WHAT TRAINING, FOR WHAT CURRICULUM? A BRIDGE BETWEEN THE BASIC EDUCATION CURRICULUM AND TEACHER TRAINING IN MOZAMBIQUE
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Educativa |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.pucgoias.edu.br/index.php/educativa/article/view/13972 |
Resumo: | The 2004 basic education curriculum reform in Mozambique introduced a set of innovations and, consequently, challenges in the teacher training component. In this text, I seek to discuss the contours of teacher training for the basic education curriculum introduced in 2004, based on the assumption that the quality of teaching depends fundamentally on the quality of training of its teachers. Curricular reforms are the result of social, economic and political changes that the country has been experiencing, aiming to adapt the National Education System to new realities. The transformations that occurred in basic education were not accompanied by the teacher training process, resulting in an apparent lack of complicity between the curricular reform and the teacher training subsystem. After 10 years of implementing the new curriculum, it is still necessary to reflect on what training was adopted for this curriculum. This question takes into account the idea of complicity as a space for constant negotiation and denial of certain aspects of the functioning of education as a system. To understand this theme, the study is based on the discussion of authors who focus on the subject, with emphasis on Garcia (1999), Nóvoa (1992), Santos (2014), Joanir and Alves (2004), dialoguing with testimonies of education technicians and teachers practicing in everyday school life on teacher training policies for the basic education curriculum. These dialogues reveal that the strategies listed for the introduction of the basic education curriculum did not work. |
id |
PUC_GO-4_a398c592935b2028e86b61bcda007c49 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.seer.pucgoias.edu.br:article/13972 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_GO-4 |
network_name_str |
Educativa |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
WHAT TRAINING, FOR WHAT CURRICULUM? A BRIDGE BETWEEN THE BASIC EDUCATION CURRICULUM AND TEACHER TRAINING IN MOZAMBIQUEQUE FORMAÇÃO, PARA QUE CURRÍCULO? UMA PONTE ENTRE O CURRÍCULO DO ENSINO BÁSICO E FORMAÇÃO DE PROFESSORES EM MOÇAMBIQUEEducaçãoCurrículoFormação de professoresEnsino básicoCurriculumTeacher trainingBasic educationThe 2004 basic education curriculum reform in Mozambique introduced a set of innovations and, consequently, challenges in the teacher training component. In this text, I seek to discuss the contours of teacher training for the basic education curriculum introduced in 2004, based on the assumption that the quality of teaching depends fundamentally on the quality of training of its teachers. Curricular reforms are the result of social, economic and political changes that the country has been experiencing, aiming to adapt the National Education System to new realities. The transformations that occurred in basic education were not accompanied by the teacher training process, resulting in an apparent lack of complicity between the curricular reform and the teacher training subsystem. After 10 years of implementing the new curriculum, it is still necessary to reflect on what training was adopted for this curriculum. This question takes into account the idea of complicity as a space for constant negotiation and denial of certain aspects of the functioning of education as a system. To understand this theme, the study is based on the discussion of authors who focus on the subject, with emphasis on Garcia (1999), Nóvoa (1992), Santos (2014), Joanir and Alves (2004), dialoguing with testimonies of education technicians and teachers practicing in everyday school life on teacher training policies for the basic education curriculum. These dialogues reveal that the strategies listed for the introduction of the basic education curriculum did not work.A reforma curricular do Ensino básico em Moçambique de 2004 introduziu um conjunto de inovações e, consequentemente, desafios na formação de professores. Procuro neste texto discutir os contornos da formação de professores para o currículo do ensino básico introduzido em 2004, partindo do pressuposto de que a qualidade de ensino depende fundamentalmente da qualidade de formação dos seus professores. As reformas curriculares são decorrentes de mudanças sociais, econômicas e políticas que o país tem vindo a registar, objetivando com isso adequar o Sistema Nacional de Educação a novas realidades. As transformações ocorridas no ensino básico não foram acompanhadas pelo processo de formação de professores num aparente descompasso de cumplicidade entre a reforma curricular e o subsistema de formação de professores. Passados 10 anos de implementação do novo currículo, ainda é necessário refletir sobre que formação foi adotada para este currículo. Esta questão tem em conta a ideia de cumplicidade como espaço de constante negociação e negação de uns e outros aspectos do funcionamento da educação enquanto sistema. Para a compreensão desta temática, o estudo baseia-se na discussão de autores que se debruçam sobre o assunto, com destaque para Garcia (1999), Nóvoa (1992), Santos (2014), Joanir e Alves (2004), dialogando com depoimentos de técnicos de educação e professores atuantes no cotidiano escolar sobre as políticas de formação de professores para o currículo do ensino básico. Esses diálogos revelam que as estratégias elencadas para a introdução do currículo básico não funcionaram.Editora da Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás2024-01-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.pucgoias.edu.br/index.php/educativa/article/view/1397210.18224/educ.v26i1.13972Revista Educativa - Education Journal; Vol. 26 No. 1 (2023); 16 páginasRevista Educativa - Revista de Educación; Vol. 26 Núm. 1 (2023); 16 páginasRevista Educativa - Magazine éducatif; Vol. 26 No. 1 (2023); 16 páginasRevista Educativa - Revista de Educação; v. 26 n. 1 (2023); 16 páginas1983-777110.18224/educ.v26i1reponame:Educativainstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás (PUC-GO)instacron:PUC_GOporhttps://seer.pucgoias.edu.br/index.php/educativa/article/view/13972/6502Copyright (c) 2024 `Professor Adelino Assaneinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAssane, Adelino Inácio2024-03-19T15:49:11Zoai:ojs2.seer.pucgoias.edu.br:article/13972Revistahttp://seer.pucgoias.edu.br/index.php/educativaONGhttps://seer.pucgoias.edu.br/index.php/educativa/oai||educativa@pucgoias.edu.br1983-77711415-0492opendoar:2024-03-19T15:49:11Educativa - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás (PUC-GO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
WHAT TRAINING, FOR WHAT CURRICULUM? A BRIDGE BETWEEN THE BASIC EDUCATION CURRICULUM AND TEACHER TRAINING IN MOZAMBIQUE QUE FORMAÇÃO, PARA QUE CURRÍCULO? UMA PONTE ENTRE O CURRÍCULO DO ENSINO BÁSICO E FORMAÇÃO DE PROFESSORES EM MOÇAMBIQUE |
title |
WHAT TRAINING, FOR WHAT CURRICULUM? A BRIDGE BETWEEN THE BASIC EDUCATION CURRICULUM AND TEACHER TRAINING IN MOZAMBIQUE |
spellingShingle |
WHAT TRAINING, FOR WHAT CURRICULUM? A BRIDGE BETWEEN THE BASIC EDUCATION CURRICULUM AND TEACHER TRAINING IN MOZAMBIQUE Assane, Adelino Inácio Educação Currículo Formação de professores Ensino básico Curriculum Teacher training Basic education |
title_short |
WHAT TRAINING, FOR WHAT CURRICULUM? A BRIDGE BETWEEN THE BASIC EDUCATION CURRICULUM AND TEACHER TRAINING IN MOZAMBIQUE |
title_full |
WHAT TRAINING, FOR WHAT CURRICULUM? A BRIDGE BETWEEN THE BASIC EDUCATION CURRICULUM AND TEACHER TRAINING IN MOZAMBIQUE |
title_fullStr |
WHAT TRAINING, FOR WHAT CURRICULUM? A BRIDGE BETWEEN THE BASIC EDUCATION CURRICULUM AND TEACHER TRAINING IN MOZAMBIQUE |
title_full_unstemmed |
WHAT TRAINING, FOR WHAT CURRICULUM? A BRIDGE BETWEEN THE BASIC EDUCATION CURRICULUM AND TEACHER TRAINING IN MOZAMBIQUE |
title_sort |
WHAT TRAINING, FOR WHAT CURRICULUM? A BRIDGE BETWEEN THE BASIC EDUCATION CURRICULUM AND TEACHER TRAINING IN MOZAMBIQUE |
author |
Assane, Adelino Inácio |
author_facet |
Assane, Adelino Inácio |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Assane, Adelino Inácio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Educação Currículo Formação de professores Ensino básico Curriculum Teacher training Basic education |
topic |
Educação Currículo Formação de professores Ensino básico Curriculum Teacher training Basic education |
description |
The 2004 basic education curriculum reform in Mozambique introduced a set of innovations and, consequently, challenges in the teacher training component. In this text, I seek to discuss the contours of teacher training for the basic education curriculum introduced in 2004, based on the assumption that the quality of teaching depends fundamentally on the quality of training of its teachers. Curricular reforms are the result of social, economic and political changes that the country has been experiencing, aiming to adapt the National Education System to new realities. The transformations that occurred in basic education were not accompanied by the teacher training process, resulting in an apparent lack of complicity between the curricular reform and the teacher training subsystem. After 10 years of implementing the new curriculum, it is still necessary to reflect on what training was adopted for this curriculum. This question takes into account the idea of complicity as a space for constant negotiation and denial of certain aspects of the functioning of education as a system. To understand this theme, the study is based on the discussion of authors who focus on the subject, with emphasis on Garcia (1999), Nóvoa (1992), Santos (2014), Joanir and Alves (2004), dialoguing with testimonies of education technicians and teachers practicing in everyday school life on teacher training policies for the basic education curriculum. These dialogues reveal that the strategies listed for the introduction of the basic education curriculum did not work. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-01-19 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.pucgoias.edu.br/index.php/educativa/article/view/13972 10.18224/educ.v26i1.13972 |
url |
https://seer.pucgoias.edu.br/index.php/educativa/article/view/13972 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18224/educ.v26i1.13972 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.pucgoias.edu.br/index.php/educativa/article/view/13972/6502 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 `Professor Adelino Assane info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 `Professor Adelino Assane |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Educativa - Education Journal; Vol. 26 No. 1 (2023); 16 páginas Revista Educativa - Revista de Educación; Vol. 26 Núm. 1 (2023); 16 páginas Revista Educativa - Magazine éducatif; Vol. 26 No. 1 (2023); 16 páginas Revista Educativa - Revista de Educação; v. 26 n. 1 (2023); 16 páginas 1983-7771 10.18224/educ.v26i1 reponame:Educativa instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás (PUC-GO) instacron:PUC_GO |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás (PUC-GO) |
instacron_str |
PUC_GO |
institution |
PUC_GO |
reponame_str |
Educativa |
collection |
Educativa |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Educativa - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás (PUC-GO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||educativa@pucgoias.edu.br |
_version_ |
1798319659895750656 |