Pre-trial detention and reasonable time in the Brazilian Superior Courts’ jurisprudence
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/176 |
Resumo: | Being the pre-trial detention the most severe precautionary measure and considering that the Judiciary has been trivializing its application, by totalizing approximately 40% of provisional prisoners in prisons custody, this present research aims to analyze the Superior Courts decisions when deliberating about the reasonableness of the precautionary prison. In conclusion, it is intended to expose how the precautionary prison duration has been deliberated on writs judgment, analyzing its content, along with the method applied when computing the precautionary prison term reasonableness. According to the statistics presented, the national Superior Courts demonstrate propensity on maintaining extended provisional prison by using generic assertion, validating the precautionary prison significant rate in Brazil. |
id |
IBRASPP-1_c8f8a65a878bbc4018fb08e578fcea6a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/176 |
network_acronym_str |
IBRASPP-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Pre-trial detention and reasonable time in the Brazilian Superior Courts’ jurisprudencePrisão cautelar e prazo razoável na jurisprudência dos Tribunais Superiores brasileirosreasonable timepre-trial detentionjurisprudence.prazo razoávelprisão cautelarjurisprudência.Being the pre-trial detention the most severe precautionary measure and considering that the Judiciary has been trivializing its application, by totalizing approximately 40% of provisional prisoners in prisons custody, this present research aims to analyze the Superior Courts decisions when deliberating about the reasonableness of the precautionary prison. In conclusion, it is intended to expose how the precautionary prison duration has been deliberated on writs judgment, analyzing its content, along with the method applied when computing the precautionary prison term reasonableness. According to the statistics presented, the national Superior Courts demonstrate propensity on maintaining extended provisional prison by using generic assertion, validating the precautionary prison significant rate in Brazil.Considerando-se que a prisão é a medida cautelar mais gravosa do ordenamento jurídico brasileiro e sua aplicação tem sido banalizada pelo Poder Judiciário, ao haver cerca de 40% de presos provisórios nos estabelecimentos prisionais pátrios, tem-se como escopo da presente pesquisa a realização de um diagnóstico sobre o conteúdo das decisões dos Tribunais Superiores pátrios cujo objeto é a análise da razoabilidade da prisão cautelar. Em suma, pretende-se desvelar como são julgados os habeas corpus e os recursos ordinários em habeas corpusacerca da temática da duração da prisão cautelar, delineando-se o conteúdo de cada decisão e o método empregado para aferição da razoabilidade do prazo da prisão cautelar. Diante dos dados apresentados, conclui-se que há tendência nos Tribunais Superiores pátrios em manter prisões provisórias longas por meio de argumentação genérica, pautada em elementos vagos, o que corrobora certamente com a existência do alto índice de prisões cautelares nos estabelecimentos prisionais brasileiros.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2019-03-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/17610.22197/rbdpp.v5i1.176Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019); 389-438Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2019); 389-438Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 5 N. 1 (2019); 389-438Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 5 n. 1 (2019); 389-4382525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v5i1reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/176/159Copyright (c) 2019 Daiana Santos Ryuinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRyu, Daiana Santos2020-07-20T07:42:33Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/176Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2020-07-20T07:42:33Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Pre-trial detention and reasonable time in the Brazilian Superior Courts’ jurisprudence Prisão cautelar e prazo razoável na jurisprudência dos Tribunais Superiores brasileiros |
title |
Pre-trial detention and reasonable time in the Brazilian Superior Courts’ jurisprudence |
spellingShingle |
Pre-trial detention and reasonable time in the Brazilian Superior Courts’ jurisprudence Ryu, Daiana Santos reasonable time pre-trial detention jurisprudence. prazo razoável prisão cautelar jurisprudência. |
title_short |
Pre-trial detention and reasonable time in the Brazilian Superior Courts’ jurisprudence |
title_full |
Pre-trial detention and reasonable time in the Brazilian Superior Courts’ jurisprudence |
title_fullStr |
Pre-trial detention and reasonable time in the Brazilian Superior Courts’ jurisprudence |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pre-trial detention and reasonable time in the Brazilian Superior Courts’ jurisprudence |
title_sort |
Pre-trial detention and reasonable time in the Brazilian Superior Courts’ jurisprudence |
author |
Ryu, Daiana Santos |
author_facet |
Ryu, Daiana Santos |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ryu, Daiana Santos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
reasonable time pre-trial detention jurisprudence. prazo razoável prisão cautelar jurisprudência. |
topic |
reasonable time pre-trial detention jurisprudence. prazo razoável prisão cautelar jurisprudência. |
description |
Being the pre-trial detention the most severe precautionary measure and considering that the Judiciary has been trivializing its application, by totalizing approximately 40% of provisional prisoners in prisons custody, this present research aims to analyze the Superior Courts decisions when deliberating about the reasonableness of the precautionary prison. In conclusion, it is intended to expose how the precautionary prison duration has been deliberated on writs judgment, analyzing its content, along with the method applied when computing the precautionary prison term reasonableness. According to the statistics presented, the national Superior Courts demonstrate propensity on maintaining extended provisional prison by using generic assertion, validating the precautionary prison significant rate in Brazil. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-03-26 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/176 10.22197/rbdpp.v5i1.176 |
url |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/176 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22197/rbdpp.v5i1.176 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/176/159 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Daiana Santos Ryu info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Daiana Santos Ryu |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019); 389-438 Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2019); 389-438 Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 5 N. 1 (2019); 389-438 Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 5 n. 1 (2019); 389-438 2525-510X 10.22197/rbdpp.v5i1 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) instacron:IBRASPP |
instname_str |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
instacron_str |
IBRASPP |
institution |
IBRASPP |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@ibraspp.com.br |
_version_ |
1809281940008730624 |