforça as teorias absolutas da pena. Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2018-10-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/18010.22197/rbdpp.v4i3.180Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 4 No. 3 (2018); 1143-1174Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 4 Núm. 3 (2018); 1143-1174Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 4 N. 3 (2018); 1143-1174Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 4 n. 3 (2018); 1143-11742525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v4i3reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/180/138Copyright (c) 2018 Décio Franco David, Gilson Bonatoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDavid, Décio FrancoBonato, Gilson2018-10-31T21:13:57Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/180Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2018-10-31T21:13:57Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Early implementation of the penalty: between the guarantee of the state of innocence, res judicata and the absolute theories of the penalty
Execução antecipada da pena: entre a garantia do estado de inocência, a coisa julgada e as teorias absolutas da pena
title Early implementation of the penalty: between the guarantee of the state of innocence, res judicata and the absolute theories of the penalty
spellingShingle Early implementation of the penalty: between the guarantee of the state of innocence, res judicata and the absolute theories of the penalty
David, Décio Franco
Presumption of innocence
Legal rules and principles
Absolute theories of punishment.
Presunção de Inocência
Normas regras e normas princípios
Teorias absolutas da pena.
title_short Early implementation of the penalty: between the guarantee of the state of innocence, res judicata and the absolute theories of the penalty
title_full Early implementation of the penalty: between the guarantee of the state of innocence, res judicata and the absolute theories of the penalty
title_fullStr Early implementation of the penalty: between the guarantee of the state of innocence, res judicata and the absolute theories of the penalty
title_full_unstemmed Early implementation of the penalty: between the guarantee of the state of innocence, res judicata and the absolute theories of the penalty
title_sort Early implementation of the penalty: between the guarantee of the state of innocence, res judicata and the absolute theories of the penalty
author David, Décio Franco
author_facet David, Décio Franco
Bonato, Gilson
author_role author
author2 Bonato, Gilson
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv David, Décio Franco
Bonato, Gilson
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Presumption of innocence
Legal rules and principles
Absolute theories of punishment.
Presunção de Inocência
Normas regras e normas princípios
Teorias absolutas da pena.
topic Presumption of innocence
Legal rules and principles
Absolute theories of punishment.
Presunção de Inocência
Normas regras e normas princípios
Teorias absolutas da pena.
description This paper analyses the judgment of habeas corpus number 126.292/SP, in which the Federal Supreme Court decided for the possibility of early execution of the penalty when there is a confirmatory decision of the conviction in Second Degree of Jurisdiction. The work has developed under the deductive method, having as technique the indirect documentation with secondary sources (bibliographic research). The paper aims to demonstrate the mismatch of the decision under the cut of the central arguments presented in the judgment, understanding that there is, initially, a difficulty of understanding as to the legal nature of the guarantee of the state of innocence and, at the end, demonstrating how the decision hurts the concept of res judicata and reinforces the absolute theories of punishment.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-10-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/180
10.22197/rbdpp.v4i3.180
url https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/180
identifier_str_mv 10.22197/rbdpp.v4i3.180
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/180/138
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Décio Franco David, Gilson Bonato
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Décio Franco David, Gilson Bonato
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 4 No. 3 (2018); 1143-1174
Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 4 Núm. 3 (2018); 1143-1174
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 4 N. 3 (2018); 1143-1174
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 4 n. 3 (2018); 1143-1174
2525-510X
10.22197/rbdpp.v4i3
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron:IBRASPP
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron_str IBRASPP
institution IBRASPP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@ibraspp.com.br
_version_ 1809281940339032064