TOWARDS MORAL TELEOLOGY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF KANT AND ZHU XI

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ouyang, Xiao
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Journal of Teleological Science
Texto Completo: https://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/jts/article/view/9
Resumo: Kant’s coining of «reflective judgment» in the third Critique by a conceptual clarification of the third higher cognitive faculty has long been criticized as redundant for his philosophical system and deemed a typical Kantian architectonic failure. Zhu Xi’s vital development of the doctrine «gewu» in his commentary on The Great Learning has been attacked for centuries for committing a hermeneutic fallacy. I argue that a comparative study shows that both conceptions steered a metaphysical transition towards «the supersensible» in each philosophy, leading to a similar construction of moral teleology. Zhu Xi’s «li» is comparable to Kant’s «purpose» as a moral teleological property. The Neo-Confucian li-qi dichotomy provides a counterpart of the Kantian double causality. Nevertheless, Neo-Confucian moral teleology does not rely on a Kantian-type rationalistic deduction concerning the idea of highest good (as final purpose) nor on the so-called intellectual intuition. Gewu looks outwards for the moral coherence between humans and things, while Kant ultimately rejects the natural world for the sake of moral certainty in terms of freedom and identifies what is unique within us.
id INDEP-3_47a4ba6ba3045dc5032ad4180ab16fff
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.www.telosjournals.com.br:article/9
network_acronym_str INDEP-3
network_name_str Journal of Teleological Science
repository_id_str
spelling TOWARDS MORAL TELEOLOGY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF KANT AND ZHU XIPARA A TELEOLOGIA MORAL: UM ESTUDO COMPARATIVO DE KANT E ZHU XIMoral teleologyKantReflective judgmentZhu XiGewuTeleologia moralKantJuízo reflexivoZhu XiGewuKant’s coining of «reflective judgment» in the third Critique by a conceptual clarification of the third higher cognitive faculty has long been criticized as redundant for his philosophical system and deemed a typical Kantian architectonic failure. Zhu Xi’s vital development of the doctrine «gewu» in his commentary on The Great Learning has been attacked for centuries for committing a hermeneutic fallacy. I argue that a comparative study shows that both conceptions steered a metaphysical transition towards «the supersensible» in each philosophy, leading to a similar construction of moral teleology. Zhu Xi’s «li» is comparable to Kant’s «purpose» as a moral teleological property. The Neo-Confucian li-qi dichotomy provides a counterpart of the Kantian double causality. Nevertheless, Neo-Confucian moral teleology does not rely on a Kantian-type rationalistic deduction concerning the idea of highest good (as final purpose) nor on the so-called intellectual intuition. Gewu looks outwards for the moral coherence between humans and things, while Kant ultimately rejects the natural world for the sake of moral certainty in terms of freedom and identifies what is unique within us.A cunhagem de Kant do “juízo reflexivo” na terceira Crítica pela clarificação conceitual da terceira faculdade cognitiva superior há muito tempo tem sido criticada como redundante por seu sistema filosófico e considerada um típico fracasso arquitetônico kantiano. O desenvolvimento vital de Zhu Xi da doutrina “gewu” em seu comentário sobre The Great Learning foi atacado por séculos por cometer uma falácia hermenêutica. Argumento que um estudo comparativo mostra que ambas as concepções conduziram a uma transição metafísica em direção ao “suprassensível” em cada filosofia, levando a uma construção semelhante de teleologia moral. O “li” de Zhu Xi é comparável ao “propósito” de Kant como uma propriedade teleológica moral. A dicotomia li-qi neoconfuciana fornece uma contraparte da dupla causalidade kantiana. No entanto, a teleologia moral neoconfuciana não depende de uma dedução racionalista do tipo kantiano a respeito da ideia do bem maior (como finalidade final) nem da chamada intuição intelectual. Gewu procura no exterior a coerência moral entre os seres humanos e as coisas, enquanto Kant acaba rejeitando o mundo natural em nome da certeza moral em termos de liberdade e identificação do que há de único dentro de nós.Sergio Salles2021-06-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/jts/article/view/9Journal of Teleological Science; Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021); 125-159Journal of Teleological Science; v. 1 n. 2 (2021); 125-1592763-6577reponame:Journal of Teleological Scienceinstname:Publicação independenteinstacron:INDEPporhttps://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/jts/article/view/9/25Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Teleological Sciencehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOuyang, Xiao2021-06-03T14:23:17Zoai:ojs2.www.telosjournals.com.br:article/9Revistahttps://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/jtsPRIhttps://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/jts/oaitelos@telosjournals.com2763-65772763-6577opendoar:2021-06-03T14:23:17Journal of Teleological Science - Publicação independentefalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv TOWARDS MORAL TELEOLOGY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF KANT AND ZHU XI
PARA A TELEOLOGIA MORAL: UM ESTUDO COMPARATIVO DE KANT E ZHU XI
title TOWARDS MORAL TELEOLOGY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF KANT AND ZHU XI
spellingShingle TOWARDS MORAL TELEOLOGY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF KANT AND ZHU XI
Ouyang, Xiao
Moral teleology
Kant
Reflective judgment
Zhu Xi
Gewu
Teleologia moral
Kant
Juízo reflexivo
Zhu Xi
Gewu
title_short TOWARDS MORAL TELEOLOGY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF KANT AND ZHU XI
title_full TOWARDS MORAL TELEOLOGY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF KANT AND ZHU XI
title_fullStr TOWARDS MORAL TELEOLOGY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF KANT AND ZHU XI
title_full_unstemmed TOWARDS MORAL TELEOLOGY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF KANT AND ZHU XI
title_sort TOWARDS MORAL TELEOLOGY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF KANT AND ZHU XI
author Ouyang, Xiao
author_facet Ouyang, Xiao
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ouyang, Xiao
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Moral teleology
Kant
Reflective judgment
Zhu Xi
Gewu
Teleologia moral
Kant
Juízo reflexivo
Zhu Xi
Gewu
topic Moral teleology
Kant
Reflective judgment
Zhu Xi
Gewu
Teleologia moral
Kant
Juízo reflexivo
Zhu Xi
Gewu
description Kant’s coining of «reflective judgment» in the third Critique by a conceptual clarification of the third higher cognitive faculty has long been criticized as redundant for his philosophical system and deemed a typical Kantian architectonic failure. Zhu Xi’s vital development of the doctrine «gewu» in his commentary on The Great Learning has been attacked for centuries for committing a hermeneutic fallacy. I argue that a comparative study shows that both conceptions steered a metaphysical transition towards «the supersensible» in each philosophy, leading to a similar construction of moral teleology. Zhu Xi’s «li» is comparable to Kant’s «purpose» as a moral teleological property. The Neo-Confucian li-qi dichotomy provides a counterpart of the Kantian double causality. Nevertheless, Neo-Confucian moral teleology does not rely on a Kantian-type rationalistic deduction concerning the idea of highest good (as final purpose) nor on the so-called intellectual intuition. Gewu looks outwards for the moral coherence between humans and things, while Kant ultimately rejects the natural world for the sake of moral certainty in terms of freedom and identifies what is unique within us.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/jts/article/view/9
url https://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/jts/article/view/9
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/jts/article/view/9/25
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Teleological Science
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Teleological Science
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sergio Salles
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sergio Salles
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Teleological Science; Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021); 125-159
Journal of Teleological Science; v. 1 n. 2 (2021); 125-159
2763-6577
reponame:Journal of Teleological Science
instname:Publicação independente
instacron:INDEP
instname_str Publicação independente
instacron_str INDEP
institution INDEP
reponame_str Journal of Teleological Science
collection Journal of Teleological Science
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of Teleological Science - Publicação independente
repository.mail.fl_str_mv telos@telosjournals.com
_version_ 1797042106143866880