Motor learning in children and adolescents institutionalized in shelters
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Fisioterapia em Movimento |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/22673 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Children and adolescents living in shelters may present with impaired motor development, cognitive function, as well as speech and understanding; psychological alterations; and hyperactivity. All of these factors may be detrimental to motor learning. Objective: To investigate motor learning in children and adolescents living in shelters, and to compare it with that of individuals living in a family context. Methods: We assessed 36 individuals who were divided into groups: an experimental group, composed of institutionalized children and adolescents (EG, n=18), and a control group (CG, n = 18) that was matched by age and sex. Motor learning was assessed using a maze test in three stages: acquisition, retention and transfer. The data were analyzed using the Shapiro Wilk, Wilcoxon, Mann Whitney, Kruskal Wallis tests and Dunn’s post-test (p < 5%). Results: The EG had a longer task performance time than the CG. There was a significant reduction in task performance time between the first (EG = 11.05 [8.50-14.85]s; CG:7.65 [5.95-10.23]s) and the last task performance block (EG:8.02 [6.86-10.23]s; GC: 5.50 [4.50-6.82]s) in both groups. When comparing the variables of the last acquisition (GE:8.02[6.86-10.23]s; GC: 5.50[4.50-6.82]s), retention (GE:8.20[7.09-9.89] s;GC:5.35[4.50-6.22]s) and transfer blocks (GE:8.30[6.28-11.43]s; GC:5.30[4.90-6.82]s) in each group, wefound no changes in task performance time between test batteries. Conclusion: Individuals living in shelters showed a motor learning deficit, as evidenced by longer task performance time when compared to their controls. Nevertheless, both groups performed the task in a similar manner. |
id |
PUC_PR-26_1eaa84b14fa1567e891b6e5c4dfe682e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.pucpr.br:article/22673 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_PR-26 |
network_name_str |
Fisioterapia em Movimento |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Motor learning in children and adolescents institutionalized in sheltersIntroduction: Children and adolescents living in shelters may present with impaired motor development, cognitive function, as well as speech and understanding; psychological alterations; and hyperactivity. All of these factors may be detrimental to motor learning. Objective: To investigate motor learning in children and adolescents living in shelters, and to compare it with that of individuals living in a family context. Methods: We assessed 36 individuals who were divided into groups: an experimental group, composed of institutionalized children and adolescents (EG, n=18), and a control group (CG, n = 18) that was matched by age and sex. Motor learning was assessed using a maze test in three stages: acquisition, retention and transfer. The data were analyzed using the Shapiro Wilk, Wilcoxon, Mann Whitney, Kruskal Wallis tests and Dunn’s post-test (p < 5%). Results: The EG had a longer task performance time than the CG. There was a significant reduction in task performance time between the first (EG = 11.05 [8.50-14.85]s; CG:7.65 [5.95-10.23]s) and the last task performance block (EG:8.02 [6.86-10.23]s; GC: 5.50 [4.50-6.82]s) in both groups. When comparing the variables of the last acquisition (GE:8.02[6.86-10.23]s; GC: 5.50[4.50-6.82]s), retention (GE:8.20[7.09-9.89] s;GC:5.35[4.50-6.22]s) and transfer blocks (GE:8.30[6.28-11.43]s; GC:5.30[4.90-6.82]s) in each group, wefound no changes in task performance time between test batteries. Conclusion: Individuals living in shelters showed a motor learning deficit, as evidenced by longer task performance time when compared to their controls. Nevertheless, both groups performed the task in a similar manner.Editora PUCPRESS2017-11-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/2267310.1590/1980-5918.030.004.AO07Fisioterapia em Movimento (Physical Therapy in Movement); Vol. 30 No. 4 (2017)Fisioterapia em Movimento; v. 30 n. 4 (2017)1980-5918reponame:Fisioterapia em Movimentoinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)instacron:PUC_PRenghttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/22673/21753Copyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESSinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSouza Santos, Caroline MoreiraMontovanelli Rodrigues, MarcelaGonçalves Luiz Fernan, Deborahi CristinaCoelho Figueira Freire, Ana PaulaMonteiro, Carlos Bandeira de MelloArtero Prado, Maria Tereza2022-03-07T19:02:01Zoai:ojs.periodicos.pucpr.br:article/22673Revistahttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisioPRIhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/oairubia.farias@pucpr.br||revista.fisioterapia@pucpr.br1980-59180103-5150opendoar:2022-03-07T19:02:01Fisioterapia em Movimento - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Motor learning in children and adolescents institutionalized in shelters |
title |
Motor learning in children and adolescents institutionalized in shelters |
spellingShingle |
Motor learning in children and adolescents institutionalized in shelters Souza Santos, Caroline Moreira |
title_short |
Motor learning in children and adolescents institutionalized in shelters |
title_full |
Motor learning in children and adolescents institutionalized in shelters |
title_fullStr |
Motor learning in children and adolescents institutionalized in shelters |
title_full_unstemmed |
Motor learning in children and adolescents institutionalized in shelters |
title_sort |
Motor learning in children and adolescents institutionalized in shelters |
author |
Souza Santos, Caroline Moreira |
author_facet |
Souza Santos, Caroline Moreira Montovanelli Rodrigues, Marcela Gonçalves Luiz Fernan, Deborahi Cristina Coelho Figueira Freire, Ana Paula Monteiro, Carlos Bandeira de Mello Artero Prado, Maria Tereza |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Montovanelli Rodrigues, Marcela Gonçalves Luiz Fernan, Deborahi Cristina Coelho Figueira Freire, Ana Paula Monteiro, Carlos Bandeira de Mello Artero Prado, Maria Tereza |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Souza Santos, Caroline Moreira Montovanelli Rodrigues, Marcela Gonçalves Luiz Fernan, Deborahi Cristina Coelho Figueira Freire, Ana Paula Monteiro, Carlos Bandeira de Mello Artero Prado, Maria Tereza |
description |
Introduction: Children and adolescents living in shelters may present with impaired motor development, cognitive function, as well as speech and understanding; psychological alterations; and hyperactivity. All of these factors may be detrimental to motor learning. Objective: To investigate motor learning in children and adolescents living in shelters, and to compare it with that of individuals living in a family context. Methods: We assessed 36 individuals who were divided into groups: an experimental group, composed of institutionalized children and adolescents (EG, n=18), and a control group (CG, n = 18) that was matched by age and sex. Motor learning was assessed using a maze test in three stages: acquisition, retention and transfer. The data were analyzed using the Shapiro Wilk, Wilcoxon, Mann Whitney, Kruskal Wallis tests and Dunn’s post-test (p < 5%). Results: The EG had a longer task performance time than the CG. There was a significant reduction in task performance time between the first (EG = 11.05 [8.50-14.85]s; CG:7.65 [5.95-10.23]s) and the last task performance block (EG:8.02 [6.86-10.23]s; GC: 5.50 [4.50-6.82]s) in both groups. When comparing the variables of the last acquisition (GE:8.02[6.86-10.23]s; GC: 5.50[4.50-6.82]s), retention (GE:8.20[7.09-9.89] s;GC:5.35[4.50-6.22]s) and transfer blocks (GE:8.30[6.28-11.43]s; GC:5.30[4.90-6.82]s) in each group, wefound no changes in task performance time between test batteries. Conclusion: Individuals living in shelters showed a motor learning deficit, as evidenced by longer task performance time when compared to their controls. Nevertheless, both groups performed the task in a similar manner. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-11-24 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/22673 10.1590/1980-5918.030.004.AO07 |
url |
https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/22673 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1980-5918.030.004.AO07 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/22673/21753 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESS info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESS |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora PUCPRESS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora PUCPRESS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Fisioterapia em Movimento (Physical Therapy in Movement); Vol. 30 No. 4 (2017) Fisioterapia em Movimento; v. 30 n. 4 (2017) 1980-5918 reponame:Fisioterapia em Movimento instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR) instacron:PUC_PR |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR) |
instacron_str |
PUC_PR |
institution |
PUC_PR |
reponame_str |
Fisioterapia em Movimento |
collection |
Fisioterapia em Movimento |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Fisioterapia em Movimento - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rubia.farias@pucpr.br||revista.fisioterapia@pucpr.br |
_version_ |
1799138748152152064 |