Consequencialismo judicial e eficiência: uma perspectiva ética

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nunes, Miguel Cordeiro
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da Uninove
Texto Completo: http://bibliotecatede.uninove.br/handle/tede/2389
Resumo: Excessive judicialization has induced the production of judicial decisions which are not always balanced, since, despite having in many cases solved concrete disputes between the parties, such decisions have resulted in detrimental economic, social and political effects that often have a great impact and that were not considered at the moment of the rendition of the judgment. Various have been the examples and ruinous has been the impact generated in such cases. This phenomenon has justified the discussion about the necessity that the magistrate ponder about the potential effects of his/her decisions before pronouncing them, and, in this sense, the civil legislation has provided for such duty. Many relevant efforts have been taken by the Judiciary Power to reflect on the effects of judges’ decisions before taking them, without offending the law, the existing jurisprudence, precedents and constitutional principles, aiming at assertiveness, and especially at the efficiency of its manifestations, and, therefore, the efficiency of the very jurisdiction from a perspective of sustainability of the system of distribution of justice. Nevertheless, frequently there have been ultimate arguments grounding decisions that dismiss the law, and this, according to critics, implies unacceptable subordination of what is a priori right and good to mere considerations and consequentialist calculations. One can notice that opponents do not distinguish between these two modes of decision, by deeming them as consequentialist through a negativistic perspective. The main goal of the present study is to investigate whether, from the ethical-philosophical point of view, there can be good and bad consequentialism and whether there is the possibility that judicial consequentialist decisions can be made without violating the rules and principles that structure the legal system. For such an investigation the deductive method with qualitative exploratory research has been used along with a bibliographical survey and a case study. In the light of the findings, the conclusion was that there is the possibility of misuse of judicial consequentialism, in view of the absence of normative criteria for the justification of a decision which considers its potential consequences, the uncertainty about the reliability concerning the magistrate’s prognosis, and mechanisms to stabilize normative criteria to prevent such consequentialism from becoming a mere expedient to justify decisions without clear criteria and subordinated to interests disassociated from an adequate sense of justice. On the other hand, despite the efforts indicated in the first ascertainment, it is possible to notice that the term consequentialism has become polysemous, inducing errors of perception grounding criticism that does not take into account the effective possibility that the magistrate may have – by making use of the traditional hermeneutics and elements of other areas of knowledge, without any disregard for the law or the constitutional principles and norms – of extracting from the legal system alternative solutions in such a way that a consideration of the potential consequences of each alternative can be used as a methodological support to such Magistrate in the moment of decision neither doing any harm to the common good nor showing subordination of justice to lesser moral foundations, and, therefore, not necessarily showing any conceptual tension between a democratic rule-of-law state and consequentialism.
id NOVE_807f24f8e800cf9ccb73f0191cf27328
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:tede/2389
network_acronym_str NOVE
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da Uninove
repository_id_str
spelling Jorge, André Guilherme LemosJorge, André Guilherme LemosBenacchio, MarceloWagner Junior, Luiz Guilherme da Costahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3717226056081471Nunes, Miguel Cordeiro2020-11-18T18:44:12Z2020-04-14Nunes, Miguel Cordeiro. Consequencialismo judicial e eficiência: uma perspectiva ética. 2020. 148 f. Dissertação( Mestrado em Direito) - Universidade Nove de Julho, São Paulo.http://bibliotecatede.uninove.br/handle/tede/2389Excessive judicialization has induced the production of judicial decisions which are not always balanced, since, despite having in many cases solved concrete disputes between the parties, such decisions have resulted in detrimental economic, social and political effects that often have a great impact and that were not considered at the moment of the rendition of the judgment. Various have been the examples and ruinous has been the impact generated in such cases. This phenomenon has justified the discussion about the necessity that the magistrate ponder about the potential effects of his/her decisions before pronouncing them, and, in this sense, the civil legislation has provided for such duty. Many relevant efforts have been taken by the Judiciary Power to reflect on the effects of judges’ decisions before taking them, without offending the law, the existing jurisprudence, precedents and constitutional principles, aiming at assertiveness, and especially at the efficiency of its manifestations, and, therefore, the efficiency of the very jurisdiction from a perspective of sustainability of the system of distribution of justice. Nevertheless, frequently there have been ultimate arguments grounding decisions that dismiss the law, and this, according to critics, implies unacceptable subordination of what is a priori right and good to mere considerations and consequentialist calculations. One can notice that opponents do not distinguish between these two modes of decision, by deeming them as consequentialist through a negativistic perspective. The main goal of the present study is to investigate whether, from the ethical-philosophical point of view, there can be good and bad consequentialism and whether there is the possibility that judicial consequentialist decisions can be made without violating the rules and principles that structure the legal system. For such an investigation the deductive method with qualitative exploratory research has been used along with a bibliographical survey and a case study. In the light of the findings, the conclusion was that there is the possibility of misuse of judicial consequentialism, in view of the absence of normative criteria for the justification of a decision which considers its potential consequences, the uncertainty about the reliability concerning the magistrate’s prognosis, and mechanisms to stabilize normative criteria to prevent such consequentialism from becoming a mere expedient to justify decisions without clear criteria and subordinated to interests disassociated from an adequate sense of justice. On the other hand, despite the efforts indicated in the first ascertainment, it is possible to notice that the term consequentialism has become polysemous, inducing errors of perception grounding criticism that does not take into account the effective possibility that the magistrate may have – by making use of the traditional hermeneutics and elements of other areas of knowledge, without any disregard for the law or the constitutional principles and norms – of extracting from the legal system alternative solutions in such a way that a consideration of the potential consequences of each alternative can be used as a methodological support to such Magistrate in the moment of decision neither doing any harm to the common good nor showing subordination of justice to lesser moral foundations, and, therefore, not necessarily showing any conceptual tension between a democratic rule-of-law state and consequentialism.A judicialização excessiva tem induzido à produção de decisões judiciais nem sempre balanceadas, pois, embora em muitos casos tenha solucionado a lide concreta entre as partes, tem produzido deletérios efeitos econômicos, sociais e políticos, muitas vezes de grande impacto, que não foram sopesados no momento da prolação. Inúmeros foram os exemplos e ruinosos os impactos gerados. O fenômeno justificou a discussão sobre a necessidade de o magistrado refletir sobre os efeitos potenciais de suas decisões antes de prolatá-las e a legislação civil veio a dispor sobre o dever nesse sentido. Muitos esforços relevantes têm sido feitos pelo Poder Judiciário para sopesar os efeitos de suas decisões antes de tomá-las, sem transgressão à lei, à jurisprudência, aos precedentes e aos princípios constitucionais, com vistas à assertividade e, sobretudo, eficiência de suas manifestações e, portanto, eficiência da própria jurisdição, numa perspectiva de sustentabilidade do sistema de distribuição de justiça. Entretanto, comumente ocorre de argumentos finalísticos embasarem decisões que se afastam da lei, o que, segundo os críticos, implica reprovável subordinação do justo e do bem a priori a meras considerações e cálculos consequencialistas. Nota-se que os opositores não fazem distinção entre esses dois modos de decidir, considerando a todos consequencialistas, por uma perspectiva negativista. O objetivo geral deste trabalho foi investigar se, do ponto de vista ético-filosófico, pode haver bom e mau consequencialismo e se há a possibilidade de decisões judiciais consequencialistas serem tomadas sem transgressão às regras e princípios que estruturam o ordenamento jurídico. Utilizou-se o método dedutivo, com pesquisa qualitativa exploratória, mediante levantamento bibliográfico e análise de caso. Diante dos resultados obtidos, concluiu-se pela possibilidade de mau uso do consequencialismo judicial, ante a ausência de critérios normativos de justificação da decisão que sopese suas potenciais consequências, a incerteza sobre a confiabilidade de prognoses do magistrado e de mecanismos de estabilização de critérios normativos que evitem que o consequencialismo se torne mero artifício de justificação de decisões sem critérios claros e subordinadas a interesses desassociados de um senso adequado de justiça. Em contrapartida, apesar dos riscos apontados na primeira constatação, nota-se que o termo consequencialismo tornou-se polissêmico, induzindo a falhas de percepção que embasam críticas que não levam em conta a efetiva possibilidade do magistrado, valendo-se da hermenêutica tradicional e elementos de outras áreas do conhecimento, sem afrontar a lei nem os princípios e regras constitucionais, extrair do ordenamento jurídico alternativas de solução, de modo que o sopesamento das potenciais consequências de cada alternativa sirva de suporte metodológico ao Magistrado no ato de decidir, sem nenhum comprometimento do bem, nem subordinação da justiça a valores de menor envergadura moral, não havendo necessariamente nenhuma tensão conceitual entre Estado de Direito e consequencialismo.Submitted by Nadir Basilio (nadirsb@uninove.br) on 2020-11-18T18:44:12Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Miguel Cordeiro Nunes.pdf: 1207182 bytes, checksum: 1934a5e689709a98df315898b9094184 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2020-11-18T18:44:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Miguel Cordeiro Nunes.pdf: 1207182 bytes, checksum: 1934a5e689709a98df315898b9094184 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020-04-14application/pdfporUniversidade Nove de JulhoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em DireitoUNINOVEBrasilDireitoconsequencialismo judicialeficiênciautilitarismoética kantianateoria da justiça por equidadejudicial consequentialismefficiencyutilitarianismkantian ethicstheory of Jjstice for equityCIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITOConsequencialismo judicial e eficiência: uma perspectiva éticainfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis-7277407233034425144600info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da Uninoveinstname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)instacron:UNINOVEORIGINALMiguel Cordeiro Nunes.pdfMiguel Cordeiro Nunes.pdfapplication/pdf1207182http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/2389/2/Miguel+Cordeiro+Nunes.pdf1934a5e689709a98df315898b9094184MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/2389/1/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51tede/23892021-10-06 11:19:36.254oai:localhost: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://bibliotecatede.uninove.br/PRIhttp://bibliotecatede.uninove.br/oai/requestbibliotecatede@uninove.br||bibliotecatede@uninove.bropendoar:2021-10-06T14:19:36Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da Uninove - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Consequencialismo judicial e eficiência: uma perspectiva ética
title Consequencialismo judicial e eficiência: uma perspectiva ética
spellingShingle Consequencialismo judicial e eficiência: uma perspectiva ética
Nunes, Miguel Cordeiro
consequencialismo judicial
eficiência
utilitarismo
ética kantiana
teoria da justiça por equidade
judicial consequentialism
efficiency
utilitarianism
kantian ethics
theory of Jjstice for equity
CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
title_short Consequencialismo judicial e eficiência: uma perspectiva ética
title_full Consequencialismo judicial e eficiência: uma perspectiva ética
title_fullStr Consequencialismo judicial e eficiência: uma perspectiva ética
title_full_unstemmed Consequencialismo judicial e eficiência: uma perspectiva ética
title_sort Consequencialismo judicial e eficiência: uma perspectiva ética
author Nunes, Miguel Cordeiro
author_facet Nunes, Miguel Cordeiro
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Jorge, André Guilherme Lemos
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Jorge, André Guilherme Lemos
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Benacchio, Marcelo
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv Wagner Junior, Luiz Guilherme da Costa
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/3717226056081471
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nunes, Miguel Cordeiro
contributor_str_mv Jorge, André Guilherme Lemos
Jorge, André Guilherme Lemos
Benacchio, Marcelo
Wagner Junior, Luiz Guilherme da Costa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv consequencialismo judicial
eficiência
utilitarismo
ética kantiana
teoria da justiça por equidade
topic consequencialismo judicial
eficiência
utilitarismo
ética kantiana
teoria da justiça por equidade
judicial consequentialism
efficiency
utilitarianism
kantian ethics
theory of Jjstice for equity
CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv judicial consequentialism
efficiency
utilitarianism
kantian ethics
theory of Jjstice for equity
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
description Excessive judicialization has induced the production of judicial decisions which are not always balanced, since, despite having in many cases solved concrete disputes between the parties, such decisions have resulted in detrimental economic, social and political effects that often have a great impact and that were not considered at the moment of the rendition of the judgment. Various have been the examples and ruinous has been the impact generated in such cases. This phenomenon has justified the discussion about the necessity that the magistrate ponder about the potential effects of his/her decisions before pronouncing them, and, in this sense, the civil legislation has provided for such duty. Many relevant efforts have been taken by the Judiciary Power to reflect on the effects of judges’ decisions before taking them, without offending the law, the existing jurisprudence, precedents and constitutional principles, aiming at assertiveness, and especially at the efficiency of its manifestations, and, therefore, the efficiency of the very jurisdiction from a perspective of sustainability of the system of distribution of justice. Nevertheless, frequently there have been ultimate arguments grounding decisions that dismiss the law, and this, according to critics, implies unacceptable subordination of what is a priori right and good to mere considerations and consequentialist calculations. One can notice that opponents do not distinguish between these two modes of decision, by deeming them as consequentialist through a negativistic perspective. The main goal of the present study is to investigate whether, from the ethical-philosophical point of view, there can be good and bad consequentialism and whether there is the possibility that judicial consequentialist decisions can be made without violating the rules and principles that structure the legal system. For such an investigation the deductive method with qualitative exploratory research has been used along with a bibliographical survey and a case study. In the light of the findings, the conclusion was that there is the possibility of misuse of judicial consequentialism, in view of the absence of normative criteria for the justification of a decision which considers its potential consequences, the uncertainty about the reliability concerning the magistrate’s prognosis, and mechanisms to stabilize normative criteria to prevent such consequentialism from becoming a mere expedient to justify decisions without clear criteria and subordinated to interests disassociated from an adequate sense of justice. On the other hand, despite the efforts indicated in the first ascertainment, it is possible to notice that the term consequentialism has become polysemous, inducing errors of perception grounding criticism that does not take into account the effective possibility that the magistrate may have – by making use of the traditional hermeneutics and elements of other areas of knowledge, without any disregard for the law or the constitutional principles and norms – of extracting from the legal system alternative solutions in such a way that a consideration of the potential consequences of each alternative can be used as a methodological support to such Magistrate in the moment of decision neither doing any harm to the common good nor showing subordination of justice to lesser moral foundations, and, therefore, not necessarily showing any conceptual tension between a democratic rule-of-law state and consequentialism.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2020-11-18T18:44:12Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2020-04-14
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv Nunes, Miguel Cordeiro. Consequencialismo judicial e eficiência: uma perspectiva ética. 2020. 148 f. Dissertação( Mestrado em Direito) - Universidade Nove de Julho, São Paulo.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://bibliotecatede.uninove.br/handle/tede/2389
identifier_str_mv Nunes, Miguel Cordeiro. Consequencialismo judicial e eficiência: uma perspectiva ética. 2020. 148 f. Dissertação( Mestrado em Direito) - Universidade Nove de Julho, São Paulo.
url http://bibliotecatede.uninove.br/handle/tede/2389
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv -7277407233034425144
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Nove de Julho
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UNINOVE
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Direito
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Nove de Julho
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da Uninove
instname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
instacron:UNINOVE
instname_str Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
instacron_str UNINOVE
institution UNINOVE
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da Uninove
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da Uninove
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/2389/2/Miguel+Cordeiro+Nunes.pdf
http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/2389/1/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 1934a5e689709a98df315898b9094184
bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da Uninove - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bibliotecatede@uninove.br||bibliotecatede@uninove.br
_version_ 1811016859444576256