Large-scale assessment in higher education and reading proficiency in the academic context

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Andrade, Sammela Rejane de Jesus
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: letrônica
Texto Completo: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/37314
Resumo: The concept of reading proficiency recommends that individuals be active in the social environment, so that they can understand and interact with the information that surrounds them. It is expected that this same conception is foreseen in every educational process, with a view to the students being trained as proficient readers, and, in composition of this process, it is also foreseen in the evaluations in large scale, considering that among its functions is the to evaluate the most different teaching stages and guide the planning of public policies. However, what has often been seen are many complaints from the agents directly involved, teachers and students, and alarming data for each report released by the competent bodies. More specifically, in terms of reading performance in the academic context, evaluations such as Enem and Enade demonstrate a broken expectation, because, even after attending years of basic education, students have entered the university with reading disabilities, and even more worrying. the fact that they are enrolled or have completed the higher education course and the difficulties still persist. In light of this, the present study aims to address the trajectory of progression of performance of university students through the two main large-scale assessments in which they participate, Enem, for being the most important exam for the selection of vacancies; and Enade, as it is a mandatory assessment for all those enrolled in undergraduate courses. For this, we will bring the concepts of reading competence in the two exams, in addition to some studies already carried out on academic reading and writing.
id PUC_RS-14_226491a0ee2c6f3d45340e04b7d8a5a8
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/37314
network_acronym_str PUC_RS-14
network_name_str letrônica
repository_id_str
spelling Large-scale assessment in higher education and reading proficiency in the academic contextAvaliação em larga escala na educação superior e a proficiência em leitura no contexto acadêmicoProficiencyReadingEnemEnadeProficiênciaLeituraEnemEnadeThe concept of reading proficiency recommends that individuals be active in the social environment, so that they can understand and interact with the information that surrounds them. It is expected that this same conception is foreseen in every educational process, with a view to the students being trained as proficient readers, and, in composition of this process, it is also foreseen in the evaluations in large scale, considering that among its functions is the to evaluate the most different teaching stages and guide the planning of public policies. However, what has often been seen are many complaints from the agents directly involved, teachers and students, and alarming data for each report released by the competent bodies. More specifically, in terms of reading performance in the academic context, evaluations such as Enem and Enade demonstrate a broken expectation, because, even after attending years of basic education, students have entered the university with reading disabilities, and even more worrying. the fact that they are enrolled or have completed the higher education course and the difficulties still persist. In light of this, the present study aims to address the trajectory of progression of performance of university students through the two main large-scale assessments in which they participate, Enem, for being the most important exam for the selection of vacancies; and Enade, as it is a mandatory assessment for all those enrolled in undergraduate courses. For this, we will bring the concepts of reading competence in the two exams, in addition to some studies already carried out on academic reading and writing.A concepção de proficiência em leitura preconiza que os indivíduos sejam ativos no meio social, de modo que consigam compreender e interagir com as informações que os cerca. Espera-se que essa mesma concepção esteja prevista em todo processo educacional, com vistas que os estudantes sejam formados enquanto leitores proficientes, e, em composição desse processo, também esteja prevista nas avaliações em larga escala, haja vista que entre as suas funções está a de avaliar as mais diferentes etapas de ensino e orientar o planejamento de políticas públicas. Todavia, o que se tem visto, com frequência, são muitas queixas dos agentes diretamente envolvidos, professores e alunos, e dados alarmantes a cada relatório divulgado pelos órgãos competentes. Tratando-se mais especificamente do desempenho em leitura no contexto acadêmico, avaliações como o Enem e o Enade demonstram uma quebra expectativa, pois, mesmo após cursar anos da educação básica, alunos têm adentrado a universidade com deficiência em leitura, e mais preocupante ainda é o fato de estarem matriculados ou terem concluindo o curso de nível superior e as dificuldades ainda persistirem. Diante disso, o presente estudo tem como proposta abordar a trajetória de progressão de desempenho dos estudantes universitários por meio das duas principais avaliações em larga escala das quais os mesmos participam, o Enem, por ser o mais importante exame de seleção de vagas; e o Enade, por ser avaliação obrigatória a todos os matriculados em cursos de graduação. Para isso, traremos as concepções de competência leitora nos dois exames, além de alguns estudos já realizados sobre leitura e escrita acadêmica.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2020-10-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/3731410.15448/1984-4301.2020.4.37314Letrônica; Vol. 13 No. 4 (2020): Literacia em um Contexto Multiletrado: bases teóricas, metodológicas e empíricas ; e37314Letrônica; v. 13 n. 4 (2020): Literacia em um Contexto Multiletrado: bases teóricas, metodológicas e empíricas ; e373141984-430110.15448/1984-4301.2020.4reponame:letrônicainstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/37314/26424Copyright (c) 2020 Letrônicahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAndrade, Sammela Rejane de Jesus2020-12-22T00:20:49Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/37314Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronicaPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/oailetronica@pucrs.br||ivanetemileski@gmail.com1984-43011984-4301opendoar:2020-12-22T00:20:49letrônica - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Large-scale assessment in higher education and reading proficiency in the academic context
Avaliação em larga escala na educação superior e a proficiência em leitura no contexto acadêmico
title Large-scale assessment in higher education and reading proficiency in the academic context
spellingShingle Large-scale assessment in higher education and reading proficiency in the academic context
Andrade, Sammela Rejane de Jesus
Proficiency
Reading
Enem
Enade
Proficiência
Leitura
Enem
Enade
title_short Large-scale assessment in higher education and reading proficiency in the academic context
title_full Large-scale assessment in higher education and reading proficiency in the academic context
title_fullStr Large-scale assessment in higher education and reading proficiency in the academic context
title_full_unstemmed Large-scale assessment in higher education and reading proficiency in the academic context
title_sort Large-scale assessment in higher education and reading proficiency in the academic context
author Andrade, Sammela Rejane de Jesus
author_facet Andrade, Sammela Rejane de Jesus
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Andrade, Sammela Rejane de Jesus
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Proficiency
Reading
Enem
Enade
Proficiência
Leitura
Enem
Enade
topic Proficiency
Reading
Enem
Enade
Proficiência
Leitura
Enem
Enade
description The concept of reading proficiency recommends that individuals be active in the social environment, so that they can understand and interact with the information that surrounds them. It is expected that this same conception is foreseen in every educational process, with a view to the students being trained as proficient readers, and, in composition of this process, it is also foreseen in the evaluations in large scale, considering that among its functions is the to evaluate the most different teaching stages and guide the planning of public policies. However, what has often been seen are many complaints from the agents directly involved, teachers and students, and alarming data for each report released by the competent bodies. More specifically, in terms of reading performance in the academic context, evaluations such as Enem and Enade demonstrate a broken expectation, because, even after attending years of basic education, students have entered the university with reading disabilities, and even more worrying. the fact that they are enrolled or have completed the higher education course and the difficulties still persist. In light of this, the present study aims to address the trajectory of progression of performance of university students through the two main large-scale assessments in which they participate, Enem, for being the most important exam for the selection of vacancies; and Enade, as it is a mandatory assessment for all those enrolled in undergraduate courses. For this, we will bring the concepts of reading competence in the two exams, in addition to some studies already carried out on academic reading and writing.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-10-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/37314
10.15448/1984-4301.2020.4.37314
url https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/37314
identifier_str_mv 10.15448/1984-4301.2020.4.37314
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/37314/26424
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Letrônica
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Letrônica
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Letrônica; Vol. 13 No. 4 (2020): Literacia em um Contexto Multiletrado: bases teóricas, metodológicas e empíricas ; e37314
Letrônica; v. 13 n. 4 (2020): Literacia em um Contexto Multiletrado: bases teóricas, metodológicas e empíricas ; e37314
1984-4301
10.15448/1984-4301.2020.4
reponame:letrônica
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str letrônica
collection letrônica
repository.name.fl_str_mv letrônica - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv letronica@pucrs.br||ivanetemileski@gmail.com
_version_ 1799128599444324352