Sensory quality and consumers’ acceptance towards wild and farmed brown-trout (Salmo trutta) and farmed rainbow-trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Food Technology |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-67232020000100424 |
Resumo: | Abstract The present study aims to compare the sensory qualities and the degree of acceptance of wild/farmed brown-trout (Salmo trutta) and the farmed rainbow-trout (Onchorynchus mykiss) by a consumer panel. Acceptability regarding attributes appearance, taste, texture, and global appreciation were evaluated on 20 wild brown-trout, 20 farmed brown-trout and 20 farmed rainbow trout by a consumers’ panel formed by 74 elements. Although the panel of consumers equally well accepted all samples, the rainbow trout had classifications slightly higher in all sensory attributes. This tendency was confirmed by internal preference maps performed for each studied attribute. Consumers’ slightly higher preference for farmed fish might indicate that farmed trout could be an alternative to wild brown trout. |
id |
ITAL-1_1b483ba1c7f5cf1b06104e6cf70a5795 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1981-67232020000100424 |
network_acronym_str |
ITAL-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Food Technology |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Sensory quality and consumers’ acceptance towards wild and farmed brown-trout (Salmo trutta) and farmed rainbow-trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)Internal preference mapPrincipal component analysisWild and farmed troutBrown troutRainbow troutAbstract The present study aims to compare the sensory qualities and the degree of acceptance of wild/farmed brown-trout (Salmo trutta) and the farmed rainbow-trout (Onchorynchus mykiss) by a consumer panel. Acceptability regarding attributes appearance, taste, texture, and global appreciation were evaluated on 20 wild brown-trout, 20 farmed brown-trout and 20 farmed rainbow trout by a consumers’ panel formed by 74 elements. Although the panel of consumers equally well accepted all samples, the rainbow trout had classifications slightly higher in all sensory attributes. This tendency was confirmed by internal preference maps performed for each studied attribute. Consumers’ slightly higher preference for farmed fish might indicate that farmed trout could be an alternative to wild brown trout.Instituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos - ITAL2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-67232020000100424Brazilian Journal of Food Technology v.23 2020reponame:Brazilian Journal of Food Technologyinstname:Instituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos (ITAL)instacron:ITAL10.1590/1981-6723.10419info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAntão-Geraldes,Ana MariaHungulo,Sílvia RafaelPereira,EtelvinaTeixeira,AmílcarTeixeira,AlfredoRodrigues,Sandraeng2020-03-25T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1981-67232020000100424Revistahttp://bjft.ital.sp.gov.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbjftsec@ital.sp.gov.br||bjftsec@ital.sp.gov.br1981-67231516-7275opendoar:2020-03-25T00:00Brazilian Journal of Food Technology - Instituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos (ITAL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Sensory quality and consumers’ acceptance towards wild and farmed brown-trout (Salmo trutta) and farmed rainbow-trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) |
title |
Sensory quality and consumers’ acceptance towards wild and farmed brown-trout (Salmo trutta) and farmed rainbow-trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) |
spellingShingle |
Sensory quality and consumers’ acceptance towards wild and farmed brown-trout (Salmo trutta) and farmed rainbow-trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Antão-Geraldes,Ana Maria Internal preference map Principal component analysis Wild and farmed trout Brown trout Rainbow trout |
title_short |
Sensory quality and consumers’ acceptance towards wild and farmed brown-trout (Salmo trutta) and farmed rainbow-trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) |
title_full |
Sensory quality and consumers’ acceptance towards wild and farmed brown-trout (Salmo trutta) and farmed rainbow-trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) |
title_fullStr |
Sensory quality and consumers’ acceptance towards wild and farmed brown-trout (Salmo trutta) and farmed rainbow-trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sensory quality and consumers’ acceptance towards wild and farmed brown-trout (Salmo trutta) and farmed rainbow-trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) |
title_sort |
Sensory quality and consumers’ acceptance towards wild and farmed brown-trout (Salmo trutta) and farmed rainbow-trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) |
author |
Antão-Geraldes,Ana Maria |
author_facet |
Antão-Geraldes,Ana Maria Hungulo,Sílvia Rafael Pereira,Etelvina Teixeira,Amílcar Teixeira,Alfredo Rodrigues,Sandra |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Hungulo,Sílvia Rafael Pereira,Etelvina Teixeira,Amílcar Teixeira,Alfredo Rodrigues,Sandra |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Antão-Geraldes,Ana Maria Hungulo,Sílvia Rafael Pereira,Etelvina Teixeira,Amílcar Teixeira,Alfredo Rodrigues,Sandra |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Internal preference map Principal component analysis Wild and farmed trout Brown trout Rainbow trout |
topic |
Internal preference map Principal component analysis Wild and farmed trout Brown trout Rainbow trout |
description |
Abstract The present study aims to compare the sensory qualities and the degree of acceptance of wild/farmed brown-trout (Salmo trutta) and the farmed rainbow-trout (Onchorynchus mykiss) by a consumer panel. Acceptability regarding attributes appearance, taste, texture, and global appreciation were evaluated on 20 wild brown-trout, 20 farmed brown-trout and 20 farmed rainbow trout by a consumers’ panel formed by 74 elements. Although the panel of consumers equally well accepted all samples, the rainbow trout had classifications slightly higher in all sensory attributes. This tendency was confirmed by internal preference maps performed for each studied attribute. Consumers’ slightly higher preference for farmed fish might indicate that farmed trout could be an alternative to wild brown trout. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-67232020000100424 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-67232020000100424 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1981-6723.10419 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos - ITAL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos - ITAL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Food Technology v.23 2020 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Food Technology instname:Instituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos (ITAL) instacron:ITAL |
instname_str |
Instituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos (ITAL) |
instacron_str |
ITAL |
institution |
ITAL |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Food Technology |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Food Technology |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Food Technology - Instituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos (ITAL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bjftsec@ital.sp.gov.br||bjftsec@ital.sp.gov.br |
_version_ |
1752128702214307840 |