The assets recovery, the mutual recognition scheme and the requests for judicial cooperation related to non-conviction based forfeiture in Portugal

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Junqueira, Gabriel Marson
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/294
Resumo: The present work seeks to answer the following question: in Portugal, does the mutual recognition regime cover a request for judicial cooperation, from another Member State of the European Union, based on non-conviction based confiscation ?. After a brief analysis of the instruments of forfeiture (criminal) adopted by Portugal (classic forfeiture and extended forfeiture), non-conviction based forms of forfeiture (of a civil nature and of criminal nature) and models of judicial cooperation in Europe, concludes that the mutual recognition model nowadays covers both the classic and extended forfeiture, but not any of the non-conviction-based forms of forfeiture - civil or in criminal prosecution. Thus, in the end, we conclude that the question that motivated the present work should be answered negatively.
id IBRASPP-1_f1dc9ca4bfb090d7e3e5ff9d1d86be2f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/294
network_acronym_str IBRASPP-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The assets recovery, the mutual recognition scheme and the requests for judicial cooperation related to non-conviction based forfeiture in PortugalA recuperação de ativos, o regime do reconhecimento mútuo e os pedidos de cooperação judiciária relacionados a confisco non-conviction based em PortugalAssets recoveryForfeitureJudicial cooperation in criminal mattersPrinciple of mutual recognitionNon-conviction based forfeiture.Recuperação de ativosConfiscoCooperação judiciária em matéria penalPrincípio do reconhecimento mútuoPerda non-conviction based.The present work seeks to answer the following question: in Portugal, does the mutual recognition regime cover a request for judicial cooperation, from another Member State of the European Union, based on non-conviction based confiscation ?. After a brief analysis of the instruments of forfeiture (criminal) adopted by Portugal (classic forfeiture and extended forfeiture), non-conviction based forms of forfeiture (of a civil nature and of criminal nature) and models of judicial cooperation in Europe, concludes that the mutual recognition model nowadays covers both the classic and extended forfeiture, but not any of the non-conviction-based forms of forfeiture - civil or in criminal prosecution. Thus, in the end, we conclude that the question that motivated the present work should be answered negatively.O presente trabalho procura responder à seguinte questão: em Portugal, o regime de reconhecimento mútuo abrange pedido de cooperação judiciária, de outro Estado-Membro da União Europeia, fundado em confisco non-conviction based? Após breve análise das modalidades de confisco (criminal) existentes em Portugal (perda clássica e perda alargada), das formas de confisco non-conviction based (o de índole civil e o de índole criminal) e dos modelos de cooperação judiciária na Europa, conclui-se que o modelo de reconhecimento mútuo, nos dias de hoje, abrange quer a perda clássica, quer a perda alargada, mas não qualquer das formas de confisco non-conviction based– civil ou em processo criminal. Assim, ao final, concluímos que se deve responder negativamente a pergunta que motivou o presente trabalho.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2020-06-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/29410.22197/rbdpp.v6i2.294Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2020); 765-798Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 6 Núm. 2 (2020); 765-798Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 6 N. 2 (2020); 765-798Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 6 n. 2 (2020); 765-7982525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v6i2reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/294/223https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/294/292Copyright (c) 2020 Gabriel Marson Junqueirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessJunqueira, Gabriel Marson2020-10-27T10:35:22Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/294Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2020-10-27T10:35:22Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The assets recovery, the mutual recognition scheme and the requests for judicial cooperation related to non-conviction based forfeiture in Portugal
A recuperação de ativos, o regime do reconhecimento mútuo e os pedidos de cooperação judiciária relacionados a confisco non-conviction based em Portugal
title The assets recovery, the mutual recognition scheme and the requests for judicial cooperation related to non-conviction based forfeiture in Portugal
spellingShingle The assets recovery, the mutual recognition scheme and the requests for judicial cooperation related to non-conviction based forfeiture in Portugal
Junqueira, Gabriel Marson
Assets recovery
Forfeiture
Judicial cooperation in criminal matters
Principle of mutual recognition
Non-conviction based forfeiture.
Recuperação de ativos
Confisco
Cooperação judiciária em matéria penal
Princípio do reconhecimento mútuo
Perda non-conviction based.
title_short The assets recovery, the mutual recognition scheme and the requests for judicial cooperation related to non-conviction based forfeiture in Portugal
title_full The assets recovery, the mutual recognition scheme and the requests for judicial cooperation related to non-conviction based forfeiture in Portugal
title_fullStr The assets recovery, the mutual recognition scheme and the requests for judicial cooperation related to non-conviction based forfeiture in Portugal
title_full_unstemmed The assets recovery, the mutual recognition scheme and the requests for judicial cooperation related to non-conviction based forfeiture in Portugal
title_sort The assets recovery, the mutual recognition scheme and the requests for judicial cooperation related to non-conviction based forfeiture in Portugal
author Junqueira, Gabriel Marson
author_facet Junqueira, Gabriel Marson
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Junqueira, Gabriel Marson
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Assets recovery
Forfeiture
Judicial cooperation in criminal matters
Principle of mutual recognition
Non-conviction based forfeiture.
Recuperação de ativos
Confisco
Cooperação judiciária em matéria penal
Princípio do reconhecimento mútuo
Perda non-conviction based.
topic Assets recovery
Forfeiture
Judicial cooperation in criminal matters
Principle of mutual recognition
Non-conviction based forfeiture.
Recuperação de ativos
Confisco
Cooperação judiciária em matéria penal
Princípio do reconhecimento mútuo
Perda non-conviction based.
description The present work seeks to answer the following question: in Portugal, does the mutual recognition regime cover a request for judicial cooperation, from another Member State of the European Union, based on non-conviction based confiscation ?. After a brief analysis of the instruments of forfeiture (criminal) adopted by Portugal (classic forfeiture and extended forfeiture), non-conviction based forms of forfeiture (of a civil nature and of criminal nature) and models of judicial cooperation in Europe, concludes that the mutual recognition model nowadays covers both the classic and extended forfeiture, but not any of the non-conviction-based forms of forfeiture - civil or in criminal prosecution. Thus, in the end, we conclude that the question that motivated the present work should be answered negatively.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-06-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/294
10.22197/rbdpp.v6i2.294
url https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/294
identifier_str_mv 10.22197/rbdpp.v6i2.294
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/294/223
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/294/292
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Gabriel Marson Junqueira
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Gabriel Marson Junqueira
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2020); 765-798
Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 6 Núm. 2 (2020); 765-798
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 6 N. 2 (2020); 765-798
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 6 n. 2 (2020); 765-798
2525-510X
10.22197/rbdpp.v6i2
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron:IBRASPP
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron_str IBRASPP
institution IBRASPP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@ibraspp.com.br
_version_ 1798329402294009856