The normative conditions of the judgment of fact and the so-called principle of sufficient reason, for the purpose of the appeal for nullity in the Chilean criminal procedure: A procedural criticism

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: del Río Ferretti, Carlos
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/688
Resumo: In this paper, a procedural analysis of the so-called principle of sufficient reason used in the Chilean criminal process is formulated. For this, it starts by establishing previous concepts on the normative conditions of the factual judgment in relation to the probative merit of the process, in order to examine in that framework and context the meaning and benefit that has been attributed to the principle of sufficient reason in the Chilean criminal process, and the consequences that derive from it for the correct application of the appeal for annulment. In this regard, a dogmatic reasoning is offered that aims to demonstrate that the principle in question is an unnecessary and erroneous concept in the Chilean legal system.
id IBRASPP-1_8193de37b84189c7dfe1ed78eb2cf943
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/688
network_acronym_str IBRASPP-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The normative conditions of the judgment of fact and the so-called principle of sufficient reason, for the purpose of the appeal for nullity in the Chilean criminal procedure: A procedural criticismLas condiciones normativas del juicio de hecho y el denominado principio de razón suficiente, a propósito del recurso de nulidad en el proceso penal chileno: Una crítica procesalPrincipio de razón suficientevaloración de la pruebajuicio de hechoPrinciple of sufficient reasonevaluation of the evidencejudgment of factIn this paper, a procedural analysis of the so-called principle of sufficient reason used in the Chilean criminal process is formulated. For this, it starts by establishing previous concepts on the normative conditions of the factual judgment in relation to the probative merit of the process, in order to examine in that framework and context the meaning and benefit that has been attributed to the principle of sufficient reason in the Chilean criminal process, and the consequences that derive from it for the correct application of the appeal for annulment. In this regard, a dogmatic reasoning is offered that aims to demonstrate that the principle in question is an unnecessary and erroneous concept in the Chilean legal system.En este trabajo se formula un análisis procesal del denominado principio de razón suficiente utilizado en el proceso penal chileno. Para ello se parte por fijar conceptos previos sobre las condiciones normativas del juicio de hecho en relación al mérito probatorio del proceso, con el fin de examinar en ese marco y contexto el sentido y el provecho que se ha querido atribuir al principio de razón suficiente, y las consecuencias que de ahí derivan para la recta aplicación del recurso de nulidad. Al respecto se ofrece un razonamiento dogmático que pretende demostrar que el principio en cuestión es un concepto innecesario y erróneo en el régimen jurídico chileno.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2022-08-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/68810.22197/rbdpp.v8i2.688Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 8 No. 2 (2022)Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 8 Núm. 2 (2022)Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 8 N. 2 (2022)Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 8 n. 2 (2022)2525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v8i2reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPspahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/688/451Copyright (c) 2022 Carlos del Río Ferrettihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessdel Río Ferretti, Carlosdel Río Ferretti, Carlos2022-08-26T11:03:45Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/688Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2022-08-26T11:03:45Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The normative conditions of the judgment of fact and the so-called principle of sufficient reason, for the purpose of the appeal for nullity in the Chilean criminal procedure: A procedural criticism
Las condiciones normativas del juicio de hecho y el denominado principio de razón suficiente, a propósito del recurso de nulidad en el proceso penal chileno: Una crítica procesal
title The normative conditions of the judgment of fact and the so-called principle of sufficient reason, for the purpose of the appeal for nullity in the Chilean criminal procedure: A procedural criticism
spellingShingle The normative conditions of the judgment of fact and the so-called principle of sufficient reason, for the purpose of the appeal for nullity in the Chilean criminal procedure: A procedural criticism
del Río Ferretti, Carlos
Principio de razón suficiente
valoración de la prueba
juicio de hecho
Principle of sufficient reason
evaluation of the evidence
judgment of fact
title_short The normative conditions of the judgment of fact and the so-called principle of sufficient reason, for the purpose of the appeal for nullity in the Chilean criminal procedure: A procedural criticism
title_full The normative conditions of the judgment of fact and the so-called principle of sufficient reason, for the purpose of the appeal for nullity in the Chilean criminal procedure: A procedural criticism
title_fullStr The normative conditions of the judgment of fact and the so-called principle of sufficient reason, for the purpose of the appeal for nullity in the Chilean criminal procedure: A procedural criticism
title_full_unstemmed The normative conditions of the judgment of fact and the so-called principle of sufficient reason, for the purpose of the appeal for nullity in the Chilean criminal procedure: A procedural criticism
title_sort The normative conditions of the judgment of fact and the so-called principle of sufficient reason, for the purpose of the appeal for nullity in the Chilean criminal procedure: A procedural criticism
author del Río Ferretti, Carlos
author_facet del Río Ferretti, Carlos
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv del Río Ferretti, Carlos
del Río Ferretti, Carlos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Principio de razón suficiente
valoración de la prueba
juicio de hecho
Principle of sufficient reason
evaluation of the evidence
judgment of fact
topic Principio de razón suficiente
valoración de la prueba
juicio de hecho
Principle of sufficient reason
evaluation of the evidence
judgment of fact
description In this paper, a procedural analysis of the so-called principle of sufficient reason used in the Chilean criminal process is formulated. For this, it starts by establishing previous concepts on the normative conditions of the factual judgment in relation to the probative merit of the process, in order to examine in that framework and context the meaning and benefit that has been attributed to the principle of sufficient reason in the Chilean criminal process, and the consequences that derive from it for the correct application of the appeal for annulment. In this regard, a dogmatic reasoning is offered that aims to demonstrate that the principle in question is an unnecessary and erroneous concept in the Chilean legal system.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-08-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/688
10.22197/rbdpp.v8i2.688
url https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/688
identifier_str_mv 10.22197/rbdpp.v8i2.688
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/688/451
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Carlos del Río Ferretti
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Carlos del Río Ferretti
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 8 No. 2 (2022)
Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 8 Núm. 2 (2022)
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 8 N. 2 (2022)
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 8 n. 2 (2022)
2525-510X
10.22197/rbdpp.v8i2
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron:IBRASPP
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron_str IBRASPP
institution IBRASPP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@ibraspp.com.br
_version_ 1809281941226127360

Registros relacionados