Two sides of the same coin: the time in STF

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Haddad, Carlos Henrique Borlido
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Quaresma, Lucas Bacelette Otto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Direito GV
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/48711
Resumo: THE PAPER DEALS WITH THE FIELD OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND REPORTS EMPIRICAL RESEARCH WHOSE GOAL WAS TO IDENTIFY THE CRITERIA USED BY THE STF TO DISTINGUISH UNDUE DELAY VS. REASONABLE TIME IN CRIMINAL CASES. A TOTAL OF 229 HABEAS CORPUS DECISIONS WERE ANALYZED WHICH HAD BEEN RULED ON DURING THE PERIODS 1991-1992, 2001-2002 AND 2011-2012. CASES IN WHICH IT WAS POSSIBLE TO DETERMINE THE LENGTH OF THE DETENTION TIMES WERE SELECTED FOR ANALYSIS. AN INCREASE OF TIME SPENT IN JAIL OVER THE YEARS WAS NOTICED, BUT IT WAS FOUND THAT TIME WAS NOT THE MAIN FACTOR IN DISTINGUISHING UNDUE DELAY OR REASONABLE DURATION. THE COMPLEXITY OF THE CASES AND THE GRAVITY OF THE CRIMES WERE PREPONDERANT FACTORS. THE STF DOESN’T ADOPT SPECIFIC LIMITS TO RECOGNIZE UNDUE DELAY AND THE DECISIONS WERE MADE IN A CASUISTIC WAY. THEREFORE, SOME CASES WITHOUT A DECISION FOR MANY YEARS WERE CLASSIFIED AS CASES DECIDED WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME.
id FGV-2_8049b9451cee81362155ae4a798af59a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/48711
network_acronym_str FGV-2
network_name_str Revista Direito GV
repository_id_str
spelling Two sides of the same coin: the time in STFDois lados da mesma moeda: o tempo no STFCRIMINAL PROCEDURESTFDETENTIONREASONABLE TIMEUNDUE DELAYPROCESSO PENALSTFPRISÃOPRAZO RAZOÁVELEXCESSO DE PRAZOTHE PAPER DEALS WITH THE FIELD OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND REPORTS EMPIRICAL RESEARCH WHOSE GOAL WAS TO IDENTIFY THE CRITERIA USED BY THE STF TO DISTINGUISH UNDUE DELAY VS. REASONABLE TIME IN CRIMINAL CASES. A TOTAL OF 229 HABEAS CORPUS DECISIONS WERE ANALYZED WHICH HAD BEEN RULED ON DURING THE PERIODS 1991-1992, 2001-2002 AND 2011-2012. CASES IN WHICH IT WAS POSSIBLE TO DETERMINE THE LENGTH OF THE DETENTION TIMES WERE SELECTED FOR ANALYSIS. AN INCREASE OF TIME SPENT IN JAIL OVER THE YEARS WAS NOTICED, BUT IT WAS FOUND THAT TIME WAS NOT THE MAIN FACTOR IN DISTINGUISHING UNDUE DELAY OR REASONABLE DURATION. THE COMPLEXITY OF THE CASES AND THE GRAVITY OF THE CRIMES WERE PREPONDERANT FACTORS. THE STF DOESN’T ADOPT SPECIFIC LIMITS TO RECOGNIZE UNDUE DELAY AND THE DECISIONS WERE MADE IN A CASUISTIC WAY. THEREFORE, SOME CASES WITHOUT A DECISION FOR MANY YEARS WERE CLASSIFIED AS CASES DECIDED WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME.O ARTIGO SITUA-SE NO DIREITO PROCESSUAL PENAL E CONSISTE EM PESQUISA EMPÍRICA COM OBJETIVO DE IDENTIFICAR OS CRITÉRIOS UTILIZADOS PELO STF PARA DISTINGUIR O EXCESSO DE PRAZO NA FORMAÇÃO DA CULPA DA RAZOÁVEL DURAÇÃO DO PROCESSO. EXAMINARAM-SE 229 ACÓRDÃOS PROFERIDOS EM JULGAMENTOS DE HABEAS CORPUS NOS ANOS DE 1991/1992, 2001/2002 E 2011/2012 E FORAM SELECIONADOS AQUELES EM QUE ERA POSSÍVEL IDENTIFICAR A DURAÇÃO DA PRISÃO PROVISÓRIA. FOI NOTADO AUMENTO DO PRAZO DA PRISÃO PROVISÓRIA AO LONGO DOS ANOS, MAS SE CONSTATOU QUE O TEMPO NÃO É O PRINCIPAL FATOR PARA SEPARAR PRAZO RAZOÁVEL DO EXCESSO DE PRAZO. A GRAVIDADE DA INFRAÇÃO E A COMPLEXIDADE DO PROCESSO PESAM COMO CRITÉRIOS PREPONDERANTES. O STF NÃO ADOTA LIMITES TEMPORAIS PRECISOS PARA RECONHECER O EXCESSO DE PRAZO E A ANÁLISE MOSTRA-SE CASUÍSTICA A PONTO DE PROCESSOS MAIS LONGOS SEREM CLASSIFICADOS COMO DE DURAÇÃO RAZOÁVEL.Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas2014-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/48711Revista Direito GV; Vol. 10 No. 2 (2014): jul.-dez. (20); 639-654Revista Direito GV; Vol. 10 Núm. 2 (2014): jul.-dez. (20); 639-654Revista Direito GV; v. 10 n. 2 (2014): jul.-dez. (20); 639-6542317-6172reponame:Revista Direito GVinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/48711/47091Copyright (c) 2015 Revista DIREITO GVinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHaddad, Carlos Henrique BorlidoQuaresma, Lucas Bacelette Otto2019-08-21T17:38:26Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/48711Revistahttps://direitosp.fgv.br/publicacoes/revista/revista-direito-gvPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br2317-61721808-2432opendoar:2019-08-21T17:38:26Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Two sides of the same coin: the time in STF
Dois lados da mesma moeda: o tempo no STF
title Two sides of the same coin: the time in STF
spellingShingle Two sides of the same coin: the time in STF
Haddad, Carlos Henrique Borlido
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
STF
DETENTION
REASONABLE TIME
UNDUE DELAY
PROCESSO PENAL
STF
PRISÃO
PRAZO RAZOÁVEL
EXCESSO DE PRAZO
title_short Two sides of the same coin: the time in STF
title_full Two sides of the same coin: the time in STF
title_fullStr Two sides of the same coin: the time in STF
title_full_unstemmed Two sides of the same coin: the time in STF
title_sort Two sides of the same coin: the time in STF
author Haddad, Carlos Henrique Borlido
author_facet Haddad, Carlos Henrique Borlido
Quaresma, Lucas Bacelette Otto
author_role author
author2 Quaresma, Lucas Bacelette Otto
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Haddad, Carlos Henrique Borlido
Quaresma, Lucas Bacelette Otto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
STF
DETENTION
REASONABLE TIME
UNDUE DELAY
PROCESSO PENAL
STF
PRISÃO
PRAZO RAZOÁVEL
EXCESSO DE PRAZO
topic CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
STF
DETENTION
REASONABLE TIME
UNDUE DELAY
PROCESSO PENAL
STF
PRISÃO
PRAZO RAZOÁVEL
EXCESSO DE PRAZO
description THE PAPER DEALS WITH THE FIELD OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND REPORTS EMPIRICAL RESEARCH WHOSE GOAL WAS TO IDENTIFY THE CRITERIA USED BY THE STF TO DISTINGUISH UNDUE DELAY VS. REASONABLE TIME IN CRIMINAL CASES. A TOTAL OF 229 HABEAS CORPUS DECISIONS WERE ANALYZED WHICH HAD BEEN RULED ON DURING THE PERIODS 1991-1992, 2001-2002 AND 2011-2012. CASES IN WHICH IT WAS POSSIBLE TO DETERMINE THE LENGTH OF THE DETENTION TIMES WERE SELECTED FOR ANALYSIS. AN INCREASE OF TIME SPENT IN JAIL OVER THE YEARS WAS NOTICED, BUT IT WAS FOUND THAT TIME WAS NOT THE MAIN FACTOR IN DISTINGUISHING UNDUE DELAY OR REASONABLE DURATION. THE COMPLEXITY OF THE CASES AND THE GRAVITY OF THE CRIMES WERE PREPONDERANT FACTORS. THE STF DOESN’T ADOPT SPECIFIC LIMITS TO RECOGNIZE UNDUE DELAY AND THE DECISIONS WERE MADE IN A CASUISTIC WAY. THEREFORE, SOME CASES WITHOUT A DECISION FOR MANY YEARS WERE CLASSIFIED AS CASES DECIDED WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-07-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/48711
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/48711
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/48711/47091
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Revista DIREITO GV
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Revista DIREITO GV
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Direito GV; Vol. 10 No. 2 (2014): jul.-dez. (20); 639-654
Revista Direito GV; Vol. 10 Núm. 2 (2014): jul.-dez. (20); 639-654
Revista Direito GV; v. 10 n. 2 (2014): jul.-dez. (20); 639-654
2317-6172
reponame:Revista Direito GV
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Revista Direito GV
collection Revista Direito GV
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943709349281792

Registros relacionados