The Dual Sovereignty Doctrine in the Case Law of the United States Supreme Court
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/297 |
Resumo: | Under the dual sovereignty doctrine the Supreme Court has accepted that different sovereigns may prosecute an individual for the same facts without violating the double jeopardy clause if the act of the individual infringed the laws of each sovereignty. This article aims to analyze the evolution of the dual sovereignty doctrine in the case law of the Supreme Court of the United States. Although the doctrine has been highly criticized by scholars, the Supreme Court has persistently upheld it. . Besides, the article addresses the safeguards that currently exist against eventual abuses of the dual sovereignty doctrine, such as the “sham exception” and the “Petite Policy”. Finally, since the previous safeguards have been considered insufficient, the contribution briefly explores the possibility of applying the Eighth Amendment as an additional protection against eventual abuses committed under the dual sovereignty doctrine. |
id |
IBRASPP-1_9b615c3545f540dfe62fa18b77bfd2b8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/297 |
network_acronym_str |
IBRASPP-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The Dual Sovereignty Doctrine in the Case Law of the United States Supreme CourtLa doctrina de la soberanía dual en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Suprema de Estados UnidosDouble jeopardymultiple prosecutionsdual sovereignty doctrine.Ne bis in idempersecuciones múltiplesdoctrina de la soberanía dual.Under the dual sovereignty doctrine the Supreme Court has accepted that different sovereigns may prosecute an individual for the same facts without violating the double jeopardy clause if the act of the individual infringed the laws of each sovereignty. This article aims to analyze the evolution of the dual sovereignty doctrine in the case law of the Supreme Court of the United States. Although the doctrine has been highly criticized by scholars, the Supreme Court has persistently upheld it. . Besides, the article addresses the safeguards that currently exist against eventual abuses of the dual sovereignty doctrine, such as the “sham exception” and the “Petite Policy”. Finally, since the previous safeguards have been considered insufficient, the contribution briefly explores the possibility of applying the Eighth Amendment as an additional protection against eventual abuses committed under the dual sovereignty doctrine. Bajo la doctrina de la soberanía dual, la Corte Suprema ha aceptado que diferentes soberanos persigan penalmente a la misma persona sin violar la cláusula double jeopardy por los mismos hechos si es que la conducta de tal individuo infringió las leyes de cada soberano. El presente artículo tiene por objeto estudiar la evolución de la doctrina de la soberanía dual en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Suprema. Además, el artículo aborda las protecciones actualmente existentes en contra de eventuales abusos que puedan ser cometidos bajo la doctrina de la soberanía dual, tales como la “sham exception” y la “Petite Policy”. Finalmente, y dado que las anteriores protecciones han sido consideradas insuficientes, el artículo explora brevemente la posibilidad de aplicar la Octava Enmienda como una protección adicional en contra de eventuales abusos que la aplicación de la doctrina de la soberanía dual pueda generar. Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2020-10-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/29710.22197/rbdpp.v6i3.297Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 6 No. 3 (2020); 1503-1540Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 6 Núm. 3 (2020); 1503-1540Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 6 N. 3 (2020); 1503-1540Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 6 n. 3 (2020); 1503-15402525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v6i3reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPenghttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/297/279https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/297/301Copyright (c) 2020 Javier Escobar Veasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEscobar Veas, Javier2020-12-03T09:21:01Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/297Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2020-12-03T09:21:01Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Dual Sovereignty Doctrine in the Case Law of the United States Supreme Court La doctrina de la soberanía dual en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos |
title |
The Dual Sovereignty Doctrine in the Case Law of the United States Supreme Court |
spellingShingle |
The Dual Sovereignty Doctrine in the Case Law of the United States Supreme Court Escobar Veas, Javier Double jeopardy multiple prosecutions dual sovereignty doctrine. Ne bis in idem persecuciones múltiples doctrina de la soberanía dual. |
title_short |
The Dual Sovereignty Doctrine in the Case Law of the United States Supreme Court |
title_full |
The Dual Sovereignty Doctrine in the Case Law of the United States Supreme Court |
title_fullStr |
The Dual Sovereignty Doctrine in the Case Law of the United States Supreme Court |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Dual Sovereignty Doctrine in the Case Law of the United States Supreme Court |
title_sort |
The Dual Sovereignty Doctrine in the Case Law of the United States Supreme Court |
author |
Escobar Veas, Javier |
author_facet |
Escobar Veas, Javier |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Escobar Veas, Javier |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Double jeopardy multiple prosecutions dual sovereignty doctrine. Ne bis in idem persecuciones múltiples doctrina de la soberanía dual. |
topic |
Double jeopardy multiple prosecutions dual sovereignty doctrine. Ne bis in idem persecuciones múltiples doctrina de la soberanía dual. |
description |
Under the dual sovereignty doctrine the Supreme Court has accepted that different sovereigns may prosecute an individual for the same facts without violating the double jeopardy clause if the act of the individual infringed the laws of each sovereignty. This article aims to analyze the evolution of the dual sovereignty doctrine in the case law of the Supreme Court of the United States. Although the doctrine has been highly criticized by scholars, the Supreme Court has persistently upheld it. . Besides, the article addresses the safeguards that currently exist against eventual abuses of the dual sovereignty doctrine, such as the “sham exception” and the “Petite Policy”. Finally, since the previous safeguards have been considered insufficient, the contribution briefly explores the possibility of applying the Eighth Amendment as an additional protection against eventual abuses committed under the dual sovereignty doctrine. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-10-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/297 10.22197/rbdpp.v6i3.297 |
url |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/297 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22197/rbdpp.v6i3.297 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/297/279 https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/297/301 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Javier Escobar Veas info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Javier Escobar Veas |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 6 No. 3 (2020); 1503-1540 Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 6 Núm. 3 (2020); 1503-1540 Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 6 N. 3 (2020); 1503-1540 Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 6 n. 3 (2020); 1503-1540 2525-510X 10.22197/rbdpp.v6i3 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) instacron:IBRASPP |
instname_str |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
instacron_str |
IBRASPP |
institution |
IBRASPP |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@ibraspp.com.br |
_version_ |
1809281940487929856 |