BTK and BCL-2 Inhibitors in the First-Line Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in High-Risk Patients: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Albuquerque, Rita de Cássia Ribeiro de
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: Vieira, Cláudia Lima, Santiago, Isabel Cristina de Almeida, Nascimento, Aline do, Chança, Raphael Duarte, Tura, Bernardo Rangel, Correia, Marcelo Goulart, Barufaldi, Laura Augusta
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online)
Texto Completo: https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/4501
Resumo: Introduction: Patients with high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have lower response rates, a more aggressive clinical course, and resistance to standard chemotherapy, representing a treatment challenge. Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTK – ibrutinib and acalabrutinib) and the BCL-2 inhibitor (venetoclax) can be used in these cases. Objective: To identify and evaluate studies on the efficacy and safety of the use of ibrutinib, acalabrutinib and venetoclax in first-line treatment in patients with high-risk CLL. Method: Systematic review of randomized clinical trials that evaluated adult patients with CLL, carriers of 17p deletion or TP53 mutation and without prior treatment. The PubMed, EMBASE, LILACS and Cochrane Library databases were searched, and the risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool and the quality of evidence was assessed with GRADE. Results: In the network meta-analysis for progression-free survival (PFS) venetoclax + obinutuzumab (RR: 0.62; 95%CI 0.41-0.95; p value 0.027) and acalabrutinib + obinutuzumab (RR: 0. 74; 95% CI 0.55-0.99; p value 0.043) presented a lower risk of progression or death, with significance considered borderline. Ibrutinib + obinutuzumab (RR: 0.93; 95% CI 0.86-1.00; p value 0.054) did not show a significant difference in PFS for patients with high-risk CLL. Conclusion: First-line treatment with BTK inhibitors (ibrutinib and acalabrutinib) and the BCL-2 inhibitor (venetoclax) associated with anti-CD20 monoclonal agents – especially obinutuzumab – have been proposed as the standard for most patients with CLL. However, based on the results of this review with network meta-analysis, it was not possible to confirm this recommendation.
id INCA-1_68cd47bf9c6cc7308501c0781c01e176
oai_identifier_str oai:rbc.inca.gov.br:article/4501
network_acronym_str INCA-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling BTK and BCL-2 Inhibitors in the First-Line Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in High-Risk Patients: Systematic Review and Network Meta-AnalysisInhibidores de BTK Y BCL-2 en el Tratamiento de Primera Línea de la Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica en Pacientes de Alto Riesgo: Revisión Sistemática y un Metaanálisis en RedInibidores BTK e BCL-2 no Tratamento de Primeira Linha da Leucemia Linfocítica Crônica em Pacientes de Alto Risco: Revisão Sistemática e Meta-Análise em Rede Leucemia Linfocítica Crônica de Células BInibidores de Proteína Tirosina QuinaseProtocolos AntineoplásicosRevisão SistemáticaMetanálise em RedeLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellTyrosine Protein Kinase InhibitorsAntineoplastic Protocols/venetoclaxSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-AnalysisLeucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células BInhibidores de la Tirosina Proteína QuinasaProtocolos Antineoplásicos/venetoclaxRevisión SistemáticaMetaanálisis en RedIntroduction: Patients with high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have lower response rates, a more aggressive clinical course, and resistance to standard chemotherapy, representing a treatment challenge. Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTK – ibrutinib and acalabrutinib) and the BCL-2 inhibitor (venetoclax) can be used in these cases. Objective: To identify and evaluate studies on the efficacy and safety of the use of ibrutinib, acalabrutinib and venetoclax in first-line treatment in patients with high-risk CLL. Method: Systematic review of randomized clinical trials that evaluated adult patients with CLL, carriers of 17p deletion or TP53 mutation and without prior treatment. The PubMed, EMBASE, LILACS and Cochrane Library databases were searched, and the risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool and the quality of evidence was assessed with GRADE. Results: In the network meta-analysis for progression-free survival (PFS) venetoclax + obinutuzumab (RR: 0.62; 95%CI 0.41-0.95; p value 0.027) and acalabrutinib + obinutuzumab (RR: 0. 74; 95% CI 0.55-0.99; p value 0.043) presented a lower risk of progression or death, with significance considered borderline. Ibrutinib + obinutuzumab (RR: 0.93; 95% CI 0.86-1.00; p value 0.054) did not show a significant difference in PFS for patients with high-risk CLL. Conclusion: First-line treatment with BTK inhibitors (ibrutinib and acalabrutinib) and the BCL-2 inhibitor (venetoclax) associated with anti-CD20 monoclonal agents – especially obinutuzumab – have been proposed as the standard for most patients with CLL. However, based on the results of this review with network meta-analysis, it was not possible to confirm this recommendation.Introducción: Los pacientes con leucemia linfocítica crónica (LLC) de alto riesgo tienen tasas de respuesta más bajas, un curso clínico más agresivo y resistencia a la quimioterapia estándar, lo que representa un desafío para el tratamiento. En estos casos se pueden utilizar los inhibidores de la tirosina quinasa de Bruton (BTK - ibrutinib y acalabrutinib) y el inhibidor de BCL-2 (venetoclax). Objetivo: Identificar y evaluar estudios sobre la eficacia y seguridad del uso de ibrutinib, acalabrutinib y venetoclax en el tratamiento de primera línea en pacientes con LLC de alto riesgo. Método: Revisión sistemática de ensayos clínicos aleatorios que evaluaron pacientes adultos con LLC, portadores de deleción 17p o mutación TP53 y sin tratamiento previo. Se realizaron búsquedas en las bases de datos PubMed, EMBASE, LILACS y Cochrane Library y se evaluó el riesgo de sesgo mediante la herramienta Cochrane RoB 2 y la calidad de la evidencia se evaluó mediante GRADE. Resultados: En el metaanálisis en red para la supervivencia libre de progresión (SSP) venetoclax + obinutuzumab (RR: 0,62; IC 95% 0,41-0,95; valor de p 0,027) y acalabrutinib + obinutuzumab (RR: 0,74; IC 95%). 0,55-0,99; valor de p 0,043) presentaron un menor riesgo de progresión o muerte, con una significación considerada límite. Ibrutinib + obinutuzumab (RR: 0,93; IC del 95 %: 0,86-1,00; valor de p 0,054) no mostró una diferencia significativa en la SSP para pacientes con LLC de alto riesgo. Conclusión: El tratamiento de primera línea con inhibidores de BTK (ibrutinib y acalabrutinib) y el inhibidor de BCL-2 (venetoclax), asociados con agentes monoclonales anti-CD20, especialmente obinutuzumab, se ha propuesto como estándar para la mayoría de los pacientes con LLC. Sin embargo, según los resultados de esta revisión con metaanálisis en red, no fue posible confirmar esta recomendación.Introdução: Pacientes com leucemia linfocítica crônica (LLC) com alto risco têm menores taxas de resposta, curso clínico mais agressivo e resistência à quimioterapia padrão, representando um desafio para o tratamento. Os inibidores da tirosina quinase de Bruton (BTK – ibrutinibe e acalabrutinibe) e o inibidor BCL-2 (venetoclax) podem ser utilizados nesses casos. Objetivo: Identificar e avaliar a eficácia e a segurança do uso de ibrutinibe, acalabrutinibe e venetoclax no tratamento de primeira linha em pacientes com LLC de alto risco. Método: Revisão sistemática de ensaios clínicos randomizados que avaliaram pacientes adultos com LLC, portadores de deleção 17p ou mutação TP53 e sem tratamento prévio. Foram pesquisadas as bases PubMed, EMBASE, LILACS e Cochrane Library, e realizadas avaliação do risco de viés pela ferramenta RoB 2 da Cochrane e avaliação da qualidade da evidência pelo GRADE. Resultados: Na meta-análise em rede para sobrevida livre de progressão (SLP), venetoclax + obinutuzumabe (RR: 0,62; IC 95% 0,41-0,95; p = 0,027) e acalabrutinibe + obinutuzumabe (RR: 0,74; IC 95% 0,55-0,99; p = 0,043) apresentaram menor risco de progressão ou óbito, com significância considerada limítrofe. Ibrutinibe + obinutuzumabe (RR: 0,93; IC 95% 0,86-1,00; p = 0,054) não apresentou diferença significativa na SLP para pacientes com LLC de alto risco. Conclusão: O tratamento de primeira linha com inibidores de BTK (ibrutinibe e acalabrutinibe) e o inibidor BCL-2 (venetoclax), associados a agentes monoclonais anti-CD20 – especialmente o obinutuzumabe –, tem sido proposto como padrão para a maioria dos pacientes com LLC. Entretanto, pelos resultados desta revisão com meta-análise em rede, não foi possível confirmar essa recomendação.INCA2024-03-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionRevisão de literaturaapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/450110.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2024v70n2.4501Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; Vol. 70 No. 2 (2024): Apr./May/June; e-014501Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; Vol. 70 Núm. 2 (2024): abr./mayo/jun.; e-014501Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; v. 70 n. 2 (2024): abr./maio./jun.; e-0145012176-9745reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online)instname:Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA)instacron:INCAporenghttps://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/4501/3384https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/4501/3392https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/4501/3393Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Brasileira de Cancerologiahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlbuquerque, Rita de Cássia Ribeiro deVieira, Cláudia LimaSantiago, Isabel Cristina de AlmeidaNascimento, Aline do Chança, Raphael DuarteTura, Bernardo RangelCorreia, Marcelo GoulartBarufaldi, Laura Augusta2024-03-28T13:08:53Zoai:rbc.inca.gov.br:article/4501Revistahttps://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revistaPUBhttps://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/oairbc@inca.gov.br0034-71162176-9745opendoar:2024-03-28T13:08:53Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online) - Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv BTK and BCL-2 Inhibitors in the First-Line Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in High-Risk Patients: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
Inhibidores de BTK Y BCL-2 en el Tratamiento de Primera Línea de la Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica en Pacientes de Alto Riesgo: Revisión Sistemática y un Metaanálisis en Red
Inibidores BTK e BCL-2 no Tratamento de Primeira Linha da Leucemia Linfocítica Crônica em Pacientes de Alto Risco: Revisão Sistemática e Meta-Análise em Rede
title BTK and BCL-2 Inhibitors in the First-Line Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in High-Risk Patients: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
spellingShingle BTK and BCL-2 Inhibitors in the First-Line Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in High-Risk Patients: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
Albuquerque, Rita de Cássia Ribeiro de
Leucemia Linfocítica Crônica de Células B
Inibidores de Proteína Tirosina Quinase
Protocolos Antineoplásicos
Revisão Sistemática
Metanálise em Rede
Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell
Tyrosine Protein Kinase Inhibitors
Antineoplastic Protocols/venetoclax
Systematic Review
Network Meta-Analysis
Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B
Inhibidores de la Tirosina Proteína Quinasa
Protocolos Antineoplásicos/venetoclax
Revisión Sistemática
Metaanálisis en Red
title_short BTK and BCL-2 Inhibitors in the First-Line Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in High-Risk Patients: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_full BTK and BCL-2 Inhibitors in the First-Line Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in High-Risk Patients: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr BTK and BCL-2 Inhibitors in the First-Line Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in High-Risk Patients: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed BTK and BCL-2 Inhibitors in the First-Line Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in High-Risk Patients: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_sort BTK and BCL-2 Inhibitors in the First-Line Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in High-Risk Patients: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
author Albuquerque, Rita de Cássia Ribeiro de
author_facet Albuquerque, Rita de Cássia Ribeiro de
Vieira, Cláudia Lima
Santiago, Isabel Cristina de Almeida
Nascimento, Aline do
Chança, Raphael Duarte
Tura, Bernardo Rangel
Correia, Marcelo Goulart
Barufaldi, Laura Augusta
author_role author
author2 Vieira, Cláudia Lima
Santiago, Isabel Cristina de Almeida
Nascimento, Aline do
Chança, Raphael Duarte
Tura, Bernardo Rangel
Correia, Marcelo Goulart
Barufaldi, Laura Augusta
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Albuquerque, Rita de Cássia Ribeiro de
Vieira, Cláudia Lima
Santiago, Isabel Cristina de Almeida
Nascimento, Aline do
Chança, Raphael Duarte
Tura, Bernardo Rangel
Correia, Marcelo Goulart
Barufaldi, Laura Augusta
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Leucemia Linfocítica Crônica de Células B
Inibidores de Proteína Tirosina Quinase
Protocolos Antineoplásicos
Revisão Sistemática
Metanálise em Rede
Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell
Tyrosine Protein Kinase Inhibitors
Antineoplastic Protocols/venetoclax
Systematic Review
Network Meta-Analysis
Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B
Inhibidores de la Tirosina Proteína Quinasa
Protocolos Antineoplásicos/venetoclax
Revisión Sistemática
Metaanálisis en Red
topic Leucemia Linfocítica Crônica de Células B
Inibidores de Proteína Tirosina Quinase
Protocolos Antineoplásicos
Revisão Sistemática
Metanálise em Rede
Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell
Tyrosine Protein Kinase Inhibitors
Antineoplastic Protocols/venetoclax
Systematic Review
Network Meta-Analysis
Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B
Inhibidores de la Tirosina Proteína Quinasa
Protocolos Antineoplásicos/venetoclax
Revisión Sistemática
Metaanálisis en Red
description Introduction: Patients with high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have lower response rates, a more aggressive clinical course, and resistance to standard chemotherapy, representing a treatment challenge. Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTK – ibrutinib and acalabrutinib) and the BCL-2 inhibitor (venetoclax) can be used in these cases. Objective: To identify and evaluate studies on the efficacy and safety of the use of ibrutinib, acalabrutinib and venetoclax in first-line treatment in patients with high-risk CLL. Method: Systematic review of randomized clinical trials that evaluated adult patients with CLL, carriers of 17p deletion or TP53 mutation and without prior treatment. The PubMed, EMBASE, LILACS and Cochrane Library databases were searched, and the risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool and the quality of evidence was assessed with GRADE. Results: In the network meta-analysis for progression-free survival (PFS) venetoclax + obinutuzumab (RR: 0.62; 95%CI 0.41-0.95; p value 0.027) and acalabrutinib + obinutuzumab (RR: 0. 74; 95% CI 0.55-0.99; p value 0.043) presented a lower risk of progression or death, with significance considered borderline. Ibrutinib + obinutuzumab (RR: 0.93; 95% CI 0.86-1.00; p value 0.054) did not show a significant difference in PFS for patients with high-risk CLL. Conclusion: First-line treatment with BTK inhibitors (ibrutinib and acalabrutinib) and the BCL-2 inhibitor (venetoclax) associated with anti-CD20 monoclonal agents – especially obinutuzumab – have been proposed as the standard for most patients with CLL. However, based on the results of this review with network meta-analysis, it was not possible to confirm this recommendation.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-03-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Revisão de literatura
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/4501
10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2024v70n2.4501
url https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/4501
identifier_str_mv 10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2024v70n2.4501
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/4501/3384
https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/4501/3392
https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/4501/3393
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv INCA
publisher.none.fl_str_mv INCA
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; Vol. 70 No. 2 (2024): Apr./May/June; e-014501
Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; Vol. 70 Núm. 2 (2024): abr./mayo/jun.; e-014501
Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; v. 70 n. 2 (2024): abr./maio./jun.; e-014501
2176-9745
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA)
instacron:INCA
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA)
instacron_str INCA
institution INCA
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online) - Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rbc@inca.gov.br
_version_ 1797042242009956352