Sensory quality and consumers’ acceptance towards wild and farmed brown-trout (Salmo trutta) and farmed rainbow-trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Antão-Geraldes,Ana Maria
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Hungulo,Sílvia Rafael, Pereira,Etelvina, Teixeira,Amílcar, Teixeira,Alfredo, Rodrigues,Sandra
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Food Technology
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-67232020000100424
Resumo: Abstract The present study aims to compare the sensory qualities and the degree of acceptance of wild/farmed brown-trout (Salmo trutta) and the farmed rainbow-trout (Onchorynchus mykiss) by a consumer panel. Acceptability regarding attributes appearance, taste, texture, and global appreciation were evaluated on 20 wild brown-trout, 20 farmed brown-trout and 20 farmed rainbow trout by a consumers’ panel formed by 74 elements. Although the panel of consumers equally well accepted all samples, the rainbow trout had classifications slightly higher in all sensory attributes. This tendency was confirmed by internal preference maps performed for each studied attribute. Consumers’ slightly higher preference for farmed fish might indicate that farmed trout could be an alternative to wild brown trout.
id ITAL-1_1b483ba1c7f5cf1b06104e6cf70a5795
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1981-67232020000100424
network_acronym_str ITAL-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Food Technology
repository_id_str
spelling Sensory quality and consumers’ acceptance towards wild and farmed brown-trout (Salmo trutta) and farmed rainbow-trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)Internal preference mapPrincipal component analysisWild and farmed troutBrown troutRainbow troutAbstract The present study aims to compare the sensory qualities and the degree of acceptance of wild/farmed brown-trout (Salmo trutta) and the farmed rainbow-trout (Onchorynchus mykiss) by a consumer panel. Acceptability regarding attributes appearance, taste, texture, and global appreciation were evaluated on 20 wild brown-trout, 20 farmed brown-trout and 20 farmed rainbow trout by a consumers’ panel formed by 74 elements. Although the panel of consumers equally well accepted all samples, the rainbow trout had classifications slightly higher in all sensory attributes. This tendency was confirmed by internal preference maps performed for each studied attribute. Consumers’ slightly higher preference for farmed fish might indicate that farmed trout could be an alternative to wild brown trout.Instituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos - ITAL2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-67232020000100424Brazilian Journal of Food Technology v.23 2020reponame:Brazilian Journal of Food Technologyinstname:Instituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos (ITAL)instacron:ITAL10.1590/1981-6723.10419info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAntão-Geraldes,Ana MariaHungulo,Sílvia RafaelPereira,EtelvinaTeixeira,AmílcarTeixeira,AlfredoRodrigues,Sandraeng2020-03-25T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1981-67232020000100424Revistahttp://bjft.ital.sp.gov.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbjftsec@ital.sp.gov.br||bjftsec@ital.sp.gov.br1981-67231516-7275opendoar:2020-03-25T00:00Brazilian Journal of Food Technology - Instituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos (ITAL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sensory quality and consumers’ acceptance towards wild and farmed brown-trout (Salmo trutta) and farmed rainbow-trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
title Sensory quality and consumers’ acceptance towards wild and farmed brown-trout (Salmo trutta) and farmed rainbow-trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
spellingShingle Sensory quality and consumers’ acceptance towards wild and farmed brown-trout (Salmo trutta) and farmed rainbow-trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
Antão-Geraldes,Ana Maria
Internal preference map
Principal component analysis
Wild and farmed trout
Brown trout
Rainbow trout
title_short Sensory quality and consumers’ acceptance towards wild and farmed brown-trout (Salmo trutta) and farmed rainbow-trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
title_full Sensory quality and consumers’ acceptance towards wild and farmed brown-trout (Salmo trutta) and farmed rainbow-trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
title_fullStr Sensory quality and consumers’ acceptance towards wild and farmed brown-trout (Salmo trutta) and farmed rainbow-trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
title_full_unstemmed Sensory quality and consumers’ acceptance towards wild and farmed brown-trout (Salmo trutta) and farmed rainbow-trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
title_sort Sensory quality and consumers’ acceptance towards wild and farmed brown-trout (Salmo trutta) and farmed rainbow-trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
author Antão-Geraldes,Ana Maria
author_facet Antão-Geraldes,Ana Maria
Hungulo,Sílvia Rafael
Pereira,Etelvina
Teixeira,Amílcar
Teixeira,Alfredo
Rodrigues,Sandra
author_role author
author2 Hungulo,Sílvia Rafael
Pereira,Etelvina
Teixeira,Amílcar
Teixeira,Alfredo
Rodrigues,Sandra
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Antão-Geraldes,Ana Maria
Hungulo,Sílvia Rafael
Pereira,Etelvina
Teixeira,Amílcar
Teixeira,Alfredo
Rodrigues,Sandra
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Internal preference map
Principal component analysis
Wild and farmed trout
Brown trout
Rainbow trout
topic Internal preference map
Principal component analysis
Wild and farmed trout
Brown trout
Rainbow trout
description Abstract The present study aims to compare the sensory qualities and the degree of acceptance of wild/farmed brown-trout (Salmo trutta) and the farmed rainbow-trout (Onchorynchus mykiss) by a consumer panel. Acceptability regarding attributes appearance, taste, texture, and global appreciation were evaluated on 20 wild brown-trout, 20 farmed brown-trout and 20 farmed rainbow trout by a consumers’ panel formed by 74 elements. Although the panel of consumers equally well accepted all samples, the rainbow trout had classifications slightly higher in all sensory attributes. This tendency was confirmed by internal preference maps performed for each studied attribute. Consumers’ slightly higher preference for farmed fish might indicate that farmed trout could be an alternative to wild brown trout.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-67232020000100424
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-67232020000100424
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1981-6723.10419
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos - ITAL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos - ITAL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Food Technology v.23 2020
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Food Technology
instname:Instituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos (ITAL)
instacron:ITAL
instname_str Instituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos (ITAL)
instacron_str ITAL
institution ITAL
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Food Technology
collection Brazilian Journal of Food Technology
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Food Technology - Instituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos (ITAL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bjftsec@ital.sp.gov.br||bjftsec@ital.sp.gov.br
_version_ 1752128702214307840