Dominant literacy and social practice: Reflections about the legal language and the power relationship with the jurisdicted

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fernandes, Luzia
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: letrônica
Texto Completo: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/38712
Resumo: Know who the language of the language in any community of speech is to communicate. In the space of legal spaces, whether courts, forums, courtroom or forensic secretaries, as reading and writing skills are of important importance to the citizen participant and in such a comprehensive manner and have the same guarantee of access to justice, provision according to the Brazilian constitutional text. That said, this article aims to reflect, to what extent, legal language represents an instrument of power and segregation between the and justice, considering the linguistic style present in judicial decisions and the lack of social literacy for the performance of man in spaces institutionalized. This analysis was carried out in the United States after the social literacy of Angela Kleiman (1995), Tfouni (1995) and Soares (2004) and, although it is, the concept of symbolic power of the sociologist Pierre Bourdieu (1989). Why, if the idea is of a certain sense, it is unintelligible, unintelligible, with a judicial decision emanating from a TRF judge. in the year 2015.
id PUC_RS-14_a81b133e4a229c917171ea09b1c05504
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/38712
network_acronym_str PUC_RS-14
network_name_str letrônica
repository_id_str
spelling Dominant literacy and social practice: Reflections about the legal language and the power relationship with the jurisdictedLetramento dominante e prática social: Reflexões sobre a linguagem jurídica e a relação de poder com o jurisdicionadoLiteracyLegal languageJurisdictionSymbolic PowerLetramentoLinguagem jurídicaJurisdicionadoPoder simbólicoKnow who the language of the language in any community of speech is to communicate. In the space of legal spaces, whether courts, forums, courtroom or forensic secretaries, as reading and writing skills are of important importance to the citizen participant and in such a comprehensive manner and have the same guarantee of access to justice, provision according to the Brazilian constitutional text. That said, this article aims to reflect, to what extent, legal language represents an instrument of power and segregation between the and justice, considering the linguistic style present in judicial decisions and the lack of social literacy for the performance of man in spaces institutionalized. This analysis was carried out in the United States after the social literacy of Angela Kleiman (1995), Tfouni (1995) and Soares (2004) and, although it is, the concept of symbolic power of the sociologist Pierre Bourdieu (1989). Why, if the idea is of a certain sense, it is unintelligible, unintelligible, with a judicial decision emanating from a TRF judge. in the year 2015.Sabe-se que o objetivo precípuo da língua em qualquer comunidade de fala é comunicar. No âmbito dos espaços jurídicos, seja tribunais, fóruns, sala de audiência ou secretarias forenses, as habilidades de leitura e escrita são de suma importância para que o cidadão participe juridicamente da sociedade de modo abrangente e tenha a tão apregoada garantia de acesso à Justiça, consoante dispõe o texto constitucional brasileiro. Dito isso, neste artigo, tem-se como objetivo propor uma reflexão sobre até que ponto a linguagem jurídica representa um instrumento de poder e segregação entre a Justiça e o jurisdicionado, considerando o estilo linguístico presente nas decisões judiciais e a falta de letramento social para atuação do indivíduo nos espaços institucionalizados. Essa reflexão ancora-se nos postulados dos Novos Estudos de Letramento, de Street (1993), Ângela Kleiman (1995) e Tfouni (1995), e também no conceito de poder simbólico do sociólogo Pierre Bourdieu (1989). Por fim, avoca-se a ideia do uso de uma linguagem jurídica capaz de inserir o jurisdicionado no universo das decisões judiciais, em detrimento do purismo linguístico, muitas vezes, ininteligível, com foco em uma decisão judicial emanada de um juiz do TRF 4, no ano de 2015.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2021-06-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/3871210.15448/1984-4301.2021.2.38712Letrônica; Vol. 14 No. 2 (2021): Reading and writing from a cognitive perspective: learning and teaching ; e38712Letrônica; v. 14 n. 2 (2021): Leitura e escrita em perspectiva cognitiva: aprendizado e ensino ; e387121984-430110.15448/1984-4301.2021.2reponame:letrônicainstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/38712/26830Copyright (c) 2021 Letrônicahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFernandes, Luzia2021-08-10T19:07:03Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/38712Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronicaPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/oailetronica@pucrs.br||ivanetemileski@gmail.com1984-43011984-4301opendoar:2021-08-10T19:07:03letrônica - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Dominant literacy and social practice: Reflections about the legal language and the power relationship with the jurisdicted
Letramento dominante e prática social: Reflexões sobre a linguagem jurídica e a relação de poder com o jurisdicionado
title Dominant literacy and social practice: Reflections about the legal language and the power relationship with the jurisdicted
spellingShingle Dominant literacy and social practice: Reflections about the legal language and the power relationship with the jurisdicted
Fernandes, Luzia
Literacy
Legal language
Jurisdiction
Symbolic Power
Letramento
Linguagem jurídica
Jurisdicionado
Poder simbólico
title_short Dominant literacy and social practice: Reflections about the legal language and the power relationship with the jurisdicted
title_full Dominant literacy and social practice: Reflections about the legal language and the power relationship with the jurisdicted
title_fullStr Dominant literacy and social practice: Reflections about the legal language and the power relationship with the jurisdicted
title_full_unstemmed Dominant literacy and social practice: Reflections about the legal language and the power relationship with the jurisdicted
title_sort Dominant literacy and social practice: Reflections about the legal language and the power relationship with the jurisdicted
author Fernandes, Luzia
author_facet Fernandes, Luzia
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fernandes, Luzia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Literacy
Legal language
Jurisdiction
Symbolic Power
Letramento
Linguagem jurídica
Jurisdicionado
Poder simbólico
topic Literacy
Legal language
Jurisdiction
Symbolic Power
Letramento
Linguagem jurídica
Jurisdicionado
Poder simbólico
description Know who the language of the language in any community of speech is to communicate. In the space of legal spaces, whether courts, forums, courtroom or forensic secretaries, as reading and writing skills are of important importance to the citizen participant and in such a comprehensive manner and have the same guarantee of access to justice, provision according to the Brazilian constitutional text. That said, this article aims to reflect, to what extent, legal language represents an instrument of power and segregation between the and justice, considering the linguistic style present in judicial decisions and the lack of social literacy for the performance of man in spaces institutionalized. This analysis was carried out in the United States after the social literacy of Angela Kleiman (1995), Tfouni (1995) and Soares (2004) and, although it is, the concept of symbolic power of the sociologist Pierre Bourdieu (1989). Why, if the idea is of a certain sense, it is unintelligible, unintelligible, with a judicial decision emanating from a TRF judge. in the year 2015.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-10
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/38712
10.15448/1984-4301.2021.2.38712
url https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/38712
identifier_str_mv 10.15448/1984-4301.2021.2.38712
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/38712/26830
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Letrônica
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Letrônica
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Letrônica; Vol. 14 No. 2 (2021): Reading and writing from a cognitive perspective: learning and teaching ; e38712
Letrônica; v. 14 n. 2 (2021): Leitura e escrita em perspectiva cognitiva: aprendizado e ensino ; e38712
1984-4301
10.15448/1984-4301.2021.2
reponame:letrônica
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str letrônica
collection letrônica
repository.name.fl_str_mv letrônica - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv letronica@pucrs.br||ivanetemileski@gmail.com
_version_ 1799128599936106496

Registros relacionados