Combined effects of resistance training and carbohydrate-restrictive or conventional diets on weight loss, blood variables and endothelium function

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mello MEIRELLES, Claudia
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Chagas GOMES, Paulo Sergio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Nutrição
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/8092
Resumo: ObjectiveTo compare the effects of either a carbohydrate-restrictive diets or a conventional hypoenergetic diet combined with resistance training. MethodsTwenty-one overweight and obese adults participated in an eight-week program consisting of progressive resistance training combined with carbohydrate-restrictive diets (initially set at <30 g carbohydrate; n=12) or conventional hypoenergetic diet (30% energetic restriction; carbohydrate/protein/lipid: 51/18/31% of total energy consumption; n=9). It was hypothesized that the carbohydrate-restrictive diets would induce greater weight loss but that both diets would elicit similar effects on selected health markers. Body mass, and body composition, blood variables and flow-mediated brachial artery dilation (flow-mediated brachial artery dilation; by ultrasound) were used to assess changes due to the interventions. ResultsSignificant within-group reductions in body mass (-5.4±3.5%; p=0.001 versus -3.7±3.0%; p=0.015) and body fat (body fat; -10.2±7.0%; p=0.005 versus -9.6±8.8%; p=0.017) were identified for carbohydrate-restrictivediets and conventional hypoenergetic diet, respectively, but there were no significant differences between groups as the result of the interventions. Fat free mass, blood variables and flow-mediated brachial artery dilation did not significantly change, except for the total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein ratio, which was reduced 10.4±16.9% in carbohydrate-restrictive diets (p=0.037) and 0.5±11.3% in conventional hypoenergetic diet (p=0.398). ConclusionCarbohydrate-restrictive diets associated with resistance training was as effective as conventional hypoenergetic diet in decreasing body mass and body fat, as well as maintaining fat free mass, blood variables and flow-mediated brachial artery dilation, however it was more effective at lowering the total cholesterol/low density lipoprotein ratio.
id PUC_CAMP-2_ea49d82922fc89ce0d2c0d84b25c1f8e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/8092
network_acronym_str PUC_CAMP-2
network_name_str Revista de Nutrição
repository_id_str
spelling Combined effects of resistance training and carbohydrate-restrictive or conventional diets on weight loss, blood variables and endothelium functionEfeitos combinados do treinamento contrarresistência e dietas restritivas em carboidrato ou convencional na perda de peso, variáveis sanguíneas e função endotelialCarbohydratesDietEndotheliumNutritional statusObesityCarboidratosDietaEndotélioEstado nutricionalObesidadeObjectiveTo compare the effects of either a carbohydrate-restrictive diets or a conventional hypoenergetic diet combined with resistance training. MethodsTwenty-one overweight and obese adults participated in an eight-week program consisting of progressive resistance training combined with carbohydrate-restrictive diets (initially set at <30 g carbohydrate; n=12) or conventional hypoenergetic diet (30% energetic restriction; carbohydrate/protein/lipid: 51/18/31% of total energy consumption; n=9). It was hypothesized that the carbohydrate-restrictive diets would induce greater weight loss but that both diets would elicit similar effects on selected health markers. Body mass, and body composition, blood variables and flow-mediated brachial artery dilation (flow-mediated brachial artery dilation; by ultrasound) were used to assess changes due to the interventions. ResultsSignificant within-group reductions in body mass (-5.4±3.5%; p=0.001 versus -3.7±3.0%; p=0.015) and body fat (body fat; -10.2±7.0%; p=0.005 versus -9.6±8.8%; p=0.017) were identified for carbohydrate-restrictivediets and conventional hypoenergetic diet, respectively, but there were no significant differences between groups as the result of the interventions. Fat free mass, blood variables and flow-mediated brachial artery dilation did not significantly change, except for the total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein ratio, which was reduced 10.4±16.9% in carbohydrate-restrictive diets (p=0.037) and 0.5±11.3% in conventional hypoenergetic diet (p=0.398). ConclusionCarbohydrate-restrictive diets associated with resistance training was as effective as conventional hypoenergetic diet in decreasing body mass and body fat, as well as maintaining fat free mass, blood variables and flow-mediated brachial artery dilation, however it was more effective at lowering the total cholesterol/low density lipoprotein ratio.ObjetivoComparar os efeitos entre a dieta com restrição de carboidratos e a dieta hipoenergética convencional combinadas com treinamento contrarresistência. Trabalhou-se com a hipótese de que as dietas com restrição em carboidratos poderiam acarretar maior perda de peso, mas que, no entanto, ambas causariam efeitos similares nos biomarcadores de saúde. MétodosVinte e um adultos com sobrepeso ou obesos participaram de um programa de 8 semanas de treinamento contrarresistência progressive combinado com dieta com restrição de carboidratos (inicialmente com <30 g de carboidrato; n=12) ou com dieta hipoenergética convencional (30% de restrição energética; carboidrato/proteína/lipídeos: 51/18/31% do valor energético total; n=9). Massa e composição corporais, variáveis sanguíneas (glicose, ureia, creatinina, ácido úrico, lipemia sanguínea, proteína c-reativa de alta sensibilidade) e dilatação fluxo-mediada da artéria braquial (por ultrassom) foram acompanhadas para observar os efeitos das intervenções. ResultadosForam identificadas reduções significativas na massa corporal (-5,4±3,5%; p=0,001 versus -3,7±3,0%; p=0,015) e na gordura corporal (-10,2±7,0%; p=0,005 versus -9,6±8,8%; p=0,017) de indivíduos em dieta com restrição de carboidratos e dieta hipoenergética convencional, respectivamente, sem diferenças significativas entre os grupos. Massa livre de gordura, variáveis sanguíneas e dilatação fluxo-mediada da artéria braquial não sofreram modificações significativas, exceto a razão colesterol total/lipoproteína de alta densidade, que reduziu 10,4±16,9% em dietas com restrição de carboidratos (p=0,037) e 0,5±11,3% em dieta hipoenergéticaconvencional (p=0,398). ConclusãoA dieta com restrição de carboidratos associada ao treinamento contrarresistência foi tão efetiva quanto a dieta convencional em reduzir a massa e a gordura corporais, assim como em manter os valores da massa livre de gordura, das variáveis sanguíneas e da dilatação fluxo-mediada da artéria braquial. No entanto, foi mais efetiva na redução da razão colesterol total/lipoproteína de baixa densidade. Núcleo de Editoração – PUC-Campinas2023-03-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/8092Brazilian Journal of Nutrition; Vol. 29 No. 4 (2016): Revista de NutriçãoRevista de Nutrição; Vol. 29 Núm. 4 (2016): Revista de NutriçãoRevista de Nutrição; v. 29 n. 4 (2016): Revista de Nutrição1678-9865reponame:Revista de Nutriçãoinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)instacron:PUC_CAMPenghttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/8092/5603Copyright (c) 2023 Claudia Mello MEIRELLES, Paulo Sergio Chagas GOMEShttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMello MEIRELLES, Claudia Chagas GOMES, Paulo Sergio 2023-03-28T12:29:41Zoai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/8092Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rnPRIhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/oai||sbi.submissionrn@puc-campinas.edu.br1678-98651415-5273opendoar:2023-03-28T12:29:41Revista de Nutrição - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Combined effects of resistance training and carbohydrate-restrictive or conventional diets on weight loss, blood variables and endothelium function
Efeitos combinados do treinamento contrarresistência e dietas restritivas em carboidrato ou convencional na perda de peso, variáveis sanguíneas e função endotelial
title Combined effects of resistance training and carbohydrate-restrictive or conventional diets on weight loss, blood variables and endothelium function
spellingShingle Combined effects of resistance training and carbohydrate-restrictive or conventional diets on weight loss, blood variables and endothelium function
Mello MEIRELLES, Claudia
Carbohydrates
Diet
Endothelium
Nutritional status
Obesity
Carboidratos
Dieta
Endotélio
Estado nutricional
Obesidade
title_short Combined effects of resistance training and carbohydrate-restrictive or conventional diets on weight loss, blood variables and endothelium function
title_full Combined effects of resistance training and carbohydrate-restrictive or conventional diets on weight loss, blood variables and endothelium function
title_fullStr Combined effects of resistance training and carbohydrate-restrictive or conventional diets on weight loss, blood variables and endothelium function
title_full_unstemmed Combined effects of resistance training and carbohydrate-restrictive or conventional diets on weight loss, blood variables and endothelium function
title_sort Combined effects of resistance training and carbohydrate-restrictive or conventional diets on weight loss, blood variables and endothelium function
author Mello MEIRELLES, Claudia
author_facet Mello MEIRELLES, Claudia
Chagas GOMES, Paulo Sergio
author_role author
author2 Chagas GOMES, Paulo Sergio
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mello MEIRELLES, Claudia
Chagas GOMES, Paulo Sergio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Carbohydrates
Diet
Endothelium
Nutritional status
Obesity
Carboidratos
Dieta
Endotélio
Estado nutricional
Obesidade
topic Carbohydrates
Diet
Endothelium
Nutritional status
Obesity
Carboidratos
Dieta
Endotélio
Estado nutricional
Obesidade
description ObjectiveTo compare the effects of either a carbohydrate-restrictive diets or a conventional hypoenergetic diet combined with resistance training. MethodsTwenty-one overweight and obese adults participated in an eight-week program consisting of progressive resistance training combined with carbohydrate-restrictive diets (initially set at <30 g carbohydrate; n=12) or conventional hypoenergetic diet (30% energetic restriction; carbohydrate/protein/lipid: 51/18/31% of total energy consumption; n=9). It was hypothesized that the carbohydrate-restrictive diets would induce greater weight loss but that both diets would elicit similar effects on selected health markers. Body mass, and body composition, blood variables and flow-mediated brachial artery dilation (flow-mediated brachial artery dilation; by ultrasound) were used to assess changes due to the interventions. ResultsSignificant within-group reductions in body mass (-5.4±3.5%; p=0.001 versus -3.7±3.0%; p=0.015) and body fat (body fat; -10.2±7.0%; p=0.005 versus -9.6±8.8%; p=0.017) were identified for carbohydrate-restrictivediets and conventional hypoenergetic diet, respectively, but there were no significant differences between groups as the result of the interventions. Fat free mass, blood variables and flow-mediated brachial artery dilation did not significantly change, except for the total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein ratio, which was reduced 10.4±16.9% in carbohydrate-restrictive diets (p=0.037) and 0.5±11.3% in conventional hypoenergetic diet (p=0.398). ConclusionCarbohydrate-restrictive diets associated with resistance training was as effective as conventional hypoenergetic diet in decreasing body mass and body fat, as well as maintaining fat free mass, blood variables and flow-mediated brachial artery dilation, however it was more effective at lowering the total cholesterol/low density lipoprotein ratio.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-03-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/8092
url https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/8092
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/8092/5603
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Claudia Mello MEIRELLES, Paulo Sergio Chagas GOMES
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Claudia Mello MEIRELLES, Paulo Sergio Chagas GOMES
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Núcleo de Editoração – PUC-Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Núcleo de Editoração – PUC-Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Nutrition; Vol. 29 No. 4 (2016): Revista de Nutrição
Revista de Nutrição; Vol. 29 Núm. 4 (2016): Revista de Nutrição
Revista de Nutrição; v. 29 n. 4 (2016): Revista de Nutrição
1678-9865
reponame:Revista de Nutrição
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)
instacron:PUC_CAMP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)
instacron_str PUC_CAMP
institution PUC_CAMP
reponame_str Revista de Nutrição
collection Revista de Nutrição
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Nutrição - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sbi.submissionrn@puc-campinas.edu.br
_version_ 1799126068971438080