PROFA: Deconstructing tradition in the search for a constructivist consensus
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Comunicações |
DOI: | 10.15600/2238-121X/comunicacoes.v16n2p73-83 |
Texto Completo: | https://www.metodista.br/revistas/revistas-unimep/index.php/comunicacoes/article/view/114 |
Resumo: | This article presents, based on documental analysis, the PROFA's (Literacy Teacher Formation Program of ME C/SE F) conception of traditional teaching. It demonstrates how conception was used as strategic mechanism of defense and induction of the adoption, by the teacher, of the conception of constructivist teaching, privileged by the Program and the federal government of the period. Based on the analysis, it was verified that PROFA has the objective of promoting and amplifying the teacher's professional training.However, when accomplishing that task, it induces the teachers to adopt the theoreticalmethodological constructivist "model", using a contrary posture to the teaching traditional model and superficially introducing in its documents. Thus, PROFA can be seen as an attempt to remove the legitimacy of the traditional practice of teaching - built by countless teachers along their careers and formations - in favor of the legitimation and purely mechanical and passive adoption of the model proposed by the Program. However, such a verification does not presuppose the defense of one or another educational model as ideal, it just recognizes the right the teacher has to discuss and reflect about his or her area, about the different pedagogic currents and choosing an effectivily legitimate political and pedagogic option. |
id |
METO-3_a4d9e21a11003d185e19767691c9626a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs-unimep.metodista.br:article/114 |
network_acronym_str |
METO-3 |
network_name_str |
Comunicações |
spelling |
PROFA: Deconstructing tradition in the search for a constructivist consensusPROFA: desconstruindo o tradicional em busca de um consenso construtivistaPROFA; FORMAÇÃO DE PROFESSORES; ENSINO TRADICIONAL; CONSTRUTIVISMOpr ofa; teacher training; traditional teaching; constructivism; years of 1990This article presents, based on documental analysis, the PROFA's (Literacy Teacher Formation Program of ME C/SE F) conception of traditional teaching. It demonstrates how conception was used as strategic mechanism of defense and induction of the adoption, by the teacher, of the conception of constructivist teaching, privileged by the Program and the federal government of the period. Based on the analysis, it was verified that PROFA has the objective of promoting and amplifying the teacher's professional training.However, when accomplishing that task, it induces the teachers to adopt the theoreticalmethodological constructivist "model", using a contrary posture to the teaching traditional model and superficially introducing in its documents. Thus, PROFA can be seen as an attempt to remove the legitimacy of the traditional practice of teaching - built by countless teachers along their careers and formations - in favor of the legitimation and purely mechanical and passive adoption of the model proposed by the Program. However, such a verification does not presuppose the defense of one or another educational model as ideal, it just recognizes the right the teacher has to discuss and reflect about his or her area, about the different pedagogic currents and choosing an effectivily legitimate political and pedagogic option.Com base em análise documental, este artigo apresenta a concepção de ensino tradicional presente no Programa de Formação de Professores alfabetizadores (PROFA) da secretaria de educação Fundamental do ministério da educação. Demonstra o modo pelo qual essa concepção foi utilizada como recurso estratégico de defesa e de indução à adoção, pelo professor, da concepção construtivista de ensino privilegiada pelo programa e pelo governo federal do período. Segundo a análise, constatou-se que o PROFA tem o objetivo de promover a ampliação da capacidade profissional do professor. No entanto, ao realizar essa tarefa, ele induz o professor à adoção de um modelo teórico-metodológico construtivista, tendo uma postura contrária ao modelo tradicional de ensino e apresentando-o de uma maneira superficial em seus documentos. Assim, o que se percebe no PROFA é a tentativa constante de deslegitimar a prática tradicional de ensino - construída por inúmeros professores ao longo de suas carreiras e de suas formações -, em favor da legitimação e da absorção mecânica e puramente passiva do modelo defendido pelo programa. Tal constatação, contudo, não pressupõe a defesa deste ou daquele modelo educacional como ideal, apenas reconhece o direito do docente de discutir e refletir sobre sua área e as diferentes correntes pedagógicas e de fazer uma opção política e pedagógica efetivamente legítima.Universidade Metodista de PiracicabaRamos, Géssica PriscilaFerraroni, Daniele de Souza2011-05-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.metodista.br/revistas/revistas-unimep/index.php/comunicacoes/article/view/11410.15600/2238-121X/comunicacoes.v16n2p73-83Comunicações; v. 16, n. 2 (2009); 73-832238-121X0104-8481reponame:Comunicaçõesinstname:Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (METODISTA)instacron:METODISTAporhttps://www.metodista.br/revistas/revistas-unimep/index.php/comunicacoes/article/view/114/61Direitos autorais 2017 Comunicaçõesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-06-03T12:28:49Zoai:ojs-unimep.metodista.br:article/114Revistahttps://www.metodista.br/revistas/revistas-unimep/index.php/comunicacoesONGhttps://www.metodista.br/revistas/revistas-unimep/index.php/comunicacoes/oaiana.franco@unimep.br||revcomunicacoes@unimep.br2238-121X0104-8481opendoar:2016-06-03T12:28:49Comunicações - Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (METODISTA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
PROFA: Deconstructing tradition in the search for a constructivist consensus PROFA: desconstruindo o tradicional em busca de um consenso construtivista |
title |
PROFA: Deconstructing tradition in the search for a constructivist consensus |
spellingShingle |
PROFA: Deconstructing tradition in the search for a constructivist consensus PROFA: Deconstructing tradition in the search for a constructivist consensus Ramos, Géssica Priscila PROFA; FORMAÇÃO DE PROFESSORES; ENSINO TRADICIONAL; CONSTRUTIVISMO pr ofa; teacher training; traditional teaching; constructivism; years of 1990 Ramos, Géssica Priscila PROFA; FORMAÇÃO DE PROFESSORES; ENSINO TRADICIONAL; CONSTRUTIVISMO pr ofa; teacher training; traditional teaching; constructivism; years of 1990 |
title_short |
PROFA: Deconstructing tradition in the search for a constructivist consensus |
title_full |
PROFA: Deconstructing tradition in the search for a constructivist consensus |
title_fullStr |
PROFA: Deconstructing tradition in the search for a constructivist consensus PROFA: Deconstructing tradition in the search for a constructivist consensus |
title_full_unstemmed |
PROFA: Deconstructing tradition in the search for a constructivist consensus PROFA: Deconstructing tradition in the search for a constructivist consensus |
title_sort |
PROFA: Deconstructing tradition in the search for a constructivist consensus |
author |
Ramos, Géssica Priscila |
author_facet |
Ramos, Géssica Priscila Ramos, Géssica Priscila Ferraroni, Daniele de Souza Ferraroni, Daniele de Souza |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ferraroni, Daniele de Souza |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ramos, Géssica Priscila Ferraroni, Daniele de Souza |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
PROFA; FORMAÇÃO DE PROFESSORES; ENSINO TRADICIONAL; CONSTRUTIVISMO pr ofa; teacher training; traditional teaching; constructivism; years of 1990 |
topic |
PROFA; FORMAÇÃO DE PROFESSORES; ENSINO TRADICIONAL; CONSTRUTIVISMO pr ofa; teacher training; traditional teaching; constructivism; years of 1990 |
description |
This article presents, based on documental analysis, the PROFA's (Literacy Teacher Formation Program of ME C/SE F) conception of traditional teaching. It demonstrates how conception was used as strategic mechanism of defense and induction of the adoption, by the teacher, of the conception of constructivist teaching, privileged by the Program and the federal government of the period. Based on the analysis, it was verified that PROFA has the objective of promoting and amplifying the teacher's professional training.However, when accomplishing that task, it induces the teachers to adopt the theoreticalmethodological constructivist "model", using a contrary posture to the teaching traditional model and superficially introducing in its documents. Thus, PROFA can be seen as an attempt to remove the legitimacy of the traditional practice of teaching - built by countless teachers along their careers and formations - in favor of the legitimation and purely mechanical and passive adoption of the model proposed by the Program. However, such a verification does not presuppose the defense of one or another educational model as ideal, it just recognizes the right the teacher has to discuss and reflect about his or her area, about the different pedagogic currents and choosing an effectivily legitimate political and pedagogic option. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-05-17 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.metodista.br/revistas/revistas-unimep/index.php/comunicacoes/article/view/114 10.15600/2238-121X/comunicacoes.v16n2p73-83 |
url |
https://www.metodista.br/revistas/revistas-unimep/index.php/comunicacoes/article/view/114 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15600/2238-121X/comunicacoes.v16n2p73-83 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.metodista.br/revistas/revistas-unimep/index.php/comunicacoes/article/view/114/61 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2017 Comunicações info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2017 Comunicações |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Metodista de Piracicaba |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Metodista de Piracicaba |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Comunicações; v. 16, n. 2 (2009); 73-83 2238-121X 0104-8481 reponame:Comunicações instname:Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (METODISTA) instacron:METODISTA |
instname_str |
Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (METODISTA) |
instacron_str |
METODISTA |
institution |
METODISTA |
reponame_str |
Comunicações |
collection |
Comunicações |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Comunicações - Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (METODISTA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
ana.franco@unimep.br||revcomunicacoes@unimep.br |
_version_ |
1822176225532051456 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.15600/2238-121X/comunicacoes.v16n2p73-83 |