Criminal Non-Prosecution Agreement: general aspects and comments about the extrajudicial confession
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/907 |
Resumo: | With the introduction of the Criminal Non-Prosecution Agreement in the criminal procedural law by L. 13.964, of 2019, the criminal consensual justice system now has yet another important institute. Although initially provided for in CNMP Resolution n. 181, of 2017, its legal provision permanently removed the criticisms directed at its implementation through an infralegal act. In addition to exploring the legal nature of the ANPP, the possibility of its application in various crimes, its relationship with the constitutional right to silence, as well as the need for the Investigated to know the evidence produced against him to better evaluate the proposed agreement, the study analyzes the extrajudicial confession as an essential requirement for its celebration and approval by the Judiciary, including the exposition of the understandings of the Federal Supreme Court and the Superior Court of Justice that are formed on the subject. In the end, in view of the researched precedents, we seek to answer the following questions: do the STF and the STJ require certain requirements to validate the extrajudicial confession? Do you understand that judicial appreciation is relevant? |
id |
IBRASPP-1_1a72acaea6c1f32a3e7d3092459ae185 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/907 |
network_acronym_str |
IBRASPP-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Criminal Non-Prosecution Agreement: general aspects and comments about the extrajudicial confessionAcordo de Não Persecução Penal (ANPP): aspectos gerais e observações sobre a confissão extrajudicialANPPConfissãolei anticrimeCriminal Non-Prosecution Agreementconfessionanti-crime lawWith the introduction of the Criminal Non-Prosecution Agreement in the criminal procedural law by L. 13.964, of 2019, the criminal consensual justice system now has yet another important institute. Although initially provided for in CNMP Resolution n. 181, of 2017, its legal provision permanently removed the criticisms directed at its implementation through an infralegal act. In addition to exploring the legal nature of the ANPP, the possibility of its application in various crimes, its relationship with the constitutional right to silence, as well as the need for the Investigated to know the evidence produced against him to better evaluate the proposed agreement, the study analyzes the extrajudicial confession as an essential requirement for its celebration and approval by the Judiciary, including the exposition of the understandings of the Federal Supreme Court and the Superior Court of Justice that are formed on the subject. In the end, in view of the researched precedents, we seek to answer the following questions: do the STF and the STJ require certain requirements to validate the extrajudicial confession? Do you understand that judicial appreciation is relevant?Com a introdução do Acordo de Não Persecução Penal na lei processual penal pela Lei nº 13.964, de 2019, o sistema de justiça consensual criminal passou a contar com mais um importante instituto. Embora previsto inicialmente na Resolução CNMP nº 181, de 2017, a sua previsão legal afastou de vez as críticas direcionadas à sua implementação por meio de ato infralegal. Além de explorar a natureza jurídica do ANPP, a possibilidade de sua aplicação em variados crimes, a sua relação com o direito constitucional ao silêncio, bem como a necessidade de o Investigado conhecer as provas produzidas contra ele para melhor avaliar o acordo proposto, o estudo analisa a confissão extrajudicial como requisito essencial para a sua celebração e homologação pelo Judiciário, inclusive com a exposição dos entendimentos do Supremo Tribunal Federal e do Superior Tribunal de Justiça que se formam sobre o tema, para ao final, à vista dos precedentes pesquisados, buscar responder às seguintes indagações: o STF e o STJ exigem determinados requisitos para validar a confissão extrajudicial? Entendem ser relevante a sua apreciação pelo Judiciário?Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2024-03-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/90710.22197/rbdpp.v10i1.907Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024)Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 10 Núm. 1 (2024)Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 10 N. 1 (2024)Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 10 n. 1 (2024)2525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v10i1reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/907/521Copyright (c) 2024 Rogerio Schietti Cruz, Eduardo Martins Neiva Monteirohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSchietti Cruz, RogerioMartins Neiva Monteiro, Eduardo2024-03-27T10:37:17Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/907Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2024-03-27T10:37:17Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Criminal Non-Prosecution Agreement: general aspects and comments about the extrajudicial confession Acordo de Não Persecução Penal (ANPP): aspectos gerais e observações sobre a confissão extrajudicial |
title |
Criminal Non-Prosecution Agreement: general aspects and comments about the extrajudicial confession |
spellingShingle |
Criminal Non-Prosecution Agreement: general aspects and comments about the extrajudicial confession Schietti Cruz, Rogerio ANPP Confissão lei anticrime Criminal Non-Prosecution Agreement confession anti-crime law |
title_short |
Criminal Non-Prosecution Agreement: general aspects and comments about the extrajudicial confession |
title_full |
Criminal Non-Prosecution Agreement: general aspects and comments about the extrajudicial confession |
title_fullStr |
Criminal Non-Prosecution Agreement: general aspects and comments about the extrajudicial confession |
title_full_unstemmed |
Criminal Non-Prosecution Agreement: general aspects and comments about the extrajudicial confession |
title_sort |
Criminal Non-Prosecution Agreement: general aspects and comments about the extrajudicial confession |
author |
Schietti Cruz, Rogerio |
author_facet |
Schietti Cruz, Rogerio Martins Neiva Monteiro, Eduardo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Martins Neiva Monteiro, Eduardo |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Schietti Cruz, Rogerio Martins Neiva Monteiro, Eduardo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
ANPP Confissão lei anticrime Criminal Non-Prosecution Agreement confession anti-crime law |
topic |
ANPP Confissão lei anticrime Criminal Non-Prosecution Agreement confession anti-crime law |
description |
With the introduction of the Criminal Non-Prosecution Agreement in the criminal procedural law by L. 13.964, of 2019, the criminal consensual justice system now has yet another important institute. Although initially provided for in CNMP Resolution n. 181, of 2017, its legal provision permanently removed the criticisms directed at its implementation through an infralegal act. In addition to exploring the legal nature of the ANPP, the possibility of its application in various crimes, its relationship with the constitutional right to silence, as well as the need for the Investigated to know the evidence produced against him to better evaluate the proposed agreement, the study analyzes the extrajudicial confession as an essential requirement for its celebration and approval by the Judiciary, including the exposition of the understandings of the Federal Supreme Court and the Superior Court of Justice that are formed on the subject. In the end, in view of the researched precedents, we seek to answer the following questions: do the STF and the STJ require certain requirements to validate the extrajudicial confession? Do you understand that judicial appreciation is relevant? |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-03-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/907 10.22197/rbdpp.v10i1.907 |
url |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/907 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22197/rbdpp.v10i1.907 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/907/521 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Rogerio Schietti Cruz, Eduardo Martins Neiva Monteiro https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Rogerio Schietti Cruz, Eduardo Martins Neiva Monteiro https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024) Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 10 Núm. 1 (2024) Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 10 N. 1 (2024) Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 10 n. 1 (2024) 2525-510X 10.22197/rbdpp.v10i1 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) instacron:IBRASPP |
instname_str |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
instacron_str |
IBRASPP |
institution |
IBRASPP |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@ibraspp.com.br |
_version_ |
1809281941802844160 |