COMPANION ANIMALS AND JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS IN COURT OF JUSTICE OF FEDERAL DISTRICT

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Regis, Arthur Henrique de Pontes
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos
Texto Completo: http://revistajrg.com/index.php/jrg/article/view/328
Resumo: In Brazil there is an estimated population of about 140 million animals present in the family nucleus. In the Federal District there are approximately 1.5 million animals that integrate the multispecies family (new family conformation), which starts to interpret these animals under the logic of ethics and affection, calling them companion animals. This new family structure generates social and legal consequences (example: the existence of discussion about the shared custody of animals after the dissolution of the family nucleus) that end up resulting in the need for state action (by one of its constituted powers). In this context, an exploratory and descriptive study of the judicial panorama in the Court of Justice of Federal District related to companion animals was carried out. It was verified the existence of court decisions that protect animals (especially due to the constitutional prohibition of cruel practices) and permeate the breaking of the current anthropocentric paradigm, although there is also a preponderance of these issues exclusively in relation to dogs and cats. This situation can be explained by the closer affective relationship existing between these companion animals and human beings within the multispecies family. It is expected that the panorama presented is one more element for the understanding of animals in society and that Animal Rights continues to evolve in the Federal District and in Brazil, also resulting in a greater understanding by human beings and, consequently, in a greater protection of animal integrity and dignity.
id JRG_86c692c8c8877034f40e56cb0153c8fd
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.revistajrg.com:article/328
network_acronym_str JRG
network_name_str Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos
repository_id_str
spelling COMPANION ANIMALS AND JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS IN COURT OF JUSTICE OF FEDERAL DISTRICTANIMAIS COMPANHEIROS E OS PRECEDENTES JUDICIAIS NO TRIBUNAL DE JUSTIÇA DO DISTRITO FEDERALDireito Animal. Família Multiespécie. Animais Companheiros.Animal Rights. Multispecies Family. Companion animals.In Brazil there is an estimated population of about 140 million animals present in the family nucleus. In the Federal District there are approximately 1.5 million animals that integrate the multispecies family (new family conformation), which starts to interpret these animals under the logic of ethics and affection, calling them companion animals. This new family structure generates social and legal consequences (example: the existence of discussion about the shared custody of animals after the dissolution of the family nucleus) that end up resulting in the need for state action (by one of its constituted powers). In this context, an exploratory and descriptive study of the judicial panorama in the Court of Justice of Federal District related to companion animals was carried out. It was verified the existence of court decisions that protect animals (especially due to the constitutional prohibition of cruel practices) and permeate the breaking of the current anthropocentric paradigm, although there is also a preponderance of these issues exclusively in relation to dogs and cats. This situation can be explained by the closer affective relationship existing between these companion animals and human beings within the multispecies family. It is expected that the panorama presented is one more element for the understanding of animals in society and that Animal Rights continues to evolve in the Federal District and in Brazil, also resulting in a greater understanding by human beings and, consequently, in a greater protection of animal integrity and dignity.No Brasil existe uma população estimada de cerca de 140 milhões de animais presentes no núcleo familiar. No Distrito Federal há aproximadamente 1,5 milhão de animais integrando a família multiespécie (nova conformação familiar), que passa a interpretar esses animais sob a lógica da ética e do afeto, denominando-os animais companheiros. Essa nova conformação familiar gera desdobramentos sociais e jurídicos (exemplificativamente: a existência de discussão sobre a guarda compartilhada de animais após a dissolução do núcleo familiar) que acabam resultando na necessidade de uma ação estatal (por um de seus poderes constituídos). Nesse contexto, realizou-se um estudo exploratório e descritivo do panorama judicial no Tribunal de Justiça do Distrito Federal e dos Territórios relacionado aos animais companheiros. Verificou-se a existência de decisões judiciais que protegem os animais (especialmente em virtude da proibição constitucional de práticas cruéis) e perpassam pela quebra do paradigma antropocêntrico vigente, embora se observe também uma preponderância dessas questões exclusivamente em relação a cães e gatos. A referida conjuntura pode ser explicada pela relação afetiva mais próxima existente entre esses animais companheiros e os seres humanos no bojo da família multiespécie. Espera-se que o panorama apresentado se configure como mais um elemento para a compreensão dos animais na sociedade e que o Direito Animal, continue evoluindo no Distrito Federal e no Brasil, resultando também em uma maior compreensão pelos seres humanos e, consequentemente, em uma maior proteção da integridade e da dignidade animal.Editora JRG2021-12-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttp://revistajrg.com/index.php/jrg/article/view/32810.5281/zenodo.5795888JRG Journal of Academic Studies; Vol. 4 No. 9 (2021): Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos ; 338-354JRG Journal of Academic Studies ; Vol. 4 Núm. 9 (2021): Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos ; 338-354JRG Journal of Academic Studies; V. 4 N. 9 (2021): Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos ; 338-354Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos ; v. 4 n. 9 (2021): Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos ; 338-3542595-166110.29327/257411.4.9-1reponame:Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicosinstname:Editora JRGinstacron:JRGporhttp://revistajrg.com/index.php/jrg/article/view/328/409https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRegis, Arthur Henrique de Pontes 2022-03-08T14:02:39Zoai:ojs2.revistajrg.com:article/328Revistahttp://revistajrg.com/index.php/jrgPRIhttp://revistajrg.com/index.php/jrg/oaiprofessorjonas@gmail.com||2595-16612595-1661opendoar:2022-03-08T14:02:39Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos - Editora JRGfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv COMPANION ANIMALS AND JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS IN COURT OF JUSTICE OF FEDERAL DISTRICT
ANIMAIS COMPANHEIROS E OS PRECEDENTES JUDICIAIS NO TRIBUNAL DE JUSTIÇA DO DISTRITO FEDERAL
title COMPANION ANIMALS AND JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS IN COURT OF JUSTICE OF FEDERAL DISTRICT
spellingShingle COMPANION ANIMALS AND JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS IN COURT OF JUSTICE OF FEDERAL DISTRICT
Regis, Arthur Henrique de Pontes
Direito Animal. Família Multiespécie. Animais Companheiros.
Animal Rights. Multispecies Family. Companion animals.
title_short COMPANION ANIMALS AND JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS IN COURT OF JUSTICE OF FEDERAL DISTRICT
title_full COMPANION ANIMALS AND JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS IN COURT OF JUSTICE OF FEDERAL DISTRICT
title_fullStr COMPANION ANIMALS AND JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS IN COURT OF JUSTICE OF FEDERAL DISTRICT
title_full_unstemmed COMPANION ANIMALS AND JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS IN COURT OF JUSTICE OF FEDERAL DISTRICT
title_sort COMPANION ANIMALS AND JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS IN COURT OF JUSTICE OF FEDERAL DISTRICT
author Regis, Arthur Henrique de Pontes
author_facet Regis, Arthur Henrique de Pontes
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Regis, Arthur Henrique de Pontes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Direito Animal. Família Multiespécie. Animais Companheiros.
Animal Rights. Multispecies Family. Companion animals.
topic Direito Animal. Família Multiespécie. Animais Companheiros.
Animal Rights. Multispecies Family. Companion animals.
description In Brazil there is an estimated population of about 140 million animals present in the family nucleus. In the Federal District there are approximately 1.5 million animals that integrate the multispecies family (new family conformation), which starts to interpret these animals under the logic of ethics and affection, calling them companion animals. This new family structure generates social and legal consequences (example: the existence of discussion about the shared custody of animals after the dissolution of the family nucleus) that end up resulting in the need for state action (by one of its constituted powers). In this context, an exploratory and descriptive study of the judicial panorama in the Court of Justice of Federal District related to companion animals was carried out. It was verified the existence of court decisions that protect animals (especially due to the constitutional prohibition of cruel practices) and permeate the breaking of the current anthropocentric paradigm, although there is also a preponderance of these issues exclusively in relation to dogs and cats. This situation can be explained by the closer affective relationship existing between these companion animals and human beings within the multispecies family. It is expected that the panorama presented is one more element for the understanding of animals in society and that Animal Rights continues to evolve in the Federal District and in Brazil, also resulting in a greater understanding by human beings and, consequently, in a greater protection of animal integrity and dignity.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://revistajrg.com/index.php/jrg/article/view/328
10.5281/zenodo.5795888
url http://revistajrg.com/index.php/jrg/article/view/328
identifier_str_mv 10.5281/zenodo.5795888
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistajrg.com/index.php/jrg/article/view/328/409
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora JRG
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora JRG
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv JRG Journal of Academic Studies; Vol. 4 No. 9 (2021): Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos ; 338-354
JRG Journal of Academic Studies ; Vol. 4 Núm. 9 (2021): Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos ; 338-354
JRG Journal of Academic Studies; V. 4 N. 9 (2021): Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos ; 338-354
Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos ; v. 4 n. 9 (2021): Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos ; 338-354
2595-1661
10.29327/257411.4.9-1
reponame:Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos
instname:Editora JRG
instacron:JRG
instname_str Editora JRG
instacron_str JRG
institution JRG
reponame_str Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos
collection Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos - Editora JRG
repository.mail.fl_str_mv professorjonas@gmail.com||
_version_ 1797068984883871744