Large-scale assessment in higher education and reading proficiency in the academic context
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | letrônica |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/37314 |
Resumo: | The concept of reading proficiency recommends that individuals be active in the social environment, so that they can understand and interact with the information that surrounds them. It is expected that this same conception is foreseen in every educational process, with a view to the students being trained as proficient readers, and, in composition of this process, it is also foreseen in the evaluations in large scale, considering that among its functions is the to evaluate the most different teaching stages and guide the planning of public policies. However, what has often been seen are many complaints from the agents directly involved, teachers and students, and alarming data for each report released by the competent bodies. More specifically, in terms of reading performance in the academic context, evaluations such as Enem and Enade demonstrate a broken expectation, because, even after attending years of basic education, students have entered the university with reading disabilities, and even more worrying. the fact that they are enrolled or have completed the higher education course and the difficulties still persist. In light of this, the present study aims to address the trajectory of progression of performance of university students through the two main large-scale assessments in which they participate, Enem, for being the most important exam for the selection of vacancies; and Enade, as it is a mandatory assessment for all those enrolled in undergraduate courses. For this, we will bring the concepts of reading competence in the two exams, in addition to some studies already carried out on academic reading and writing. |
id |
PUC_RS-14_226491a0ee2c6f3d45340e04b7d8a5a8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/37314 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RS-14 |
network_name_str |
letrônica |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Large-scale assessment in higher education and reading proficiency in the academic contextAvaliação em larga escala na educação superior e a proficiência em leitura no contexto acadêmicoProficiencyReadingEnemEnadeProficiênciaLeituraEnemEnadeThe concept of reading proficiency recommends that individuals be active in the social environment, so that they can understand and interact with the information that surrounds them. It is expected that this same conception is foreseen in every educational process, with a view to the students being trained as proficient readers, and, in composition of this process, it is also foreseen in the evaluations in large scale, considering that among its functions is the to evaluate the most different teaching stages and guide the planning of public policies. However, what has often been seen are many complaints from the agents directly involved, teachers and students, and alarming data for each report released by the competent bodies. More specifically, in terms of reading performance in the academic context, evaluations such as Enem and Enade demonstrate a broken expectation, because, even after attending years of basic education, students have entered the university with reading disabilities, and even more worrying. the fact that they are enrolled or have completed the higher education course and the difficulties still persist. In light of this, the present study aims to address the trajectory of progression of performance of university students through the two main large-scale assessments in which they participate, Enem, for being the most important exam for the selection of vacancies; and Enade, as it is a mandatory assessment for all those enrolled in undergraduate courses. For this, we will bring the concepts of reading competence in the two exams, in addition to some studies already carried out on academic reading and writing.A concepção de proficiência em leitura preconiza que os indivíduos sejam ativos no meio social, de modo que consigam compreender e interagir com as informações que os cerca. Espera-se que essa mesma concepção esteja prevista em todo processo educacional, com vistas que os estudantes sejam formados enquanto leitores proficientes, e, em composição desse processo, também esteja prevista nas avaliações em larga escala, haja vista que entre as suas funções está a de avaliar as mais diferentes etapas de ensino e orientar o planejamento de políticas públicas. Todavia, o que se tem visto, com frequência, são muitas queixas dos agentes diretamente envolvidos, professores e alunos, e dados alarmantes a cada relatório divulgado pelos órgãos competentes. Tratando-se mais especificamente do desempenho em leitura no contexto acadêmico, avaliações como o Enem e o Enade demonstram uma quebra expectativa, pois, mesmo após cursar anos da educação básica, alunos têm adentrado a universidade com deficiência em leitura, e mais preocupante ainda é o fato de estarem matriculados ou terem concluindo o curso de nível superior e as dificuldades ainda persistirem. Diante disso, o presente estudo tem como proposta abordar a trajetória de progressão de desempenho dos estudantes universitários por meio das duas principais avaliações em larga escala das quais os mesmos participam, o Enem, por ser o mais importante exame de seleção de vagas; e o Enade, por ser avaliação obrigatória a todos os matriculados em cursos de graduação. Para isso, traremos as concepções de competência leitora nos dois exames, além de alguns estudos já realizados sobre leitura e escrita acadêmica.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2020-10-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/3731410.15448/1984-4301.2020.4.37314Letrônica; Vol. 13 No. 4 (2020): Literacia em um Contexto Multiletrado: bases teóricas, metodológicas e empíricas ; e37314Letrônica; v. 13 n. 4 (2020): Literacia em um Contexto Multiletrado: bases teóricas, metodológicas e empíricas ; e373141984-430110.15448/1984-4301.2020.4reponame:letrônicainstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/37314/26424Copyright (c) 2020 Letrônicahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAndrade, Sammela Rejane de Jesus2020-12-22T00:20:49Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/37314Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronicaPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/oailetronica@pucrs.br||ivanetemileski@gmail.com1984-43011984-4301opendoar:2020-12-22T00:20:49letrônica - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Large-scale assessment in higher education and reading proficiency in the academic context Avaliação em larga escala na educação superior e a proficiência em leitura no contexto acadêmico |
title |
Large-scale assessment in higher education and reading proficiency in the academic context |
spellingShingle |
Large-scale assessment in higher education and reading proficiency in the academic context Andrade, Sammela Rejane de Jesus Proficiency Reading Enem Enade Proficiência Leitura Enem Enade |
title_short |
Large-scale assessment in higher education and reading proficiency in the academic context |
title_full |
Large-scale assessment in higher education and reading proficiency in the academic context |
title_fullStr |
Large-scale assessment in higher education and reading proficiency in the academic context |
title_full_unstemmed |
Large-scale assessment in higher education and reading proficiency in the academic context |
title_sort |
Large-scale assessment in higher education and reading proficiency in the academic context |
author |
Andrade, Sammela Rejane de Jesus |
author_facet |
Andrade, Sammela Rejane de Jesus |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Andrade, Sammela Rejane de Jesus |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Proficiency Reading Enem Enade Proficiência Leitura Enem Enade |
topic |
Proficiency Reading Enem Enade Proficiência Leitura Enem Enade |
description |
The concept of reading proficiency recommends that individuals be active in the social environment, so that they can understand and interact with the information that surrounds them. It is expected that this same conception is foreseen in every educational process, with a view to the students being trained as proficient readers, and, in composition of this process, it is also foreseen in the evaluations in large scale, considering that among its functions is the to evaluate the most different teaching stages and guide the planning of public policies. However, what has often been seen are many complaints from the agents directly involved, teachers and students, and alarming data for each report released by the competent bodies. More specifically, in terms of reading performance in the academic context, evaluations such as Enem and Enade demonstrate a broken expectation, because, even after attending years of basic education, students have entered the university with reading disabilities, and even more worrying. the fact that they are enrolled or have completed the higher education course and the difficulties still persist. In light of this, the present study aims to address the trajectory of progression of performance of university students through the two main large-scale assessments in which they participate, Enem, for being the most important exam for the selection of vacancies; and Enade, as it is a mandatory assessment for all those enrolled in undergraduate courses. For this, we will bring the concepts of reading competence in the two exams, in addition to some studies already carried out on academic reading and writing. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-10-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/37314 10.15448/1984-4301.2020.4.37314 |
url |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/37314 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15448/1984-4301.2020.4.37314 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/37314/26424 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Letrônica http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Letrônica http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Letrônica; Vol. 13 No. 4 (2020): Literacia em um Contexto Multiletrado: bases teóricas, metodológicas e empíricas ; e37314 Letrônica; v. 13 n. 4 (2020): Literacia em um Contexto Multiletrado: bases teóricas, metodológicas e empíricas ; e37314 1984-4301 10.15448/1984-4301.2020.4 reponame:letrônica instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
letrônica |
collection |
letrônica |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
letrônica - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
letronica@pucrs.br||ivanetemileski@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799128599444324352 |