Influência de variáveis metodológicas na resistência de união ao cisalhamento

• Autor(a) principal: Farret, Marcel Marchiori
• Data de Publicação: 2010
• Outros Autores: Gonçalves, Tatiana Siqueira, Lima, Eduardo Martinelli Santayana de, Menezes, Luciane Macedo de, Oshima, Hugo Mitsuo Silva, Kochenborger, Renata, Freitas, Maria Perpétua Mota
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional PUCRS
• Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10923/940
• topic: VARIÁVEIS METODOLÓGICAS; PROTOCOLO DE PESQUISA; COLAGEM DE BRAQUETES; RESISTÊNCIA AO CISALHAMENTO; ODONTOLOGIA; COLAGENS ORTODÔNTICAS; RESISTÊNCIA DOS MATERIAIS (ODONTOLOGIA)

Aim: Evaluate the influence of several methodological variables on the shear bond strength of in vitro studies. Methods: 105 bovine incisors were sectioned at the cervical level. The coronary portion was included in PVC rings, fulfilled with auto polymerized acrylic resin, with its labial faces turned to the top. All the samples were prepared for bonding, cleaned and acid etched on the central area of the crowns. In this area, central incisors’ Morelli™ brackets were bonded with Concise™ (3M/Unitek). Three testing groups were established, according to the studied variable: Group 1 – storage previous to bonding (a-Thymol 0,1%; b- distilled water; c- freezing); Group 2 – crosshead speed of the universal testing machine (a- 0,5mm/min; b- 1,0mm/min; c- 2,00mm/min) and Group 3 – commercial brand of 37% phosphoric acid (a- 3M/Unitek; b- Acid Gel; c- Attack Tek). The shear bond strength test was performed at the Emic DL2000™ universal testing machine. Data was analyzed through the Student’s t test for independent samples. Results: In Group 1, the freezing group showed the higher values of shear bond strength when compared to the others, although no statistical difference was observed (p>0,05). For Group 2, the higher the crosshead speed, the lower the shear bond strength, with no statistical difference. In Group 3, the 3M/Unitek brand showed the highest average of shear bond strength in MPa, but also no statistical difference was shown. Conclusions: The variable analyzed in this research had not presented enough influence to determine significant differences between the results.