The role of the constitutional courts and ECtHR in shaping negotiated justice mechanisms: – a comparative perspective

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Czerwińska, Dorota
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/681
Resumo: The article analyses the role of constitutional courts of Germany, France and Italy in shaping negotiated justice mechanisms in these countries with regard to their procedural and – to some extent – substantive fairness as well as the role of the ECtHR in establishing common standards of fairness of such settlements. In each of the analysed countries, as well as in the case law of the EctHR, it was frequently questioned whether institutions similar to plea bargaining are conform to continental constitutional concepts as well as the standard of the fair trial derived from the ECHR. The role of constitutional courts and the ECtHR in shaping fairness of criminal justice settlements has been non-negligible, although differed in compared legal systems: in France and in case of ECtHR it has rather been a controlling one, whereas in Germany and Italy significant tensions between constitutional courts and the legislature as well as lower courts have arisen and had to be resolved.
id IBRASPP-1_63639205e4d55e55da0c88450168ab1c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/681
network_acronym_str IBRASPP-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The role of the constitutional courts and ECtHR in shaping negotiated justice mechanisms: – a comparative perspectiveO papel das cortes constitucionais e do TEDH em modelar os mecanismos de justiça negocial: – uma perspectiva comparadaplea bargainingnegotiated justicefair trial rightscomparative criminal procedureacordo criminaljustiça negocialdevido processoprocesso penal comparadoThe article analyses the role of constitutional courts of Germany, France and Italy in shaping negotiated justice mechanisms in these countries with regard to their procedural and – to some extent – substantive fairness as well as the role of the ECtHR in establishing common standards of fairness of such settlements. In each of the analysed countries, as well as in the case law of the EctHR, it was frequently questioned whether institutions similar to plea bargaining are conform to continental constitutional concepts as well as the standard of the fair trial derived from the ECHR. The role of constitutional courts and the ECtHR in shaping fairness of criminal justice settlements has been non-negligible, although differed in compared legal systems: in France and in case of ECtHR it has rather been a controlling one, whereas in Germany and Italy significant tensions between constitutional courts and the legislature as well as lower courts have arisen and had to be resolved.Este artigo analisa o papel das cortes constitucionais da Alemanha, França e Itália ao modelar os mecanismos de justiça criminal negocial nesses países em relação à legitimidade processual e – em alguma medida – material, bem como o papel do Tribunal Europeu de Direitos Humanos em estabelecer os parâmetros comuns da legitimidade de tais acordos. Em cada país analisado, assim como na jurisprudência do TEDH, é frequentemente questionada a conformidade dos institutos semelhantes à plea barganing em relação aos conceitos constitucionais continentais e ao standard de justo processo estabelecido pelo TEDH. O papel das cortes constitucionais e do TEDH em modelar da legitimidade dos acordos criminais não é negligenciável, mas difere nos sistemas jurídicos comparados: na França e no caso do TEDH, ele foi um pouco mais limitado, enquanto na Alemanha e na Itália, tensões significativas surgiram entre as cortes constitucionais e o legislador e tiveram que ser resolvidas.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2022-04-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/68110.22197/rbdpp.v8i1.681Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2022)Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 8 Núm. 1 (2022)Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 8 N. 1 (2022)Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 8 n. 1 (2022)2525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v8i1reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPenghttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/681/434Copyright (c) 2022 Dorota Czerwińskahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCzerwińska, DorotaCzerwińska, Dorota2022-06-28T13:26:21Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/681Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2022-06-28T13:26:21Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The role of the constitutional courts and ECtHR in shaping negotiated justice mechanisms: – a comparative perspective
O papel das cortes constitucionais e do TEDH em modelar os mecanismos de justiça negocial: – uma perspectiva comparada
title The role of the constitutional courts and ECtHR in shaping negotiated justice mechanisms: – a comparative perspective
spellingShingle The role of the constitutional courts and ECtHR in shaping negotiated justice mechanisms: – a comparative perspective
Czerwińska, Dorota
plea bargaining
negotiated justice
fair trial rights
comparative criminal procedure
acordo criminal
justiça negocial
devido processo
processo penal comparado
title_short The role of the constitutional courts and ECtHR in shaping negotiated justice mechanisms: – a comparative perspective
title_full The role of the constitutional courts and ECtHR in shaping negotiated justice mechanisms: – a comparative perspective
title_fullStr The role of the constitutional courts and ECtHR in shaping negotiated justice mechanisms: – a comparative perspective
title_full_unstemmed The role of the constitutional courts and ECtHR in shaping negotiated justice mechanisms: – a comparative perspective
title_sort The role of the constitutional courts and ECtHR in shaping negotiated justice mechanisms: – a comparative perspective
author Czerwińska, Dorota
author_facet Czerwińska, Dorota
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Czerwińska, Dorota
Czerwińska, Dorota
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv plea bargaining
negotiated justice
fair trial rights
comparative criminal procedure
acordo criminal
justiça negocial
devido processo
processo penal comparado
topic plea bargaining
negotiated justice
fair trial rights
comparative criminal procedure
acordo criminal
justiça negocial
devido processo
processo penal comparado
description The article analyses the role of constitutional courts of Germany, France and Italy in shaping negotiated justice mechanisms in these countries with regard to their procedural and – to some extent – substantive fairness as well as the role of the ECtHR in establishing common standards of fairness of such settlements. In each of the analysed countries, as well as in the case law of the EctHR, it was frequently questioned whether institutions similar to plea bargaining are conform to continental constitutional concepts as well as the standard of the fair trial derived from the ECHR. The role of constitutional courts and the ECtHR in shaping fairness of criminal justice settlements has been non-negligible, although differed in compared legal systems: in France and in case of ECtHR it has rather been a controlling one, whereas in Germany and Italy significant tensions between constitutional courts and the legislature as well as lower courts have arisen and had to be resolved.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-04-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/681
10.22197/rbdpp.v8i1.681
url https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/681
identifier_str_mv 10.22197/rbdpp.v8i1.681
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/681/434
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Dorota Czerwińska
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Dorota Czerwińska
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2022)
Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 8 Núm. 1 (2022)
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 8 N. 1 (2022)
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 8 n. 1 (2022)
2525-510X
10.22197/rbdpp.v8i1
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron:IBRASPP
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron_str IBRASPP
institution IBRASPP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@ibraspp.com.br
_version_ 1809281941219835904

Registros relacionados