Combined effects of resistance training and carbohydrate-restrictive or conventional diets on weight loss, blood variables and endothelium function
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Nutrição |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/8092 |
Resumo: | ObjectiveTo compare the effects of either a carbohydrate-restrictive diets or a conventional hypoenergetic diet combined with resistance training. MethodsTwenty-one overweight and obese adults participated in an eight-week program consisting of progressive resistance training combined with carbohydrate-restrictive diets (initially set at <30 g carbohydrate; n=12) or conventional hypoenergetic diet (30% energetic restriction; carbohydrate/protein/lipid: 51/18/31% of total energy consumption; n=9). It was hypothesized that the carbohydrate-restrictive diets would induce greater weight loss but that both diets would elicit similar effects on selected health markers. Body mass, and body composition, blood variables and flow-mediated brachial artery dilation (flow-mediated brachial artery dilation; by ultrasound) were used to assess changes due to the interventions. ResultsSignificant within-group reductions in body mass (-5.4±3.5%; p=0.001 versus -3.7±3.0%; p=0.015) and body fat (body fat; -10.2±7.0%; p=0.005 versus -9.6±8.8%; p=0.017) were identified for carbohydrate-restrictivediets and conventional hypoenergetic diet, respectively, but there were no significant differences between groups as the result of the interventions. Fat free mass, blood variables and flow-mediated brachial artery dilation did not significantly change, except for the total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein ratio, which was reduced 10.4±16.9% in carbohydrate-restrictive diets (p=0.037) and 0.5±11.3% in conventional hypoenergetic diet (p=0.398). ConclusionCarbohydrate-restrictive diets associated with resistance training was as effective as conventional hypoenergetic diet in decreasing body mass and body fat, as well as maintaining fat free mass, blood variables and flow-mediated brachial artery dilation, however it was more effective at lowering the total cholesterol/low density lipoprotein ratio. |
id |
PUC_CAMP-2_ea49d82922fc89ce0d2c0d84b25c1f8e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/8092 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_CAMP-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Nutrição |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Combined effects of resistance training and carbohydrate-restrictive or conventional diets on weight loss, blood variables and endothelium functionEfeitos combinados do treinamento contrarresistência e dietas restritivas em carboidrato ou convencional na perda de peso, variáveis sanguíneas e função endotelialCarbohydratesDietEndotheliumNutritional statusObesityCarboidratosDietaEndotélioEstado nutricionalObesidadeObjectiveTo compare the effects of either a carbohydrate-restrictive diets or a conventional hypoenergetic diet combined with resistance training. MethodsTwenty-one overweight and obese adults participated in an eight-week program consisting of progressive resistance training combined with carbohydrate-restrictive diets (initially set at <30 g carbohydrate; n=12) or conventional hypoenergetic diet (30% energetic restriction; carbohydrate/protein/lipid: 51/18/31% of total energy consumption; n=9). It was hypothesized that the carbohydrate-restrictive diets would induce greater weight loss but that both diets would elicit similar effects on selected health markers. Body mass, and body composition, blood variables and flow-mediated brachial artery dilation (flow-mediated brachial artery dilation; by ultrasound) were used to assess changes due to the interventions. ResultsSignificant within-group reductions in body mass (-5.4±3.5%; p=0.001 versus -3.7±3.0%; p=0.015) and body fat (body fat; -10.2±7.0%; p=0.005 versus -9.6±8.8%; p=0.017) were identified for carbohydrate-restrictivediets and conventional hypoenergetic diet, respectively, but there were no significant differences between groups as the result of the interventions. Fat free mass, blood variables and flow-mediated brachial artery dilation did not significantly change, except for the total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein ratio, which was reduced 10.4±16.9% in carbohydrate-restrictive diets (p=0.037) and 0.5±11.3% in conventional hypoenergetic diet (p=0.398). ConclusionCarbohydrate-restrictive diets associated with resistance training was as effective as conventional hypoenergetic diet in decreasing body mass and body fat, as well as maintaining fat free mass, blood variables and flow-mediated brachial artery dilation, however it was more effective at lowering the total cholesterol/low density lipoprotein ratio.ObjetivoComparar os efeitos entre a dieta com restrição de carboidratos e a dieta hipoenergética convencional combinadas com treinamento contrarresistência. Trabalhou-se com a hipótese de que as dietas com restrição em carboidratos poderiam acarretar maior perda de peso, mas que, no entanto, ambas causariam efeitos similares nos biomarcadores de saúde. MétodosVinte e um adultos com sobrepeso ou obesos participaram de um programa de 8 semanas de treinamento contrarresistência progressive combinado com dieta com restrição de carboidratos (inicialmente com <30 g de carboidrato; n=12) ou com dieta hipoenergética convencional (30% de restrição energética; carboidrato/proteína/lipídeos: 51/18/31% do valor energético total; n=9). Massa e composição corporais, variáveis sanguíneas (glicose, ureia, creatinina, ácido úrico, lipemia sanguínea, proteína c-reativa de alta sensibilidade) e dilatação fluxo-mediada da artéria braquial (por ultrassom) foram acompanhadas para observar os efeitos das intervenções. ResultadosForam identificadas reduções significativas na massa corporal (-5,4±3,5%; p=0,001 versus -3,7±3,0%; p=0,015) e na gordura corporal (-10,2±7,0%; p=0,005 versus -9,6±8,8%; p=0,017) de indivíduos em dieta com restrição de carboidratos e dieta hipoenergética convencional, respectivamente, sem diferenças significativas entre os grupos. Massa livre de gordura, variáveis sanguíneas e dilatação fluxo-mediada da artéria braquial não sofreram modificações significativas, exceto a razão colesterol total/lipoproteína de alta densidade, que reduziu 10,4±16,9% em dietas com restrição de carboidratos (p=0,037) e 0,5±11,3% em dieta hipoenergéticaconvencional (p=0,398). ConclusãoA dieta com restrição de carboidratos associada ao treinamento contrarresistência foi tão efetiva quanto a dieta convencional em reduzir a massa e a gordura corporais, assim como em manter os valores da massa livre de gordura, das variáveis sanguíneas e da dilatação fluxo-mediada da artéria braquial. No entanto, foi mais efetiva na redução da razão colesterol total/lipoproteína de baixa densidade. Núcleo de Editoração – PUC-Campinas2023-03-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/8092Brazilian Journal of Nutrition; Vol. 29 No. 4 (2016): Revista de NutriçãoRevista de Nutrição; Vol. 29 Núm. 4 (2016): Revista de NutriçãoRevista de Nutrição; v. 29 n. 4 (2016): Revista de Nutrição1678-9865reponame:Revista de Nutriçãoinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)instacron:PUC_CAMPenghttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/8092/5603Copyright (c) 2023 Claudia Mello MEIRELLES, Paulo Sergio Chagas GOMEShttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMello MEIRELLES, Claudia Chagas GOMES, Paulo Sergio 2023-03-28T12:29:41Zoai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/8092Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rnPRIhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/oai||sbi.submissionrn@puc-campinas.edu.br1678-98651415-5273opendoar:2023-03-28T12:29:41Revista de Nutrição - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Combined effects of resistance training and carbohydrate-restrictive or conventional diets on weight loss, blood variables and endothelium function Efeitos combinados do treinamento contrarresistência e dietas restritivas em carboidrato ou convencional na perda de peso, variáveis sanguíneas e função endotelial |
title |
Combined effects of resistance training and carbohydrate-restrictive or conventional diets on weight loss, blood variables and endothelium function |
spellingShingle |
Combined effects of resistance training and carbohydrate-restrictive or conventional diets on weight loss, blood variables and endothelium function Mello MEIRELLES, Claudia Carbohydrates Diet Endothelium Nutritional status Obesity Carboidratos Dieta Endotélio Estado nutricional Obesidade |
title_short |
Combined effects of resistance training and carbohydrate-restrictive or conventional diets on weight loss, blood variables and endothelium function |
title_full |
Combined effects of resistance training and carbohydrate-restrictive or conventional diets on weight loss, blood variables and endothelium function |
title_fullStr |
Combined effects of resistance training and carbohydrate-restrictive or conventional diets on weight loss, blood variables and endothelium function |
title_full_unstemmed |
Combined effects of resistance training and carbohydrate-restrictive or conventional diets on weight loss, blood variables and endothelium function |
title_sort |
Combined effects of resistance training and carbohydrate-restrictive or conventional diets on weight loss, blood variables and endothelium function |
author |
Mello MEIRELLES, Claudia |
author_facet |
Mello MEIRELLES, Claudia Chagas GOMES, Paulo Sergio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Chagas GOMES, Paulo Sergio |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mello MEIRELLES, Claudia Chagas GOMES, Paulo Sergio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Carbohydrates Diet Endothelium Nutritional status Obesity Carboidratos Dieta Endotélio Estado nutricional Obesidade |
topic |
Carbohydrates Diet Endothelium Nutritional status Obesity Carboidratos Dieta Endotélio Estado nutricional Obesidade |
description |
ObjectiveTo compare the effects of either a carbohydrate-restrictive diets or a conventional hypoenergetic diet combined with resistance training. MethodsTwenty-one overweight and obese adults participated in an eight-week program consisting of progressive resistance training combined with carbohydrate-restrictive diets (initially set at <30 g carbohydrate; n=12) or conventional hypoenergetic diet (30% energetic restriction; carbohydrate/protein/lipid: 51/18/31% of total energy consumption; n=9). It was hypothesized that the carbohydrate-restrictive diets would induce greater weight loss but that both diets would elicit similar effects on selected health markers. Body mass, and body composition, blood variables and flow-mediated brachial artery dilation (flow-mediated brachial artery dilation; by ultrasound) were used to assess changes due to the interventions. ResultsSignificant within-group reductions in body mass (-5.4±3.5%; p=0.001 versus -3.7±3.0%; p=0.015) and body fat (body fat; -10.2±7.0%; p=0.005 versus -9.6±8.8%; p=0.017) were identified for carbohydrate-restrictivediets and conventional hypoenergetic diet, respectively, but there were no significant differences between groups as the result of the interventions. Fat free mass, blood variables and flow-mediated brachial artery dilation did not significantly change, except for the total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein ratio, which was reduced 10.4±16.9% in carbohydrate-restrictive diets (p=0.037) and 0.5±11.3% in conventional hypoenergetic diet (p=0.398). ConclusionCarbohydrate-restrictive diets associated with resistance training was as effective as conventional hypoenergetic diet in decreasing body mass and body fat, as well as maintaining fat free mass, blood variables and flow-mediated brachial artery dilation, however it was more effective at lowering the total cholesterol/low density lipoprotein ratio. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-03-28 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/8092 |
url |
https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/8092 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/8092/5603 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Claudia Mello MEIRELLES, Paulo Sergio Chagas GOMES https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Claudia Mello MEIRELLES, Paulo Sergio Chagas GOMES https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Núcleo de Editoração – PUC-Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Núcleo de Editoração – PUC-Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Nutrition; Vol. 29 No. 4 (2016): Revista de Nutrição Revista de Nutrição; Vol. 29 Núm. 4 (2016): Revista de Nutrição Revista de Nutrição; v. 29 n. 4 (2016): Revista de Nutrição 1678-9865 reponame:Revista de Nutrição instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS) instacron:PUC_CAMP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_CAMP |
institution |
PUC_CAMP |
reponame_str |
Revista de Nutrição |
collection |
Revista de Nutrição |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Nutrição - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sbi.submissionrn@puc-campinas.edu.br |
_version_ |
1799126068971438080 |