Burden of proof of the exclusions of unlawfulness in the criminal process and the necessity to break with its civil origin

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nogueira, Rafael Fecury
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/124
Resumo: The present work proposes a critical analysis about the burden of proof of the exclusion of unlawfulness in criminal procedure, researching about the responsible for it, whether prosecution or defense. Traditionally, in Brazil, the jurisprudential orientation links the burden of proof of the exclusion of unlawfulness to the defendant. This link happens because the exclusion of liability’s cases is equated to the civil theory about impeding, modifying or extinguishing rights facts. The following study is focused in the origin of the theses that allowed the construction of the current conception. This method enables to compare the civil and the criminal rules concerning to the burden of proof. For a detailed understanding of the subject, it is necessary to carry out a historical course of dogmatic aspects specific to civil procedural law and criminal law that converge to the current theme, such as the rule of distribution of the burden of proof in the civil procedure and the evolution of crime’s theory.
id IBRASPP-1_e42ff1ecdc6b3e3fd22af1fd2f75b0cf
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/124
network_acronym_str IBRASPP-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Burden of proof of the exclusions of unlawfulness in the criminal process and the necessity to break with its civil originÔnus da prova das excludentes de ilicitude no processo penal e a necessidade de rompimento com a sua matriz civilistaCriminal procedureburden of proofexclusion of unlawfulnesscivil procedure.Processo penalônus da provaexcludentes de ilicitudeprocesso civil.The present work proposes a critical analysis about the burden of proof of the exclusion of unlawfulness in criminal procedure, researching about the responsible for it, whether prosecution or defense. Traditionally, in Brazil, the jurisprudential orientation links the burden of proof of the exclusion of unlawfulness to the defendant. This link happens because the exclusion of liability’s cases is equated to the civil theory about impeding, modifying or extinguishing rights facts. The following study is focused in the origin of the theses that allowed the construction of the current conception. This method enables to compare the civil and the criminal rules concerning to the burden of proof. For a detailed understanding of the subject, it is necessary to carry out a historical course of dogmatic aspects specific to civil procedural law and criminal law that converge to the current theme, such as the rule of distribution of the burden of proof in the civil procedure and the evolution of crime’s theory.O presente trabalho propõe uma análise crítica do tema do ônus da prova das excludentes de ilicitude no processo penal, aprofundando acerca do destinatário desse ônus, se acusação ou defesa. Tradicionalmente, no Brasil prevalece o entendimento jurisprudencial de que ônus da prova das excludentes de ilicitude incumbe ao acusado, numa equiparação dessas excludentes aos fatos impeditivos, modificativos ou extintivos do direito, próprios da matriz processual civil. A origem das teses que deram sustentação para a construção da concepção atual constituirá o mote do estudo crítico a ser empregado para se avaliar a compatibilidade da matriz civilista com as regras sobre o ônus da prova no processo penal. Para uma compreensão detida do tema, necessária a realização de um percurso histórico de aspectos dogmáticos próprios do direito processual civil e do direito penal que confluem para a presente temática, como a regra de distribuição do ônus da prova no processo civil e a evolução da teoria do crime.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2018-03-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/12410.22197/rbdpp.v4i1.124Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2018); 243-275Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 4 Núm. 1 (2018); 243-275Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 4 N. 1 (2018); 243-275Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 4 n. 1 (2018); 243-2752525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v4i1reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/124/109Copyright (c) 2018 Rafael Fecury Nogueirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNogueira, Rafael Fecury2018-03-07T14:29:55Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/124Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2018-03-07T14:29:55Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Burden of proof of the exclusions of unlawfulness in the criminal process and the necessity to break with its civil origin
Ônus da prova das excludentes de ilicitude no processo penal e a necessidade de rompimento com a sua matriz civilista
title Burden of proof of the exclusions of unlawfulness in the criminal process and the necessity to break with its civil origin
spellingShingle Burden of proof of the exclusions of unlawfulness in the criminal process and the necessity to break with its civil origin
Nogueira, Rafael Fecury
Criminal procedure
burden of proof
exclusion of unlawfulness
civil procedure.
Processo penal
ônus da prova
excludentes de ilicitude
processo civil.
title_short Burden of proof of the exclusions of unlawfulness in the criminal process and the necessity to break with its civil origin
title_full Burden of proof of the exclusions of unlawfulness in the criminal process and the necessity to break with its civil origin
title_fullStr Burden of proof of the exclusions of unlawfulness in the criminal process and the necessity to break with its civil origin
title_full_unstemmed Burden of proof of the exclusions of unlawfulness in the criminal process and the necessity to break with its civil origin
title_sort Burden of proof of the exclusions of unlawfulness in the criminal process and the necessity to break with its civil origin
author Nogueira, Rafael Fecury
author_facet Nogueira, Rafael Fecury
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nogueira, Rafael Fecury
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Criminal procedure
burden of proof
exclusion of unlawfulness
civil procedure.
Processo penal
ônus da prova
excludentes de ilicitude
processo civil.
topic Criminal procedure
burden of proof
exclusion of unlawfulness
civil procedure.
Processo penal
ônus da prova
excludentes de ilicitude
processo civil.
description The present work proposes a critical analysis about the burden of proof of the exclusion of unlawfulness in criminal procedure, researching about the responsible for it, whether prosecution or defense. Traditionally, in Brazil, the jurisprudential orientation links the burden of proof of the exclusion of unlawfulness to the defendant. This link happens because the exclusion of liability’s cases is equated to the civil theory about impeding, modifying or extinguishing rights facts. The following study is focused in the origin of the theses that allowed the construction of the current conception. This method enables to compare the civil and the criminal rules concerning to the burden of proof. For a detailed understanding of the subject, it is necessary to carry out a historical course of dogmatic aspects specific to civil procedural law and criminal law that converge to the current theme, such as the rule of distribution of the burden of proof in the civil procedure and the evolution of crime’s theory.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-03-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/124
10.22197/rbdpp.v4i1.124
url https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/124
identifier_str_mv 10.22197/rbdpp.v4i1.124
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/124/109
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Rafael Fecury Nogueira
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Rafael Fecury Nogueira
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2018); 243-275
Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 4 Núm. 1 (2018); 243-275
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 4 N. 1 (2018); 243-275
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 4 n. 1 (2018); 243-275
2525-510X
10.22197/rbdpp.v4i1
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron:IBRASPP
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron_str IBRASPP
institution IBRASPP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@ibraspp.com.br
_version_ 1809281939955253248

Registros relacionados