Comparative analysis between the chlorination and ultraviolet radiation methods for the disinfection of bacteria-contaminated water

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ritt,Barbara Santos
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Fernandes,André Luís Teixeira, Thedei Júnior,Geraldo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Ambiente & Água
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-993X2021000200308
Resumo: Abstract The quality of water for human consumption has been a concern for large organizations and researchers, since the disinfection process, a step of great importance in water treatment plants, has not achieved its proper purpose. There have been frequent reports of the ineffectiveness of bacteria inactivation by the use of chlorine, which is the most used in Brazil, and also due to the formation of by-products such as trihalomethanes and haloacetic acids that are considered toxic to human health. The method of disinfection by ultraviolet radiation (UV) has been widely explored, due to its effectiveness in inactivating a wide variety of pathogens, in addition to the absence of by-product formation. The combined chlorine+UV process as chemical and physical disinfectants, respectively, is complementary and essential when looking for the safety of water for human consumption. The objective of this research was to statistically analyze the performance of disinfectants, chlorine and UV radiation, both separately and together, by inactivating the bacteria Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and then incubating for 48 hours after having received the treatments. The statistical method showed that chlorine and UV obtained the same significance of 100% bacteria inactivation, and that within the determined time of 48 hours after the treatments the bacteria did not show reactivation. Thus, the study affirmed the usefulness of applying UV radiation as a complement to systems that use chlorine, with a special focus on residential water systems and supply.
id IPABHI-1_0b36fb9a26ed7798389587859a93b806
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1980-993X2021000200308
network_acronym_str IPABHI-1
network_name_str Revista Ambiente & Água
repository_id_str
spelling Comparative analysis between the chlorination and ultraviolet radiation methods for the disinfection of bacteria-contaminated waterbacteria inactivationchlorineUV lightwater treatmentAbstract The quality of water for human consumption has been a concern for large organizations and researchers, since the disinfection process, a step of great importance in water treatment plants, has not achieved its proper purpose. There have been frequent reports of the ineffectiveness of bacteria inactivation by the use of chlorine, which is the most used in Brazil, and also due to the formation of by-products such as trihalomethanes and haloacetic acids that are considered toxic to human health. The method of disinfection by ultraviolet radiation (UV) has been widely explored, due to its effectiveness in inactivating a wide variety of pathogens, in addition to the absence of by-product formation. The combined chlorine+UV process as chemical and physical disinfectants, respectively, is complementary and essential when looking for the safety of water for human consumption. The objective of this research was to statistically analyze the performance of disinfectants, chlorine and UV radiation, both separately and together, by inactivating the bacteria Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and then incubating for 48 hours after having received the treatments. The statistical method showed that chlorine and UV obtained the same significance of 100% bacteria inactivation, and that within the determined time of 48 hours after the treatments the bacteria did not show reactivation. Thus, the study affirmed the usefulness of applying UV radiation as a complement to systems that use chlorine, with a special focus on residential water systems and supply.Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-993X2021000200308Revista Ambiente & Água v.16 n.2 2021reponame:Revista Ambiente & Águainstname:Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas (IPABHI)instacron:IPABHI10.4136/ambi-agua.2654info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRitt,Barbara SantosFernandes,André Luís TeixeiraThedei Júnior,Geraldoeng2021-04-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1980-993X2021000200308Revistahttp://www.ambi-agua.net/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||ambi.agua@gmail.com1980-993X1980-993Xopendoar:2021-04-27T00:00Revista Ambiente & Água - Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas (IPABHI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative analysis between the chlorination and ultraviolet radiation methods for the disinfection of bacteria-contaminated water
title Comparative analysis between the chlorination and ultraviolet radiation methods for the disinfection of bacteria-contaminated water
spellingShingle Comparative analysis between the chlorination and ultraviolet radiation methods for the disinfection of bacteria-contaminated water
Ritt,Barbara Santos
bacteria inactivation
chlorine
UV light
water treatment
title_short Comparative analysis between the chlorination and ultraviolet radiation methods for the disinfection of bacteria-contaminated water
title_full Comparative analysis between the chlorination and ultraviolet radiation methods for the disinfection of bacteria-contaminated water
title_fullStr Comparative analysis between the chlorination and ultraviolet radiation methods for the disinfection of bacteria-contaminated water
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis between the chlorination and ultraviolet radiation methods for the disinfection of bacteria-contaminated water
title_sort Comparative analysis between the chlorination and ultraviolet radiation methods for the disinfection of bacteria-contaminated water
author Ritt,Barbara Santos
author_facet Ritt,Barbara Santos
Fernandes,André Luís Teixeira
Thedei Júnior,Geraldo
author_role author
author2 Fernandes,André Luís Teixeira
Thedei Júnior,Geraldo
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ritt,Barbara Santos
Fernandes,André Luís Teixeira
Thedei Júnior,Geraldo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv bacteria inactivation
chlorine
UV light
water treatment
topic bacteria inactivation
chlorine
UV light
water treatment
description Abstract The quality of water for human consumption has been a concern for large organizations and researchers, since the disinfection process, a step of great importance in water treatment plants, has not achieved its proper purpose. There have been frequent reports of the ineffectiveness of bacteria inactivation by the use of chlorine, which is the most used in Brazil, and also due to the formation of by-products such as trihalomethanes and haloacetic acids that are considered toxic to human health. The method of disinfection by ultraviolet radiation (UV) has been widely explored, due to its effectiveness in inactivating a wide variety of pathogens, in addition to the absence of by-product formation. The combined chlorine+UV process as chemical and physical disinfectants, respectively, is complementary and essential when looking for the safety of water for human consumption. The objective of this research was to statistically analyze the performance of disinfectants, chlorine and UV radiation, both separately and together, by inactivating the bacteria Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and then incubating for 48 hours after having received the treatments. The statistical method showed that chlorine and UV obtained the same significance of 100% bacteria inactivation, and that within the determined time of 48 hours after the treatments the bacteria did not show reactivation. Thus, the study affirmed the usefulness of applying UV radiation as a complement to systems that use chlorine, with a special focus on residential water systems and supply.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-993X2021000200308
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-993X2021000200308
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.4136/ambi-agua.2654
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Ambiente & Água v.16 n.2 2021
reponame:Revista Ambiente & Água
instname:Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas (IPABHI)
instacron:IPABHI
instname_str Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas (IPABHI)
instacron_str IPABHI
institution IPABHI
reponame_str Revista Ambiente & Água
collection Revista Ambiente & Água
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Ambiente & Água - Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas (IPABHI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||ambi.agua@gmail.com
_version_ 1752129751643848704