Flexibility of legality in the Supreme Court’s case-law: enforcing criminal sentences pending judgement before high courts

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Estellita, Heloisa
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/141
Resumo: The instrumentalism and flexibility of the legal norms that prevail today in our legal culture, especially in its jurisprudential component, create inequality and insecurity. The case of the enforcement of a criminal sentence pending judgement before high courts depicts the methods for this sake and proves that its outcome is the denial of equality and security. This essay deals with the arguments developed on the adjudication of HC 126.292 by the Brazilian Supreme Court in order to corroborate its findings.
id IBRASPP-1_6d931a940d89497b4900d259b7cd9ad1
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/141
network_acronym_str IBRASPP-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Flexibility of legality in the Supreme Court’s case-law: enforcing criminal sentences pending judgement before high courtsA flexibilização da legalidade no Supremo Tribunal Federal: o caso da execução da condenação sujeita a apelos extremosService of the sentencepresumption of innocencelegality.Execução penalpresunção de inocêncialegalidade.The instrumentalism and flexibility of the legal norms that prevail today in our legal culture, especially in its jurisprudential component, create inequality and insecurity. The case of the enforcement of a criminal sentence pending judgement before high courts depicts the methods for this sake and proves that its outcome is the denial of equality and security. This essay deals with the arguments developed on the adjudication of HC 126.292 by the Brazilian Supreme Court in order to corroborate its findings.O instrumentalismo e a flexibilização das normas jurídicas que reinam, hoje, em nossa cultura jurídica, especialmente em seu componente jurisprudencial, criam desigualdade e insegurança. O caso da execução da condenação sujeita a apelos extremos retrata os métodos para isso utilizados e comprova que seu produto é a denegação de igualdade e segurança aos jurisdicionados. O artigo analisa, essencialmente, os argumentos utilizados no julgamento do HC 126.292/STF para evidenciar esse quadro.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2018-06-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/14110.22197/rbdpp.v4i2.141Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 4 No. 2 (2018); 709-730Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 4 Núm. 2 (2018); 709-730Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 4 N. 2 (2018); 709-730Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 4 n. 2 (2018); 709-7302525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v4i2reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/141/125Copyright (c) 2018 Heloisa Estellitainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEstellita, Heloisa2018-06-17T21:16:42Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/141Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2018-06-17T21:16:42Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Flexibility of legality in the Supreme Court’s case-law: enforcing criminal sentences pending judgement before high courts
A flexibilização da legalidade no Supremo Tribunal Federal: o caso da execução da condenação sujeita a apelos extremos
title Flexibility of legality in the Supreme Court’s case-law: enforcing criminal sentences pending judgement before high courts
spellingShingle Flexibility of legality in the Supreme Court’s case-law: enforcing criminal sentences pending judgement before high courts
Estellita, Heloisa
Service of the sentence
presumption of innocence
legality.
Execução penal
presunção de inocência
legalidade.
title_short Flexibility of legality in the Supreme Court’s case-law: enforcing criminal sentences pending judgement before high courts
title_full Flexibility of legality in the Supreme Court’s case-law: enforcing criminal sentences pending judgement before high courts
title_fullStr Flexibility of legality in the Supreme Court’s case-law: enforcing criminal sentences pending judgement before high courts
title_full_unstemmed Flexibility of legality in the Supreme Court’s case-law: enforcing criminal sentences pending judgement before high courts
title_sort Flexibility of legality in the Supreme Court’s case-law: enforcing criminal sentences pending judgement before high courts
author Estellita, Heloisa
author_facet Estellita, Heloisa
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Estellita, Heloisa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Service of the sentence
presumption of innocence
legality.
Execução penal
presunção de inocência
legalidade.
topic Service of the sentence
presumption of innocence
legality.
Execução penal
presunção de inocência
legalidade.
description The instrumentalism and flexibility of the legal norms that prevail today in our legal culture, especially in its jurisprudential component, create inequality and insecurity. The case of the enforcement of a criminal sentence pending judgement before high courts depicts the methods for this sake and proves that its outcome is the denial of equality and security. This essay deals with the arguments developed on the adjudication of HC 126.292 by the Brazilian Supreme Court in order to corroborate its findings.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-06-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/141
10.22197/rbdpp.v4i2.141
url https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/141
identifier_str_mv 10.22197/rbdpp.v4i2.141
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/141/125
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Heloisa Estellita
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Heloisa Estellita
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 4 No. 2 (2018); 709-730
Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 4 Núm. 2 (2018); 709-730
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 4 N. 2 (2018); 709-730
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 4 n. 2 (2018); 709-730
2525-510X
10.22197/rbdpp.v4i2
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron:IBRASPP
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron_str IBRASPP
institution IBRASPP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@ibraspp.com.br
_version_ 1798329401761333248

Registros relacionados