The complexity of probatory signification: problems, dimensions, and content of the intentionality of the criminal proof
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/817 |
Resumo: | What do we mean by the assertion "it is proved that"? The main argument of this article is that it is a problem of probative significance, whose proper understanding goes through the central concept of intentionality, about which we found many problems, we need to distinguish semiotic dimensions and specify a constellation of logical notions. The purpose of this article is to discuss these issues, based on an approach that mobilizes arguments from the philosophy of mind and language, especially found in the theories of J. R. Searle. In the end, we hope to make it clear that the evidential meaning, although it presupposes a mind and is found in procedural language, consists of a specific intermediate intentionality, which can theoretically benefit from the two conceptual bases, and thus make evident everything that is assumed in the assertion “it is proven that”. |
id |
IBRASPP-1_b2b7c2bdbdffa4ac1e1155898132ff1d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/817 |
network_acronym_str |
IBRASPP-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The complexity of probatory signification: problems, dimensions, and content of the intentionality of the criminal proofA complexidade da significação probatória: problemas, dimensões e conteúdo da intencionalidade da prova penalsignificaçãointencionalidadesemióticaprovasignificationintentionalitysemioticsproofWhat do we mean by the assertion "it is proved that"? The main argument of this article is that it is a problem of probative significance, whose proper understanding goes through the central concept of intentionality, about which we found many problems, we need to distinguish semiotic dimensions and specify a constellation of logical notions. The purpose of this article is to discuss these issues, based on an approach that mobilizes arguments from the philosophy of mind and language, especially found in the theories of J. R. Searle. In the end, we hope to make it clear that the evidential meaning, although it presupposes a mind and is found in procedural language, consists of a specific intermediate intentionality, which can theoretically benefit from the two conceptual bases, and thus make evident everything that is assumed in the assertion “it is proven that”.O que queremos dizer com a asserção “está provado que”? O argumento principal deste artigo é que se trata de um problema de significação probatória, cuja devida compreensão passa pelo conceito central de intencionalidade, acerca do qual encontramos muitos problemas, precisamos distinguir dimensões semióticas e especificar uma constelação de noções lógicas. O objetivo deste artigo consiste em discutir essas questões, com base em uma abordagem que mobiliza argumentos da filosofia da mente e da linguagem, especialmente encontrados nas teorias de J. R. Searle. Ao final, esperamos tornar claro que a significação probatória, embora pressuponha uma mente e se encontre em linguagem processual, consiste em uma específica intencionalidade intermediária, que se pode beneficiar teoricamente das duas bases conceituais, e assim tornar evidente tudo que se supõe na asserção “está provado que”.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2023-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/81710.22197/rbdpp.v9i2.817Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023)Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 9 Núm. 2 (2023)Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 9 N. 2 (2023)Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 9 n. 2 (2023)2525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v9i2reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/817/498Copyright (c) 2023 Eliomar da Silva Pereirahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessda Silva Pereira, Eliomar2023-06-30T14:01:26Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/817Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2023-06-30T14:01:26Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The complexity of probatory signification: problems, dimensions, and content of the intentionality of the criminal proof A complexidade da significação probatória: problemas, dimensões e conteúdo da intencionalidade da prova penal |
title |
The complexity of probatory signification: problems, dimensions, and content of the intentionality of the criminal proof |
spellingShingle |
The complexity of probatory signification: problems, dimensions, and content of the intentionality of the criminal proof da Silva Pereira, Eliomar significação intencionalidade semiótica prova signification intentionality semiotics proof |
title_short |
The complexity of probatory signification: problems, dimensions, and content of the intentionality of the criminal proof |
title_full |
The complexity of probatory signification: problems, dimensions, and content of the intentionality of the criminal proof |
title_fullStr |
The complexity of probatory signification: problems, dimensions, and content of the intentionality of the criminal proof |
title_full_unstemmed |
The complexity of probatory signification: problems, dimensions, and content of the intentionality of the criminal proof |
title_sort |
The complexity of probatory signification: problems, dimensions, and content of the intentionality of the criminal proof |
author |
da Silva Pereira, Eliomar |
author_facet |
da Silva Pereira, Eliomar |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
da Silva Pereira, Eliomar |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
significação intencionalidade semiótica prova signification intentionality semiotics proof |
topic |
significação intencionalidade semiótica prova signification intentionality semiotics proof |
description |
What do we mean by the assertion "it is proved that"? The main argument of this article is that it is a problem of probative significance, whose proper understanding goes through the central concept of intentionality, about which we found many problems, we need to distinguish semiotic dimensions and specify a constellation of logical notions. The purpose of this article is to discuss these issues, based on an approach that mobilizes arguments from the philosophy of mind and language, especially found in the theories of J. R. Searle. In the end, we hope to make it clear that the evidential meaning, although it presupposes a mind and is found in procedural language, consists of a specific intermediate intentionality, which can theoretically benefit from the two conceptual bases, and thus make evident everything that is assumed in the assertion “it is proven that”. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-06-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/817 10.22197/rbdpp.v9i2.817 |
url |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/817 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22197/rbdpp.v9i2.817 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/817/498 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Eliomar da Silva Pereira https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Eliomar da Silva Pereira https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023) Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 9 Núm. 2 (2023) Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 9 N. 2 (2023) Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 9 n. 2 (2023) 2525-510X 10.22197/rbdpp.v9i2 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) instacron:IBRASPP |
instname_str |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
instacron_str |
IBRASPP |
institution |
IBRASPP |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@ibraspp.com.br |
_version_ |
1809281941742026752 |