Comparative analysis between the chlorination and ultraviolet radiation methods for the disinfection of bacteria-contaminated water
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Ambiente & Água |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-993X2021000200308 |
Resumo: | Abstract The quality of water for human consumption has been a concern for large organizations and researchers, since the disinfection process, a step of great importance in water treatment plants, has not achieved its proper purpose. There have been frequent reports of the ineffectiveness of bacteria inactivation by the use of chlorine, which is the most used in Brazil, and also due to the formation of by-products such as trihalomethanes and haloacetic acids that are considered toxic to human health. The method of disinfection by ultraviolet radiation (UV) has been widely explored, due to its effectiveness in inactivating a wide variety of pathogens, in addition to the absence of by-product formation. The combined chlorine+UV process as chemical and physical disinfectants, respectively, is complementary and essential when looking for the safety of water for human consumption. The objective of this research was to statistically analyze the performance of disinfectants, chlorine and UV radiation, both separately and together, by inactivating the bacteria Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and then incubating for 48 hours after having received the treatments. The statistical method showed that chlorine and UV obtained the same significance of 100% bacteria inactivation, and that within the determined time of 48 hours after the treatments the bacteria did not show reactivation. Thus, the study affirmed the usefulness of applying UV radiation as a complement to systems that use chlorine, with a special focus on residential water systems and supply. |
id |
IPABHI-1_0b36fb9a26ed7798389587859a93b806 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1980-993X2021000200308 |
network_acronym_str |
IPABHI-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Ambiente & Água |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparative analysis between the chlorination and ultraviolet radiation methods for the disinfection of bacteria-contaminated waterbacteria inactivationchlorineUV lightwater treatmentAbstract The quality of water for human consumption has been a concern for large organizations and researchers, since the disinfection process, a step of great importance in water treatment plants, has not achieved its proper purpose. There have been frequent reports of the ineffectiveness of bacteria inactivation by the use of chlorine, which is the most used in Brazil, and also due to the formation of by-products such as trihalomethanes and haloacetic acids that are considered toxic to human health. The method of disinfection by ultraviolet radiation (UV) has been widely explored, due to its effectiveness in inactivating a wide variety of pathogens, in addition to the absence of by-product formation. The combined chlorine+UV process as chemical and physical disinfectants, respectively, is complementary and essential when looking for the safety of water for human consumption. The objective of this research was to statistically analyze the performance of disinfectants, chlorine and UV radiation, both separately and together, by inactivating the bacteria Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and then incubating for 48 hours after having received the treatments. The statistical method showed that chlorine and UV obtained the same significance of 100% bacteria inactivation, and that within the determined time of 48 hours after the treatments the bacteria did not show reactivation. Thus, the study affirmed the usefulness of applying UV radiation as a complement to systems that use chlorine, with a special focus on residential water systems and supply.Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-993X2021000200308Revista Ambiente & Água v.16 n.2 2021reponame:Revista Ambiente & Águainstname:Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas (IPABHI)instacron:IPABHI10.4136/ambi-agua.2654info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRitt,Barbara SantosFernandes,André Luís TeixeiraThedei Júnior,Geraldoeng2021-04-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1980-993X2021000200308Revistahttp://www.ambi-agua.net/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||ambi.agua@gmail.com1980-993X1980-993Xopendoar:2021-04-27T00:00Revista Ambiente & Água - Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas (IPABHI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparative analysis between the chlorination and ultraviolet radiation methods for the disinfection of bacteria-contaminated water |
title |
Comparative analysis between the chlorination and ultraviolet radiation methods for the disinfection of bacteria-contaminated water |
spellingShingle |
Comparative analysis between the chlorination and ultraviolet radiation methods for the disinfection of bacteria-contaminated water Ritt,Barbara Santos bacteria inactivation chlorine UV light water treatment |
title_short |
Comparative analysis between the chlorination and ultraviolet radiation methods for the disinfection of bacteria-contaminated water |
title_full |
Comparative analysis between the chlorination and ultraviolet radiation methods for the disinfection of bacteria-contaminated water |
title_fullStr |
Comparative analysis between the chlorination and ultraviolet radiation methods for the disinfection of bacteria-contaminated water |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative analysis between the chlorination and ultraviolet radiation methods for the disinfection of bacteria-contaminated water |
title_sort |
Comparative analysis between the chlorination and ultraviolet radiation methods for the disinfection of bacteria-contaminated water |
author |
Ritt,Barbara Santos |
author_facet |
Ritt,Barbara Santos Fernandes,André Luís Teixeira Thedei Júnior,Geraldo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Fernandes,André Luís Teixeira Thedei Júnior,Geraldo |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ritt,Barbara Santos Fernandes,André Luís Teixeira Thedei Júnior,Geraldo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
bacteria inactivation chlorine UV light water treatment |
topic |
bacteria inactivation chlorine UV light water treatment |
description |
Abstract The quality of water for human consumption has been a concern for large organizations and researchers, since the disinfection process, a step of great importance in water treatment plants, has not achieved its proper purpose. There have been frequent reports of the ineffectiveness of bacteria inactivation by the use of chlorine, which is the most used in Brazil, and also due to the formation of by-products such as trihalomethanes and haloacetic acids that are considered toxic to human health. The method of disinfection by ultraviolet radiation (UV) has been widely explored, due to its effectiveness in inactivating a wide variety of pathogens, in addition to the absence of by-product formation. The combined chlorine+UV process as chemical and physical disinfectants, respectively, is complementary and essential when looking for the safety of water for human consumption. The objective of this research was to statistically analyze the performance of disinfectants, chlorine and UV radiation, both separately and together, by inactivating the bacteria Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and then incubating for 48 hours after having received the treatments. The statistical method showed that chlorine and UV obtained the same significance of 100% bacteria inactivation, and that within the determined time of 48 hours after the treatments the bacteria did not show reactivation. Thus, the study affirmed the usefulness of applying UV radiation as a complement to systems that use chlorine, with a special focus on residential water systems and supply. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-993X2021000200308 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-993X2021000200308 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.4136/ambi-agua.2654 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Ambiente & Água v.16 n.2 2021 reponame:Revista Ambiente & Água instname:Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas (IPABHI) instacron:IPABHI |
instname_str |
Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas (IPABHI) |
instacron_str |
IPABHI |
institution |
IPABHI |
reponame_str |
Revista Ambiente & Água |
collection |
Revista Ambiente & Água |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Ambiente & Água - Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas (IPABHI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||ambi.agua@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1752129751643848704 |