Peanut yield under residual effect of basaltic rock powder in a sugarcane reform area
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | South American Sciences |
Texto Completo: | https://www.southamericansciences.com.br/index.php/sas/article/view/127 |
Resumo: | The stonemeal technique is a sustainable process in agricultural production, dealing with soil management with a natural source product, such as basaltic rock dust. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate peanut yield under residual effect of Coplan basaltic rock dust (BRD) in a sugarcane reform area in the 2020/21 harvest. The experiment was arranged in strips (split pots), with a length of 60.0 m and width of 10.8 m, including three treatments: T1 - without PRB; T2 - 2.5 t ha-1 of PRB e; T3 - 5.0 t ha-1 of PRB, for each strip, with 10 collection points (repeats), distributed at 6 m each, obtaining, after analysis of variance, the means, which were compared by the Tukey Test, at 5% probability and polynomial regression for the effect of the doses. After characterization of the BRD, the application was carried out through a tractored corrective and fertilizer distributor, covering the width of the strips, carried out 10 days after the cutting of ratoon cane in the 2019/20 harvest, in september. After the harvest of this sugarcane, in october 2020, the area underwent conventional soil preparation. Peanuts were planted in november 2020, with the cultivar IAC 503, without correction and soil fertilization. The cultural treatments were carried out according to recommendations for the culture. After 160 days of planting, the start-up, inversion and harvest of the windrows were carried out, in April 2021, in a mechanized manner, obtained in the useful area of each point (6.0 m x 3.6 m), within the ranges, by treatment and, later, the collected weight was transformed into productivity, given per kilograms and sacks per hectare. It was observed that the treatment without BRD presented average yield values equal to 5,602.32 kg ha-1 and 224.10 sc ha-1 and, that the doses of 2.5 and 5.0 t ha-1 presented the average values yield of 7,354.63 and 7,421.76 kg ha-1, with 294.19 and 296.87 sc ha-1, respectively, with an increase of 24.51% in productivity. |
id |
PROS_0ac6f346b1bfe9867dda4b2c49f9f5b9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.southamericansciences.com.br:article/127 |
network_acronym_str |
PROS |
network_name_str |
South American Sciences |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Peanut yield under residual effect of basaltic rock powder in a sugarcane reform areaRendimiento de maní bajo efecto residual del polvo de roca basáltica em un área de reforma de caña de azúcar Produtividade do amendoim sob efeito residual da rochagem em área de reforma de canavialArachis hypogaea L.Roca de silicatoBasaltoBioinsumosArachis hypogaea L.Silicate rockBasaltBioinputArachis hypogaearocha silicáticabasaltoBioinsumoThe stonemeal technique is a sustainable process in agricultural production, dealing with soil management with a natural source product, such as basaltic rock dust. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate peanut yield under residual effect of Coplan basaltic rock dust (BRD) in a sugarcane reform area in the 2020/21 harvest. The experiment was arranged in strips (split pots), with a length of 60.0 m and width of 10.8 m, including three treatments: T1 - without PRB; T2 - 2.5 t ha-1 of PRB e; T3 - 5.0 t ha-1 of PRB, for each strip, with 10 collection points (repeats), distributed at 6 m each, obtaining, after analysis of variance, the means, which were compared by the Tukey Test, at 5% probability and polynomial regression for the effect of the doses. After characterization of the BRD, the application was carried out through a tractored corrective and fertilizer distributor, covering the width of the strips, carried out 10 days after the cutting of ratoon cane in the 2019/20 harvest, in september. After the harvest of this sugarcane, in october 2020, the area underwent conventional soil preparation. Peanuts were planted in november 2020, with the cultivar IAC 503, without correction and soil fertilization. The cultural treatments were carried out according to recommendations for the culture. After 160 days of planting, the start-up, inversion and harvest of the windrows were carried out, in April 2021, in a mechanized manner, obtained in the useful area of each point (6.0 m x 3.6 m), within the ranges, by treatment and, later, the collected weight was transformed into productivity, given per kilograms and sacks per hectare. It was observed that the treatment without BRD presented average yield values equal to 5,602.32 kg ha-1 and 224.10 sc ha-1 and, that the doses of 2.5 and 5.0 t ha-1 presented the average values yield of 7,354.63 and 7,421.76 kg ha-1, with 294.19 and 296.87 sc ha-1, respectively, with an increase of 24.51% in productivity.La técnica de la harina de piedra es un proceso sostenible en la producción agrícola, que se ocupa de la gestión del suelo con un producto de origen natural, como el polvo de roca basáltica. Por lo tanto, el objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el rendimiento de maní bajo el efecto residual del polvo de roca basáltica Coplan (PRB) en un área de reforma de caña de azúcar en la temporada 2020/21. El experimento se dispuso en tiras (macetas partidas), con una longitud de 60,0 my un ancho de 10,8 m, incluyendo tres tratamientos: T1- sin PRB; T2- 2,5 t ha-1 PRB e; T3 – 5,0 t ha-1 de PRB, para cada rango, con 10 puntos de recolección (repeticiones), distribuidos a 6 m cada uno, obteniendo, luego del análisis de varianza, las medias, las cuales fueron comparadas por la prueba de Tukey, al 5% de probabilidad y regresión polinomial para el efecto de la dosis. Luego de la caracterización del PRB, la aplicación se realizó a través de un tractor correctivo y distribuidor de fertilizante, cubriendo el ancho de las tiras, realizado 10 días después del corte de la caña de soca en la zafra 2019/20, en septiembre. Luego de la cosecha de esta caña de azúcar, en octubre de 2020, el área se sometió a preparación convencional del suelo y se sembró maní en noviembre de 2020, con el cultivar IAC 503, sin corrección y fertilización del suelo. Los tratamientos culturales se realizaron de acuerdo con las recomendaciones del cultivo. Luego de 160 días de siembra, las hileras fueron puestas en marcha, invertidas y cosechadas, en abril de 2021, de manera mecanizada, obtenidas en el área útil de cada punto (6,0 mx 3,60 m), dentro de las franjas, por tratamiento y, posteriormente, el peso recolectado se transformó en productividad, expresada en kilogramos y sacos por hectárea. Se observó que el tratamiento sin PRB tuvo valores medios de rendimiento iguales a 5.602,32 kg ha-1 y 224,10 sc ha-1 y que las dosis de 2,5 y 5,0 t ha-1 tuvieron valores promedio de rendimiento de 7.354,63 y 7.421,76 kg ha-1, con 294,19 y 296,87 sc ha-1, respectivamente, con un aumento del 24,51% en el rendimiento.A técnica de rochagem é um processo sustentável na produção agrícola, tratando do manejo do solo com produto de fonte natural, como o pó de rocha basáltica. Assim, o objetivo desse estudo foi avaliar a produtividade do amendoim sob efeito residual de pó de rocha basáltica Coplan (PRB) em área de reforma de canavial na safra 2020/21. O experimento foi disposto em faixas (split pots), com comprimento de 60,0 m e largura de 10,8 m, contemplando três tratamentos: T1 - sem PRB; T2 - 2,5 t ha-1 de PRB e; T3 - 5,0 t ha-1 de PRB, para cada faixa, com 10 pontos de coleta (repetições), distribuídos a 6 m cada, obtendo-se após análise de variância, as médias, que foram comparadas pelo teste de Tukey, a 5% de probabilidade e regressão polinomial para o efeito das doses. Após caracterização do PRB, procedeu-se a aplicação por meio de distribuidor de corretivos e fertilizantes tratorizado, cobrindo a largura das faixas, realizada 10 dias após o corte da cana soca na safra 2019/20, em setembro. Após a colheita da dessa cana, em outubro de 2020, a área passou por preparo de solo convencional e o plantio do amendoim ocorreu em novembro de 2020, com a cultivar IAC 503, sem correção e adubação do solo. Foram realizados os tratos culturais conforme recomendações para a cultura. Após 160 dias de plantio realizou-se o arranque, inversão e colheita das leiras, em abril de 2021, de forma mecanizada, obtidos na área útil de cada ponto (6,0 m x 3,60 m), dentro das faixas, por tratamento e, posteriormente, transformou-se o peso coletado em produtividade, dada por quilos e sacas por hectare. Foram observados que o tratamento sem PRB apresentou valores médios de produtividade igual a 5.602,32 kg ha-1 e 224,10 sc ha-1 e, que as doses de 2,5 e 5,0 t ha-1 apresentaram os valores médios de produtividade de 7.354,63 e 7.421,76 kg ha-1, com 294,19 e 296,87 sc ha-1, respectivamente, com um aumento de 24,51% da produtividade.SAS2021-12-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.southamericansciences.com.br/index.php/sas/article/view/12710.52755/sas.v2iedesp1.127South American Sciences; Vol. 2 Núm. edesp1 (2021): Anais do XVIII Encontro Sobre a Cultura do Amendoim; e21127South American Sciences; v. 2 n. edesp1 (2021): Anais do XVIII Encontro Sobre a Cultura do Amendoim; e211272675-722210.52755/sas.v2iedesp1reponame:South American Sciencesinstname:Instituto Prosinstacron:PROSporhttps://www.southamericansciences.com.br/index.php/sas/article/view/127/160Copyright (c) 2021 César Martoreli da Silveira, Gabriel Vinícius Lima de Souza, Carlos Roberto De Toffoli, Antônio Alexandre Bizãohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessda Silveira, César Martoreli de Souza, Gabriel Vinícius Lima De Toffoli, Carlos Roberto Bizão, Antônio Alexandre 2021-12-14T07:02:56Zoai:ojs2.southamericansciences.com.br:article/127Revistahttps://www.southamericansciences.com.br/index.php/sasPRIhttps://www.southamericansciences.com.br/index.php/sas/oaisoares-agro@hotmail.com || atenaconsultoriac@gmail.com2675-72222675-7222opendoar:2021-12-14T07:02:56South American Sciences - Instituto Prosfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Peanut yield under residual effect of basaltic rock powder in a sugarcane reform area Rendimiento de maní bajo efecto residual del polvo de roca basáltica em un área de reforma de caña de azúcar Produtividade do amendoim sob efeito residual da rochagem em área de reforma de canavial |
title |
Peanut yield under residual effect of basaltic rock powder in a sugarcane reform area |
spellingShingle |
Peanut yield under residual effect of basaltic rock powder in a sugarcane reform area da Silveira, César Martoreli Arachis hypogaea L. Roca de silicato Basalto Bioinsumos Arachis hypogaea L. Silicate rock Basalt Bioinput Arachis hypogaea rocha silicática basalto Bioinsumo |
title_short |
Peanut yield under residual effect of basaltic rock powder in a sugarcane reform area |
title_full |
Peanut yield under residual effect of basaltic rock powder in a sugarcane reform area |
title_fullStr |
Peanut yield under residual effect of basaltic rock powder in a sugarcane reform area |
title_full_unstemmed |
Peanut yield under residual effect of basaltic rock powder in a sugarcane reform area |
title_sort |
Peanut yield under residual effect of basaltic rock powder in a sugarcane reform area |
author |
da Silveira, César Martoreli |
author_facet |
da Silveira, César Martoreli de Souza, Gabriel Vinícius Lima De Toffoli, Carlos Roberto Bizão, Antônio Alexandre |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
de Souza, Gabriel Vinícius Lima De Toffoli, Carlos Roberto Bizão, Antônio Alexandre |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
da Silveira, César Martoreli de Souza, Gabriel Vinícius Lima De Toffoli, Carlos Roberto Bizão, Antônio Alexandre |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Arachis hypogaea L. Roca de silicato Basalto Bioinsumos Arachis hypogaea L. Silicate rock Basalt Bioinput Arachis hypogaea rocha silicática basalto Bioinsumo |
topic |
Arachis hypogaea L. Roca de silicato Basalto Bioinsumos Arachis hypogaea L. Silicate rock Basalt Bioinput Arachis hypogaea rocha silicática basalto Bioinsumo |
description |
The stonemeal technique is a sustainable process in agricultural production, dealing with soil management with a natural source product, such as basaltic rock dust. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate peanut yield under residual effect of Coplan basaltic rock dust (BRD) in a sugarcane reform area in the 2020/21 harvest. The experiment was arranged in strips (split pots), with a length of 60.0 m and width of 10.8 m, including three treatments: T1 - without PRB; T2 - 2.5 t ha-1 of PRB e; T3 - 5.0 t ha-1 of PRB, for each strip, with 10 collection points (repeats), distributed at 6 m each, obtaining, after analysis of variance, the means, which were compared by the Tukey Test, at 5% probability and polynomial regression for the effect of the doses. After characterization of the BRD, the application was carried out through a tractored corrective and fertilizer distributor, covering the width of the strips, carried out 10 days after the cutting of ratoon cane in the 2019/20 harvest, in september. After the harvest of this sugarcane, in october 2020, the area underwent conventional soil preparation. Peanuts were planted in november 2020, with the cultivar IAC 503, without correction and soil fertilization. The cultural treatments were carried out according to recommendations for the culture. After 160 days of planting, the start-up, inversion and harvest of the windrows were carried out, in April 2021, in a mechanized manner, obtained in the useful area of each point (6.0 m x 3.6 m), within the ranges, by treatment and, later, the collected weight was transformed into productivity, given per kilograms and sacks per hectare. It was observed that the treatment without BRD presented average yield values equal to 5,602.32 kg ha-1 and 224.10 sc ha-1 and, that the doses of 2.5 and 5.0 t ha-1 presented the average values yield of 7,354.63 and 7,421.76 kg ha-1, with 294.19 and 296.87 sc ha-1, respectively, with an increase of 24.51% in productivity. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-09 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.southamericansciences.com.br/index.php/sas/article/view/127 10.52755/sas.v2iedesp1.127 |
url |
https://www.southamericansciences.com.br/index.php/sas/article/view/127 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.52755/sas.v2iedesp1.127 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.southamericansciences.com.br/index.php/sas/article/view/127/160 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SAS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SAS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
South American Sciences; Vol. 2 Núm. edesp1 (2021): Anais do XVIII Encontro Sobre a Cultura do Amendoim; e21127 South American Sciences; v. 2 n. edesp1 (2021): Anais do XVIII Encontro Sobre a Cultura do Amendoim; e21127 2675-7222 10.52755/sas.v2iedesp1 reponame:South American Sciences instname:Instituto Pros instacron:PROS |
instname_str |
Instituto Pros |
instacron_str |
PROS |
institution |
PROS |
reponame_str |
South American Sciences |
collection |
South American Sciences |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
South American Sciences - Instituto Pros |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
soares-agro@hotmail.com || atenaconsultoriac@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1808858544517152768 |